Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - NinpoReloaded

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
General / Anyone look at google's search engine pic?
« on: October 07, 2009, 02:05:22 AM »
This is it.

Any questions?

Sue's Place / One Hell of a True Rant
« on: October 04, 2009, 09:19:57 PM »
One Hell of a True Rant
    Author Unknown

    More and more of what you are going to keep finding (and will soon start increasing at an alarming rate) is that men today do not want a relationship, per say, with American women anymore, be it a steady girlfriend and certainly not marriage, because women today are simply out of touch, do not share any values with humanity as a whole, and are damaged goods; as worthless an old broken washing machine, wherein the replacement parts are no longer even available.

    Women in 2005 do not "get it." They are far too demanding, far too critical, feel an overwhelming sense of "entitlement" because of the endless feminist propaganda they are bombarded with through the media, attorneys, and state programs. They want "independence" (which really means working at a frivolous part-time job, answering to no one, to be completely unaccountable for their actions) while walking on the backs of men as their financial support, or worse, as a monthly check they have extorted through the bizarre world of "family court" after a divorce. American women have simply left the human race.

    American women want a man to be "traditional," yet seemed to have lost touch with reality.. strangely oblivious to the fact that if you want a man to play a traditional role, you would have to play the traditional counterpart. Women today have ascribed to this notion of "empowerment," which translates into being far too bossy, self absorbed and self centered, in addition to all the negatives one associates with women since the dawn of time; pettiness, cattiness, manipulative, confusing sex with love, grossly superficial (any and all value is simply placed in something's appearance) back stabbing, irrational, let their emotions dictate even the most important decisions resulting in disaster, (in direct contradiction to the fantasy on T.V. and movies, that create the illusion that women are always "intelligent" and "wise" in any given situation) are "above" criticism (once again, an unfortunate byproduct of feminist coaching) completely fake "niceness" (just to get in the door like a salesman) .. my god, the list goes on forever!

    The point is, there is nothing even like-able about women today, much less loveable, and Feminism is to blame. If Feminism were to suddenly end tomorrow, it would still take at least two generations to undo the damage that women have done to themselves. To be fair, I have met women who do realize they are to blame for their own misery and the breakdown of the American family. I worked with a twenty-six year old woman who once said, "women are their own worst enemies." Yet ironically, she was one of the most obnoxious and caustic women I have ever met. So it would seem that even when women realize the truth, they are hopelessly lost for any answer to the problem. Feminism destroyed marriage, the family, the business world, religion- you name it- because it was flawed from the very beginning in that it offered no actual alternative system; women do not have any interest outside of their financial and reproductive freedoms. And come on, let's get real here- the vast majority of women have never even cared about, or even possess the mental capacity for real political debate or comprehension, but women today are so dumbed down, most of them probably don't even really know what Feminism is. Sure, we will always have the stray Hillary Clintons, but they do not change the rule. An example of how most women's I.Q.'s are rarely above room temperature are the ads on television for birth control that actually have to explain to women that birth control products will not prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

    The quest for true freedom was a noble thing, yet that was never the true desired goal of Feminism. But freedom is not freedom when it comes at someone else's expense (i.e. men) The only time most women will even entertain this "debate" is from the angle that somehow men are now simply "intimidated" by a "strong" woman. "Strong" translated from women speak means a confrontational nightmare of a human being with all the charm of a garbage truck, who though they may "get their way" today through loud demands and legal threats, is only making enemies along the way, isolating themselves and creating a truly treacherous world around themselves, while driving quality men away. I suppose you could argue that American men today are, in fact, intimidated by the modern American female, that is if your definition of intimidation is complete revulsion.. the same someone would have for a black widow spider. There is a world of difference between being intimidated and wanting to just simply hurry up and get a verbal exchange, business deal, or quick romp in the sack over with because of the person's hopelessly broken down dysfunction you're dealing with. Why women today do not understand this simple distinction is a mystery, possibly the result of their inability to rationalize. So, in the end, there was nothing wrong with the idea of women having more freedoms, the enormous problems women have today were created by the side effects of Feminism.

    You'll probably think, "well, I'm "happily" married and know tons of other men and women in "happy" relationships." Well, there is a word that is missing from that sentence, and that word is today. You (or they) are "happily" (together) today, but what about two, maybe five years from now? Women who I never even dreamed capable of the viciousness and betrayal they suddenly ravaged on everyone around them shock me everyday. For you see, this is far, far beyond any "character" issue- this a condition of an entire "movement" (Feminism) that is horribly flawed to the very core from the bottom up. Realizing this clears up all the confusion. So the statement "not all women are like that" becomes obsolete. I'm sure not all violent convicted felons are in fact violent, and we all know for a fact that not every chamber in a gun has a bullet when someone is playing Russian roulette, but who has the luxury of taking that chance? No one. This is about survival, so get smart.

    Not only is there absolutely nothing that a man can gain from a "relationship" of any kind with an American woman, it is now down right dangerous and even stupid to marry an American woman; sooner or later she'll simply dump you when the wind starts blowing a different direction through her head (fickle) then financially rape you in divorce court, while making false accusations of god knows what. Worse, they may only be in a marriage with you in order to pillage your very life- putting on a good show for a few years so it looks legit. American women today, no matter what they look like, are hideous monsters; the most god-awful, most horrible people in human history, yet they keep cluelessly chugging along in their own little cutesy fantasy world of wedding magazines, shopping malls, gossip, teddy bears, drearily dull cell phone conversations, (sounding not unlike quaking ducks) puppies, and babies.

    Therefore American men are turning their backs on American women. American women are the gas-guzzling, oil dripping, noisy, over sized, and high maintenance 1973 Chevy Impala nobody wants. Read the stories of American women taking jobs in foreign countries and finding that no man outside of the U.S. wants anything to do with them. And then let's face it, women are just too insane to face reality.. but there is hope- thanks to the Internet and the world becoming "smaller" everyday, it's easier to meet quality women who are actually marriage material in other countries. The difference between women from countries with traditional values and American women is the difference between a well balanced, home cooked meal and a meal at McDonald's. Like McDonald's, American women are nothing more than junk filled with bad chemicals, it's bad for you and will kill you. Though it is still legal to sell trash food, it's dangerous to eat it everyday.

    So it's not all gloom and doom and complete hopelessness- there is now finally a light at the end of the tunnel. I've already made two trips out of the country recently and have met some or the most wonderful women in my life! Sure, once I marry someone from out of the country and bring them back here, there is a good chance they will become corrupted, but one thing is for certain, that a woman raised in a family from a culture that stresses strong family values with a mother and a father, is light years ahead of any worthless American woman raised by what amounts to nothing more than a stupid whore "single mother." It is so beautiful... intelligent American men can now completely shut out American women entirely and cut them out like the cancer they are.

    Every year is going to get progressively worse for women in America in their relationships; the quality of men who will sleep with them (and that is all American men want from American women now, a drive-thru quickie) will keep steadily declining. So you'll find that men are simply turning their backs on American women and walking away (or avoiding them altogether, the smartest thing to do). They just went too far and now it's over. Women just haven't woken up yet. Just look around you and see how miserable today's women are. They all need the guidance of a man, but they, along with our government have driven a wedge between men and women. American women now are diseased and on dangerous psychiatric drugs. For God's sake, the next woman you meet here in the U.S., tell them to get to a clinic and do society a favor; invest in a vibrator and a lots of cats, and get the hell away! Finally, best of luck finding your bride overseas, it's going to be so much simpler than you think.

History & Civilization / Feminists are nasty things.
« on: April 14, 2009, 10:51:09 AM »
Feminists are nasty things.
Esther Vilar wrote her book, The Manipulated Man, in 1972. In 1998 she wrote that, "violent threats have not ceased to this date." In other words, for over 25 years has Esther Vilar been subjected to the nastiness and vindictiveness of feminist women simply because she spoke up on behalf of men.

And this has been the experience of many WOMEN who have tried to expose feminists and feminism for what they really are.

And this is why politicians and the media are so terrified of offending feminists and women's groups.

These are mostly made up of a particularly revolting and hostile bunch of women who are quite prepared to use the most odious of tactics in order to keep alive and further their hatred of all things male.

Here is what Erin Pizzey - the very founder of the Refuge Centres for Battered Women - has to say. All through my career, as a journalist, a writer and a social reformer, I have been hounded and bullied by feminist women and their coat-trailing 'new men.'

And this is what recently happened to Professor Christina Hoff Sommers ...

From: Christina Sommers

I enclose a statement I wrote about the event.

Statement by Christina Hoff Sommers regarding participation in a Health and Human Services program "Boy Talk : A Dialogue About the Health and Well Being of Boys in America"

On November 1, 2001 I served as an invited panelist at a program sponsored by the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) at Heath and Human Services (HHS). The program was entitled "Boy Talk: A Dialogue About the Heath and Well Being of Boys in America." Before I describe the ugly treatment to which I was subjected, I shall describe my background.

I am a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. I have written a well-received book on boys (The War Against Boys Simon & Schuster, 2000). The book was excerpted for a cover story in The Atlantic Monthly and was selected as a "notable book of the year" by The New York Times. So, now I am frequently invited to speak about boys at conferences around the country. In the past year, I have delivered a keynote address at International Coalition of Boys Schools, read a paper at a scholarly conference on boys at Morehouse College, and addressed audiences at dozens of schools and colleges. Without exception, audiences and panels have hitherto been courteous and civil. The HHS panel on November 1st was very much the exception. Here is what happened.

My panel "What is Being Done for Boys?" convened at 1:30. The first speaker was Joe Ereneta, a young man from San Francisco who works for Lyric, a group that offers help to gay and lesbian youths, bisexual and transgendered youth. He was followed by Marvin Eisner from the Urban Institute who gave a talk that was well-structured and contained information critical to any successful program for boys. Eisner emphasized the importance of evidence-based programs and the necessity of rigorous follow-up evaluation. The focus on evidence and outcomes seemed to exasperate some members of the HHS staff. In the middle of his talk, he was interrupted by an HHS official, Ms. Luisa Pollard, who criticized him for being off the point. Her objection was lengthy and somewhat incoherent. Mr. Eisner was flustered and never able to finish.

Now it was my turn. I cited research showing that boys were at greater risk than girls for academic failure and for drug and alcohol disabilities. But I cautioned HHS to be careful in its remedies. There is no good evidence that gender-specific drug and alcohol programs are better than gender-neutral programs. HHS has invested millions of dollars in a highly dubious program called "Girl Power!" The new program for boys ( "Boy Talk") looks very much like Girl Power!. It was my intention to suggest that the HHS officials first do some careful studies of Girl Power! before replicating it for boys. But before I could explain these concerns, I was cut off by Ms. Linda Bass, another HHS official. (She is Acting Branch Chief in the Public Education Branch of the Center for Substance Abuse and Prevention. ) She called out from her chair that I had not been invited there to talk about "Girl Power!" She instructed me to move on and to leave that subject alone. I politely explained to her and the audience that if HHS was launching a program for boys modeled on "Girl Power!" it was essential that the Girl Power! be evaluated for effectiveness. A furious Ms. Bass insisted again that I drop the subject. I was ordered not to talk about Girl Power! I was startled by her behavior and her efforts to muzzle me. It soon proved impossible to finish the comments I had been invited to present.

Ms. Bass and her associate Mr. Kevin Teal (a member of the CSAP "Communication team" at HHS ) immediately called for a break. They rushed out of the room and caucused intensely for 15 minutes. I was then informed that my question and answer period was canceled. We would proceed to a "facilitated discussion" led by Mr. Teal. I asked Mr. Teal if we could take a vote to see if the audience would allow me to have a question and answer period. He did not think that was a good idea. "You can leave," said the less polite Ms. Bass.

But, I decided not to leave.This was, after all, a government-sponsored conference. I was an invited participant, author of a book on boys. All the audience members were there to share their expertise and views with HHS officials to help them with the "Boy Talk" campaign.

Mr. Teal soon lost control of the "facilitated discussion." It disintegrated into an all-out attack on social science. Several audience members attacked me and Marvin Eisen for paying so much attention to data. "You can prove anything with statistics," said one participant. Many in the room roared with approval for this insight.

