Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

Pages: [1] 2
History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: January 16, 2011, 07:29:08 AM »

This Jerzy Ulicki-Rek has unfortunately also been spamming
by Jerzy Ulicki-Rek » 16 Jan 2011 02:40 pm

"He claimed that diesel does not kill, when I quoted a report from a US environmental organisation showing how many accidental deaths per year occur in the US by diesel poisoning he claimed that this was just another Jewish fraud.
I think he is the perfect example of the holocaust denier liar. A psychiatrically sick hater, probably whose only purpose in life is hatred and blaming others for his own mistakes."

Gentlemen .I am honored. I am not kidding.You just rewarded me with a very high order.

Please consider:every insult from you is like be promoted in our organization.
The highest rank in our organization is :FREE MAN"
And your insults are pushing me up on this stepladder to this ultimate goal very fast.

More insults from you- the faster I go up...

Don't spare me!!!Give me your best!!!

And then-as a FREE MAN I will come back.

Remember the OLD WORD from your sacred book?
"Against a free man we don't stand a chance..?"

Yes ,against a Free Man you don't stand a chance...


You are welcome to try..     

BTW:I don't have to say that I cant respond on Shallit blog.They banned me...   

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek


10:35 PM, January 30, 2010
Jeffrey Shallit said...

Since you didn't seem to understand, here it is again:

Your Holocaust-denying shenanigans are not welcome here. I will not post anything you say.

Now get lost.

8:36 AM, February 17, 2010
Anonymous said...
This Jerzy Ulicki-Rek has unfortunately also been spamming my website with his hate.
He claimed that diesel does not kill, when I quoted a report from a US environmental organisation showing how many accidental deaths per year occur in the US by diesel poisoning he claimed that this was just another Jewish fraud.
I think he is the perfect example of the holocaust denier liar. A psychiatrically sick hater, probably whose only purpose in life is hatred and blaming others for his own mistakes.     

Back to the history, I find the story a little far fetched but remain with an open mind. One remembers the similar story of Mr Perel who ended up fighting in the Wehrmacht at Leningrad and was featured in the Polish film Europa Europa.

Alan Heath"end cit

Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek
Posts: 10951
Joined: 06 Nov 2007 01:10 pm

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: January 16, 2011, 07:26:33 AM »
Treblinka wa 27 acres ..... there were 2,000,000 jews buried there  ........but they dug them up, burned them, and threw the ashes into the wind  .....David Irving verified it

But according to another eyewitness mr.WILLENBERG  it was only 250 x 300 meters:)

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: January 01, 2011, 04:55:42 AM »

Only Laconas would buy this nonsense.   ...... Oh God, why did we stand by while 4,000,000 jews were burnt in six ovens at Auschwitz?

How could we allow Anne Frank to hide in an attic, and shit in a bucket, for 2 1/2 years?  

Moment,moment!!! Why do you think that is had to be a small bucket!?
Maybe it was ...bigger .. Circa... 6 000 000 hololiters... :)

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 31, 2010, 05:03:14 AM »
Holocaust Truth
by Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

According to the Holocaust story the Nazi party used Jews as a scapegoat for the problems in Germany in order to win votes and come to power. But, after the Nazi party came to power, instead of anti-Semitism going down because there would be no more elections, thus no more need to blame Jews, anti-Jewish feelings increased for no justifiable reason at all. And after Jews were put into concentration camps, the Germans decided to divert what little fuel they had for the war effort, (airplanes, trucks, tanks, etc.) and cremate six million Jews in ovens. They want us to believe that gassing and burning 6 million Jews was more important to the Nazi regime than winning the war, and as for the reason as to why they didn't use inexpensive bullets to kill Jews instead of a complex system of gas chambers, it was because the Nazi SS guards didn't have the stomach to shoot Jews. This, from a people who have told us since the day most of us were born, that Hitler's "dreaded" SS were the most cruel human beings ever to have existed. Well, which is it? Were they inhuman Jew hating monsters, or were they too moral and humane to kill Jews? As you can see, the Holocaust story is so illogical and full of holes that it is surprising that anyone would believe it, but that's the power of the mass media. It's the same mass media that got most people to believe that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and that Saddam Hussein had ties to Al-qaeda.

A history of Holocaust stories.

The first Jewish claimed "Holocaust" began in Bethar, Palestine - 135 AD where Jews wrote in their Talmud that 4 billion Jews were killed by the Romans. Over time more Holocaust stories were told including one in the 'The American Hebrew' newspaper dated Oct, 1919 titled "The Crucifixion of Jews must stop!". In this Holocaust story they claimed that 6 million Jews were in danger of dying from "tyranny of war" and a "bigoted lust for Jewish blood". The article then asks for 35 million dollars in donations to save the six million. During WWII another Holocaust story came out, once again six million Jews were claimed, but this time the Jews had something they never had before to advance and protect their fabricated story, control of the mass media, especially the newest and most thought controlling media - television.

The Holocaust story didn't gain much ground until the 1960's when television started to re-educate the population with Holocaust propaganda, and pressuring businessmen, educators, elected officials, and religious leaders to accept this new dogma, or be labeled a neo-Nazi apologist or "Holocaust denier". And it is a dogma, a new religion where the more time that passes since its supposed occurrence, the more we have to hear about it, the less we can question it, and the more we must watch our political and religious leaders prove their faith by making pilgrimages to its holy shrines: Auschwitz, Sobibor, Treblinka, and of course the many Holocaust memorials that have sprung up like mushrooms all over the western world. It seems that if you want to get elected to higher office you must visit three places, a concentration camp, a Holocaust memorial, and Israel.

The Holocaust was crafted for three purposes.

1. To make billions of dollars in reparations.

2. To justify the existence of Israel.

3. To get all non-Jews, especially White people to believe that Jews suffered more than any other people in the world, and therefore no one has the right to question Jewish motives, or organize in opposition to Jewish power (media, banking, etc), because the Nazis did those things, and what did it lead to? The "Holocaust".

The main purpose of the Holocaust story is to prevent White people from organizing for their own interests. That's why in every racially diverse White country, non-Whites are allowed to have racial organizations, but not White people.

The non-White minority groups are no threat to Jewish power at this time, so they get a pass, but the Jews know that White people have successfully organized against them in the past, therefore, they needed a way to prevent White people from organizing against them in the future. The Holocaust is a psychological warfare weapon (psyop) meant to morally disarm White people by injecting a feeling of White guilt, engendering a belief that Jews as a group are innocent and powerless, and programing people to think that anyone who talks about Jewish influence in the media, banks, or government is an anti-Semite, just like those Nazi's who carried out the "Holocaust" were.

A good way to break though this kind of propaganda is for White patriots to side with all who are victims of Jewish supremacism, not just White people. Remember, White people are very empathetic, so play on their empathy by defending the oppressed and exposing their oppressors. For example, the Palestinian's are suffering greatly under the Jewish occupation. Learn more about this real Holocaust and oppose it. Blacks and Latinos in America are also victimized because they are being used by the Jews as a divide and conquer bio-weapon. A way to divide the population against itself, so that no large body of people can come together to remove the increasingly oppressive Jewish ruling regime. Non-Whites will never be free in a Jewish controlled nation; they may be allowed to have racial organizations to lobby for more government money and racially biased laws, but they will never be allowed to free themselves of Jewish control and be independent. Blacks in the U.S. for example who want their people to be self sufficient and free of Jewish control are either attacked in the press as anti-Semite's (Nation of Islam), or they are killed and jailed like the Black Panthers.

Below are examples of how Holocaust propaganda works to keep White people from organizing for their own interests.

If you want to form an organization that advocates for the interests of White people the same way the Jewish ADL does for Jewish people, then be prepared to be compared by the Jewish controlled press to Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's.

If you don't like the way the Jewish international bankers are sucking the wealth out of your country, then be careful not to say so publicly because that's what the Nazi's used to say in Germany, you're not a Nazi are you?

If you don't like Jewish produced movies and magazines promoting immorality, degeneracy, homosexuality, and interracial sex? Look out, that's what those Germans spoke out against, and you know what happened then, right?

Feeling like an outsider in your own country because more people are looking and speaking differently than you? Yep, you guessed it. You're definitely a Nazi now - reserve your seat in hell you no good Nazi SOB!
In conclusion, and in all seriousness, the Holocaust must someday be exposed for the fraud that it is, so that Jews can no longer use it to demonize people who don't want to live under Jewish control. A control that leads to: Jewish groups like the ADL and SPLC pushing White guilt propaganda, Jewish businessmen using ponzi schemes to suck the wealth out of our pockets and out of our country, Jewish lobby groups like AIPAC pressuring, bribing (though campaign contributions), and possibly blackmailing our political leaders into giving more of our money to Israel, the Jewish controlled press using lies to trick the American people into supporting more wars for Israel or Jewish globalism, Jewish made movies promoting every sort of filth and degeneracy to corrupt our society, especially the youth of America, and Jewish organizations pressuring our lawmakers to keep our borders open to the third world because they want to make White people a minority everywhere in the world, while they use their control of the entertainment media to promote race mixing so they can breed us out of existence. And if any White man stands up against this genocide, he is labeled a "racist" or "nazi".

Since it is not possible to disprove the Holocaust at this time because the mass media is controlled by Holocaust propagandists, the only productive thing a patriot can do is to educate himself and other patriots, and if in public, demand an independent investigation. There has never been an independent investigation in the Holocaust, and to make sure that no independent investigation ever takes place, laws have been enacted in most European countries that make it illegal to report any evidence that contradicts the version of the government. An independent investigation is needed because so many lies have been told by concentration camp survivors that everything about the Holocaust becomes questionable. For example, we were told that Germans made lamp shades from the skin of dead Jews - that was a lie. We were told that Germans made soap from the fat of dead Jews - that was a lie. We were told that 4 million Jews died in Auschwitz - that was a lie, then 2.5 million - that was a lie, and now the latest official figure is under half a million. What is the truth?

Once again, the Holocaust's main purpose is to prevent White people from resisting Jewish power by equating any form of White activism or identity to Nazism, and because Nazism = the Holocaust, and the Holocaust = the worst crime in human history, Whites can not be allowed to speak or organize for their own interests. If Whites in America, Britain, France, Germany, and elsewhere don't like being forced into becoming a minority in their own countries, or don't like what Jewish Hollywood and TV is producing for their children to watch, or don't like the way the Jewish controlled press manipulates people into supporting wars for Israel, or how Jews get away with killing Palestinian's - too bad, they must either keep their mouth shut, or speak out and be called anti-Semites and Nazis by the Jewish controlled news media and hate organizations. That's the power of the Holocaust story - it's a thought and speech suppressor.

There is no doubt that the leaders of all the major Jewish groups know that the Holocaust is a lie, that's why they pushed so hard to get speech crime laws passed in Europe, Canada, and Australia, and that's why they are pushing so hard for those same laws here in America. They don't want the truth about their Holocaust myth to get out, so they need laws to intimidate people into keeping silent about what they know. And this plan makes perfect sense because the Holocaust story protects Jewish power. Why should they allow you or anyone else to ruin such a good thing for them?

Nowhere in the world is there a speech crime law for those that would deny that slavery took place. Why? Because the evidence for slavery can stand on its own merits without the need for such laws. But the Holocaust story is not based on the truth, so laws are needed to prop it up to maintain the illusion of truth. Without speech crime laws to silence and imprison people, Jewish hate groups to intimidate people, and Jewish controlled attack dogs in the press to vilify people, the Holocaust story would disintegrate into dust. It would and should go into the Guinness Book of World Records as the biggest lie and scam in world history.

Short Q&A:

Were Jews put in concentration camps during WWII? Yes

Were Jews put in gas chambers? No

Were Jews made to work? Yes

Did 6 million die? No

Did Jews suffer during WWII? Yes

Who else suffered during WWII? Everyone. Jews did not corner the market on suffering, although they want you to think they did.

For more information:


Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust


The Numbers Drop - The Controversy Continues

Holocaust Victims: A Statistical Analysis

International Red Cross Holocaust Report

For information on the Jewish Communist Holocaust of 20-60 million White people in Eastern Europe.

Judaic Russian Holocaust

Bolshevik Jews Plotted The Ukrainian Holocaust
Stalin's Jews " We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish"
"Democratic" U.S. Allies who have imprisoned people for State unapproved opinions on the Holocaust.
Where is Amnesty International?
How did Amnesty International start? On 28 May 1961, the newspaper 'Appeal for Amnesty', called on people everywhere to protest against the imprisonment of men and women for their political or religious beliefs – prisoners of conscience.

Ernst Zundel sentenced to 5 years for Holocaust denial
In several European countries, including Germany, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Spain and France, Holocaust denial is a specific criminal offense. In Canada, Holocaust denial can be prosecuted as a hate crime.

Horst Mahler Gets 6 Years in prison over Holocaust statement
The 70 year old lawyer called the holocaust "the most colossal lie in the history of mankind" and for that was sentenced to 6 years in prison.

German Defence Lawyer Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half years in prison and disbarred for 5 years for Holocaust denial.

Sylvia Stolz is a German lawyer who defended Ernst Zundel at his trial for denying the Holocaust in February 2007. During that trial she called the Holocaust "the biggest lie in world history." Zundel was convicted and served five years in prison. Stolz was in turn tried for the same offense and is currently serving a 3 1/2 year prison term.

Dr. Toben Is Jailed For His Opinions On The Holocaust in Australia.

World Jewish Leaders Praise Argentina's Decision to Expel Holocaust Denying Bishop.
Kicked out of Argentina because he refuses to bend to pressure and retract his belief that the Holocaust is a lie.

How Holocaust Enforcers incite violence against Holocaust Truthers

Additional victims of Zion

This list was compiled in 1996. Since then, hundreds of writers, researchers, historians, even clergy and others who dared to question the Holocaust Dogma have been arrested, fined, imprisoned - even kidnapped! Hundreds of people have put their lives, reputation and freedom on the line to bring Holocaust Truth to the world.

"Jewish Soap" and "Lampshade" Lies
A Picture Tells A Thousand Words. Jewish concentration camp survivors were caught lying before, who can be trusted?

And BTW ...
Remember to sign the petition.
It is ver ysimple.
Jews used the same tactic when they run KGB.
It was not important  WHAT KGB COULD REALLY DO .
Important was that the people believe  that KGB could  do anything:)

Do you know termites?
Of course you do:)
Exposed to the light they...  kaput  at once.