I am a philosophy professor and I rarely walk away from an argument. I was troubled by the rampant ant-intellectualism in the room and I said so. I made some attempts to defend scientific methodology. If you want to help at-risk children, you need to be sure that the methods you are using are effective. This invited more opprobrium, more denunciations. Professor Jay Wade of the Department of Psychology at Fordham University delighted many in the audience when he said Shut the F*** up bitch." Miss Bass and Mr. Teal, who were officially in charge of the proceedings, did and said nothing to protect a speaker they had invited from this kind of abusive attack.

One member of the audience, Greg Orfalea , a public affairs specialist at HHS, had finally had had enough. He stood up and told the enraged professor from New York that it was inappropriate to speak to anyone in that manner. He also chastised his colleagues at CSAP for treating a guest so rudely.

I decided it was time to leave. Civil discussion was impossible. But, before I left, I stopped at the desk in the back of the room where a woman was taping the event. I requested that she send me a copy of the tape. Ms. Bass rushed over and told me that I could not have a copy and that CSAP had not decided how they were going to use it. (I now have a copy and a written transcript)

Something is seriously wrong at in the CSAP division at Heath and Human Services. I hope that someone in a position of responsibility will demand to a copy of the tape, listen to it and do something to restore some badly needed professionalism and common courtesy. No government official should be allowed to behave the way these HHS officials behaved to me.


(Also see Silencing Sommers Stanley Kurtz - 5 min)

Also see Slap That Face - Beatrix Campbell to see how just one feminist destroys the lives of so many people - in my view.

Angry Wimmin O`Beirne has hit a nerve, and now these same angry women are trying to sink the book. Their tactic is an apparent smear campaign on Charlotte Hays

Attacking The Researchers When we reported the results of the Second National Family Violence Survey the personal attacks continued and the professional critiques simply ignored methodological revisions to the measurement instrument. This round of personal attacks was much more insidious`”in particular, it was alleged that Murray had abused his wife. This is a rather typical critique in the field of family violence`”men whose research results are contrary to political correctness are labeled `perps.`

Angry Harry Analysed By Psychologists According to the Critical Research Group Angry Harry`s image of heroic masculinity is rooted in traditional ideas of manliness in which the hero is one who rejects notions of gender equality".

Yeah, right.

Hmm. Can anyone tell me where, exactly, on this website is there expressed any desire on my part for society to return to the 'traditional ideas of manliness' and where, exactly, on this website is there any suggestion that someone who rejects 'notions of gender equality' is necessarily a 'hero'?

Well. "Nowhere," is the correct answer to both questions.

And these people consider themselves to be the brains of our society!




The authors will discuss the implications of Angry Harry`s arguments for challenging or supporting efforts towards gender equality in this society.

Oh, will they now?

That's good.

But, of course, they didn't discuss these things with me, did they?

Well, of course, I don't really care; but it does irritate me to discover that even supposedly lofty academics cannot understand my various pontifications.

But, then again, as I have often pointed out, these so-called academics are nowadays little more than politically-corrected robots with not much in the way of intellect. They have been completely brainwashed throughout their lives and are incapable of stepping out of the mental boxes in which they have become entrapped. "Men are abusers and women are abused," is about the only refrain that rattles around inside their empty heads.

It is this refrain that gets them promoted up the career ladder. And so they learn it well.

For example, ...

How Feminists Do Their 'Research' When Suzanne Steinmetz revealed that women are often as violent as their husbands, the fem-fascists started a whispering campaign designed to block her promotion at the University of Delaware. When that didn`t work, they phoned in a bomb threat at her daughter`s wedding. Cowed by the threats, Steinmetz soon suspended her pioneering research. Carey Roberts

Ho Hum.

Never mind.

But, I repeat, there is nowhere on this website where I particularly endorse 'traditional ideas of manliness' nor anywhere do I make the suggestion that resisting (their stupid bankrupt notions of) 'gender equality' is especially heroic.


I'm in a bad mood now.

So here's this! ...

Suffragettes 'were like al-Qa'eda' A new thesis published this week claims that the "so-called heroines" of the fight for the vote for women actually delayed progress by their "carefully calculated, stage managed, cold-blooded crimes".

Men Are Doomed The scientists predicting the demise of the Y get furious emails from men denouncing them as "man-haters". One website that pelts Jones,, rants that men will prevail over women, who are described as Marxists and Nazis. Maureen Dowd


Angry Harry mentioned in the Sydney Morning Herald - and in Maureen Dowd's book!

Yo! - again!

But, of course, Mzzzz Dowd is telling lies - something that media feminists do all the time in order to demonise men - the evidence for which is strewn all over this website.

Lies. Lies. Lies.

There is nowhere on this website where I describe women as Marxists or Nazis.

Harlots, hussies, harridans and ho's: Yes indeed.

But, 'Nazis'?


(Also see, Biologist Steven Jones - A Parasite? and Feminism and Nazism.)

Women Who Make the World Worse Women Who Make the World Worse shows how feminism has devastated American society: fracturing families; making American schools and workplaces into battlefields to advance feminist causes; and exalting working women among mothers and consigning millions of children to a soulless upbringing by daycare center employees. Through it all, O'Beirne shows that feminists have poisoned American public discourse about gender issues with politically charged claptrap about how a hostile patriarchy makes women its helpless victims. Kate O'Beirne

Suffragettes Planned To Kill PM Suffragettes planned to assassinate the Prime Minister early in the last century and honed their gun skills at a shooting range, according to Home Office advisers investigating the threat.

Their memorandum, from 1909, describes pickets at the House of Commons as `half-insane women` who intended to commit acts of violence.
From: Dr. Reena Sommer


I'd like to add my comments to the discussion of lesbian violence, DV in general as well as respond to feedback on the Susan Thread.....

When my own research on female perpetrated violence first came out (1992), the feminists jumped all over me with criticisms. They took offence at my reporting that there are just as many women who use physically abusive tactics as they are men. Because I was also a woman, they had a particularly difficult time dealing with me and my findings. They saw me as a defender of men and as a traitor to women. When they tried to argue that men are "inherently" violent and that any discussion of women's violence was another attempt by the "male proletariat" to further subjugate women, I countered with the research on lesbian abuse which reports that rates of reported abuse in this population are equivalent to those found among heterosexual couples.

The feminists then used a different line of defence by arguing that women's abuse toward men was purely in self defence. That too became problematic when I reported my research finding that more than 85% of women who had used abusive tactics reported that it was for reasons other than self defence.

Back in 1990's, the feminist organizations were an extremely powerful lobby. Through their efforts they shaped public perception and were successful in securing considerable funding to advance their positions and run women's shelters throughout the U.S. and Canada. However, investigations showed that the research put out by feminist led groups was methodologically unsound and/or biased and that shelters were either inflating their occupancy rates and/or they were filling their beds with women who were not abuse victims, but were new immigrants/refugees in need of housing.

 Domestic Violence - It's Always The Same Women
We are told by the UK Home Office that 25% of women experience domestic violence at some time in their lives, which means that 75% of women NEVER experience it. Further, we are told that, every year, 10% of ALL women experience domestic violence.

Now, this 10% must come exclusively from the 25% of women who do experience domestic violence at some time in their lives.

It follows, therefore, that from this sub-group of 25% of women, a whopping 40% of them are experiencing domestic violence EVERY YEAR!

In other words, it is the same women - EVERY YEAR - who are claiming to be the victims of domestic violence.

Let me simplify for non-mathematicians.

Imagine that there are 100 women in the entire population. According to the Home Office, 75 of them never experience domestic violence throughout their entire lives. So, let's forget about them.

25 of them do experience some domestic violence in their lives.

But, according to the Home Office again, 10 women out of the original 100 women will experience domestic violence.


But these 10 women must come out of the 25 women who have experienced domestic violence at some stage in their lives.

None of these allegedly-violated women can be from the group of 75 women who have never experienced domestic violence.

And so it must be the case that it is the SAME women allegedly experiencing domestic violence - year after year after year after year.

There is no other way of interpreting the figures.

And this implies that, being the common denominator - year after year after year after year - these women are actually either provoking whatever it is that they claim is actually happening to them. Or they are inveterate liars.

Or, most probably, both!

And, of course, this fits in exactly with what Erin Pizzey said! "Most of the women arriving at the refuge centres were MORE violent, even toward their children, than were the men they were supposedly escaping from."

(And this also fits in with the American domestic homicide data e.g. see Only Women Are Offered An Alternative To Domestic Violence)

Further, given that somewhere around 5% of women (and this means about one million women in the UK, and five million in the USA) have a fairly severe personality disorder (e.g. BPD) and that 25% of women (about five million in the UK, and twenty-five million in the USA) admit to having considerable problems with PMS every month (which, apart from directly affecting their behaviour, interferes significantly with normal personality development and emotional competence) it is hardly surprising to find that it is the same women - pretty much - over and over again, who are finding themselves 'having serious relationship problems'.

And over-empowering these women who have psychological and emotional dysfunction through handing over to them almost exclusively the resources of the state, and with the law enforcement agencies taking draconian and unjustifiable measures almost exclusively on their unstable and irrational behalfs, we have what we see today - violence from men desperately trying to cope, an enormous number of broken families, an utter CORRUPTION of the justice system, hordes of delinquent teenagers, our prisons full to bursting point, and a growing army of citizens - mostly men - now very much either determined to question the legitimacy of their very own government or even, indeed, to undermine it as much as possible.

Further, how many men, exactly, do politicians and judges think that they can continue to provoke into rejecting wholesale their CORRUPT systems, before the number grows so large (as is occurring with our youth) that society becomes seriously destabilised?

And then what!?

January 2006

As I have often pointed out on this website, as soon as the phony and purposely misleading statistics of those in the 'abuse industry' are eventually exposed or - as in the case above - should they clearly imply that there is something 'untoward' about the alleged victims themselves, the abuse industry quickly conjures up (allegedly through some new 'research') the notion that the statistics have now all changed.

And since (as per the piece above) I and others have exposed to the public what all their previous statistics have necessarily implied  - viz; that it must be the same women experiencing domestic violence, year in, year out - those in the 'abuse industry' are now claiming that 75% of women have suffered from domestic violence! In other words, there has suddenly been a threefold increase in the number of women who say that they have experienced domestic violence in their lives.

The truth, however, is this. The domestic violence industry is mostly precious little more than a money-making, job-providing racket. And it is now worth many billions of dollars every year.

And this huge industry needs plenty of business to keep the pay cheques coming in for the thousands upon thousands of its employees.

More Men Than Women Are Victims Of Domestic Violence A 32-nation study of violence against dating partners by university partners found that about a third had been violent, and most incidents of partner violence involve violence by both the man and woman,... The second largest category was couples where the female partner was the only one to carry about physical attacks, not the male partner.

As recently as December 2005, the National Institute of Justice refused to consider applications for funding that dealt with male victims.
Police Expose 999 Time Wasters Police in Cambridgeshire have released a compilation of time-wasting calls made to 999.

Yep - and most of them are women.

(You can actually hear some of these time wasters in this short *.mp3 file.)

What the police have exposed is not only just how prepared are many women to waste everybody's time, but also the egotistical attitude that this clearly entails. Basically, these selfish women think that their exceedingly trivial problems merit the use of the resources of our overstretched emergency services.

But the calls from these women also indirectly reveal something else - though, of course, the police would never dare admit to this publicly - and this is that the number of frivolous calls made to the police concerning sex-assault and domestic violence must be positively huge.

Women right across the nation are urged every single day to see themselves as being the victims of some kind of 'abuse'. And so you can bet your last dollar that for every time-wasting call to the emergency services from some woman who wants to find her nearest Homebase store, there will be 100 women time-wasters who reckon that they have just been abused by their partners in some way.

And it is from selfish women such as these - women who think that everyone should jump to attention and cater for even their most trivial of 'needs' - that much, if not most, of the sex-assault and domestic violence data arise.

History & Civilization / First-Class Tribute to Men of Titanic
« on: April 14, 2009, 10:46:30 AM »

First-Class Tribute to Men of Titanic
Ken Ringle

Washington Post

Eighteen years ago, two TV producers and two directors at NBC were having a drink when Jim Silman mentioned his latest discovery in Washington. It was a memorial to the men on the RMS Titanic who had surrendered their places in the liner's too few lifeboats so that women and children could be saved when the great ship went down on April 15, 1912.