Let;s try  together.
And of course ...petition. :)
In 3 days 10 brave  Germans...Sorry,9 brave German and Jerzy   used the keyboard  ...
You can do it  :)

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 30, 2010, 05:13:22 AM »
"Uncritical belief in the Holocaust in the West is an act of faith, of zealotry, even the most
outrageous lies go
unchallenged. My favourite piece of Holocaust nonsense is a story that appeared in the
supposedly prestigious New
York Times newspaper in 1988. According to Holocaust survivor Morris Hubert, a most
remarkable menagerie existed in
"In the camp there was a cage with a bear and an eagle," he said. "Every day, they would
throw a Jew in there. The bear
would tear him apart and the eagle would pick at his bones."
"But that's unbelievable," whispered a visitor.
"It is unbelievable," said Mr. Hubert, "but it happened." (7)[/u]
This story is prima facie ludicrous; that doesn't mean it couldn't have happened, of course, but
as far as I
know, it is a unique claim: there are no reports of the same acts of barbarism from any other
source. Has anyone here
heard of bears being kept in the Nazi concentration camps? And how would the Nazis or anyone
keep an eagle in the
same cage as a bear without the bear tearing it to pieces? Perhaps it was a special breed of
bear, a man-eating koala
trained to perform this particular task?
I don't wish to sound uncharitable, or to mock the afflicted, but it would help if newspapers such
as the New York Times didn't insult my intelligence, and yours, by endorsing such nonsense.

(7) Too Painful to Remember, by Aril Goldman, published in the New York Times, November 10,
1988, (Late Edition), page A10
Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 30, 2010, 05:12:12 AM »
The Camps in the Treblinka Area
In an analysis of the eyewitness testimony and accounts existing with regard to the Treblinka group of
camps, the first thing one notices is that they are completely contradictory of each other. The witnessPrawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 7 sur 38
camps, the first thing one notices is that they are completely contradictory of each other. The witness
claims diverge so widely - not only where the numbers of victims are concerned, but also with respect to the
alleged methods of killing, about the way the bodies and evidence were eliminated, and about the location,
size, form and equipment of the alleged extermination camp - that it is impossible to cull a plausible overall
account from this material.[36] Udo Walendy has drawn up a detailed study of these contradictions and
inconsistencies, to which readers interested in specifics are referred.[37] We shall touch on only the
grossest discrepancies here and will then focus on the scenario on which the Holocaust-dogmatists have
agreed after a 50-year process of evolution and selection from among the 'usable eyewitness testimony',
even though such a practice by the establishment historians is devoid of any scientific value due to the
selectivity with which the sources are treated.
2.1. The Malkinia Camp
Among the confused and mostly contradictory descriptions of the camp Treblinka II (i.e., B) and the
corresponding sketches of this camp,[38] which were also used in the Treblinka Trials of 1950-51, 1964-65
and 1969-70,[39] there is not one which clearly establishes that aside from the camp Treblinka I (A) and II
(B), there was another camp, Malkinia, 3.7 miles north of Treblinka. This was a transit and delousing camp
approximately 740' ?820' (607,000 sq.ft.) in size, probably for Jews being deported to destinations in
Byelarus and Ukraine.
In prison, more than 15 years after the fact, Kurt Franz - the main defendant in the Treblinka Trial of 1965 -
drew a sketch, from memory, of the camp where he had been employed as of November 1942.[40] This
sketch could perforce not be correct in every detail, considering the many years of constant influencing that
had gone by, but it differed entirely and not only in its external form from Treblinka II (B) as it is shown on
an official Polish layout.[41] As we know today, the camp as described by the witnesses is a mixture of
conditions and elements from the camps Treblinka II and Malkinia. A stunning confirmation of Franz's camp
sketch was found on an aerial photograph of May 13, 1944, which is held in the National Archives.[42] This
camp is also the source of the terms 'lower' and 'upper' camp, as Franz had already marked on his sketch.
The smaller 'upper camp' was separated from the 'lower camp' by a road. Franz was able to label the
buildings in the camp and to mark his sketch with a large number of the surnames of the personnel in
Malkinia, including his own surname, Franz, in relation to certain areas of the camp. The fact that many
eyewitnesses describe this camp casts a rather dubious light on these witness statements, as the transit
camp Malkinia has never been suspected of harboring an extermination center.
2.2. The Treblinka II (B) Camp
Treblinka II has gone down in Holocaust history as an extermination camp, whereas the camp Treblinka I,
closely associated with a gravel pit, has hardly figured in subject literature at all. Since it is beyond the
scope of this study to analyze all the accounts that have been advanced with respect to Treblinka II, and
since it is only our intent to consider the necessary prerequisites and consequences of the mass
extermination alleged by the witnesses, we shall confine the following to the most striking points.
In a brochure from 1943 the World Jewish Congress reported that construction of a "slaughter house" for
Jews from Poland and other European nations had begun in March 1942 in an area 12,350 acres in size.[43]
It is hard to imagine that even people largely lacking in gray matter could seriously propose a camp almost
20 square miles in size, yet this figure nevertheless found its way into a prosecution document with the
International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg.[44] This fact alone suffices to reveal the producer-directors of
the extermination scenario of Treblinka II in a suspicious light.
This author has in his possession a copy of an official-looking plan of the camp Treblinka II (cf. illustration
1, next page), showing an archive number, two rubber stamps and a legend, but apparently no date. The
scale of 1:2,000 is wrong, as this would result in only half the camp dimensions given. A camp sketch in a
brochure of the Treblinka Museum shows the same shape as that on the official-looking plan, but gives a
scale of 1:4,000. All camp sketches known to date exhibit more or less considerable deviations in detail. In
terms of the points of the compass, the various maps agree with each other but not with the air photos of
expert John C. Ball.[45]
T. Skowron has also shed some light on the state of these camp sketches, which were drawn up on the
basis of eyewitness accounts; to date he has located more than 40 different sketches.[46]
2.3. The Origin of the Current Version of Treblinka
Treblinka II was situated in an area by no means particularly remote and it concealed few secrets. The trainPrawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 8 sur 38
Treblinka II was situated in an area by no means particularly remote and it concealed few secrets. The train
line leading from the village of Treblinka to Siedlce ran at a distance of all of 300 meters from the camp,
parallel to the nearby road; scarcely two kilometers separated the camp from the hamlets of Wólka Okraglik
in the east and Grady and Poniatowo in the west.[47] If one credits the testimony of eyewitnesses, lively
contacts even existed between the camp inmates and the local populace, with which a flourishing barter
trade flourished.[48] In fact, soon after the opening of the camp (July 23, 1942), information from it was
reaching the outer world. This was essentially coming from Jews who had run away from Treblinka, from the
populace which resided in the area surrounding the camp, as well as from the Polish railway workers who
operated the trains with the deportees. In these reports, the following methods of killing were mentioned:
Exhaust gases of a motor in whose fuel "toxic substances" had been mixed (Report of the Polish
underground newspaper Informacja bieżąca, October 5, 1942[49]).
A gas with a delayed effect, which enabled the victims to leave the gas chamber and walk to the
mass graves; there they lost consciousness and fell into the graves (Informaca Bieżąca,
September 8, 1942.[50]
A mobile gas chamber, which moved along the mass graves and unloaded the bodies into them
(Informacja bieżąca, August 17, 1942).[51]
Shooting with machine guns (Report of the Resistance to the Polish government-in-exile in
London, March 31, 1943).[52]
Quick lime in the trains; the deportees arrived in Treblinka as corpses and were buried there
(further report of the Resistance to the Polish government-in-exile, March 31, 1943).[52]
Electric current ("Ghetto Chronicle" of Emmanuel Ringelblum, entry for October 15, 1942).[53]
Hot steam. This murder method was described in several reports and dominated propaganda
concerning Treblinka up into 1944. Of capital importance in connection with this is an unusually
detailed report dating from 15 November 1942, from the resistance movement of the Warsaw
Ghetto with the title Likwidacja żydowskiej Warszawy (Liquidation of Jewish Warsaw), in which
mass killing by means of steam is described as follows:[54]
"It [the death house] is a walled building. [...] It consists only of three small chambers in
addition to a boiler room. Along the North wall of this house runs a corridor from which one can
enter the doors into the chambers. The exterior wall of the chambers possesses a flap-door (until
a short while ago there was a door, which for practical reasons was replaced by a flap-door). In
addition, a ramp in the shape of a baking trough runs up to the level of the flap-door. A boiler
room is directly annexed to the building. Within the boiler room there is a large boiler for the
production of water vapor and super-heated water vapor forces its way into the chambers by
means of pipes which run through the death chambers and have the corresponding number of
openings. [...] The floor in the chambers is slippery, people slide and fall over, but cannot stand
up again, since new crowds of victims who have been violently driven inside roll on top of them,
The commander [of the camp guards] flings small children onto the heads of the women in the
chambers. In this way the execution chambers are filled to the bursting point, and then the doors
are hermetically closed, and there begins slow suffocation of the people by the water vapor,
which enters through the numerous openings in the pipes. In the beginning, choked-off screams
break forth from inside, then gradually become weaker, and after 15 minutes the execution is
Now it's the turn of the grave-diggers. With screaming and curses the German overseers drive the gravediggers to work, which consists of pulling the corpses out of the execution chambers. The grave-diggers
stand by the ramp, facing the flap-door. The flaps open but no corpses fall out. Under the influence of the
steam, all of the bodies have formed a monolithic mass which is cemented together by the sweat of the
murdered victims. In their death struggles, many hands, legs and trunks have become entwined in a
macabre fashion. To make it possible for the grave-diggers to pull out individual bodies, pails of cold water
are poured over this mass from out of the closest well. Now one body is separated from another and they
can be easily removed. In general, the external aspect of the bodies has not changed; only the head and
buttocks have darkened to violet. The grave-diggers, beaten and harried without respite by the Germans,
put the bodies on the ramp until the chambers have been emptied."
According to this report, two million Jews had already been murdered in Treblinka by this
method (thus, about 17,000 per day!); it said that after the Germans had begun to also kill nonJewish Poles with steam, the entire population of Poland had "the spectre of death in the steam
chambers" before its mind's eye.
This report enjoyed wide circulation. A complete English translation appeared by the year 1943 in the
omnibus volume The Black Book of Polish Jewry, and on August 8, 1943, the New York Times, in an article
headlined "2,000,000 Murders by Nazis Charged. Polish Paper in London says Jews are Exterminated inPrawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 9 sur 38
headlined "2,000,000 Murders by Nazis Charged. Polish Paper in London says Jews are Exterminated in
Treblinka Death House," reported that according to information from Poland, two million Jews had been
murdered in Treblinka by steam.
In 1944, the Rabbi Abraham Silberschein published an eight-page report in Geneva concerning Treblinka,
which largely adopted the claims of the resistance movement of the Warsaw Ghetto, but which was
nevertheless ambiguous with regard to the technique used to do the killing: on the one hand, Silberschein
spoke of "gas chambers" and of "gas which flows out of the pipes," but on the other hand, of how the
corpses stuck to one another "under the influence of the steam.".[55] [/b]
For the orthodox 'Holocaust' historians, all of this is naturally most embarrassing, and many of them resort
to shameless falsification of the historical sources. This is particularly true of the Israeli historian Yitzhak
Arad, whose book Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. The Operation Reinhard Death Camps[56] is regarded as the
standard work about these three camps. Arad mentions in it the report of November 15, 1942, but brazenly
substitutes "gas chambers" for the embarrassing steam chambers![57]
The suppression of the steam chambers in favor of gas chambers received its impetus from a report of the
Jewish-Polish cabinetmaker Jankiel Wiernik, which first appeared in May 1944 in the Polish language but was
then translated into English that same year.[58] Wiernik, who according to his statements had been
interned in Treblinka for a year and had escaped from there, plagiarized in this text the report of the
resistance movement of November 15, 1942, but replaced the steam chambers with gas chambers in every
instance and mentioned a motor as the instrument, without, however, specifying that it had been a diesel
motor. Evidently he believed - with good reason - that steam as a murder method was all too unbelievable.
Why the motor? In Treblinka there was certainly an electrical plant, since the camp was not connected to
the local power supply. The generator of such a plant was customarily driven by a diesel motor. Since the
exhaust fumes of such machinery have an atrocious odor, Wiernik, a layman with respect to the technical
facts, obviously believed they made a suitable instrument for murder. After the Red Army had gained
control over the area around Treblinka in August 1944, a Soviet investigatory commission quickly got to
work and 'determined' that in Treblinka three million people had been killed. However, neither steam nor
gas were now named as the method of murder, but instead suffocation by means of chambers which were
"The 'bath' was a building which consisted of 12 compartments each of which were 6 meters x 6 meters in
dimension. About 400 to 500 persons were driven into one compartment at the same time. They had two
doors which could be hermetically sealed. In the corner, between ceiling and wall, were two openings
connected with hoses. Behind the 'bath' stood a machine. It pumped the air out of the room. People
suffocated in 6 to 10 minutes."
The Soviet-Jewish propagandist Vassily Grossmann entered the area of the former Treblinka camp in
September 1944 and spoke with numerous witnesses who had already been questioned in advance by the
Soviet investigatory commission. In his book Die Hölle von Treblinka (The Hell of Treblinka), which appeared
in 1945, he wrote:[60]
"The most diverse means were employed for the killing: the exhaust fumes of a heavy Panzer [armored
tank] motor, which served the power station of Treblinka, were squeezed inside. [...] The second procedure,
which was used most often in Treblinka, was the pumping out of air from the chambers by means of special
suction devices. [...] And finally, the third method, rarer but likewise employed, the murdering by steam,
which also was based upon depriving the organism of oxygen."
In addition to these three techniques, others were also described by witnesses. One of the best known of
the Treblinka chief witnesses, Samuel Rayzman, on the occasion of being questioned by a Soviet military
examining judge on 26 September 1944, stated that the killings in Treblinka were performed in the
beginning "by means of evacuation of the air from the compartments," but then - according to Rayzman, -
"they resorted to another method - poisoning by chlorine gas and Zyklon gas."
The quotations cited make clear the incredible chaos which prevailed among the witnesses at that time with
respect to the technology of murder in Treblinka. In December 1945, the Polish government, in a report
presented to the Nuremberg Tribunal, was still speaking of how in Treblinka several hundred thousand Jews
had been exterminated by steam,[62<FONT>] yet at approximately the same time, the Polish judge
Zdzisław Łukaszkiewicz, , head of a committee charged with the investigation of the events in Treblinka,Prawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 10 sur 38
Zdzisław Łukaszkiewicz, , head of a committee charged with the investigation of the events in Treblinka,
opted for the motor-gas chambers, apparently because this seemed to him to be the most believable of the
diverse murder instruments described by the witnesses.[63]
It is worth remarking that the technique for killing which was also claimed for the "extermination camp"
Belzec during the war and during the immediate post-war period, does not agree with the version later
sanctioned by the official historiography.
Various sources describe the methods for the alleged extermination camp Belzec, where, it is claimed, the
victims were killed with electric current, on an enormous platform that could be submerged in water; the
victims were then immediately incinerated, using electricity.[64] This account shows a complete lack of
technical and scientific understanding; the excessive powers of imagination it attests to render an ordinary
person speechless. We shall therefore dispense with a serious evaluation of it here, even though this tale
was even accorded a hearing before the IMT.[65]
The version of the diesel exhaust chambers made its final successful breakthrough in 1951. That
was when a book entitled Bréviaire de la Haine (Breviary of Hatred) appeared from the pen of
the French-Jewish historian Léon Poliakov, which quickly became a classic of orthodox
historiography. Poliakov cited a long excerpt there from the Gerstein report, and commented on
it as follows:[66]
"We do not need to add much to this description; it applies to Treblinka and Sobibor just as it
does to the Belzec camp. The facilities were designed there quite similarly, and carbon monoxide
produced by a diesel motor was the chosen method for administering death."
In such a way were the steam and the suctioned-air chambers, as well as the various other
murder methods hawked by the witnesses, finally consigned to the junkyard of history, and the
diesel gas chambers of Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor became transmogrified into 'established
historical facts.'
3. The Extermination Camp Treblinka
According to the current (2003) teachings of the official 'Holocaust' thesis, a large part of the Polish Jews
were deported to the extermination camp Treblinka as of the summer of 1942. Without first being registered
in the camp, they were gassed in Diesel gas chambers, and buried in mass graves until winter. As of spring
1943, it is said, the gassing victims were immediately incinerated without leaving a trace, as were the
exhumed bodies.[67] Allegedly this was done in pits several meters deep and very long (formerly these pits
were 'mass graves'), on a grating of steel girders supported by concrete pillars. In autumn 1943 the camp
was razed to the ground and all evidence was eliminated. According to reports some 870,000 to 1.2 million
Jews fell victim to this scenario.[68] But before examining details of this account, we shall first present a
general overview of the matter.
3.1. Generalities on the Site of the Crime and the Murder Weapons
Under normal circumstances, solving a crime involves criminological investigations in order to obtain
irrefutable evidence with which to convict the criminal. Since eyewitness statements are frequently very
imprecise, it is the task of the courts to establish the true state of the matter on the basis of
incontrovertible facts and evidence. Murder ranks among the most heinous of crimes, which is why it is
particularly necessary in such cases to precisely establish the relevant facts. In such a crime, the scene of
the crime, the murder weapon, the course of events, the cause of death, and the motive are generally
investigated in order to ascertain the identity of the murderer/s. The whereabouts of the victims is also of
central importance.
If the victim of an alleged crime cannot be located, it is difficult if not downright impossible to prove that
the crime took place. In murders with only one or at most a very few victims, the elimination of evidence
may be possible, provided that the site of the crime and the method of eliminating the victims remain
unknown. If, however, the number of victims is great, and if the site of their elimination is precisely
documented cartographically and even recorded on aerial photographs, then given the standards of modern
technology the crime can be established with absolute certainty. One need only recall, for example, that in
the course of archaeological digs the discovery of ashes suffices to establish the presence of human
settlements beyond any doubt even hundreds of thousands of years after the fact. To date forensic
investigations of the Holocaust have been based almost exclusively on eyewitness testimony.[69] In only
one single case is there a report of an excavation, which the Court of Siedlce had commissioned. ThisPrawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 11 sur 38
one single case is there a report of an excavation, which the Court of Siedlce had commissioned. This
excavation was carried out in Treblinka II on November 9-13, 1945.[70] We shall touch on the results of
this investigation a little later.
Official Polish Map of the camp Treblinka II ("extermination camp"). (Click to enlarge.)
According to the expositions of the supporters of the Holocaust dogma, the deportation, internment and
killing of the Jews during the Second World War was a systematic and methodical program for purposes of
exterminating the European Jews. The supposedly methodical and systematic nature of this campaign
requires that there was a plan providing for it. To date, however, the sources available to researchers have
yielded no evidence for a plan or its systematic implementation - unless all orders and decrees that are
supposed to have been issued with respect to the solution of the Jewish Question were in the form of a
secret code. But even for this no evidence has been uncovered, for no source has yet been found which
contained a definition of the codes comprising such a secret language; however, such a 'Rosetta Stone'
would have been indispensable to ensure a proper understanding between the issuers and the receivers of
the orders. It was and remains a characteristic habit of the Germans to organize and document every
measure taken right down to the smallest detail, and this practice was particularly evident among the
authorities of the Third Reich. The Holocaust dogmatists' theory that the mass murder was guided by
improvisation, coincidences and spontaneity, and even by a decision-making process based on mindreading,[71] is utterly implausible and downright ludicrous, not only for Germany but on the whole.
3.2. Site of the Crime: the Upper Death Camp
As already mentioned, the dubious witness statements and the lack of any definite identification of the
murder site by courts or commissions, as well as the commensurate efforts at securing evidence, preclude
any exact and reliable reconstruction of the so-called site of the crime. The very fact that there are sketches
of the site which show a rectangular camp area and others that show oblique-angled outlines with variant
measurements compels one to view the matter with some doubt. Therefore it would seem best to regard as
the alleged site of the crime, that camp 'Treblinka II' which is shown on an official looking ground plan and
which appears on German aerial photographs from the year 1944.[42] According to the plan from the
Treblinka Archives, the camp had an area of 1,447,200 sq.ft., as stated, and the so-called Extermination
Area measured 193,700 sq.ft. Working from the air photos, the Extermination Area measured about 230 ft.
?295 ft., corresponding to an area of 67,800 sq.ft. According to the accounts at hand, the Extermination
Area included the two buildings housing a total of 13 hermetically sealed gas chambers, as follows:[72] the
first Death House, with three gas chambers of approximately 16 ft. ?16 ft. each (other claims allege 13 ft. ?
13 ft.) and 8.5 ft. in height, was a concrete construction built in late summer and early autumn 1942. The
second Death House, built a little later, had ten gas chambers and an area of 26 ft. ?13 ft. (other claims are
23 ft. ?23 ft.) per gas chamber, and was a stone building with a concrete foundation. Five gas chambers
each flanked a 5 ft. wide corridor. The outer walls had gas-tight trap doors that could be pulled up to speed
the emptying of the gas chambers. Adjoining the gable wall was the engine room, whence the Diesel
exhaust gas was piped into the chambers.
Whereas the Black Book of 1946 speaks of 4,000 to 6,000 people being squeezed into the chambers at one
time, most sources are content with fewer than 2,000. The mass graves for accommodation of the bodies
are also part of the immediate site of the crime. According to Eliahu Rosenberg,[73] these mass graves,
located near the gas chambers, measured 394 ft. ?49 ft. ?20 ft.,[74] but these dimensions vary from 164 ft.
in length ?33 ft. in width ?16.4 ft. in depth to 492 ft. in length ?82 ft. in width ?33 ft. in depth, depending
on the source. Later the site of the crime was functionally enhanced by the addition of gratings, or grilles,
for burning the bodies.
Drawing on the accounts provided by witnesses and the subject literature, we shall examine a few aspects
of this, with an eye to the technical prerequisites and their feasibility. These are elements that ought to
have been realized long ago, and taken into consideration in the relevant trials. To illustrate the absence of
a critical mindset and the frightening incapacity for technical conceptualization on the part of judges and
public prosecutors, the following example is taken from the book Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen
durch Giftgas:
"The building was low, long and broad [...] it was of gray concrete, had a flat roof of roofing felt
[!!! A.N. ...] Three steps without banisters led into the building [...] The chambers were 5 ft.
above ground level [...]"[75]Prawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 12 sur 38
This means that for each step the riser was an astonishing 1.6 ft. high, which would have been
quite an obstacle in filling the gas chambers with the people to be gassed.
3.3. The Murder Weapon
In recent times no one has given any serious consideration to the alleged facilities for the
production of high-temperature steam, of sub-atmospheric pressure, or of chlorine gas for mass
killing; these claims have clearly been rejected for their absurdity. But it is inexplicable why
witnesses, historians and the courts have agreed on Diesel exhaust gas as the 'murder weapon'
for Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. It is quite incomprehensible why those planning the
extermination of incredibly great numbers of Jews should have resorted to the exhaust from
Diesel engines, since we know today from many environmental reports that the exhaust from
gasoline-powered engines is a hundred times more poisonous than that from a Diesel engine. A
comparison of the various witness statements does not clarify just exactly how the gas affected
those locked into the gas chambers. Any grave toxic effects of the exhaust from a Diesel engine
can be ruled out due to the low carbon monoxide content of said gas.[76] Piping Diesel exhaust
gas into the gas chambers would amount to a reduced but still adequate supply of oxygen to the
rooms in question.
It is more than strange that the Black Book of 1943[64] cites a CO content of 2 to 3% for Diesel exhaust. It
is not likely that this was printed in error, since the allegedly lethal nature of Diesel exhaust is still a vital
brick in the foundation of the Holocaust. The value of 2 to 3% CO given for Diesel exhaust cannot be traced
back to any witness statements. One may assume that the World Jewish Congress had subject experts at its
disposal in this issue as well; the accompanying expositions of the biochemical effects of CO on hemoglobin
would suggest this.
After escaping from the combustion chamber, the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines are
channeled into exhaust pipes, whence they pass into the open air. If the gas escaping out the end of the
exhaust pipe is stopped up, the pressure will increase until the engine stalls. The degree to which the
pressure can rise varies with the type and construction of the engine.[77]

According to the witnesses, the engines used to supply the gas chambers with gas were heavy
Diesel engines taken from Soviet tanks, whose power ranged up to 550 hp. Since Diesel engines
have a high compression ratio (1:15), it may be assumed that they are still able to function even
if the pressure of the exhaust increases by 0.5 atm. after exiting the cylinder.

Now if these exhaust gases are channeled into a hermetically sealed room, the pressure there
can also increase by 0.5 atm. (corresponding to a weight of 500g/cm2, or 1,024 pounds per
sq.ft.); this means that there would have been a force equivalent to the weight of 5 metric tons
pushing outward against each square meter of surface area. This would have been the situation
in any gassing as described by the witnesses for these allegedly hermetically sealed gas
chambers. To illustrate the total force acting on the walls of the gas chamber, let us look at the
dimensions of the chambers of Death House 2. Given the assumed height of 6.6 ft. and a room
length of 26.25 ft., the wall surface area comes to about 173 sq.ft.; the force pushing outwards
against the wall amounts to the equivalent of 80 metric tons. Imagine, if you will, three tractortrailers of more than 25 tons each, simultaneously pushing against the wall!

The ceiling of this facility has a total surface area of 603 sq.ft. The force acting on it from below
would be equivalent to the weight of 280 metric tons. The dead weight of such a ceiling is
approximately 10 metric tons. If the ceiling did not actually lift off, it would at least snap in half
upwards, since the steel reinforcement of reinforced ceilings is located in the lower third of the
ceiling as seen in cross-section. Since according to Rückerl et al. the floor of this gas chamber
was 5 ft. above ground level, there must have been an empty space beneath it. Therefore the
floor must have had a load-carrying capacity of more than 5 t/m2. Ceilings and floors of 6 t/m2
weight-bearing capacity would not have simply vanished into thin air after the war.

Similar considerations apply to the doors of the gas chambers. The aforementioned trap doors measured 8.2
ft. width ?6.6 ft. assumed height, i.e., 54 sq.ft. The pressure brought to bear on them would thus have
amounted to 25 tons pushing outward - and yet these doors still managed to remain airtight. No doubt such
a highly engineered door would be a prized museum exhibit.

Regarding the weight put on walls, ceilings and doors, we shall quote the Black Book of 1946,[14] which
"The second method, the one that was most widely used, was pumping air out of the chambers
with suction pumps until the victims were dead."

(Is that so called :"blow job"?)