The memorial, at a seldom-visited site on the Washington Channel near Fort McNair, had been erected in 1931 by "the women of America" in the spirit of "lest we forget," with a program of annual wreath-layings on the anniversary of the Titanic's sinking. But the women had forgotten, Silman said. Now nobody remembered those brave men. Hell, you could barely even find the memorial.

The anniversary of the Titanic's sinking was just days away. Maybe we should go down there, the men decided, and drink a toast to the stuff those guys were made of.

Sunday night the Men's Titanic Society, its numbers now swollen to 15, gathered once again on the anniversary of the ship's sinking to once again honor "those brave men."

Dressed in black tie (Titanic passenger Benjamin Guggenheim, realizing death was inevitable, had donned evening dress in order "to die like a gentleman"), they ate a ceremonial dinner mimicking the last consumed in the Titanic's first-class dining room. Then, in the early morning hours when the great ship foundered, they adjourned to the Washington waterfront with champagne to wistfully toast the sort of manhood Alan Alda wouldn't recognize.

"Chivalry, gallantry, bravery and grace -- in these times those ideals seem to have all but disappeared," said writer David Blomquist, raising his glass in the darkness to the floodlighted statue with its outstretched arms. "But by our remembrance they are born again. And in our lives they can live again."

If those words aren't the sort you hear much on radio or television these days, maybe that's part of the point. Most members of the MTS are TV producers or directors from more ambitious days in the broadcast news industry, and there's a faint wagon-circling quality to an organization that meets just once a year, is more social than historical and views its annual observance as more a private commemoration than a public event.

"I think that first year it was a kind of tongue-in-cheek thing for the four of us," said Don Elder, now a TV producer with the Federal Trade Commission. "The anniversary fell on an Easter Sunday, and we picked up some daffodils across from WRC and went down there in the afternoon with a glass of champagne."

But like so many others, they found that the closer they got to the Titanic story, the more it started to mean to them. The next few years their toast to "those brave men" occasioned a preliminary lunch at Hogate's or the Flagship. Soon they had added a few members and were contemplating a more authentic, time-appropriate wreath-laying at night. In dress that Benjamin Guggenheim might approve of.

"It has to do with so many of us being directors," mused Chris Cavas, an independent formerly with NBC. "It's become theater without an audience. We don't take it too seriously. Or rather, we take the sacrifice of the men on the Titanic seriously, but we don't take ourselves very seriously. Except at the memorial. Oh, who knows why we do this. Maybe you'll figure it out and tell us."

"All I know is I always leave feeling much better," said Bob Vitarelli, formerly of CBS. "And not just because of the wine."

Among the dozens of organizations around the world fixated on the metaphoric resonance of the Titanic as the last symbol of human extravagance and hubris before the global reckoning of World War I, the Men's Titanic Society may be remarkable for its relative lack of interest in Titanic trivia and politics.

No one at the meeting could be found who cared much one way or the other about the recent marketing of Titanic coal lumps dredged up from the ocean floor, or of purported plans to launch luxury cruise ships to witness the salvage of a portion of the great liner's hull.

"I happen to be a ship buff," said Cavas, "but that's not really what this organization is about. It's about courage and sacrifice and grace under pressure. And about who remembers and who forgets."

There were only 16 lifeboats. Three hundred sixteen women were saved, with 57 children. More than 1,300 men -- passengers and crew -- went down with the ship after a relatively orderly evacuation of "women and children first."

"Let us remember what they faced and what they gave in those last hours," Asman concluded.

After some brief picture-taking, they lined up in front of the memorial with their glasses and their wreath of red carnations and raised their individual toasts.

"To their dignity, grace and style, but most of all tonight we toast their courage. . . . To those brave men."

"Hear! Hear!"

"To the stewards, the men who stoked the boilers, the crew who shared that bravery as much as any man in a tuxedo. . . . To those brave men."

"Hear! Hear!"

"To the young and old, the rich and the poor, the ignorant and the learned, all who gave their lives nobly to save women and children. To those brave men."

"Hear! Hear!"

"In these days of air disasters, death is sudden. . . . They had time to think and choose. . . . To those brave men."

"Hear! Hear!"

Finally, Max Schindler of NBC raised his glass. "We'd like to apologize for the women who have forgotten," he said.


% of men saved 20%
% of women saved 74%
% of children saved 55%


Yep; a greater percentage of women was saved than even children.

Now, you might think that this was just a coincidence - a happenstance - but you would be wrong.

For example, just take a look at the table below to see how much concern there is throughout the internet for the welfare of men, women and children. You will surely notice that 'women' hog the agenda when it comes to the issue of human rights to an almost unbelievable degree - and this, despite the fact that men are more often than women the victims of just about anything that you can think of.



Google Pages 05/Jun/2005




Men's Rights



Women's Rights



Children's Rights






Men's Rights



Women's Rights



Children's Rights



 (You can check the links yourself.)

One only has to look at the selfless way that men sacrificed their lives on the Titanic, where 'women and children first' was the order for escape and safety, to appreciate just how valuable the female gender was regarded by men in the recent past. This was the reality then, no matter what feminists will tell you about the 'oppression' and the 'low status' of women in those days.

Indeed, if women had been truly oppressed and seen to be of low status, then they would have been oppressed right back into their cabins while the men escaped into the lifeboats.

It is absolutely inconceivable that women would have been given priority for the lifeboats if their welfare was considered to be less important than the welfare of men.

The feminist-inspired myth that women were treated as second-class citizens in recent history is a downright lie - like so many other myths that feminists promulgate.

And these myths - and there are hundreds of them - are designed with one aim in mind - to stir up hatred towards men.

This is what you will discover, if you look closely at what feminists say and do.

Titanic Memorial, Washington DC

The inscription reads ...

To The Brave Men Who Perished In The Wreck of The Titanic, April 15, 1912.
They Gave Their Lives That Women and Children Might Be Saved.

Erected By The Women Of America, 1931
George Orwell ...

... "[Beyond hunger] The second great evil of a tramp's life--it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second--is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

"Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level, society is entirely male... at the [poverty] level men outnumber women by something like ten to one.

"The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above--even a very little above--are as far out of his reach as the moon...but there is no doubt that women never, or hardly ever, condescend to men who are much poorer than themselves.

Dense Inert Metal Explosive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME) is an experimental type of explosive that has a relatively small but effective blast radius. It is manufactured by producing a homogeneous mixture of an explosive material (such as HMX or RDX) and small particles of a chemically inert material such as tungsten. It is intended to limit the distance at which the explosion causes damage, to avoid collateral damage in warfare.

The phrase inert metal refers to a chemically inert metal that is not chemically active and therefore not part of the chemical reaction that causes the explosion, as opposed to some metals, such as aluminium that form part of the chemical reaction.

An emerging criticism of DIME weapons is that they might turn out to have strong biological effects in those who are hit by the micro-shrapnel from these types of explosives.[1]

DIME mixtures have been studied for some time,[2] but apparently only began to be adopted for weapons after the year 2000.

    * 1 Method of operation
    * 2 Toxic/carcinogenic effects
    * 3 Reported use
    * 4 See also
    * 5 References
    * 6 External links

[edit] Method of operation

DIME weapons consist of a carbon fiber casing filled with mixture of explosive and a very dense powder of a heavy metal tungsten alloy (HMTA) composed of tungsten and other metals such as cobalt and nickel or iron.

Two common HMTA alloys are:

    * rWNiCo: tungsten (91`“93%), nickel (3`“5%) and cobalt (2`“4%)
    * rWNiFe: tungsten (91`“93%), nickel (3`“5%) and iron (2`“4%)

Upon detonation of the explosive, the casing disintegrates into extremely small particles, as opposed to the shrapnel which results from the fragmentation of a metal shell casing. The HMTA powder acts as micro-shrapnel which is very lethal at close range (about 4 meters or 13 feet), but loses momentum very quickly due to air resistance, coming to a halt within approximately 40 times the diameter of the charge. This increases the probability of killing people within a few meters of the explosion while reducing the probability of causing death and injuries or damage farther away. Survivors close to the lethal zone may have their limbs amputated (as the micro shrapnel can slice through soft tissue and bone) from the HMTA micro-shrapnel embedded in their body tissue.[3]

[edit] Toxic/carcinogenic effects

The carcinogenic effects of heavy metal tungsten alloys (HMTA) have been studied by the U.S. Armed Forces since at least 2000 (along with depleted uranium (DU)). These alloys were found to cause neoplastic transformations of human osteoblast cells.[4]

A more recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study in 2005 found that HMTA shrapnel rapidly induces rhabdomyosarcoma cancers in rats.[5]

The tungsten alloy carcinogenicity may be most closely related to the nickel content of the alloys used in weapons to date. However, pure tungsten and tungsten trioxide are also suspected of causing cancer and other toxic properties, and have been shown to have such effects in animal studies.[6]

DIME wounds are considered to be untreatable because the metal is delivered in the form of small pellets rather than larger chunks of metal that could be removed with surgery.[7]

[edit] Reported use

As reported in the French national newspaper Le Monde, according to a team of journalists from the Italian State radio-television RAI, DIME-type bombs were being used in the Gaza Strip by the IDF against Palestinian targets during July/August 2006. The investigation was performed by examining the unusual wounds, and a lab analysis of the metals found in the victims' bodies was reportedly "compatible with the hypothesis" that a DIME weapon was involved. Israel denied possessing or using such weapons.[8]

Dr. Mads Gilbert and Dr. Erik Fosse, working on wounded from the 2008`“2009 Israel`“Gaza conflict, report injuries that they believe can only be caused by some new type of weapon used by Israel which they suspect are DIME bombs.[9][10][11]

[edit] See also

    * GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb

[edit] References

   1. ^ DIME: A New Horror at Question Everything, January 14, 2009
   2. ^ Cooper, Paul W. Explosives Engineering. New York: Wiley-VCH, 1996. ISBN 0-471-18636-8.
   3. ^ Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME) at
   4. ^ "Neoplastic transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by heavy metal`“tungsten alloy particles: induction of genotoxic effects". Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 1, 115-125, January 2001
   5. ^ Embedded Weapons-Grade Tungsten Alloy Shrapnel Rapidly Induces Metastatic High Grade Rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 Rats by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
   6. ^ Tungsten and Selected Tungsten Compounds - Review of Toxicological Literature
   7. ^ "Gaza: Israel under fire for alleged white phosphorus use", Christian Science Monitor, January 14, 2009, by Robert Marquand and Nicholas Blanford
   8. ^ Gaza doctors say patients suffering mystery injuries after Israeli attacks, The Guardian. October 17, 2006.
   9. ^ Is Israel Using Banned and Experimental Munitions in Gaza?, Democracy Now!. Retrieved January 19, 2009
  10. ^ Fouche G. Norwegian doctors call for investigation into weapons used on Gaza., BMJ 2009;338:b170.
  11. ^ Amira Hass (19/01/2009). "Norwegian doctor: Israel used new type of weapon in Gaza". Haaretz (Israel). Retrieved on 2009-01-19. "His best guess, he said, is that the pressure wave is caused by a dense inert metal explosive, or DIME, a type of bomb developed to minimize collateral damage. A military expert working for Human Rights Watch also told Haaretz that the nature of the wounds and descriptions given by Gazans made it seem likely that Israel used DIMEs."

[edit] External links

    * Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME)
    * How Goes the War From Here? Small diameter solutions SF Chronicle, September 12, 2006
    * Cancer worries for new U.S. bombs by Defense Tech

Health & Healing / Paraplegic Man Suffers Spider Bite, Walks Again
« on: March 13, 2009, 01:04:19 PM »
Paraplegic Man Suffers Spider Bite, Walks Again
MANTECA, Calif. (CBS) ―
[Click to zoom.] Click to enlarge
    Brown Recluse Spider

1 of 1


numSlides of totalImages
Related Links

    * Local Coverage From KOVR-TV

He's been confined to a wheelchair for 20 years. Now a paraplegic man is walking again. And his doctors call it a miracle. CBS station KOVR-TV in Sacramento went to Manteca, Calif. to find out how a spider bite helped get him back on his feet.