Rachel Auerbach cites a modified version, according to which the air was pumped out before the
Diesel exhaust was piped in.[78]  :)

That even just the first half of this would have sufficed to kill
the victims if the gas chamber had survived the process from a construction point of view is
something which clearly does not occur to Ms. Auerbach. For these methods of killing, the forces
acting on the building would have been reversed in comparison to the previous, i.e., acting
inwardly from without, and of even greater intensity up to twice the previously demonstrated
values, since the difference in pressure between a normal room and one pumped to vacuum
conditions is approximately 1 atm. It must be stressed that even considerably smaller pressure
differences between the gas chamber and the atmosphere would have demolished the building.
Let us briefly consider how long it would have taken to attain an excess pressure of 0.5 atm. in
the gas chamber of 603 sq.ft. area ?6.6 ft. height, i.e., 3,980 cu.ft. Of the aforementioned Soviet
Diesel engines, the W2 with 38 liter cubic capacity would be a possibility.[76] In a gassing
situation the air volume in the gas chamber (volume of chamber minus volume of victims locked
into it) would have been approximately 2,684 cu.ft. Assuming that the engine ran at 500 rpm,
the volume of exhaust gas output would have been 335 cu.ft. per minute. The introduction of a
total of 1,342 cu.ft. of exhaust gas would have increased the pressure in the gas chamber to 1.5
atm. within 4 minutes. Even running at full load and under the most unfavorable conditions, a
Diesel engine does not put out enough toxins in this short time to suffice to kill anyone - but the
volume of exhaust certainly would suffice to blow up hermetically sealed brick-walled rooms.
How would a homicidal gassing process even be possible if, for example, the ten gas chambers
of Death House 2 were simultaneously filled with 6,000 people, as the Black Book reports? The
hallway leading to the gas chambers was allegedly 5 ft. wide. This is just wide enough to allow
two people to enter it side by side. So if the victims-to-be are lined up outside the Death House,
two abreast and each 2 ft. behind the person before them, we end up with a line-up almost 11/4
mile long. Entering the Death House, filing into the gas chambers and crowding them closely with
victims will allow a marching speed of the line-up of, perhaps, 11/4 mile per hour if the victims
behave with great discipline and cooperation. The absurdity of the conditions required for this
best-case scenario shows that one hour certainly would not have sufficed to crowd the 6,000
people forcibly into the chambers. This means that the victims in the chamber that was filled first
would have already been locked up in their air-tight room for an hour or more before the gassing
even began; for to assume that the gassing began as soon as the first chamber was filled
contradicts eyewitness testimony, for example the claim that Ivan the Terrible not only drove the
victims into the chambers but also operated the Diesel unit. He could not have done both at
once. This further indicates that the victims locked up in the chamber that was filled first had less
than 16 m3 oxygen available to them.
According to technical specifications for engineers, the oxygen requirement for people
performing even non-strenuous work is 2/3 liters per minute. Under the conditions given - being
crowded together in a small room - this is the least amount required. This means that 600
persons under the specified conditions use up some 400 liters of oxygen per minute, so that as
long as consumption remained steady, the available oxygen would already have been completely
used up within 40 minutes; dead bodies would have been all that was left in the chamber, long
before the start of any gassing. In fact, oxygen consumption decreases with the onset of death,
so that it would have taken the victims about one hour to suffocate. Even the witnesses ought to
have noticed that. These, however, report that death by suffocation took 24 or even 48 hours
when the Diesel engines failed to work; this account, therefore, must be rejected as being a
sheer flight of fancy.[79]
If, however, the chambers were not hermetically sealed and were only enriched, so to speak,
with Diesel exhaust gas, then the 15-17% oxygen content of the exhaust would not have been
Incidentally, it does not make sense that individual chambers should have been used for
gassings, since one single large room would have been much more practical in terms of filling
and emptying as described for the alleged scenario.Prawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 14 sur 38
and emptying as described for the alleged scenario.
The divergent eyewitness testimony regarding the function of the Diesel engines in the camps
necessitates further observations. From time to time it is claimed that the engines used for
gassing also supplied electrical power to the camps.[81] According to the claims for Treblinka II,
the lower camp already existed before the upper one was constructed. If the Diesel engine
mentioned for the upper camp had been meant to supply the entire Treblinka II camp, then the
lower camp would have had to obtain its electricity from elsewhere until the upper camp was
built. But if the engine had been intended to supply only the upper camp, this would have been
technical nonsense, since due to the nature of the facilities all that would have been required
was at most 100 light bulbs @ 75 Watt - a total of 7.5 kW - for lighting purposes. The Soviet tank
engines had a capacity of up to 550 hp (@ 400 KW), which is why no one would have used them
to generate 7.5 kW of electricity. At such a low level, one may assume that the composition of
the Diesel exhaust would have approximated that of an engine running at idle. One must also
bear in mind that it is highly unlikely that engines from captured Soviet vehicles would have
been used to generate electrical power, since in the case of a break-down it would have been
difficult during wartime to obtain replacement parts for these engines. Eyewitnesses even tell of
such defects and break-downs, and claim that they caused repeated delays in the gassings.
The water supply (the camp had its own well) was also dependent on electrical power. Since
witnesses have reported time and again that the gassing engines were turned on for the
gassings, and were turned off again after the gassings were finished (after 5 to 45 minutes[82]),
but the electrical and water supplies would have had to be present without interruption, one may
consider it certain that the gassing engine in the upper camp cannot have served to generate
electrical power for the lower camp. Treblinka II will thus have been connected to the power
supply of the nearby town, and probably also had a separate emergency power back-up in the
event of power failures.
Accounts of interruptions of the described gassings due to Diesel engine failures are not
restricted to Treblinka. For Belzec SS-Führer Gerstein reported such a failure of a Diesel
engine[76] which was used solely for gassings, and would thus almost certainly have been run
at idle - if Gerstein's report were correct, but this can almost definitely be ruled out.[83] Since
according to Gerstein the people in the gas chambers remained alive for hours while the engine
was out of service, a closed chamber must have been very well ventilated indeed.
Any serious plan to commit mass murder by means of exhaust gas would thus not only have
provided for a different (non-Diesel) kind of engine, it would also have had to provide for backup facilities.
All the considerations and calculations presented here are quite simple on the whole, and it is
therefore utterly incomprehensible that such technical analyses have not been commissioned and
carried out long ago. Another point which the courts really ought to have noted is that so far not
one single case is known of someone committing suicide with the exhaust gas from a Diesel
engine, whereas suicide by means of exhaust from a gasoline-powered engine is unfortunately
not at all a rare occurrence. Thus the toxic effects of Diesel exhaust falsely alleged by the
Holocaust dogmatists have not found practical application outside a gas chamber.
The technical considerations set out in the foregoing show that the gas chambers as they are
described would not have been physically able to serve as murder weapon as they are commonly
believed to have done. The following investigation shall shed some light on the alleged removal
of the bodies, which allegedly left no traces whatsoever.
4. Treblinka: Elimination of Corpses Without a Trace
4.1. Burial Pits
According to Eliahu Rosenberg,[16] after the trap doors of the gas chambers were pulled up,
the corpses (some 850,000 altogether) were taken to pits measuring 394 ft. in length, 49 ft. in
breadth and 20 ft. in depth. Based on Rosenberg's testimony, and assuming a likely gradient of
65° in the sandy and gravelly terrain of the Treblinka area and a 1.6 ft. soil layer to cover the
mass grave, such a burial pit would have had a fillable volume of some 282,500 cu.ft.
Some witnesses have stated that the bodies were layered into the pit and that each layer wasPrawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 15 sur 38
Some witnesses have stated that the bodies were layered into the pit and that each layer was
covered with a layer of soil; others claim that the bodies were haphazardly thrown into the pit.
Both situations would allow for approximately 8 bodies per cubic meter (10 per 44 cubic ft.),
meaning that the pits described would have accommodated about 64,000 bodies each.
Interestingly enough, none of the witnesses mention the considerable amount of excavated soil,
which came to about 339,000 cubic ft. per pit, given a 20% loosening-up of the soil. The gradient
of a pit dug in natural ground conditions is known to be much steeper than that of the pile of
dug-up contents. If the surface area of the burial pit measured 19,300 sq.ft., as alleged, then
given a gradient of approximately 30° for the excavated gravel or sand - and after subtracting
approximately 35,300 cu.ft. for the material with which the corpses were covered - the area
taken up by the dug-up material piled 20 ft. high along the pit would have been approximately
28,000 sq.ft.
According to the Slovenian historian Tone Ference,[84] the upper extermination area, which is
said to have been within the camp area of Treblinka II, covered an area of about 172,000 sq.ft.;
however, to forestall any objections on this score, we shall base our further considerations on
the size of the extermination area indicated by the archival plan, namely about 193,700 sq.ft.
This area held not only burial pits and the material dug up in the course of their excavation, but
gas chambers and other buildings as well. If one accepts the 875,000 dead mentioned in the
Jerusalem Trial of John Demjanjuk, then 14 burial pits &agrave; la Rosenberg and a total of
some 4.6 million cu.ft. of excavated earth would have been involved in the accommodation of all
these bodies. Since these 14 pits would have taken up an area of 271,150 sq.ft, they could not
have fit into the extermination area measuring only 193,700 sq.ft. Further, the heaps of
excavated material resulting from the 14 burial pits would have required an additional area of
more than 392,000 sq.ft.
If, on the other hand, one proceeds on the assumption that the claims of 3 million victims are correct, then
47 burial pits covering some 910,000 sq.ft. would have been needed; these would have taken up almost
two-thirds of the area of Treblinka II - not even including the excavated soil going with them.
Finally, some comments on the allegedly 20-ft.-deep burial pits. First of all, it seems unlikely that
the pits would have been dug that deep, as doing so would have required either complicated
heavy machinery or increased expenses related to the construction of ramps. The excavators
allegedly used in Treblinka would hardly have been adequate to this task.[85] At depths of 20
ft., it is also probable that ground water seepage occurs, which would have impeded or
downright prevented the construction and use of pits of such depth. However, since the camp
Treblinka I, with a large gravel pit, is said to have been located near Treblinka II, a ground
water level lower than 20 ft. is certainly conceivable. If one proceeds on the assumption of a
more realistic pit depth of approximately 10 ft., then a pit of the aforementioned surface area
would have held some 35,000 bodies, and 25 pits would have been needed, covering a total of
484,200 sq.ft. excluding the area taken up by the excavated soil. The excavated material itself
would have required an area of 570,300 sq.ft., making for a total of almost 1.1 million sq.ft. For
the alleged 3 million victims, 86 pits covering 1.67 million sq.ft. would have been needed, plus
the corresponding area for the excavated soil.
In the case of Auschwitz, quantitative considerations based on events 'attested to' by witnesses, and on the
technical and material consequences resulting from the alleged events, have brought about a constant and
ongoing reduction in the number of victims.[86] Scientific facts have always been the enemy of religious
4.2. Elimination of the Corpses - Not Quite Without a Trace
The elimination of victims without a trace is a vital link in the chain of evidence for the Holocaust in general.
Elimination without a trace is the prerequisite for an arbitrary number of victims. This is how the numbers of
victims alleged for Treblinka come to vary from 700,000 to 3 million - a phenomenon that also appears in
other cases.[87] The casual treatment of such high numbers of victims seems questionable from the start,
and ought to prompt those concerned with the topic to gather scientifically irrefutable facts so as to prevent
the Holocaust from becoming a matter of faith. But smoke and mirrors and eyewitness testimony have been
deemed good enough. The technically unrealistic claims regarding the mass murder of human beings are
compounded by the utterly unbelievable accounts of the removal of bodies without any trace. Millions of
dead cannot simply vanish into thin air. In this context the reader is referred to the case of Katyn, where
the 4,500 Polish officers murdered by the Soviets in 1940 were discovered in 1943.[88]Prawda2 :: Zobacz temat - Holokaust - c.d. 15/11/09 10:02 Page 16 sur 38
According to eyewitness testimony, Himmler ordered the incineration of bodies in the extermination camp
Treblinka to eliminate any evidence of the killings; this order was allegedly given in March 1943.[89] This is
said to have involved the exhumation..."
Gnosis.Poczytaj i policz anim zaczniej zadawc mi po raz kolejny te same pytania.
I jeszcze :
"In their article on the Treblinka concentration camp, historian Mark Weber and attorney Andrew
Allen collected six pieces of evidence that point to the conclusion that Jews and others were
murdered in steam chambers at the site.13 Let us note each of them:
According to an “eyewitness” account received in November 1942 in London from the Warsaw
ghetto underground organization, Jews were supposedly exterminated in death rooms with
“steam coming out of the numerous holes in the pipes.”14

In 1943, the New York Times published more “eyewitness” testimony regarding the mass murder
of Jews in the alleged Treblinka steam chambers. This account provided readers with essential
details about the operation of these steam chambers.15

In The Black Book of Polish Jewry, a 1943 work sponsored by an array of respected dignitaries
like Albert Einstein and Eleanor Roosevelt, the Treblinka steam story was again given in detail.16

Another book, Lest We Forget, published in New York in 1943 by the World Jewish Congress,
describes how Jews were steamed to death, and provides a diagram showing the location of the
purported boiler room that produced the live steam.17

According to a 1944 “eyewitness” account compiled by the OSS, the principle US intelligence
agency, Jews at Treblinka “were in general killed by steam and not by gas as had been first

In 1945, the Polish government “conclusively proved” the Germans operated these death
chambers. They carried out “an onsite, physical examination of the steam chambers,” submitting
an “expert report” to the Nuremberg Tribunal.19

Here we have a convergence of evidence from six sources. The eyewitness testimony is
substantiated by the onsite, hands-on investigation of the Polish authorities. This convergence of
evidence is even better than the one that Judge Gray heard because it has an onsite, expert
study of the murder weapon itself that “conclusively proves” the existence of the steam
Therefore, the Germans must have murdered people in steam chambers at Treblinka.
Lo and behold, the pitfalls of such a conclusion! [/u
Historians now tell us there were no steam chambers at Treblinka. The convergence of evidence
that “proves” their existence is entirely false. Over the years, the story changed and today it is
alleged that Jews and others were murdered with carbon monoxide gas, generated from captured
Soviet diesel tank engines.20 Neither Judge Gray or Lipstadt and company’s team of world
renowned Holocaust experts have ever explained why the convergence of evidence for Treblinka
steam chambers points to a false conclusion and the convergence of evidence for the Auschwitz
gas chambers allegedly points to true conclusion.

Since most of the evidence in the convergence of evidence for the Treblinka steam chambers is
not qualitatively different from the evidence in the convergence of evidence for the Auschwitz
gas chambers; and since the convergence of evidence for the Treblinka steam chambers leads to
a false conclusion, isn’t it also possible that the convergence of evidence for the Auschwitz gas
chambers also points to a false conclusion?

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 29, 2010, 03:32:53 AM »
"Steamed to death in Treblinka "
by Jerzy Ulicki-Rek » 10 May 2010 03:50 am

The Holohoaxers couldn't get their Treblinka "death camp" tale straight at first, with conflicting "eyewitness" stories of "extermination" of jews by gas and steam chambers. The steam chamber fairy tale has been abandoned, and now jewry has settled on gas with bug spray.

source: The Library of Congress, Volume 5, DOCUMENT 3311-PS, from the International Military Tribunal at Nurnberg, Germany.

The following is a a “Collection of Documentary Evidence and Guide Materials Prepared by the American and British Prosecuting Staffs for Presentation before the International Military Tribunal at Nurnberg, Germany.” It is recorded in an eight-volume, 12-book series, known as "Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression", also known as “The Red Series."

From Volume 5, DOCUMENT 3311-PS, we find the following on the "steam chambers" and "electrocution chambers" allegedly at Treblinka:



[Seal of Main Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland]

In accordance with article 6 of the Charter the Poish Government indicts Dr. Hans Frank, Governor General of Poland, of the following crime:

The German authorities acting under the authority of Governor General Dr. Hans Frank established in March 1942 the extermina tion-camp at Treblinka, intended for mass killing of Jews by suffocating them in steam-filled chambers.

Particulars of the alleged Crime

In 1940 the German authorities established in the village 01 Treblinka. near Malkinia close to the railway-line Warsaw - Bialy stok, a concentration camp for Poles who refused to deliver contingents of agricultural products ordered by the German administrative authorities. In November 1941, the District Governor of Warsaw, Dr. FISCHER, proclaimed this camp as a general concentration camp for the whole district of Warsaw and ordered all Poles to be deported there who some way or other contravened against the orders or prohibitions of the German authorities. Later on this camp was named "Treblinka A".

In March 1942, the Germans began to erect another camp "Treblinka B", /in the neighbourhood of "Treblinka A"/, intended to become a place of torment for Jews.

The erection of this camp was closely connected with the Ger man plans aiming at a complete destruction of the Jewish popula tion in Poland which necessitated the creation of a machinery by means of which the Polish Jews could be killed in large numbers. Late in April 1942, the erection of the first three chambers was finished in which these general massacres were to be performed by means of steam. Somewhat later the erection of the real "death building" was finished which contains ten death chambers. It was opened for wholesale murders early in autumn 1942.

It may be mentioned here that there were several phases in the development of the persecution of the Jews in Poland. During the first period until October 1940, the Germans were aiming only at the moral degradation and complete pauperisation of the Jews by all kinds of restrictions of their rights, by the confiscation of their property etc., but later on they turned to their gradual an nihilation and destruction as a nation. This change of policy is apparent in their treatment of the ghettos, first they had only to isolate the Jews from the Aryans but later on they were the ghettos, the very means of the physical annihilation of the Jews.

Healthier and stronger Jews were deported for forced labor while those who remained in the Ghettos were decimated by starvation and epidemics. As these methods did not produce the desired results more drastic measures were adopted. Wholesale massacres were organized in the Ghettos and, finally, a complete annihilation of the ghettos was decided upon.

The Jews had simply ceased to exist. Special camps were established for this purpose where the destruction of human lives was carried on by mechanized means. The best known of these death camps are those of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobiber in the Lublin district. In these camps the Jews were put to death in their thousands by hitherto unknown, new methods, gas and steam chambers as well as electric current employed on a large scale. The Victims were recruited chiefly from the General Government, and particularly from the following districts: Warsaw, Radom, Lublin, Krakow and Lwow, but Jews from outside the General Government were also sent there, particularly from. the Bialystok district where the Ghettos were maintained for a long time and where in the summer months of 1943 about 10,000 Jews were rounded up and transported to Treblinka for extermination.

The main part of the "work" was done in summer and autumn 1942. Winter 1942 and the year 1943 were used for "mopping up operations", i. e. for the extermination of those who managed to dodge the main round-up and, of those younger Jews who were employed in war industry. To indulge in their lust for destruction the Germans did not hesitate to put to death even those younger Jews although their man-power was badly needed and their loss - as admitted by the Germans themselves - was a serious handicap for the war effort.

The Camp B of Treblinka is situated in hilly, wooded country It covered an area of about 5.000 ha (18 sq. miles) and was fenced off by hedges and barbed wire. It is bordered in the north by a young forest, in the west by a railway embankment while low hills shut it off from the East and South. There are several obser­vation posts in the camp for the camp guard (Lagerschutz) as well as searchlights used for securing the camp during the hours of darkness. A side track leads from the main railway track on to a loading platform adjoining a large open place fenced off by barbed wire. where several thousands persons can be accom modated at the same time. To the north stands a large barrack and in the south-western corner an observation post. The place to the south of the barbed wire fence was used for sorting out pieces of clothes of the victims which were fit for further use (Lumpen sortierungsplatz). Further to the south is the place of execution and a mass grave. A gate opens from the place to a road leading to the buildings and one of them is divided by a narrow corridor into two parts and measures approx. 40 yards by 25 yards. On each side of the corridor are situated five chambers whose height is about 6 and a half feet. There are no windows. The doors can be shut hermetically.

The second building consists of three chambers and a boiler room. The steam generated in the boilers is led by means of pipes to the chambers. There are terracota floors which become very slippery when wet. Along the southern wall of the building runs a long platform where the bodies of the victims were piled up after execution. A well is situated near the boiler-room.

Behind this building and separated from the rest of the camp by barbed wire stands a barrack and a kitchen destined for the grave diggers. On both sides of these buildings are situated observation posts. As the executions grew in numbers, mass graves were dug out by motor driven machines and not by hand and shovel as in the beginning.

The camp was guarded by Germans of the SS-detachments and by Ukrainians. The officer to whom this guard was subordinated was the SS-Capt. SAUER. This garrison (Lagerschutz) performed also duties of executioners, while menial services had to be performed by the inmates of the camps themselves, so e.g. the unload ing of the trucks, stripping of the victims and sorting out of their clothes and shoes (Lumpensortierung), the emptying of the death chambers and the burying of the bodies. When a new transport arrived some of the Jews were picked out to do this work so long till they broke down morally under the impression of this organized and mechanized mass murder. Then they had to dig their own graves and take up their position at them, whereupon they were shot one by one by SAUER personally. Their last duty before dying was to push the body of the preceding victim into its own grave. A new party was then chosen to continue their work in the camp. The sadism of SAUER in enjoying the shooting personally sounds incredible, but his guilt has been proven beyond any doubt.

The average number of Jews dealt with at the camp in summer 1942 was about two railway transports daily, but there were days of much higher efficiency. From autumn 1942 this number was falling.

After unloading in the siding all victims were assembled in one place where men were separated from women and children. In the first days of the existence of the camp the victims were made to believe that after a short stay in the camp, necessary for bathing and disinfection, they would be sent farther east, for work. Explanations of this sort were given by SS-Men who assisted at the unloading of the transports and further explanations could be read in notices stuck up on the walls of the barracks. But later, when more transports had to be dealt with, the Germans dropped all pretences and only tried to accelerate the procedure.

All victims had to strip of their clothes and shoes, which were collected afterwards, whereupon all victims, women and children first, were driven into the death chambers. Those too slow or too weak to move quickly were driven on by rifle butts, by whipping and kicking, often by SAUER himself. Many slipped and fell, the next victims pressed forward and stumbled over them. Small children were simply thrown inside. After being filled up to capacity the chambers were hermetically closed and steam was let in. In a few minutes all was over. Jewish menial workers had to remove the bodies from the platform and to bury them in mass graves. By and by, as new transports arrived, the cemetery grew extending in eastern direction.

From reports received may be assumed that several hundred thousands of Jews have been exterminated in Treblinka. Exact figures are impossible to obtain as the Germans did not bother to keep any records concerning the number of Jews deported to this camp and killed there. It will be even impossible to establish some correct figures because as early as spring 1943 the Germans began to exhume the bodies and to burn them so as to destroy all evidence of the crimes perpetrated. These cremations continue until summer 1943, when the victims were able to start a mutiny and to kill some of the guards enabling thus several hundred Jews to escape from the camp.

The above description of the mass murders in Treblinka gives only a faint idea of the horrors which prevailed in the camp. It is practically impossible to imagine the sufferings of the victims in the camp and to grasp the full extent of the atrocities. For the victims transported to the camp in cattle trucks and exposed for several days to the most cruel sufferings of body and soul, death in the steam chambers must have almost come as a welcome relief. Their only crime consisted in the fact of belonging to a race condemned by Hitler to death.

The responsibility of Dr. Hans FRANK for the setting up of the camp at Treblinka and for the mass killings described above is inherent to his official position as Governor General of Poland.

The camp could not be set up without either his direct order or, at least, his approval, and the numbers of people killed there, clearly indicate, that these atrocities were elements of a systematic policy of extermination. All those connected with the "liquidation" of ghettos and of the Jews themselves took their orders from the Governor General.

[Seal of Main Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland]


This will certify that the document entitled "Charge No 6. Camp of Treblinka", concerning the extermination of Jews in this camp, is hereby officially submitted by the Polish Government to the International Military Tribunal by the undersigned under the pro visions set forth in Article 21 of the Charter.

/S/ Dr. Cyprian
Dr. Tadeusz Cyprian
Polish Deputy Representative on the United
Nations War Crimes Commission in London

[Seal of Main Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland]

Nurnberg, the 5th December, 1945

So the Germans wanted to "exterminate every single jew in Poland they could get their hands on", and the best method they could devise for this was steam chambers??

Oh, and note at the end where they state that the Germans "did not bother to keep any records concerning the number of Jews deported" to Treblinka. I thought the Germans were meticulous record-keepers?

Then right after that, note the allegation that the Germans "dug up the remains" of hundreds of thousands of dead jews from the mass graves and cremated the bodies in order to "destroy all evidence of the crimes perpetrated." Suuuurre.

If you believe this nonsense, I have some ocean-front property in Arizona for sale too.

Lastly, I would mention of the Governor-General of occupied Poland indicted here, Hans Frank...When is the last time you heard of a person with the surname Frank who was not Jewish?

via the research of Carlos Whitlock Porter


Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Freilegen des Holocaust-Hoax-Archiv

Jews alleged a "holocaust" of "6 Million" Jews in Romania, Poland and Ukraine in 1919 at end of WWI
NY Times reports in 1906 that Russia's "6,000,00 jews" facing a final "solution" of "systematic and murderous extermination"
New York Times reports 6 million jews holocausted in Russia in 1921!
Jews at NY Times refer to "European holocaust" of Jews in 1936, several years before alleged "mass killings"
The Kabalistic-Occult origins and purpose of the Holocaust™ dogma, and the 6 million number
Early Holohoax Tale - 64 million Jewish children wrapped in scrolls and burned by the Romans in 2nd century A.D.

Glaring Evidence of the Farce that was the Nuremberg Trials - Soviet Prosecutors Convicted the Germans of the Katyn Forest Massacre
The "Human Skin Lampshades" and "Nazi Shrunken Heads" Psyop - "Evidence" Presented at Nuremberg
Absurd "Evidence" Presented at Nuremberg - The "Steam and Electrocution Death Chambers" at Treblinka
More Remarkable Nonsense Presented at Nuremberg - The Nazi "mobile bone-grinding machines"
Private letter from Thomas Dodd, former US Senator and top American Nuremberg prosecutor: 75% of staff lawyers at Nuremberg are Jewish
"Nazi Concentration Camps" (Nuremberg Trial Film)

Dachau - The fraudulent stories of "extermination" and "homicidal gas chambers"
Treblinka - Holohoaxers say ~850,000 jews gassed to death - Australian scientists find no evidence whatsoever of mass graves
The Lies of Simon Wiesenthal; His Holohoax story an outrageous fabrication; His work as "Nazi hunter" and Holocaust™ "historian" a total fraud
Elie Wiesel: Prominent Liar and Anti-German Hatemonger; Claims jews "burned alive in flaming ditches" and "ground spurted geysers of jewish blood"
No "extermination camps" on German soil (or elsewhere in German-occupied territory) - Typhus epidemics the cause of mass deaths and emaciated bodies
Number of Dead at Auschwitz Alleged by Holocaust™ Proponents Continues to Drop - Sacred 6 million Number Remains Unchanged

Moshe Peer's astounding Holy Shoah tale - Gassed six times by the Nazis and survived!! - Claims people were murdered in gas chambers at Bergen-Belsen
William Lowenberg's astounding Holy Hoax tale - Had a magic thirst-quenching pebble, did not drink water, survived on his saliva for 3 years
Yanina Cywinska's Hoaxacaust tale-"Nazis paraded around briefcases and lamps made of human skin while washing their bodies with soap from Jewish bone"
Rivka Yosselevska's absurd Holy Hoax fable - Escaped biting jew corpses, witnessed geysers of blood
Yankel Wiernik's Holotale - Babies torn in half, woman leaps 10 ft barbed-wire fence, guards nail inmates' ears to walls, jews roasted on giant outdoor hibachis
Katalin Weinberger's HolyCo$t tale- Saved life of her sister by "burying her in ground for 30 days with a pipe sticking up through soil to breathe"
Judith Perlaki's tale - Auschwitz gas chambers "as long as 50 football fields", Germans "tied women’s legs together to stop them from having babies"
Eva Olsson's ludicrous Holohoax tale - "Gas chambers" and "Five children at a time burned alive in crematoriums" at Bergen-Belsen"

Jewish Studies / Re: Polish 'Barbie Doll' from a Polish Forums Thread
« on: December 28, 2010, 04:17:48 AM »

If she is "Polish" then I 'm Jewish:)

The fact that someone was born in stable doesn't make him a horse...


History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 28, 2010, 03:18:04 AM »
Let me add another picture from my collection:

"Six millions man i woman are dying...eight hundred thousand children cry for bread.."

This one is from 1919  :)

Direct link:


History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 28, 2010, 02:53:39 AM »
Any one  ready to put a pen to paper?

The German text will be ready as well (after being translated )and attached to the English version.


History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 27, 2010, 05:19:24 PM »
German is beaten for daring to question a "Holocaust survivo
by Jerzy Ulicki-Rek » 28 Dec 2010 02:10 am

From my point of view is should be :"Human beeing beaten.." His nationality is less important here...

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

The Hoffman Wire
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor.

German is beaten for daring to question a "Holocaust survivor"

A "Holocaust survivor" approves of a beating administered in a library
to a heretical German who dared to ask a question of the saint ... stion.html

Hoffman's note: Very few donations or orders to our online store have
have been received during Christmas week in response to our appeal,
therefore we are slowly switiching to a concentration on our printed
publications rather than Internet activism. Consider the following
column a terminal one; until such time, if ever, that readers vote with
their pocketbooks for its continuation.


By Noah Klieger

Noah Klieger recounts unexpected event during Holocaust lecture in

Ynet News Dec. 27, 2010


I returned from a lecture tour in Germany; 20 lectures in 11 days in
nine different cities. In recent years the frequency of the invitations
I receive grows, and during my lectures I dedicate much time to the
despicable, sadistic behavior of most Germans during the Holocaust - the
hundreds of thousands of murders of European Jewry and the tens of
millions who were overjoyed by the mass extermination of the hated Jews.

I usually speak before audiences whose grandparents were those Germans.
In the case of school children it may even be the great grandparents.
Through my personal story I detail the crimes and basic inhumanity, and
the audiences arrive in large numbers and always applaud me at length.