"I closed my eyes and then I was spinning like a flying saucer," explains David Blancarte.

A motorcycle accident almost killed David 21 years ago. At the time he might have wished he was dead.

"I asked my doctor, "sir what happened?' I can't feel my legs," said David.

Ever since, David's been relying on his wheelchair to get around. Then the spider bite. A Brown Recluse sent him to the hospital, then to rehab for eight months.

"I'm here for a spider bite. I didn't know I would end up walking," says David.

A nurse noticed David's leg spasm and ran a test on him.

"When they zapped my legs, I felt the current, I was like whoa and I yelled," he says.

He felt the current and the rush of a renewed sense of hope.

"She says,'your nerves are alive. They're just asleep," explained David.

Five days later David was walking.

"I was walking on the bar back and forth," he said.

Now David is out of the hospital and on his feet and walking.

David basks in his glory and gives a ray of hope to other hoping to walk again. The 48-year-old former boxer and dancer are taking it in stride, knowing his best days are still ahead.

David's dream is to see his 14-year-old twin daughters grow up and get married so he can walk them down the aisle and have that first dance.

(© MMIX, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

« Go Back · Print this Page
Eureka! The Banking Industry`s Problems Are Solved!
by Mike Larson   03-13-09
Mike Larson

Who knew it would be so easy? Who knew we could solve the banking industry`s collapse by simply changing how we account for assets. Eureka! Problem solved!

That seems to be the conclusion Wall Street came to earlier this week, judging by the reaction to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke`s comments at the Council on Foreign Relations on Tuesday. During that speech, Bernanke weighed in on `mark to market` accounting, saying the following:

`The ongoing move by those who set accounting standards toward requirements for improved disclosure and greater transparency is a positive development that deserves full support. However, determining appropriate valuation methods for illiquid or idiosyncratic assets can be very difficult, to put it mildly. Similarly, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate levels of loan loss reserves over the cycle.

`As a result, further review of accounting standards governing valuation and loss provisioning would be useful, and might result in modifications to the accounting rules that reduce their procyclical effects without compromising the goals of disclosure and transparency. Indeed, work is underway on these issues through the Financial Stability Forum, and the results of that work may prove useful for U.S. policymakers.`
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke`s recent comments suggest 'modifying' accounting rules might help the banking system.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke`s recent comments suggest `modifying` accounting rules might help the banking system.

What Bernanke did is shift ever so slightly toward the position of the banking industry`s apologists. These lobbyists, assorted policymakers, and pundits (including folks like Steve Forbes, who wrote an Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal the other day), are arguing `” once you cut to the chase `” the following `¦

The problem with the banks isn`t all the crappy securities and loans they`re loaded up with.

It`s not that they took on too much excessive risk, lending against assets whose value is plunging.

It`s not that they funded asinine private equity deals, stupid commercial construction deals, and dumb home purchases.

It`s that they have to mark their book of securities made up of these bundled loans to market. And they argue that the prices they could get for those securities in the markets are `artificially` low `” or in some cases, that there is NO market for them.

If only they could avoid marking those assets to market, or use their super- duper net present value and cash flow MODELS `” which, surprise, surprise, say the `real` value of those securities is higher `” then the banking system would be fine. We could all go back to the wonderful world of yesteryear.
Internal Sponsorship

War Room video online NOW!

Have you ever wished you could eavesdrop on successful investors as they talked about their investment strategies?

Want to learn how to grow your wealth in one of the worst economic times in recent memory?

Here is your chance `“ and it`s FREE!

Click here for more information `¦

There`s just one problem `¦

Pretending Something`s Worth More Than It Is Doesn`t Change Reality!

Look, the problem isn`t that there`s NO market for these bad securities. The problem isn`t that the prices are `artificially` low. The problem isn`t how we account for these assets. The problem is that the industry doesn`t want to acknowledge that today`s prices are the REAL prices.

There are tons of bidders out there for this crappy paper `¦ at the RIGHT price. Vulture funds, hedge funds, private equity investors: They`re all raising billions and billions of dollars to scoop up cheap real estate, inexpensive bundles of mortgage backed securities, and distressed buyout loans.

But sellers don`t want to admit reality. They`re not hitting the buyer`s bids. They`re hanging on to the garbage securities, hoping against hope that they won`t have to sell at the true market prices. And the government is busy trying to figure out ways to prop up the price of the garbage rather than forcing banks to take their medicine now, even if it means the result is that they have to temporarily be nationalized or put into receivership.
There are plenty of buyers for bad paper `” but too few sellers willing to hit buyers' bids.
There are plenty of buyers for bad paper `” but too few sellers willing to hit buyers` bids.

I understand why this is occurring: Policymakers are afraid of mass insolvencies. So they`re trying to figure out how to do something akin to the early 1980s use of Regulatory Accounting Principles (RAP), which papered over insolvencies in the Savings & Loan industry.

Of course, papering over the problem didn`t mean it went away. No surprise, then, that the unofficial nickname for RAP used to be Creative Regulatory Accounting Principles; you can figure out the acronym yourself.

Worse, many of the S&Ls that were granted forbearance were also allowed to try to grow their way out of insolvency. They increasingly gambled on new ventures, especially commercial real estate, to do so. Result: They eventually blew up anyway `” at a much LARGER cost to U.S. taxpayers.

This strategy of delay, stall, and hope has another more recent analog: It`s exactly what we saw in the early days of the housing market downturn. Sales VOLUME dried up, while the SUPPLY of homes for sale surged.
Internal Sponsorship

It doesn`t matter if you`re age 20 or 70 `¦
RIGHT NOW Is the Time to
Take Charge of Your Retirement!

The financial crisis and ensuing stock market crash have wiped out at least $7 trillion in wealth.

Your ability to retire has never been more threatened than it is today.

While the outlook might seem bleak, this is actually the perfect time to take a look at your retirement strategy!

Click here for more information on a worry-free retirement `¦

Yet reported median prices didn`t decline. I lost count of how many people asked me: If the market is so bad, why aren`t prices falling? I answered that fewer and fewer buyers were paying inflated prices, holding up the median.

But the huge build up in supply and dramatic fall off in the sales pace meant it was just a matter of time. The TRUE, underlying market value of U.S. homes was declining; it just wasn`t being acknowledged by most sellers yet. Sure enough, the numbers eventually took a dramatic turn for the worse. It`s kind of like those old Road Runner cartoons, where the coyote runs over the cliff but doesn`t start plunging until he looks down.
It was just a matter of time before the true, underlying market value of U.S. homes sharply declined.
It was just a matter of time before the true, underlying market value of U.S. homes sharply declined.

My Prescription: Deal with the Problem Head On!

The longer the industry tries to push out the day of reckoning `¦ and the longer Washington pretends the problem is accounting rules (or even worse, short sellers, who also were cast as the latest bogeyman for the banking sector) `¦ the longer this recession is going to drag on. It also increases the chance we end up like Japan, with zombie institutions consuming more and more government dollars even as the economy stagnates.

Think I`m crazy? Then consider this: If institutions just bit the bullet a year or two ago, and unloaded all this crappy paper at the then-available prices, they would be in clover today. They would have gotten much higher prices for these assets.

But they followed the delay, stall, and hope doctrine `” and instead of learning from that mistake and changing course, they`re STILL making the same mistake today. They`re still saying their modeled prices are the `real` prices and that anyone who suggests otherwise doesn`t know what he`s talking about. They say if the accounting procedures are modified, and the regulators forebear, everything will be fine down the road.

That strategy didn`t work for the S&Ls in the 1980s. It didn`t work in Japan in the 1990s. It hasn`t worked so far this time around. And I don`t think it will work in the future.

Until next time,


About Money and Markets

For more information and archived issues, visit

Money and Markets (MaM) is published by Weiss Research, Inc. and written by Martin D. Weiss along with Tony Sagami, Nilus Mattive, Sean Brodrick, Larry Edelson, Michael Larson and Jack Crooks. To avoid conflicts of interest, Weiss Research and its staff do not hold positions in companies recommended in MaM, nor do we accept any compensation for such recommendations. The comments, graphs, forecasts, and indices published in MaM are based upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates
but must be considered hypothetical in as much as we do not track the actual prices investors pay or receive. Regular contributors and staff include Kristen Adams, Andrea Baumwald, John Burke, Amber Dakar, Dinesh Kalera, Red Morgan, Maryellen Murphy, Jennifer Newman-Amos, Adam Shafer, Julie Trudeau, Jill Umiker, Leslie Underwood and Michelle Zausnig.

Attention editors and publishers! Money and Markets issues can be republished. Republished issues MUST include attribution of the author(s) and the following short paragraph:

    This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit

From time to time, Money and Markets may have information from select third-party advertisers known as `external sponsorships.` We cannot guarantee the accuracy of these ads. In addition, these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see our terms and conditions.

© 2009 by Weiss Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

15430 Endeavour Drive, Jupiter, FL 33478

2009 / ISPs must comply with snooping law from Sunday
« on: March 13, 2009, 01:00:58 PM »
ISPs must comply with snooping law from Sunday
Service providers will have to provide customer records on demand

Written by Tom Young

Computing, 11 Mar 2009

UK ISPs will be required to hand over records of customers` internet surfing habits, including IP addresses and times of use, to police and intelligence agencies from Sunday.

As part of the EU Data Retention Directive, all ISPs must retain customers` names, addresses and user IDs, as well as records of email and internet telephony communications, for a year.

ISPs have been given an extra 18 months to comply with the regulations after some smaller providers complained of a heavy administrative burden ­ phone companies are already subject to the law.

The Internet Service Providers` Association said most firms are ready for the legislation. `We have made our members aware of what is required and as far as we know they will all be compliant,` said a spokesman.

The legislation builds on existing voluntary arrangements the companies have with law enforcement agencies in the UK where information is freely provided.

The UK ISP industry has always maintained that the existing voluntary agreement was adequate and that the legislation would impose a disproportionate financial burden.

But some providers in foreign countries have not been so quick to co-operate, and the European Commission felt legislation was needed as terrorist organisations are increasingly using the internet as a communication tool.

ISPs in Ireland and Slovakia have tried to bring legal cases to prevent the laws being implemented, but have been unsuccessful.

Some respondents to the UK`s consultation on implementing the directive said they had had little or no dialogue with the Home Office concerning the complex issues of retaining data ­ the Home Office has since set up an implementation group to help them comply.

And as a further olive branch to the industry, the government has said it will meet the additional costs of complying with regulations.

The data must be kept in a form that is easily accessible to law enforcement, but can only be disclosed in relation to specific cases ­ meaning that agencies will not get free access to the records without providing a reason.

The Home Office said the laws for ISPs would be formally introduced on 6 April.

Heaven Above / Our Pigs, Our Food, Our Health (DCS)
« on: March 13, 2009, 12:59:15 PM »
Our Pigs, Our Food, Our Health
Nicholas D. Kristof/The New York Times

Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: March 11, 2009

Skip to next paragraph
On the Ground

Nicholas Kristof addresses reader feedback and posts short takes from his travels.
Go to Blog » Go to Columnist Page »
Health Guide: MRSA Infection
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Nicholas D. Kristof
Enlarge This Image
Nicholas D. Kristof/The New York Times

Dr. Tom Anderson's daughter, Lily, and, wife, Cindi, in Camden, Indiana. Dr. Anderson treated an epidemic of MRSA infections before he died.

The late Tom Anderson, the family doctor in this little farm town in northwestern Indiana, at first was puzzled, then frightened.

He began seeing strange rashes on his patients, starting more than a year ago. They began as innocuous bumps `” `pimples from hell,` he called them `” and quickly became lesions as big as saucers, fiery red and agonizing to touch.

They could be anywhere, but were most common on the face, armpits, knees and buttocks. Dr. Anderson took cultures and sent them off to a lab, which reported that they were MRSA, or staph infections that are resistant to antibiotics.

MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) sometimes arouses terrifying headlines as a `superbug` or `flesh-eating bacteria.` The best-known strain is found in hospitals, where it has been seen regularly since the 1990s, but more recently different strains also have been passed among high school and college athletes. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that by 2005, MRSA was killing more than 18,000 Americans a year, more than AIDS.