My last meeting in Berlin, on the eve of my return to Israel, was
organized by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation at the German capital's
public library. It was a cold evening, -16 degrees Celsius, with snow
piling up in the streets and the few cars outside having trouble making
their way through it. The organizers expected a small audience, if at
all, and I too didn't expect much.

Yet reality was different. The 90-seat venue filled up within minutes,
and dozens of chairs had to be brought in. Here too, the audience sat
and attentively listened to my words, and again it applauded at length.
As always, I proceeded to take questions. I responded to two women, and
then a man stood up, in his 40s or 50s.

"You claim," he said, and I immediately stopped him: "I'm not claiming.
I'm telling facts."       The man continued to ask whether I saw gas chambers with my own eyes, yet before I had time to tell him about the reality I
saw in Auschwitz and Birkenau, with the gas chambers and crematoria,
several of those in attendance stood up and started yelling "raus, raus.
"Out" in German. The man did not comply of course, and then several men
charged at him and forcefully dragged him out while beating him up.

Readers at the library who wondered what the commotion was all about
were told the man was a Holocaust denier, and everyone was happy to see
him thrown out.

This is the first time I've seen something like this happen in the
dozens or hundreds of times I appeared in Germany thus far. The response
of the audience to the provocation taught me that there are indeed
"other Germans."

It is true that even today quite a few Germans are latent anti-Semites.
Many are not willing to believe that their fathers or grandfathers
indeed murdered Jews, and they cannot speak out only because of the law
that bans Holocaust denial and religious incitement.

At the same time, more and more people in Germany are starting to
understand in recent years what the Germans of yore did to the Jewish
people, and to the whole world. (End quote)


Notice the author's megalomania: ""You claim," he said, and I
immediately stopped him: "I'm not claiming. I'm telling facts."

This is the first law when approaching the "Holy People," everything
they say is truth, not "claims."

This is why the book 'The Great Holocaust Trial,' reprinted this month,
is important: when these "infallible survivors" were on a witness stand
in the Toronto trial of Ernst Zundel, subject to cross-examination by
Zundel's defense attorney Doug Christie, their "facts" dissolved into
thin air. The butcher's bill for that revisionist victory came years
later, when Zundel suffered seven years' imprisonment in Canadian and
German dungeons.

Klieger writes, "...during my lectures I dedicate much time to the
despicable, sadistic behavior of most Germans during the Holocaust..."

Here we see how the religion of Holocaustianity has as its most perverse
component the racist defamation of the "despicable, sadistic" German
people. It is illegal in Germany to refer to the Judaic nation in these
terms but vile anti-German hatred is licensed as a form of human rights
education under the rubric of "Holocaustianity."

Klieger further states that, "tens of millions (of Germans)...were
overjoyed by the mass extermination of the hated Jews."

How did you ascertain this figure, Mr. Klieger? What proof do you have
that the German people were aware of alleged gas chamber extermination,
much less were 'overjoyed' by it? Of course I realize that merely posing
these questions to your Royal Highness could result in this writer
receiving a (justifiable) beating, but I will run that risk.

The rest of the 'report' by Mr. Klieger is run-of-the-mill Talmudic
arrogance, violence and terrorism: a German heretic asks a skeptical
question at a speech in a library given by a Judaic 'Holocaust" saint.
The heretic is beaten and thrown out of the library. The loving,
tolerant, humanist Noah Klieger comments, "and everyone was happy to see
him thrown out."

As we approach the complete triumph of Judaic supremacy in the West, the
Talmudic mentality will no longer need to cloak itself and we will be
treated to more of this open gloating over the violent suppression of
opponents, which is so at variance with the cinematic and academic
mythos concerning Judiasm's relationship with heretics and heresy, i.e.
as the forever hunted ones. But when Judaics themselves unleash the dogs
and become the hunters there is no Steven Spielberg or New York Times to
record it for posterity. It is up to us to do so.

Michael Hoffman is the author of "The Great Holocaust Trial: The
Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic"
(Independent History and Research, 2010)


The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:

Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.

Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

Please do not laugh.

Last night Bugs Bunny confirmed this story.

According  to Bugs his grand-parents were in those cages and only because of Marmurek  help they managed to escape
to a forest near by  .


History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: December 24, 2010, 04:58:46 AM »
1.Merry Christmas to all of you  :)

2.Not even one word from madame Lipstadt or her cronies:)

3.   :) ;D

Kevin Käthers Fragen, vor denen sich die Holocaust-Zunft und Richter fürchteten
Kevin Käther’s Questions That Caused Berlin
District Court to Drop His Case

Written by Kevin Käther
Translated by J M Damon
The original German is posted at

{Germanophiles everywhere are following the self-accusation trials of young dissidents such as Kevin Käther and Dirk Zimmermann with great interest, and we are encouraged by the growth of dissident sentiment in the judiciary of the “Federal Republic.”

As dissident attorney Sylvia Stolz remarked at her own sentencing: “NICHT ALLE RICHTER SIND SCHURKEN!” (Not all judges are scoundrels).}

Kevin Käther’s most recent self-accusation trial began before Berlin District Court on 25 October 2010.

The background to his trials is posted on <> website along with his original trial reports.

Kevin had originally mailed CDs of Germar Rudolf’s Lectures on the Holocaust to the Berlin Attorney General, Lea Rosh, Professor Wolfgang Benz and Professor Ernst Nolte.

Under the provisions of Section 130 of the German Penal Code he then filed charges against himself, accusing himself of VOLKSVERHETZUNG (Incitement of the Masses) in order to compel a WAHRHEITSERHEBUNG (judicial truth ascertainment) of the official “Holocaust” narrative.

For this crime he was initially sentenced to eight months imprisonment without parole.

However, the Berlin Superior Court set aside this sentence, ruling that mailing CDs did not comprise incitement of the masses and was not a punishable offense.

His case was scheduled for retrial on 25 October 2010.

This time, the persons to whom the CDs had been addressed were called as witnesses.

Kevin, who has doubts about the veracity of the official “Holocaust” narrative, welcomed an opportunity to be educated by the facts and the arguments of such an officially acknowledged “Holocaust” expert as Prof. Wolfgang Benz, who was summoned as a witness.

He welcomed the opportunity to be convinced that six million Jews had really been gassed under Hitler and that he, Kevin Käther, was in fact suffering under misapprehensions.

And he hoped for enlightenment from Professor Ernst Nolte as well.

The Court should have shown a lively interest in allowing the accused to be enlightened by these famous professors.

The defendant, a so-called “Holocaust Denier” was standing before the Court eager to be instructed. 

He was prepared to abandon his heresies if presented with sufficient evidence of the veracity of “Holocaust.”

Alas – his redemption was not to be!

Performing an abrupt about-face, the Court would not allow questioning of these knowledgeable witnesses by a defendant who was thirsting for knowledge and enlightenment. 

After just two questions directed at Prof. Ernst Nolte, the Court terminated Kevin’s questioning of witnesses. 

On 1 November 2010, before Kevin could ask Prof. Wolfgang Benz a single question, the Court discontinued his trial.

In preparation for his trial Kevin had submitted the following questions for the witnesses in the form of an evidentiary motion which the Court apparently considered dangerous.

By discontinuing the trial, the Court was able to delete Kevin’s questions.

They were not entered into the trial record as an evidentiary motion.

Thus the Inquisitorial Court of the so-called Federal Republic of Germany preferred to discontinue a “Holocaust” trial rather than expose its experts to the questions of a heretical Revisionist intent on enlightening himself!     

Can anyone with any vestiges of a conscience believe anything this government says?

”Holocaust” experts such as Professor Benz, on whom the System so confidently relies as long as Revisionists are not allowed to put them through the wringer, have to be protected from the questions of an eager-to-learn defendant.

Such is the unmistakable reality in our Federal Republic of Germany.

Questions For Witnesses Ernst Nolte and Wolfgang Benz
from Käther’s Evidentiary Motion

From the above mentioned contents we must determine whether the present book sent through the mails, Germar Rudolf’s LECTURES ON THE HOLOCAUST, meets the criteria for “Denying ‘Holocaust’” or whether we are dealing with a scientific work that is based on empirical facts, and whose sending through the mails therefore cannot be proscribed.
In addition, questioning of the witnesses will reveal uncertainty regarding the ruling by the BUNDESGERICHTSHOF (Federal Supreme Court) on OFFENKUNDIGKEIT (“Manifest Obviousness”) and necessitate additional evidentiary motions regarding the “Holocaust” complex.
In order to ascertain and debate these circumstances, all the witnesses must be asked the following questions:

1. Have you read the book that I sent to you, LECTURES ON THE HOLOCAUST, by the diploma chemist Germar Rudolf?

2. Did you read this book?
-Yes or no?

3. Did you disseminate this book?
-Yes or no?

4. Did you make this book available to a third person?
-Yes or no?

5. Did you find any errors or mistakes in the book LECTURES ON THE -HOLOCAUST?
-Yes or no?


6. (Question for Witness Nolte).
Is the following quotation taken from your book “STREITPUNKTE” applicable?
[FOOTNOTE 1: ERNST Nolte, Streitpunkte, Ullstein, Frankfurt am Main – Berlin, 1993, p. 308]
“The widely held opinion that all doubt about the prevailing conceptions of ‘Holocaust’ with its six million Jewish victims is evidence of an inherently evil attitude and contempt for all mankind, and that it must be suppressed whenever possible, is completely unacceptable to science.

This is because of the fundamental and overriding significance of the maxim ‘DE OMNIBUS DUBITANDUM EST’ (Everything must be questioned) for the verification of truth.

We must reject the proscription of doubts about ‘Holocaust’ because such proscription is an attack on the very principle of freedom of scientific investigation.”

7. (Question for Witness Nolte.)
Do you perceive an assault on freedom of scientific investigation in the conviction of Germar Rudolf by Mannheim District Court?

8. (Question for Witness Nolte.)
Is the following quotation, which is taken from your book STREITPUNKTE, relevant to the issue of freedom of scientific investigation?
[FOOTNOTE 2: Nolte, ibid., p. 9]
“Although I felt more challenged by ‘Revisionism’ than did other contemporary German historians, I was soon convinced that this school was being treated unscientifically in mainstream literature.
It was treated solely with rejection, with suspicion of the motives of the authors, and by completely ignoring them.”

9. (Question for Witness Nolte).
In addition, you write the following in your work “STREITPUNKTE:”
“...Questions about the reliability of eyewitnesses, authenticity of documents, the scientific possibility or impossibility of certain processes and events, the credibility of statistics and the emphasis placed on certain circumstances are not only permissible, they are scientifically indispensable.
Every attempt to banish certain arguments and evidence by ignoring or proscribing them must be considered illegitimate.”

- Prof. Nolte, in regard to this quotation, may we conclude that considerations and investigations by Revisionists should be considered legitimate and desirable?

10. (Question for Witness Nolte).
In 1999, you published the work FEINDLICHE NÄHE in association with the leftist French philosopher Francois Furet.
Here is a quotation that you yourself wrote.
[FOOTNOTE 3: François Furet - Ernst Nolte. "Feindliche Nähe”. Kommunismus und Faschismus im 20. Jahrhundert. Ein Briefwechsel. München (Herbig), 1998, pp. 74-79]

“If radical Revisionism were correct in its contention that a ‘Holocaust,’ in the sense of extensive and systematic extermination measures originating in the highest levels of government never existed, I would have to make the following confession: National Socialism was not a ‘VERZERRTE KOPIE DES BOLSCHEWISMUS’ (deformed copy of Bolshevism).
Rather, National Socialism was occupied exclusively with the survival struggle of a Germany that had been internationally forced onto the defensive.
No author willingly admits that his work is lying in ruins, and so I have a vital interest in demonstrating that Revisionism is incorrect -at least in its radical version.”

Prof. Nolte, more than 12 years have now passed since the publication of FEINDLICHE NÄHE.
In the course of ongoing Revisionist findings, have you already had to admit or concede incorrectness in any of your earlier historical publications?
If so, which ones?

11. (Question for Witness Nolte).

In your work DER KAUSALE NEXUS., you cover the “confession” of Rudolf Höß, Commandant of Auschwitz Camp, as well as the Gerstein documents and eyewitness testimony, and you write the following.


“The confessions of the commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höß, which undeniably contributed greatly to the collapse of the defense of alleged war criminals in the Nuremberg trials, were obtained by the use of torture.
Under the rules of Western jurisprudence, they would have been inadmissible in a court of law.
The so-called Gerstein Documents are so filled with contradictions, and include so many scientific impossibilities, that they must be dismissed as worthless.
The greater part by far of witness testimony rests on hearsay and unsubstantiated assumptions.
The reports of the few eyewitnesses contradict one another, which creates doubt concerning their credibility...
In contrast to the investigations of the Katyn massacre following the Wehrmacht’s discovery of mass graves in 1943, no international commissions of experts were allowed to scientifically investigate the allegations of homicidal gassings in German concentrations following World War II.

The responsibility for this lack of investigation rests with the Soviet and Polish Communists...

The widespread publications of photographs of crematoria as well as canisters with the label ‘Cyclon B Poison Gas’ have no evidentiary significance, since crematoria were necessitated by the recurrent epidemics and Cyclon B was the standard pesticide used to control typhus-bearing lice everywhere that large numbers of people lived under poor sanitary conditions...

For these reasons, it is vitally necessary to question postwar rulings that mass exterminations in homicidal gas chambers were “proven” by countless statements and unsubstantiated “facts” of which there are no doubts whatsoever.
Such questioning must be allowed, or else scientific truth in this area of history is ruled out – it is simply not a possibility.”

Professor Nolte, did I state the passage correctly?

If so, what information and insight can we now consider obvious and allowable in court?

12. (Question for Witness Nolte).
In your book DER KAUSALE NEXUS (FOOTNOTE 5: E. Nolte, ibid., p. 122) you write the following:
“At issue is the allegation that, on the basis of scientific evidence and matters of fact, there either were no mass killings by gassings or else they did not occur to the extent alleged.
Here I am referring to chemical investigations, including an expert report [the Rudolf Report] comparing residues of cyanide in delousing chambers at Auschwitz with residues in areas designated in construction plans as crematoria morgues.
[The Rudolf Expert Report was commissioned by a German court during the trial of Gen. Remer in 1992 and carried out by Diploma Chemist Germar Rudolf of Max Planck Institute, who was subsequently sentenced to thirty months imprisonment.]
These investigations were carried out by Leuchter, Rudolf and Lüftl. They also include extremely detailed studies by Carlo Mattogno that include burn-hours, coke consumption and similar matters.
It is impossible to objectively argue against the recurrent thesis that what is scientifically or technically impossible could not have taken place, notwithstanding hundreds of confessions and eyewitness accounts asserted the contrary.

Such a thesis cannot be scientifically argued, on principle.

Objectively and scientifically speaking, the admission is unavoidable that humanities scholars and ideologists should have no voice in such an argument [that pertains to the realm of the natural sciences].”

Prof. Nolte, please explain to us whether Rudolf erred and, in case his work contains mistakes, tell us what they are.
In 1993, 300 professors of anorganic chemistry were unable to find a single mistake in Rudolf’s Expert Report, and Swiss expert witness Prof. Henri Ramuz attested to its correctness before Court Chatel-St. Denis on 18 May 1997.

13. (Question for Witness Nolte).
Shortly before his death in June 2006, the “Holocaust” specialist Raul Hilberg, who is frequently quoted by official historians, felt obliged to admit that a great deal of research is still required in “Holocaust” historiography.
Hilberg [author of the extensive three-volume DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN JEWRY] admitted, “We understand perhaps twenty percent of the Holocaust (DER STANDARD, Vienna, 10 June 2006, p. 42).

Jürgen Heynsel of the Warsaw Jewish Historical Institute endorsed this assessment: “The decisive stage of writing the history of the Holocaust is still before us.” (“Kein Schindler” in NEUES DEUTSCHLAND, 13 October 2009.)

Prof. Nolte - in view of Hilberg’s and Heynsel’s elucidations, do you consider the “Holocaust” to be a “manifestly obvious” fact that has no need of supporting evidence and further research?

14. (It is not stated for whom this question was intended; apparently it was intended for Prof. Wolfgang Benz.)
The Federal Republic of Germany has decreed that HOLOCAUST-OFFENKUNDIGKEIT (the Manifest Obviousness of “Holocaust”) is unquestionable and the BUNDESGERICHTSHOF (Federal Supreme Court) has decreed that it is unchallengeable.
Since the Deckert trial, “...genocide committed against the Jews, primarily in gas chambers of concentration camps is a manifestly obvious historical fact.”
(Court Verdict 1 StR 179/94)
Why then was Daniel Goldhagen’s book HITLER’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS not placed on the index of proscribed books and why was he not charged with a crime, since he writes in his book that gassing was a “minor event” in the murder of Jews?

15. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
Are you aware that both Rita Süßmuth (former president of the BUNDESTAG) and Fritjof Meyer (former editor of SPIEGEL magazine) reduced the number of Jewish victims gassed at Auschwitz to 356,000 and relocated the “murder weapons” or places of mass murder (the alleged “gas chambers” of official historiography) to two farm houses that stood outside Auschwitz Camp and no longer exist?

16. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
The office of the District Attorney of Stuttgart accepted these revisions as authentic and declined to prosecute author Fritjof Meyer, chief editor of SPIEGEL magazine, and former President of the BUNDESTAG Rita Süßmuth, publisher of the article "DIE ZAHL DER OPFER VON AUSCHWITZ - NEUE ERKENNTNISSE DURCH NEUE ARCHIVFUNDE" (in the periodical OSTEUROPA, 5, 2002, pp. 631-.)
The District Attorney declined to prosecute Meyer and Süßmuth for violating Section 130 of the Penal Code - the corresponding Order to Stop Proceedings) was released on 28 May 2003 in Document 4 Js 75185/02.
In your opinion, is the principle of Manifest Obviousness still operative?

17. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
How can the obvious fact be explained that obviously the official number of “Holocaust” victims is continuing to melt like snow in the sun of springtime?
Can acceptance of the evidence submitted by Fritjof Meyer be ascribed to the fact that the last camp commander of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höß, signed this confession with its fantastical numbers under torture - in the hope and expectation that the exaggerations would be recognized and attention directed to the circumstances under which the incriminating testimony was obtained?

18. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
The world-renowned Jewish “Holocaust” researcher and author Gitta Sereny stated in the London Times on 29 August 2001:
“Why in the world have these people made Auschwitz into a holy cow?
Auschwitz was a terrible place, but it was not an extermination camp!”
As a distinguished historian, can you explain why I, an independent researcher, should not believe the distinguished “Holocaust” historian Gitta Sereny, especially considering that according to official historiography, Auschwitz was supposed to be the center of “Jewish Extermination?”

19. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
In conjunction with the article by Fritjof Meyer and Rita Süßmuth as well as the statements of Hilberg, Sereney and Heynsel, do you consider an examination and revision of the official account of Auschwitz necessary?

20. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
What is your opinion of the findings of official historiography that after 1960, Dachau could no longer be considered the center of alleged National Socialist “exterminations”?
Also, what brought about the sudden recent findings that no homicidal gassings took place there at all?

21. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
On which facts and documents are the new findings based, that no one was gassed at Dachau, even though the Allied “factfinders” at Nuremberg alleged the exact opposite?

22. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
Why is it not explained in detail which “facts” were originally used to allege mass exterminations at Dachau, and what evidence was later used to prove that the opposite was true?

23. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
As an acknowledged expert, you can surely inform me as to which of the two following National Socialist verdicts in our so-called “nation of laws” is true and which false, as well as why it is true or false:
a) “Concentration Camp Maidanek contained no gas chamber” (Verdict of Berlin District Court (8.5.1950, PKs 3/50) and
b) “Mass gassings took place in Maidanek.”
(Verdict of Düsseldorf District Court, 30.6.1981, XVII-1/75 S).
In order to come right to the point, let me point out that both verdicts refer to the same period of time.
I sincerely request elucidation in this matter.

24. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)
In addition, you can surely also instruct me in my quest for real truth as to which truth is correct: the truth proclaimed in the Nuremberg Tribunal or the truth proclaimed in Düsseldorf District Court.

Nuremberg Tribunal Document 3311-PS “proved” that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed with steam at Treblinka, but decades later Düsseldorf District Court (K I Is 2/64) proclaimed that these victims were not steamed but rather gassed.
I sincerely request elucidation in this matter.

25. (Question apparently intended for Witness Benz)

Why does the so-called “Federal Republic” enact legal ordinances to protect narratives and allegations that even the government itself cannot coherently explain?
For lack of space, I have listed only a few isolated examples of these contradictions.
Why does the “Federal Republic” not allow free and independent historical research into the historical subject of “Holocaust?”
Why are historians who arrive at differing conclusions regarding “Holocaust” slandered, demonized and incarcerated, even though their findings have never been disproven in court?

Kevin Käther <>


The translator is a Germanophile who makes German articles about Germany’s historical plight accessible to those who do not read German.

Here's freedom to him who would speak,
Here's freedom to him who would write;
For there's none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!
ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)
Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj

General / Defense Against Jewish Aggression
« on: November 11, 2010, 10:55:46 PM »
Defense Against Jewish Aggression

Once we acknowledge the threat that faces us `“ Jewish Aggression `“ we are left with the problem of how to remove that threat. Jews are in controlling positions in every segment of our lives, from the financial collapse of Wall Street, to the collapse of our currency by the Federal Reserve Corporation, the collapse of the US military from Jewish wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a de facto Jewish war against Pakistan and a threatened Jewish war against Iran. Trillions of tax dollars have been lost to the pockets of Jewish bankers and speculators.

The news media have always been and continue to be in the hands of Jews. These lie factories, thanks to the Internet, are in freefall collapse and deservedly so. If the news media had been honest, we would have been informed and warned of the criminal conspiracy so that we could have dealt with it legally. But we were not informed or warned. It was not in the interest of the Jews to do so, as they explained in their Jewish Protocols a hundred years ago. So to save ourselves we must take the law into our own hands, where it belongs anyway. This is where the failure of news has put us.

Jews are the masters of destruction. They now admit that they possess several hundred nuclear weapons, quite illegally in terms of international agreements, but very logically since it was Jewish mad scientists who designed and developed nuclear weapons and supervised the use of two of them on helpless Japanese civilians. Whether the Jewish nukes actually will work is open to question, since much of what the Israeli military does ends in failure, as we saw with the Lavi jet fighter and Merkava tank and their disastrous invasion of Lebanon in 2006, which ended in a rout. The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was a catastrophic failure that destroyed an elaborate US/Israeli operation to sink the ship and blame it on the Egyptians, which would have `forced` the US military to join Israel and invade and occupy the Arab countries. It is now generally acknowledged that Israel engineered the shock and awe attacks on 9-11, with the complicity of the US air force and intelligence agencies. This attack was finally successful in putting the US at war with Islam.

Israel`s military strategy is completely dependent on the US military backing it up. The fact that Israel now slyly brags about its illegal nukes and even threatens to burn European cities with them indicates they may not actually function, that they are bluffing. Reports of American missile sites being mysteriously knocked out suggest that much of the world`s nuclear arsenal is kaput. But it has been Jews such as Einstein, Oppenheimer and Teller who have been behind the dropping of nuclear weapons on people in the past and Jews such as Netanyahu and Lieberman who want to drop them on people now.

I am proposing that we neutralize the Jewish threat before they try to use them again.

Jewish aggression is caused by their control of our money system. If this is taken away from them, and only if this is taken away from them, we could regain our national health, and the rest of the world could do so, too. There is a very simple way to do this. It has been done before in this country. The two presidents who did it were shot in the head soon afterward, so there is a risk involved. The Austrian leader of Germany also did this quite successfully until stopped by the combined forces of the Jewish allies (America, England and the Soviet Union) some years later. The Jews were successful in stopping these men mainly because the people didn`t understand the nature of money and debt, which the Jews call `credit.`

Once we understand that Jewish Rule depends on their control of our money system we can figure out how to beat them. Events have shown that there is no political solution, i.e., by elected politicians. The politicians can`t save us even if they wanted to, which they don`t. The police and FBI are controlled by Jewish agencies such as the ADL and SPLC. There is lately talk of a US military coup against the Jews but this is frankly unlikely, since there is no curriculum in the military academies teaching the army, navy and air force about Jewish subversion. The Jews have made sure that the only curriculum is about the Moslem threat and the threat presented by American `patriots.`

The way Jews control our money and our lives should be basically understood. It has been done by Privatization of the only legitimate function of the federal government, the creation of our money. This writer is not an admirer of the US Constitution for reasons explained in other essays, but Article 1, Section 8 does specify that `the Congress shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.`

Nevertheless, Alexander Hamilton persuaded President Washington and the Congress to allow the private Bank of New York to become the first Bank of the United States in 1791, in a charter lasting twenty years until 1811. On the Caribbean island of Nevus, Hamilton`s birthplace, it is known and openly recorded that Hamilton`s actual father was named `Levy.` Hamilton was a Rothschild agent. The Bank of New York, aka the Bank of the United States, was a private, profit-making company owned mainly (at least 72 %) by the Rothschild-owned central bank in London `“ the Bank of England. So, from the very beginning of this country, the financial system has been owned and controlled by foreign Jews and their agents here. Despite a bloody war for independence from England, our money and credit was still run by the Bank of England `“ and is to this day. Dividends to investors have continued virtually uninterrupted for 219 years! The Bank of New York is today known as the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the actual headquarters of the Federal Reserve System.

Anyone still dumb enough to pay Jewish income taxes should examine the back of his canceled check to the IRS. It will say, `Pay to the order of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.` Why do you suppose it doesn`t designate the IRS or Treasury Department? Why does your tax money go to a private, profit-making English corporation owned by Jews?

The (first) Bank of the United States lost its charter in 1811. Due to our second war with England in thirty-six years, the War of 1812, it was not possible to charter a second Bank of the United States `“ owned by the Bank of England! `“ until 1819, when another twenty-year charter was granted. In 1833, President Jackson cut off its funds and this private British-Jewish company calling itself the Bank of the United States died six years before its charter would have expired.

People were a lot smarter or more educated in the 19th Century and they would not allow the Congress to create another private, foreign-owned central bank that would profit by lending us our own currency at interest. By 1913, however, the persistence of the Jews finally paid off when Paul Warburg of Germany bribed and manipulated American politicians to pass the Federal Reserve Act, which gave us our third and current private central bank.

Paul Warburg`s brother, Max, was Germany`s chief financial advisor to the Kaiser as well as the head of the German espionage service during World War I, while Paul was on the board of the Federal Reserve `“ while Germany and America were at war! Only Jews can get away with such wild criminality.

Our corrupt government pretends to sell treasury bonds on Wall Street which are converted by the Federal Reserve into Federal Reserve Notes for which we pay the Fed to use our own currency! In other words, our government can print and sell bonds but cannot print and distribute currency. The currency must be supplied to us from a private, British/Jewish company (printed at the Treasury Department`s Bureau of Engraving!) at great profit to itself. The US government is now trillions of dollars in debt to this artificial company calling itself by the grandiose name of the Federal Reserve System.

This scam must have irritated John F. Kennedy because he attempted to put an end to it, sort of in the manner of Andrew Jackson, by ordering the issuance of Series 1963 United States Notes `“ about $4.3 billion worth. That was just the beginning of his move to destroy the Fed. He tied the US Note to silver and this would have meant the end of the Federal Reserve Note, for who would have wanted something backed only by smoke and mirrors? But, five months later, JFK was dead and the US Notes were withdrawn from circulation. I still have one.

But, what Jack Kennedy did can be done again and must be done again. The Federal Reserve Note must be replaced by the United States Note and be issued by the Congress interest-free. This is exactly how the economic miracle of Germany was produced starting in 1933, when Germans were still starving due to our rapacious and sadistic program of `reparations payments to the victors` of World War I. Hitler and Schacht issued interest-free currency tied only to the productivity of the German worker, since we had stolen all of Germany`s gold ten years earlier. By 1935, while American farmers were starving to death and trekking to California to pick other people`s prunes or working themselves to death building dams, six million formerly unemployed German workers were taking paid vacations on cruise ships and buying their first cars. Germany was manufacturing again and exporting goods while the rest of the world was mired in the Great Depression, engineered by the Jewish-owned central banks `“ the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve. To the Jewish banker, German success was an outrage that had to be controlled or destroyed, and so we became the military partners of the Soviet Union for three and a half years, something America can never live down. Together, we, the Jewish allies, destroyed Germany and millions of Germans for the crime of being successful. To be successful, though, requires the removal of Jews from power. That`s what Germany did, or attempted to do. For that they had to die. For that we were ordered to kill them, which we did by the millions.