Dr. Anderson at first couldn`t figure out why he was seeing patient after patient with MRSA in a small Indiana town. And then he began to wonder about all the hog farms outside of town. Could the pigs be incubating and spreading the disease?

`Tom was very concerned with what he was seeing,` recalls his widow, Cindi Anderson. `Tom said he felt the MRSA was at phenomenal levels.`

By last fall, Dr. Anderson was ready to be a whistle-blower, and he agreed to welcome me on a reporting visit and go on the record with his suspicions. That was a bold move, for any insinuation that the hog industry harms public health was sure to outrage many neighbors.

So I made plans to come here and visit Dr. Anderson in his practice. And then, very abruptly, Dr. Anderson died at the age of 54.

There was no autopsy, but a blood test suggested a heart attack or aneurysm. Dr. Anderson had himself suffered at least three bouts of MRSA, and a Dutch journal has linked swine-carried MRSA to dangerous human heart inflammation.

The larger question is whether we as a nation have moved to a model of agriculture that produces cheap bacon but risks the health of all of us. And the evidence, while far from conclusive, is growing that the answer is yes.

A few caveats: The uncertainties are huge, partly because our surveillance system is wretched (the cases here in Camden were never reported to the health authorities). The vast majority of pork is safe, and there is no proven case of transmission of MRSA from eating pork. I`ll still offer my kids B.L.T.`s `” but I`ll scrub my hands carefully after handling raw pork.

Let me also be very clear that I`m not against hog farmers. I grew up on a farm outside Yamhill, Ore., and was a state officer of the Future Farmers of America; we raised pigs for a time, including a sow named Brunhilda with such a strong personality that I remember her better than some of my high school dates.

One of the first clues that pigs could infect people with MRSA came in the Netherlands in 2004, when a young woman tested positive for a new strain of MRSA, called ST398. The family lived on a farm, so public health authorities swept in `” and found that three family members, three co-workers and 8 of 10 pigs tested all carried MRSA.

Since then, that strain of MRSA has spread rapidly through the Netherlands `” especially in swine-producing areas. A small Dutch study found pig farmers there were 760 times more likely than the general population to carry MRSA (without necessarily showing symptoms), and Scientific American reports that this strain of MRSA has turned up in 12 percent of Dutch retail pork samples.

Now this same strain of MRSA has also been found in the United States. A new study by Tara Smith, a University of Iowa epidemiologist, found that 45 percent of pig farmers she sampled carried MRSA, as did 49 percent of the hogs tested.

The study was small, and much more investigation is necessary. Yet it might shed light on the surge in rashes in the now vacant doctor`s office here in Camden. Linda Barnard, who was Dr. Anderson`s assistant, thinks that perhaps 50 people came in to be treated for MRSA, in a town with a population of a bit more than 500. Indeed, during my visit, Dr. Anderson`s 13-year-old daughter, Lily, showed me a MRSA rash inflaming her knee.

`I`ve had it many times,` she said.

So what`s going on here, and where do these antibiotic-resistant infections come from? Probably from the routine use `” make that the insane overuse `” of antibiotics in livestock feed. This is a system that may help breed virulent `superbugs` that pose a public health threat to us all. That`ll be the focus of my next column, on Sunday.

I invite you to visit my blog, On the Ground. Please also join me on Facebook, watch my YouTube videos and follow me on Twitter.

General / Who™s behind Madoff? (copycat the_skunk material)
« on: March 13, 2009, 12:57:40 PM »
Who`s behind Madoff?
Forest Hills, New York. (Photo by Complicated )

What links might there be between Madoff and the Jewish Mafia and Forest Hills?

Wayne Madsen, at Online Journal, 19 Feb 2009, asked Who`s behind Madoff?

According to Wayne Madsen:

1. Part of Madoff`s Ponzi scheme was Madoff Energy LLC and a number of other energy groups.

There are links between these and Texas oil and natural gas industry interests, "some close to the Bushes and Dick Cheney."

2. Madoff`s Ponzi scheme was part of a larger operation.

Allegedly, this larger operation involved top people from the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations, as well as the Russian-Israeli Mafia.

3. One of the investors in Madoff`s scam was the Bank of New York (BONY).

4. BONY was the subject of a Wayne Madsen Report on the activities of the Russian-Israeli mob:

"Forest Hills has been identified by the FBI as a major center for both the Russian-Israeli Mafia and Mossad and it is a place where the two interests often cooperate.

OPERATION SPIDERWEB was a joint FBI-EUROPOL operation in 2002.

It led to the arrest of 20 Russian-Israeli dual citizens on charges of money laundering.

The laundering involved the Bank of New York (BONY) and other groups.

Marc Rich

The money-laundering network included a firm called Benex.

Benex is connected to 'Bill Clinton-pardoned Mossad figure' Marc Rich.

Benex`s office was in Forest Hills in the same building where Grigori Loutchansky had the HQs of two of his companies.

"Loutchansky is a Latvian-born Israeli who laundered billions through his Vienna-based NORDEX firm.

"National Security Agency (NSA) signals intercepts have reportedly yielded intelligence on Loutchansky`s role in the smuggling of nuclear materials.

"Loutchansky also was closely linked to Clinton`s 1996 re-election campaign through New York real estate magnate and Democratic donor Sam Dombs. . . .


Forest Hills was also the hometown of international diamond dealer Yehuda Abraham.

Abraham was convicted in a plot to smuggle surface-to-air missile launchers from Russia into the United States, four months after 9/11.

"The network was discovered to have links with the Viktor Bout weapons smuggling network and money laundering facilities linked to 'Al Qaeda' Southeast Asia affiliate Jemaah Islamiyah.

"Abraham, an Afghan Jew, was linked not only to Mossad but to the Saudi Royal Family."

Yehuda Abraham

Obama`s attorney general, Eric Holder, was the Clinton administration`s deputy attorney general who approved the eleventh hour Clinton pardon for Rich.

5. Another Madoff investor was Mellon Financial Services. On July 8, 2008, WMR reported:

"A February 27, 2008, truck theft of backup data tapes from Bank of New York Mellon Corporation`s Jersey City Shareholder Services unit has the hallmarks of an organized crime heist.

"Shareholders of the Walt Disney Company, John Hancock Financial Services (a division of Manulife Financial Corporation), People`s United Bank of Connecticut, and the Bank of New York were informed that their stock sale transactions may have been compromised."

6. Obama`s Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, is a former chairman of the Board of the Walt Disney Company.

7. "WMR has learned from a U.S. intelligence source in the Middle East that much of the $50 billion scammed by Madoff is now in Israeli banks and other financial contrivances established to secretly launder the ill-gotten loot."

8. "The Madoff Ponzi scheme may also be linked to the revelations by former Liechtenstein LGT bank employee Heinrich Kieber of secret off-shore accounts held by tax-evading politicians and businessmen in the United States and other countries, as well as the Clearstream entity in Luxembourg that involved allegations of a slush fund used to finance the political ambitions of France`s neocon president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and other right-wing politicians."

9. "Harry Markopolos, a former investment manager-turned-investigator, recently told the US House Financial Services Subcommittee that the SEC failed to take action against Madoff when Markopolos repeatedly warned the regulatory agency of the Ponzi scheme activities of Madoff, a former chairman of NASDAQ.

"The hearing at which Markopolos testified was chaired by Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), whose 5th congressional district adjoins the 9th congressional district of Forest Hills and Rego Park, a nexus for Russian-Israeli mob activity in the New York City area."

10. On February 9, the SEC announced that Linda Thomsen, the agency`s top enforcement official, was resigning to 'pursue opportunities in the private sector.'


Original material copyright © 2008

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report (subscription required).

Will there be 'wild card' extraterrestrial UFO landings worldwide in 2012 or beyond?


March 12, 10:50 AM · 21 comments
White House: Obama inauguration speech, Moscow

Part I in a multi-part series on possible `wild card` ET/UFO mass landings

There is converging objective predictive evidence, expert opinion, exopolitical policy analysis, and extraterrestrial contactee communications supporting a hypothesis that large scale `wild card` event(s), involving mass extraterrestrial (UFO) sightings or landings over major urban or other visible centers on the planet for peaceful purposes may occur during the period leading up to 2011-12 or beyond.  

`Wild card` events are low probability, high impact events

In future studies, John Petersen author of 'Out of The Blue - How to Anticipate Big Future Surprises' defines `wild card` events as `Low Probability, High Impact events that, were they to occur, would severely impact the human condition.  A low probability event does not mean, however, that the event cannot be identified and predicted within the parameters of scientific research or expert-based opinion`.

Exopolitics as the science of relations between human civilization and other intelligent civilizations in the Universe, draws on a number of data sources in arriving at conclusions or operating hypotheses about `wild card` events like mass extraterrestrial (UFO) sightings or landings over human urban centers.   Assuming it is not a `false flag` event created by a human military intelligence power, an authentic worldwide extraterrestrial (UFO) mass sighting or landing, when and if it would occur, would severely impact the human condition.   Extraterrestrial civilizations are stakeholders in the arena of our solar system and the galaxies, and the creation of such a `wild card` mass event is within their power.

Exopolitics & future studies

Exopolitics, like other sciences, can draws upon diverse data sources in reaching conclusions about `wild card` events.   Exopolitical data sources can include reports from extraterrestrial contactees with ethical extraterrestrial civilizations; policy analysis of relations between leading human military space powers (such as the United States) and ethical extraterrestrial civilizations now visiting earth; `` analysis using compilations of internet spiders; and even reports of reverse speech analysis of major announcements by significant human leaders, such as U.S. president Barack Obama.   Each of these involves `identifying and predicting an event within the parameters of scientific research or expert-based opinion`.

In this sense, the exopolitical study of a `wild card` extraterrestrial (UFO) mass landing is functionally similar to a futurist`s study of the UFO mass landing `wild card` event.  The only difference is that mainstream futurists do not yet include a `UFO mass landing` in their menu of significant `wild card` events because mainstream futurology paradigm excludes the existence the extraterrestrial presence, most probably because of the effect of the 1953 CIA Robertson panel, which excluded extraterrestrial affairs from public discourse under penalty of professional ridicule.

Reverse speech identification & ET/UFO `wild card` event

On February 20, 2009, this column introduced reverse speech evidence of a future extraterrestrial UFO `wild card` event by Canadian speech recognition expert and former CBS radio producer Jon Kelly in an article entitled, Barack Obama`s inaugural speech predicts `extraterrestrial event` on scale of Iraq war says expert.

With over 10 years of clinical practice and hundreds of publicly witnessed demonstrations Jon Kelly is one of the world's most sought-after practitioners in the field of secret backwards messages. Jon's professional speech recognition experience includes a F500 President's Club, member national board of directors for non-profit UN NGO, CBS radio feature producer of The Secret Message Report, BBC, DR Berlin, Fox News, Coast to Coast and #1-rated US television shows. Using reverse speech, Jon accurately reported the "Shock and Awe" strikes that opened the Iraq War 2 years in advance.

In other words, Jon Kelly has a public track record of accuracy using reverse speech to predict public events of some consequence, including extraterrestrial-related public events and/or public figures.  Jon has appeared on a number of past radio shows as my guest, and has objectively used reverse speech analysis with remarkable accuracy on former President George W. Bush and his Shock & Awe illegal invasion of Iraq; former U.S. president Bill Clinton, 2008 U.S. Republican presidential candidate John McCain, and former astronaut Edgar Mitchell, PhD.

My February 20, 2009 article was followed by a March 7, 2009 interview with Jon Kelly on in an interview listened to in 81 countries and all 50 states of the U.S. on our EXOPOLITICS RADIO affiliates.

In that interview, Jon amplified on his interpretation and comments of the secret messages he had found encoded in backward speech in Barack Obama`s inaugural address of January 20, 2001, using the science of reverse speech analysis in the mode of an expert in that science.

Radio interview: Obama`s inaugural address contains reverse speech messages about ET/UFO `wild card` events

In the 35-minute radio interview, Jon Kelly reviews how reverse speech analysis of Barack Obama's inaugural address reveals secret, subconscious messages about large-scale extraterrestrial events during the years of the Obama administration.   Obama`s first term of office runs through January 20, 2013.  If re-elected, he will be in office through January 20, 2017.

The interview covers Kelly's analysis of how George W. Bush's inaugural address of January 20, 2001 revealed subconscious reverse speech secret messages about war - the Iraq war, 2 years before the illegal invasion of Iraq.  As opposed to Bush, Obama's subconscious messages are not about war during his administration. Obama`s secret messages are about predominant extraterrestrial events during his presidency.  

Kelly states that the same way that the George W. Bush presidency was characterized by war; the Obama presidency years may be characterized by large-scale extraterrestrial events or extraterrestrial impacts in our terrestrial society.

In the interview, Jon Kelly agrees that Obama`s secret messages can be analyzed to include alternative possibilities: a large-scale extraterrestrial event, the emergence of ET-derived energy, and/or large-scale extraterrestrial disclosure by terrestrial authorities and/or by extraterrestrials themselves.

Jon stressed in the interview that even though the reverse speech signal was `weak` he stood by his analysis. One point that Jon mentioned was that he performed a visual wave analysis of Obama`s speech on his computer, as well as an auditory analysis of the reverse speech as part of his methodology.

My earlier publication in of Jon`s reverse speech analysis of Obama`s inaugural address as a possible UFO extraterrestrial `wild card` event caused some public controversy, fueled principally by one particular reverse speech analyst, David Oates.

Listen to Interview: can listen to the radio interview with Jon Kelly here.

Jon Kelly vs. David Oates:  Interpretation vs. Gatekeeping

Reverse speech expert David Oates began a public attack on Jon Kelly`s analysis shortly after the publication of my original February 20, 2009 article that set out Jon Kelly`s reverse speech analysis of Obama`s inaugural address as predicting a possible ET/UFO wild card event.  These attacks by Oates culminated on a broadcast interview on with David Oates, in which David sets out a series of methodological objections to Jon`s conclusions about Obama`s reverse speech.  

Included in David Oates` rebuttal is a reverse speech analysis of a fragment from a Barack Obama speech on health care policy.  The core problem with David Oates` analysis is that it supports Jon Kelly`s analysis.   There is virtually no distinction between the Oates analysis of Obama reverse speech Oates selects (health care policy) and the Kelly analysis of Obama reverse speech Kelly selects (inaugural address).

Moreover, there may be a history of personal animus between the two parties here (David Oates and Jon Kelly) that precipitated David Oates` confrontational intervention in a public analysis of a key question of social importance: whether an extraterrestrial UFO wild card event was announced in Barack Obama`s inaugural speech by his subconscious.

Listen to interview: readers can listen to the interview here.  My opinion? Caveat Lector `“ let the listener beware.

Readers can listen both to the interview by Jon Kelly and the interview of David Oates, evaluate and make their own decisions about the probability of a future extraterrestrial UFO `wild card` event.  

The Oates interview, in my opinion, unfairly disparages the Jon Kelly reverse speech analysis.  Functionally, and David Oates attempt to gate keep from the listener`s mind an important future `wild card` event `“ that of a global `wild card` extraterrestrial event, as announced in Obama`s inaugural address in reverse speech.  

One can ask `“ why does a seemingly petty methodological argument about a frontier science like reverse speech analysis between Kelly and Oates matter?  Why does a petty media rivalry between and matter?  

Well, gate keeping from the U.S. and global public possible reverse speech secret messages from the subconscious of Barack Obama in his inaugural address about what a major dimension encompassing his presidency might be about `“ extraterrestrial/UFO wild card events or disclosure, matters a great deal.  

The issue of gate keeping about a possible `wild card` extraterrestrial UFO event, an event that the secret government has been attempting to suppress, is at stake in the Kelly-Oates debate. Military-intelligence forces attempting to suppress this issue may have recently assassinated at least one important government whistleblower witness to the details of a `wild card` extraterrestrial/UFO landing in 2012.

A major USA radio station, in a mainstream radio news production in the United States, first broadcast Kelly`s Obama reverse speech prediction. Jon Kelly contacted me with the story as a news source because his dial tone was cut off by some external agency the night before the radio interview in the U.S., and he entrusted me with the story as a backup, because I have done radio programs with him on reverse speech and major public figures over the past several years. With his permission, I broke the story in print on after publishing several preliminary articles in my series on the Obama administration and extraterrestrial life to provide historical context and points of reference.

Jon Kelly is a courageous and learned individual and a Canadian who will travel to do media interviews from Canada into the United States despite harassment by military intelligence agencies.  U.S. military intelligence will harass persons with inside knowledge on ethical extraterrestrial civilization`s possible `wild card` strategy for 2012. Jon has spent many years studying reverse speech analysis and is a leading expert in the field. His results and historical accuracy speak for themselves.

ET/UFO "wild card" events & journalistic responsibility

To avoid reporting on these possible `wild card` events, as and David Oates would have us do would be the height of journalistic and exopolitical irresponsibility. Analysis of the possibility of an ET/UFO wild card event announced by U.S. President Barack Obama is probably one of the most responsible exercises in exopolitical journalism at this moment in history.  

In fact, at the deepest level, as observers we may see playing out here in public view of an exopolitical and evolutionary drama.  Those who are swayed by the Oates analysis of Barack Obama`s unconscious reverse speech fall on one side of a future evolutionary dividing line.  

Those who reverberate with the Kelly analysis of the possibility of Obama`s unconscious announcing ethical extraterrestrial `wild card` events in his inaugural (in the same way that George W. Bush announced the Iraq war in his inaugural), fall on some other side of an important evolutionary dividing line.  Call it goats versus sheep.  It is an ancient karmic drama.

Where do you stand on the issue of a future extraterrestrial UFO `wild card` event?  Unimpressed?  Uncommitted?  Pro ET/UFO `wild card`?  Pro Oates?  Your own future lies in your choice, perhaps.

Reverse speech analysis is just the beginning of the evidence.  There is strong converging evidence from government whistleblowers, from predictions, from expert opinion, from exopolitical policy analysis, and from extraterrestrial contactee communications that `wild card` global mass extraterrestrial/UFO landings may in fact occur at crucial human population centers around the world, sometime during the Obama years through 2012 or beyond.

These extraterrestrial UFO `wild card` events can severely (and beneficially) impact the human condition, and may be linked to human survival during a crucial period of alignment of our planet to the plane of the galactic center black hole.

EDITORIAL NOTE: These articles are designed as a resource in preparing for the contingencies of 2011-12, which may consist in an elevation of our collective human consciousness.

10% of the value of this article is contained in reading it.  90% of its value is contained in listening to the and interviews (above), and internalizing the profound messages Barack Obama's subconscious sent billions of fellow earthlings on his inauguration day.

Continued in Part II in a multi-part series on possible `wild card` ET/UFO mass landings

2009 / La Raza and Jews on Collision Course in Alta California
« on: March 13, 2009, 12:44:11 PM »
La Raza and Jews
on Collision Course in Alta California
There are now significant signs of an impending collision between La Raza and Jews in California. The signs were first manifested during the state's 1998 election primary when a Mexicano defeated the Jewish candidate Richard Katz in the state's 20th Senate District and when the wealthy Jew, Ron Unz, was successful in having an anti-bilingual education initiative approved by the state's electorate. The battle lines between Mexicanos and Jews in California have been drawn and they have been drawn most clearly in the City of Los Angeles.

La Raza's battle for the 20th Senate District is a perfect example of how the Jews will fight tooth and nail to maintain their dominance in state government. The victorious battle by La Raza in the 20th S.D., which is located in the middle of the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles, was only a small skirmish of a larger battle that is about to occur as we seek more equitable proportional representation in state and local governments.

The Jews of California, about 3% of the state's population, have an overwhelming and disproportionate share of the state's wealth which they utilize effectively to wield immense influence on the state's political apparatus principally through dominance of the Democratic Party. Both U.S Senators of the state are ladies of Jewish descent and there is no sector of California society, either private or public, in which Jews are not significant policy makers. The sectors that they can not control directly, they will do it indirectly through the purchase of influence as well as the cunning manipulation of ethnic and other minorities.

La Raza's victory in the 20th Senate District has been a turning point in the relationship between Mexicanos and Jews. It is the very first time that a significant clash for political control, at the state level, has taken place between the two ethnic groups.

Political representation in Los Angeles County is presently determined along racial and ethnic lines. For example, the Congressional Delegation of the county is presently divided between Mexicanos, Afro-Americans, Jews and Whites. There are four Congresspersons of Mexican descent (Becerra, Solis, Roybal, Napolitano) , three of African descent, two of Jewish descent (Waxman, Berman) and the rest are Whites. They each represent districts where the majority of the population are of the same racial or ethnic group as they are. The same is true with state assembly and state senate districts.

The 20th Senate District was one in transition where Mexicanos were barely outnumbering Jews. The race became wide open when Herschel Rosenthall, a Jew, could not run for re-election because of term limits. A very popular Mexicano by the name of Richard Alarcon, then a Los Angeles City Councilman, decided to challenge the Jewish domination of the senate district by declaring himself a candidate against the Jew Richard Katz . He won by a mere 29 votes but the bloody battle between the Jews and La Raza left a bitter aftermath that has had negative repercussions to this day.

The Jews are sore losers and they did not take the defeat graciously. They insinuated that Mexicans were racists and anti-semitic simply because we challenged them and beat them politically. They criticized Senator Richard Alarcon because during his campaign he publicized a very nice picture of himself and Catholic Cardinal Roger Mahoney. Never mind that various Jewish publications in Los Angeles, supporting Katz' campaign, had photographs of him wearing Jewish kippahs while praying at Jewish synagogues.

The battle for the 20th Senate District in California should provide a very valuable lesson for La Raza. In our political struggle for self-determination, we can not assume the certain groups will be our friends. Jews have catered for our vote in the past but when it comes our turn to share in real political power, they will turn their face and become our enemies.

Since they comprise a very small percent of the overall population, they are forced to utilize strategies outside of having the most numbers to maintain control. A principal strategy is to utilize their vast supply of funds to manipulate the political system as they are presently doing in the race for mayor of Los Angeles. They are very adept at manipulating the varied political interests as well as the interests of racial, ethnic and sexual preference minorities.

They have formed alliances with the Black community, for example, in order to put the rightful political emergence of La Raza in check as they did when a Jew/Black coalition elected Tom Bradley, the first Black mayor of Los Angeles. Later, they formed an alliance with Republicans to elect Richard Riordan as the mayor. Jews are very good at formimg alliances with anyone as long it serves their interests . They play all sides of a fence, this way they guarantee that they will always be on the winning side. What they are doing now in the present race for mayor of Los Angeles speaks volumes as to the varied and effective strategies they utilize to perpetuate their political and economic power.

Sensing that Chicanos and Mexicanos have now become an increasing challenge that can no longer be checked with their traditional methods, they have now resorted to investing in the development and empowerment of a small cadre of "vendido hispanic politicos" that they can easily manipulate to carry out their policies. One of these "politicos" is Antonio "Tony" Villargairosa who is running for mayor of Los Angeles. Tony Villargairosa was recruited from East Los Angeles and appointed a Vice-President of the Jewish run American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) which is led in southern California by a Jewish lady by the name of Ramona Ripston. Soon, with the guidance and funding of Jews, he became and Assemblyperson and eventually the Speaker of the State Assembly.

As Speaker of the Assembly, Villargairosa did nothing for La Raza. He is presently running under the "Education Banner" , but he did nothing to open up higher education for the many deserving Chicano/Mexicano students who are now left without a future. He was a member of UC Board of Regents yet he never took a leadership role in changing their racist and ethnocentric policies. He was merely a "puppet" of Jewish interests in the Assembly.

A case in point is his relationship with Jews Ron Unz and Bob Hertzberg. Ron Unz is the wealthy Jewish Mogul who funded the successful passage of the anti-Bilingual Initiative that outlawed Spanish/English bilingual education in California's public schools. This has been a devastating defeat for La Raza yet Antonio "Tony" Villargairosa awarded Ron Unz with an appointment to an Assembly Blue Ribbon Commission. Later, Ron Unz departed to Arizona where he was instrumental in passing a similar anti-Spanish language initiative there. La Raza considers Villagairosa's actions concerning Ron Unz pure treason. We can not trust him as mayor of Los Angeles because we know that he will not represent our interests. One of his Campaign Finance Officers is Eli Broad who, according to Fortune Magazine, is the richest man in Los Angeles county in addition to being Jewish.