Today we face the modern version of the Great Depression. Actual unemployment in 1933 was 25%. Today it is 22% and climbing. This writer was `laid off` a very good job and subsequently homeless for 21 months and was lucky to get his old job back `“ but for how long? Those 21 months were the most terrible, degrading and frightening of his life during which he and his wife lost their home and vehicles and horses and virtually all of their belongings. Millions of Americans are experiencing this terror right now, with 43 million of us on food stamps! All of this misery has been caused by Jewish bankers and Jewish speculators on Wall Street.

George W. Bush lied us into two evil wars of aggression for the benefit of Israel and the Jewish war profiteers on Wall Street and the banks.

We are the victims of Jewish aggression. I have spent much space on our money system, since it is the heart of our lives. No money `“ no lives. We must remove the Jews from our money or we will die, and soon. Now, of course, the Jews cannot let go of our veins, arteries and bank accounts. It would be against their religion, the control of all money. We must pry them loose.

There is no legal way to do this, because Jews are the law. The Jews are God and they are the law. So, to bring them under control we must ignore Jewish law and make our own law. What law is that? It is the law of survival.

The Jewish Problem is much more terrible than we even know. Jewish subversion has saturated our lives with death and filth and our minds with confusion and an inability to defend ourselves. If you wonder how this was done, read a few of the twenty-four Jewish Protocols. You`ll get the picture very quickly. Few can read all twenty-four of them `“ they are too revolting.

Defense Against Jewish Aggression requires that Jews be disfranchised from all positions of power and influence in the important aspects of our lives. Starting with government, of course. Medicine, law, banking, finance, news, publishing, entertainment `“ all must be free of Jews and Jewish influence. Our actions should start against the powerful Jewish organizations of subversion, such as the Anti-Defamation League, AIPAC, the Jews-only Masonic lodge they call B`nai B`rith and the Council on Foreign Relations, which is roughly 70% Jewish. There are hundreds and hundreds of Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization. Quite simply, these subversive organizations must be destroyed. Jews must be put on notice that their dreamy days of power are ending. All things must end and Jewish power is one of them.

Naturally, the Jews will fight hard to prevent losing their unearned power over us. That is, they will hire as many of us as they can to fight us. Jews can`t fight. They can kill, assassinate, murder and just about anything by stealth, but they can`t fight. When the Jew is confronted with his Jewishness, he splits.

The filmmaker John Carpenter made a great training film for us in this coming struggle. THEY LIVE. Malevolent aliens live among us. But most of us can`t tell who`s who, or realize how they control our lives. A small group of resistance fighters have special glasses that reveal the hideous faces of the aliens, who have taken over the organs of power. The aliens are so evil that no mercy can be shown them. If you see the scary face, start shooting, because they mean to enslave all of us and kill some of us. The only way to save ourselves is to kill them and keep killing them until the source of their power can be turned off `“ forever.

Carpenter`s aliens are the Jews. Most of them actually look like us. Carpenter`s special glasses represent the Jewish Protocols. Once you read a few of them, you see immediately what we`re up against. That`s why the Jews always freak out whenever the Protocols are mentioned. They are probably the most important writings you will ever read, even if you can only manage a few of them. Victor Marsden of the London Morning Post translated them in a special room in the British Museum but could only manage a page or so per day, so malevolent and disturbing were they. He died shortly after finishing his work.

Just look at Palestine! Do you want to live the way those people live, showing your papers to some creepy armed Jew at a checkpoint twice a day, fearful that he may refuse to let you pass today? This is how life is under Jewish Rule. But forget Palestine `“ now we`re getting a well-deserved dose of Jewish Rule at our airports. In case you hadn`t considered it, the only reason for `airport security` is the fake fear that enraged, crazy Moslems are trying to get on board with bombs and guns, which the TSA can`t seem to find at the best of times. And why are these Moslems supposedly enraged and crazy? Because of Israel, right? Isn`t airport security all about Moslems being angry about Israel? Now there may have been a couple of fake Moslems with phony explosives in their pants or shoes, but real Palestinians? Name one. Not to mention that most airport security is run by Israeli companies.

TSA now stands for The Sex Aggressors. These morons are now authorized to squeeze your private parts for Glocks and grenades. Little kids, too! A friend of mine`s wife was strip-searched in June after she`d passed successfully through the metal detector because the moron thought she `didn`t look right.` `Airport security` is the result of what Israel does to Arabs. When you get your crotch squeezed, if you haven`t got the brains to stop flying, think about Defense Against Jewish Aggression.

DAJA. First step: Recognize the Jewish Problem. Where does the Problem originate? Well, probably in the synagogues, in Hebrew school, in all the brainwash programs the Jews have for their kids. These kids are born and bred to hate us, to feel nothing when they cheat us, steal from us and kill us. It`s all laid out in the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, and of course in the Talmud. The problem is with the rabbis. I`ve written it before but Defense Against Jewish Aggression means the entire rabbinical class has to be wiped out. That means all the rabbis who preach Jewish hate and all the Jews who accept it. The rabbis are the political commissars who keep the party members in line, just like the Jewish commissars under Stalin who shot Russian soldiers from behind to terrorize the rest into attacking the Germans. I`d bet that a lot of Jews who`d like to assimilate with us would even help wipe out some of the hate-mongering rabbis.

Theodor Herzl comes to mind. Herzl, the supposed designer of Zionism, actually hated the Jewish ruling class and all typically Jewish ways. What he wanted was to blend with the Gentiles, whom he greatly admired. He was rejected because in those days, it was hard to trust a Jew, no matter how much he wanted to be a Gentile, or a Christian. Sad story.

So Plan B was to get the Jews out of Europe, out of polite society, and into a land for Jews only. Herzl knew that most Jews just couldn`t behave properly, so the humane thing was to put them somewhere they couldn`t do any harm. What he didn`t count on was the rise of the Russian Jews, the real Zionists, whom he`d never heard of before his 1897 Zionist Congress in Basel. These uncouth roughnecks from the Pale showed up, demanding to go to Palestine. Not Uganda, not Madagascar, not America, not South America `“ Palestine. These were the phony Jews, the poseurs, the Khazar converts to Judaism but converts who possessed the deadliest zeal in the history of the world. They wanted to kill all the Palestinians and take over `the holy land.` Well?

My late friend, Heinz Weichardt, was another. His mother was Jewish, a famous opera singer in Berlin, his father a well-known journalist with the big German papers. Heinz was a life-long supporter of Hitler and of National Socialism. I recommend his memoir, `Under Two Flags,` on the Gnostic Liberation Front website. Jews such as Aaron Russo and David Cole have done more to hurt the Jewish racket than anyone on our side. So we mustn`t be indiscriminant in our Defense Against Jewish Aggression.

Anti-Jewish operations must be designed carefully. The big organizations must be taken out first.

The US military has never exactly covered itself in glory. Actually, it has been a total disgrace to America. The military has done the Jews` dirty work, and I do mean dirty, ever since the Civil War and the Indian Wars. World Wars I & II? Imagine, Americans going to fight Germans in Europe! Most Americans in those days were of German descent. Korea, Vietnam`¦ Total disgraces. Desert Storm? Burying alive thousands of Iraqis with their hands up. Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, Bagram, Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman, Fallujah, Predator drones `“ Jesus, what a shower of shit the US military has always been, including the glory days against the fascists. (Read Other Losses, Crimes & Mercies, Operation Keelhaul if you`re craving US military glory.)

And, soldier boys, I have news for you. The Jews consider YOU to be the fascists. That`s what the military is for, to absorb the `fascistic element` of society (masculine men) into a controllable organization, because you scare the hell out of the Jews. They dread the day that you will turn on them, stop killing their enemies like the fools you are, and aim your guns at them. Watch THEY LIVE. How do you think the guards at Abu Ghraib could become so sadistic so early in our invasion and occupation of Iraq? They were conditioned by Jews with Jewish hate before they ever got out of the US.

I do have one good story to tell about the marines. A buddy of mine, Mike Hanson, was at the airport in West Beirut in `83, near where Arafat and his men were holed up. A half-dozen Israeli tanks came rolling up to wipe them out. The marines just looked at them but the captain in charge of the airport detail climbed up on the lead tank and held the muzzle of his .45 against the Jew commander`s head. `If this tank moves another foot, your brains are gonna be all over this tank.` Jew commander ordered everyone to leave. This is the only language Jews understand.
The upshot was, a truck bomb soon killed over 240 marines nearby. Victor Ostravsky, a Mossad officer, revealed that the Mossad knew about the plot but deliberately withheld the information. Translation: the bombing of the marine barracks was a Mossad operation, probably in retaliation for the marine captain`s heroism. Mike bunked in the open and escaped the blast at the barracks. He carried out a lot of bodies.

But that captain was the exception that proves the rule: the US military man is always obeying Jewish orders. So, the only way for a US military man to gain his honor is to join with this DAJA program `“ Defense Against Jewish Aggression. It`s the only way to gain honor. You can`t regain something you never had. You joined up to fight, didn`t you? Against all enemies, foreign and domestic? The only foreign enemies we have are in Israel. You don`t need to mess with them. The real enemy is domestic, the Jew who sends you to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran to kill people who never threatened us but who are hated by Jews. We have to clean up this country by wiping out the Jewish organization. Once the organization is wiped out, the Federal Reserve and its stinking Note can be wiped out and replaced by the debt-free US Note.

And that`s how we`re going to clean up this Jewish mess.

Author unknown

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: What's the German caption of this photo?
« on: November 09, 2010, 02:31:49 AM »
"I would love to see the genetic tree on the Khazars"

I  would love to see the Khazars on the tree...genetic or oak...
Alle die gleichen... :)

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: November 09, 2010, 02:25:14 AM »
"Professor" Jerzy Ulicki-Rek challenging "professor" Lipstadt :)

Jewish and Zionist mass media did and still doing a lot of noise about D.Lipstadt book:"History on trial".

The propaganda has one aim:convince us that so called "holocaust' was debated in independent court and the Madame Lipstadt won the debate against David Irving , proving -at the same time that holocaust did happened .

That's lie.

Few years ago David Irving ,outraged by the label"holocaust denier" stack on him by m-de Lipstadt and other professors of holocaustianity ,challenged Madame Lipstadt at court.
And lost.
Court decided that David Irving is a "holocaust denier".

But it was not a "history' on trial but David's Irving case against something he considered as a slander.
Full stop.

Of course reading the Jewish propaganda (incl.a book by D.L.) we should have the impression that during the court procedure the existence of gas chambers ,electric chambers,vacuum chambers etc was proven once and for all beyond any reasonable doubt.

I observed (and still do) Mrs..Lipstadt holo-convulsions since several years.

I forced myself to read her books .

After 25 years of studying the holocaustianity is don't have any doubt that holocaust is a myth and Mrs..Deborah Lipstadt is a liar enjoying the reputation build on lies and propaganda.

After considering the fact that I spend 25 years studying the subject,considering the fact that I published on internet the results of my studies ,considering that Mrs..Lipstadt is using a "professor" title I decided to award myself with exactly the same scientific status.

I,Jerzy Ulicki-Rek call Madame Lipstadt a liar .

Today,on 4.11.2010 I-professor of holocaustianity-challenge my learned  :)colleague DEBORAH LIPSTATD to present us with a proof that the theory she is supporting has any merit.

I challenge her arguments and her statements.

I state here -officially and under my own name that professor Lipsatdt is a pathetic fake and liar.

I demand to be presented with scientific arguments which will support Mrs. Lipstatdt theory.

Those arguments have to be in accord with the laws of chemistry,biology,physics,nature and common sense.

I give professor Lipstatd ONE month to respond to my friendly challenge.
If this appeal will be left unanswered I will considered that Mrs. Lipstatd lost by walkover.

I ask every person reading those words to do her/his best in forwarding my challenge to Mrs. .Lipstadt to make sure that she will be aware of the challenge presented.

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek
Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: November 09, 2010, 02:11:04 AM »
Yes  they did!!!
According to mr.JACKSON ,a leader of the US  lynch group at Nuremeberg Trials  it was done in 1942 by atomic bomb.
No kidding.

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: October 20, 2010, 03:33:58 AM »
Copy of the letter I send to a D.Lipstadt.
In case it will not be published on her blog:)

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek


Dear Madame
My name is Jerzy Ulicki-Rek and I'm 56 years old Polish-Australian.
After studying the "holocaust' for almost 25 years I do not have ANY doubts
that the official version (6 millions,gas chambers,electric chambers,vacuum
chambers etc0 is nothing else but a pile of lies.
looking for the new informations I forced myself to read a book "Denying the
holocaust' written by You.

The number of lies you produced between the covers is fantastic.
Some of them (as I stated in e letter to the university which pays you
wages) are absolutely fantastic and even the very official Museum in
Oswiecim is very reluctant to confirm you words:)
In fact they refuse to comment on your revelations To refute all the lies
will take a long time and maybe another book.
Now only one of you creations:

On the page 115 you wrote:

"Harwood contended that the report made "nonsense" of the allegation that
there were "gas chambers' cunningly disguised as shower facilities".
He substantiated this assertion by quoting a passage from the report (IRC
report published in 1948-Jerzy) that depicted how ICRC officials inspected
baths and showers in the camps.
When they found problems they acted swiftly "to have fixtures made less
primitive and to have them repaired or enlarged".

This Harwood argued ,demonstrated conclusively that showers functioned as
showers ,however primitive,and not as killing apparatus.
The problem with Harwood choice of this citation ,which he quoted correctly

End cite.

No Madame.
You are presenting us with another lie.

I am VERY familiar with the IRC report.
Those words are in relation to a concentration camp.
Please do not insult me any more.

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek
Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj

History & Civilization / Re: HOLOCAUST MYTH
« on: September 14, 2010, 04:41:41 PM »
Consider your self lucky.
Read the EVA MOSES-KORR memoirs  and then you will know what could happened to you :) :) :)


Pages: [1] 2