Another example of Villargairosa's Jewish collusion is his selling-out of the Assembly Speakership to Bob Hertzberg. Bob Hertzburg is a Jewish Assemblyman that represents Assembly District 40. Assembly District 40 is one half of Senate District 20 that was won by Richard Alarcon during the bitter fight between La Raza and Jews in the district. The other half of Senate District 20 is Assembly District 39 which is predominantly Mexicano, and is represented by Tony Cardenas. Because of term limits, Villargairosa had to move on and instead of making sure that a Chicano/Mexicano would replace him as Speaker, he made a deal with the Jews and helped Bob Hetzberg become Speaker. This is a second act of treason for Villargairosa, and more proof that he is simply a lackey for Jewish interests.

Our increasing population and voting strength will, in the near future, collide with the interests of the Jews in Alta California, and for that matter, in the other regions of Aztlan. Our increasing ties with our brothers and sisters in Mexico will also present a challenge for the American Jewish community. The Mexican Dual Nationality Program means that we now have the same status with Mexico that American Jews have with Israel. We are now in the position to question the over eight billion dollars of our tax money that are sent to Israel each year, much of it which is used for military weaponry to strike out against the Palestinians, and soon we will be in the position to remind the American Jews of their shoddy treatment of Mexico when the nation's UN Ambassador voted to equate Zionism with Racism.

La Raza has been intimidated, over the years, from bringing the above issues into discussion. La Voz de Aztlan has been the victim of censorship on the Internet because we have dared to dialogue on these matters. Hate e-mail we have received from Jews has demonstrated to us that they can be as bigoted as some white supremacists and their treatment of the Palestinians in Israel shows us that they can be as racist.

Philosophy & Religion / Avoiding the Collective Karma Stuart Wilde
« on: March 09, 2009, 09:43:57 PM »
Avoiding the Collective Karma
Stuart Wilde

I have re-written this one from before, it is very topical right now`”

Your waking intellect (your personality) brings to you an instant karma. For example, if you are diligent and responsible, life tends to treat you the same way. If you're uncaring and irresponsible, you pull to you all sorts that will treat you erratically and let you down. If you are out of control emotionally and inattentive, you slip off the sidewalk and sprain your ankle; if you stay in control and focused, you complete your journeys without incident.

If you are generous, people treat you warmly, if you are mean, life treats you more harshly. Your waking intellect bends reality to suit your personality. So quite naturally, you see and comprehend life and events as you want to see them, so you may not realize you are hard on people, and yet you may wonder why life is hard on you. Karma is hidden. It doesn't usually offer explanations. You have to work things out looking inside yourself.

Beyond the intellect is your subconscious. Very few have much idea what their subconscious mind is or what information it contains. You will see it talking to you in your dreams, but it may offer you such an incoherent hotchpotch of images and feelings, you haven't much idea what it is saying.

The subconscious mind is more the 'real' you, as it doesn't have the fake concoction of the waking intellect, it just accepts your feeling and ideas and impulses, without the ability to alter them. Simply put you could say, beyond denial is the subconscious. It is the perpetual memory of everything that you are and all your innermost feelings. It's your raw self.

Your intellect ceases, when your brain stops functioning at death. But I believe your subconscious lives on in a mirror-world dimension, a parallel world that is placed opposite to this one, right is left in the world of the subconscious mind. In effect, the subconscious is what we call 'the soul'.

Jung discovered much about the collective unconscious. He said we are all linked by the same archetypes and symbols: mother, father, life, death, etc. I think Jung was right. We are all one-mind, and while you have your own karma, which is fairly instant, derived from balance and imbalance, you are also linked to a more distant 'collective karma' of your society or nation, and that is linked into an even more distant global karma.

Deep in the subconscious are your archetypal feelings and impulses: love, hate, equanimity, arrogance, each is a defined compartment; you could say each is a dimension of its own`”birds of a feather flock together in the subconscious realms. You drift into that part of the mirror-world that is comfortable for you. Where you go, your long-term karma goes with you, for your subconscious mind can pull to you a long-term individual karma many years in the becoming, as well as a more distant collective karma that belong to you as well as many others.

Your instant karma you can easily change by taking charge of your life and being more practical and living a healthier lifestyle, but your long-term collective karma is more trapping. You can't escape that as easily, unless you make moves very early on. For example, if you were a carpenter in Nagasaki in the 1940s, you had your daily instant karma, keeping your family fed say, but unbeknown to you, a collective karma approached. If you were aware of your subconscious and that of people around you, you would have left Nagasaki, and many thousands probably did. Others traveled there the day before the bomb. They came to join the collective unconscious department that accommodates for 200,000 incinerations in one day.

The trick to understanding the collective karma is to listen to what people are saying about their feelings and to watch their innermost impulses. If you watch the news you'll see the national-ego running rampant. It's all arrogance, disdain and self-interest. So you can see where the national karma might be headed. The trick is to uncouple from the collective feelings and try to discover who you really are? Do you agree with ideals being expressed or do you differ? What are your innermost feelings and impulses? You may discover that you like the shared impulses you see on the news, and if you do, you will have to accept the collective fate that that might create. The problem is you don't know exactly where the collective fate will end up. Is it Nagasaki or Nirvana?

Here is an example on how the long-term karma of America is to go bankrupt. Americans consume more than the planet can provide, eventually the supply and demand lines will creek and fall apart. If you were a citizen hoping to avoid his or her karma, you would consume less and make your ego's needs less demanding, so you could easily handle a sudden down-turn. If you were sophisticated at karma avoidance, you'd be thinking Nagasaki-style, and you'd plan a move to safety.

America, realizing she would run out of oil, went to war to capture supply lines and resources belonging to others. The long-term karma of that is she will have no oil at all. It will be taken from her. In the subconscious, you can see it quite obviously. So karma avoidance would be to get rid of the gas-guzzler, while you still can and downsize to a small car or even a scooter or moped.

It is part of the British collective mind-set to be right, people are endlessly arguing, sustaining their need to be right. In Britain, it is very much more important to be right, than to be nice. So people are rather nasty to each other, while pretending to be right, and so its long-term karma is to be found to be terribly wrong. In the olden days, honor and a gentleman's or gentlewoman's code of conduct was what held up the edifice of British life, but now that code is lacking. So the country will rot and falter.

The trick to being British is to agree to be wrong and make changes now. If you go down the path of righteous-indignation, you will fall as the country falls. The British feel they are very superior, so their long-term karma is to become inferior. They will lose their economic status. If you don't feel you are superior or right, and if status doesn't bother you, the nation's karma won't bother you at all. The French think they are important, so their long-term destiny is to be become irrelevant, funny eh?

Each of us has the option of going with the collective karma of our people, or you can vote "No" and walk in the other direction, but you have to make a move soon, as a 'collective karma' is the most trapping and the least easy to escape from. That is because people don't see it coming, because it is the result of a 'collective idea' that everyone agrees to, so that makes it seem right.

If you're very reliant on others, you are linked to their karma. The more you become self-sufficient and self-reliant, the more you are in your own karma, and the easier life is to control. If you can't make major changes, make small ones.

© Stuart Wilde 2007,2009 -

General / We Are Breeding Ourselves to Extinction
« on: March 09, 2009, 09:37:02 PM »
We Are Breeding Ourselves to Extinction
Posted on Mar 8, 2009
AP photo / Andy Wong

China has long imposed a limit of one child per family in an effort to reduce population growth.

By Chris Hedges

All measures to thwart the degradation and destruction of our ecosystem will be useless if we do not cut population growth. By 2050, if we continue to reproduce at the current rate, the planet will have between 8 billion and 10 billion people, according to a recent U.N. forecast. This is a 50 percent increase. And yet government-commissioned reviews, such as the Stern report in Britain, do not mention the word population. Books and documentaries that deal with the climate crisis, including Al Gore`s `An Inconvenient Truth,` fail to discuss the danger of population growth. This omission is odd, given that a doubling in population, even if we cut back on the use of fossil fuels, shut down all our coal-burning power plants and build seas of wind turbines, will plunge us into an age of extinction and desolation unseen since the end of the Mesozoic era, 65 million years ago, when the dinosaurs disappeared.

We are experiencing an accelerated obliteration of the planet`s life-forms`”an estimated 8,760 species die off per year`”because, simply put, there are too many people. Most of these extinctions are the direct result of the expanding need for energy, housing, food and other resources. The Yangtze River dolphin, Atlantic gray whale, West African black rhino, Merriam`s elk, California grizzly bear, silver trout, blue pike and dusky seaside sparrow are all victims of human overpopulation. Population growth, as E.O. Wilson says, is `the monster on the land.` Species are vanishing at a rate of a hundred to a thousand times faster than they did before the arrival of humans. If the current rate of extinction continues, Homo sapiens will be one of the few life-forms left on the planet, its members scrambling violently among themselves for water, food, fossil fuels and perhaps air until they too disappear. Humanity, Wilson says, is leaving the Cenozoic, the age of mammals, and entering the Eremozoic`”the era of solitude. As long as the Earth is viewed as the personal property of the human race, a belief embraced by everyone from born-again Christians to Marxists to free-market economists, we are destined to soon inhabit a biological wasteland.

The populations in industrialized nations maintain their lifestyles because they have the military and economic power to consume a disproportionate share of the world`s resources. The United States alone gobbles up about 25 percent of the oil produced in the world each year. These nations view their stable or even zero growth birthrates as sufficient. It has been left to developing countries to cope with the emergent population crisis. India, Egypt, South Africa, Iran, Indonesia, Cuba and China, whose one-child policy has prevented the addition of 400 million people, have all tried to institute population control measures. But on most of the planet, population growth is exploding. The U.N. estimates that 200 million women worldwide do not have access to contraception. The population of the Persian Gulf states, along with the Israeli-occupied territories, will double in two decades, a rise that will ominously coincide with precipitous peak oil declines.

The overpopulated regions of the globe will ravage their local environments, cutting down rainforests and the few remaining wilderness areas, in a desperate bid to grow food. And the depletion and destruction of resources will eventually create an overpopulation problem in industrialized nations as well. The resources that industrialized nations consider their birthright will become harder and more expensive to obtain. Rising water levels on coastlines, which may submerge coastal nations such as Bangladesh, will disrupt agriculture and displace millions, who will attempt to flee to areas on the planet where life is still possible. The rising temperatures and droughts have already begun to destroy crop lands in Africa, Australia, Texas and California. The effects of this devastation will first be felt in places like Bangladesh, but will soon spread within our borders. Footprint data suggests that, based on current lifestyles, the sustainable population of the United Kingdom`”the number of people the country could feed, fuel and support from its own biological capacity`”is about 18 million. This means that in an age of extreme scarcity, some 43 million people in Great Britain would not be able to survive. Overpopulation will become a serious threat to the viability of many industrialized states the instant the cheap consumption of the world`s resources can no longer be maintained. This moment may be closer than we think.

A world where 8 billion to 10 billion people are competing for diminishing resources will not be peaceful. The industrialized nations will, as we have done in Iraq, turn to their militaries to ensure a steady supply of fossil fuels, minerals and other nonrenewable resources in the vain effort to sustain a lifestyle that will, in the end, be unsustainable. The collapse of industrial farming, which is made possible only with cheap oil, will lead to an increase in famine, disease and starvation. And the reaction of those on the bottom will be the low-tech tactic of terrorism and war. Perhaps the chaos and bloodshed will be so massive that overpopulation will be solved through violence, but this is hardly a comfort.

James Lovelock, an independent British scientist who has spent most of his career locked out of the mainstream, warned several decades ago that disrupting the delicate balance of the Earth, which he refers to as a living body, would be a form of collective suicide. The atmosphere on Earth`”21 percent oxygen and 79 percent nitrogen`”is not common among planets, he notes. These gases are generated, and maintained at an equable level for life`s processes, by living organisms themselves. Oxygen and nitrogen would disappear if the biosphere was destroyed. The result would be a greenhouse atmosphere similar to that of Venus, a planet that is consequently hundreds of degrees hotter than Earth. Lovelock argues that the atmosphere, oceans, rocks and soil are living entities. They constitute, he says, a self-regulating system. Lovelock, in support of this thesis, looked at the cycle in which algae in the oceans produce volatile sulfur compounds. These compounds act as seeds to form oceanic clouds. Without these dimethyl sulfide `seeds` the cooling oceanic clouds would be lost. This self-regulating system is remarkable because it maintains favorable conditions for human life. Its destruction would not mean the death of the planet. It would not mean the death of life-forms. But it would mean the death of Homo sapiens.

Lovelock advocates nuclear power and thermal solar power; the latter, he says, can be produced by huge mirrors mounted in deserts such as those in Arizona and the Sahara. He proposes reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide with large plastic cylinders thrust vertically into the ocean. These, he says, could bring nutrient-rich lower waters to the surface, producing an algal bloom that would increase the cloud cover. But he warns that these steps will be ineffective if we do not first control population growth. He believes the Earth is overpopulated by a factor of about seven. As the planet overheats`”and he believes we can do nothing to halt this process`”overpopulation will make all efforts to save the ecosystem futile.

Lovelock, in `The Revenge of Gaia,` said that if we do not radically and immediately cut greenhouse gas emissions, the human race might not die out but it would be reduced to `a few breeding pairs.` `The Vanishing Face of Gaia,` his latest book, which has for its subtitle `The Final Warning,` paints an even grimmer picture. Lovelock says a continued population boom will make the reduction of fossil fuel use impossible. If we do not reduce our emissions by 60 percent, something that can be achieved only by walking away from fossil fuels, the human race is doomed, he argues. Time is running out. This reduction will never take place, he says, unless we can dramatically reduce our birthrate.

All efforts to stanch the effects of climate change are not going to work if we do not practice vigorous population control. Overpopulation, in times of hardship, will create as much havoc in industrialized nations as in the impoverished slums around the globe where people struggle on less than two dollars a day. Population growth is often overlooked, or at best considered a secondary issue, by many environmentalists, but it is as fundamental to our survival as reducing the emissions that are melting the polar ice caps.

General / Obama's teleprompter goes out
« on: March 09, 2009, 10:26:34 AM »
Obama's teleprompter goes out

2009 / Judge assails cases doubting Obama's citizenship
« on: March 08, 2009, 09:01:54 AM »
Judge assails cases doubting Obama's citizenship
Source: AP
URL Source: ... EnyP1Bu6Ol4zJsN94mlewD96O5TV03
Published: Mar 6, 2009
Post Date: 2009-03-08 00:33:51 by bluegrass
Ping List: *Tracking Comrade Obama*     Subscribe to *Tracking Comrade Obama*
Keywords: None
Views: 223
Comments: 45

Judge assails cases doubting Obama's citizenship


WASHINGTON (AP) `” A federal judge on Thursday threw out a lawsuit questioning President Barack Obama's citizenship, lambasting the case as a waste of the court's time and suggesting the plaintiff's attorney may have to compensate the president's lawyer.

In an argument popular on the Internet and taken seriously practically nowhere else, Obama's critics argue he is ineligible to be president because he is not a "natural-born citizen" as the Constitution requires.

In response last summer, Obama's campaign posted his Hawaiian birth certificate on its Web site. But the lawsuit argues it is a fake and that Obama was actually born in his father's homeland of Kenya, even though Hawaiian officials have said the document is authentic.

"This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to do," U.S. District Judge James Robertson said in his written opinion.

The lawsuit didn't even use Obama's legal name but called him "Barry Soetoro," the name he went by while attending elementary school in Indonesia. It's one of many that has been filed claiming Obama is ineligible to serve as president.

Robertson ordered plaintiff's attorney John Hemenway of Colorado Springs, Colo., to show why he hasn't violated court rules barring frivolous and harassing cases and shouldn't have to pay Obama's attorney, Bob Bauer, for his time arguing that the case should be thrown out.

General / Hey everyone! I figured it out!
« on: March 08, 2009, 08:38:23 AM »
There are no reptiles in other dimensions that the elite use human sacrifice to contact. There is no rockafellas plan to microchip the population. There is no kosher tax on food. There isn't an animal holocaust going on on the planet. Vegans are terrorists. There are no rothchilds. The queen has no power. Guns are bad. Bigger is better. Might makes right. The earth is flat. Milk is good for you. Blacks are not racist against whites. All whites have money. Beer is good for you. aspartame is better. DDT doesn't kill bugs. The earth is clean and trees are growing everywhere. There is no plastic in the oceans. There was only one holocaust. Hitler was not a rothchild agent. The CIA and IMF are looking out for your best interest. Welfare queens don't exist. Homosexuality is good for the family. Not taking out evil stops it. The world is flat. You only live once. Yoga is bad for you. Limeys know everything. Obongo is a natural citizen of hawaii. Blacks cannot be racist. The best people and the worst people are jooz. If you are not a christian, you are bad. Monsanto and walmart is not kosher.

What am I missing?

General / Please don't riot, it's what they want-David Icke
« on: March 07, 2009, 11:04:56 AM »

'What you fight, you become.' - David Icke

By David Icke

As I travel around America it is clear that this country is on the brink of an economic catastrophe the like of which it has never seen. And, of course, it is not alone. A similar story can be told around the world.

The foreclosure figures are fantastic as families and others lose their homes through no fault of their own on a scale that, according to current projections, is destined to become a tidal wave.

The credit explosion was orchestrated through Illuminati agents and Satanists like Alan Greenspan, who represents the interests of the Illuminati's Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and other far more exclusive and sinister secret societies. 

Greenspan was the long-time head of the privately-owned 'US central bank', the Federal Reserve. Once his policies had manipulated as much personal and commercial debt as possible the plug was pulled on the system to trigger what is designed to be global economic meltdown.

Greenspan, who led 'the Fed' under Reagan, Father Bush, Clinton and Boy Bush, operates at a deeper level within the Illuminati network than most of their public figures, and I was told by a former Satanist, an unofficial offspring of the Rothschild family, how he remembered Greenspan at sacrifice rituals he attended:

'I can recall the Rockefellers and the Bushes attending rituals, but never having the supremacy to lead them. I still regard them as lackeys and not real brokers of occult power. Except for Alan Greenspan, most of these fellows were camp followers in the occult, primarily for the economic power and prestige. Greenspan, I recall, was a person of tremendous spiritual, occult power and could make the Bushes and the younger Rockefellers cower with just a glance.'

This, then, is the man who was controlling the United States economy from 1987 to 2006 and who, as planned, oversaw the insane economic policies that led to the current global collapse. Go to another level of understanding and you can see that Greenspan and other Illuminati place-men throughout the world knew exactly what they were doing and what the outcome was planned to be.

Zionist Greenspan got out just before the true scale and consequences of his manipulation came to light. It has been left to others, including his Zionist successor at the 'Fed', Ben Shalom Bernanke, to offer the 'solutions' to the problems that Greenspan and his like created. All of these 'solution' people are controlled by the same force that was, and is, behind Greenspan. This is why Obama has named blatant insiders to his 'economic team' who were fundamentally culpable in the very collapse they have been appointed to 'address'.

The Zionists Tim Geitner, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker etc., who are all stalwarts of the same Bilderberg Group-Council on Foreign Relations-Trilateral Commission network as Greenspan, have no intention of finding a 'solution' that will benefit the people of America or anywhere else.

Neither does Obama's Budget Director, the Zionist Peter R. Orszag. It was Orszag who advised the Russian finance ministry at the time when Zionist oligarchs were raping the Russian economy and stealing its resources and he was a financial advisor to the Icelandic central bank just before the Iceland banking system crashed. Great 'choice', Barack.

During the Clinton administration, Orszag worked with Obama's White House Chief of Staff, the ultra-Zionist Rahm Emanuel, on imposing the NAFTA 'free trade' agreement that has cost incredible numbers of American jobs - exactly as planned. Emanuel served in the Israeli army and is the son of a terrorist with the notorious Irgun, one the terror groups which bombed Israel into existence after World War Two. It was Emanuel who said after Obama's election: 'You never let a serious crisis go to waste'.

Emanuel, a cold and vicious piece of work, is directly controlling Obama and the White House in league with senior White House advisor, the Zionist David Axelrod, who ran the puppet 'president's' election campaign and oversees the writing of the speeches that he reads from the teleprompter screens.

Emanuel: Obama's puppeteer

Axelrod: Obama's voice on the teleprompter screens

At least most of 'Obama's' economic place-men are fundamentally connected to the Zionist Robert E. Rubin, the Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton, who oversaw financial deregulation that led ultimately to the current crisis. Rubin recently resigned from Citigroup after encouraging the policies that led the company to the brink of collapse. In January 2009, Rubin was named by Marketwatch as one of the '10 most unethical people in business' and his proteges and close associates are now running the US economy under Obama.

Another massive blow to economic confidence came when the Zionist hedge fund crook, Bernard Madoff, revealed that he'd 'lost' $50 billion of his clients' money. He says he acted alone. No bloody chance. Other financial disasters which have collapsed the markets include American International Group (A.I.G.), the insurance giant headed by the Zionist, Maurice Greenberg. It has just announced losses of $61.7 billion for the final three months of 2008 - the biggest quarterly loss in corporate history.

Greenberg is extremely close to the Zionist Henry Kissinger, one of the Illuminati's most vociferous global manipulators of the last 50 years. Kissinger was appointed chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987.

Zionist Kissinger with Zionist Greenberg. Anyone see a common theme building here??

Are all these people just breathtakingly incompetent? No, no, no. Their role for the cabal is to destroy the economy and America in general by, among many other things, triggering the financial crisis and then wasting staggering amounts of borrowed money - trillions of dollars - to ensure that there is no way back.

A US TV ad apparently said that if you spent a million dollars a day every day from the alleged birth of 'Christ' to today you would still not spend as much as Obama is spending in borrowed money in his 'stimulus' package - let alone the other fantastic sums on top of that to 'bail' the banks.

They have worked super-fast, using fear and the Obama hype as their weapons, to throw more petrol on the fire in the full knowledge that this will make matters worse, not better. Bush's 'bail out' of the banks has disappeared from the radar with nothing to show for it and now Bush Mark 11, Mr Change, is fronting up the spending of another three trillion.

The biggest recipient of bail-out money has been Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G, which has been given $180 billion in borrowed money that the American taxpayers, and their children, are now responsible for repaying. Rubin's Citigroup is in for $50 billion of borrowed 'government' money.

The idea is not only to collapse the American economy, but to throw so much money at the problem (the banks mostly) as quickly as possible so that the response options of the government are zero by the time the economy really crashes on the scale that is planned.

The same is being orchestrated around the world, as we see in Britain where the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is also hurling borrowed money at the banking system only for the situation to go on getting worse. Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer, in charge of the country's finances, right through the Blair years when he pursued policies that mirrored those of Greenspan.

Now the man who was a major cause of the banking crisis in the UK is asking us to believe that he is the 'saviour' of the financial system. That's like a guy smashing someone around the head with a baseball bat and then claiming to be a hero for driving the fellah to hospital. But these people have no shame.

The global economic collapse is designed to trigger a stream of 'benefits' to the Illuminati agenda. One, as I have said from the start, is to use this as an excuse to impose a global economic dictatorship controlled by a world central bank. But there are many other 'solutions' and connected 'benefits' that are planned to be exploited and we need to be streetwise to them.

The one I want to emphasise here is the need to stay calm and react peacefully to what is happening. This is not easy when there is so much stress and fear around with regard to the economic present and 'future', but we need to do it all the same or we will walk straight into a massive trap that has been set for us.

Let's get this straight: They want you to riot in response to the unfolding economic catastrophe and we are already seeing people falling for this.

Riots in France over economic conditions

Why would the authorities want people to riot? Readers of my books over the years will see the answer immediately. They want an excuse to bring in a fully-fledged Police State all over the world and people who riot in their desperation (instigated invariably by agent-provocateurs) are just the excuse they are looking for.

Be very, very aware of anyone who starts rioting, or encourages others to do so, amid peaceful demonstrations. Who are they and why are they doing this when it is handing all the aces to the system to impose a Police State? They are either stupid or agents of that State.

Regular readers of my newsletters will recall the one about the UK traffic warden who was suddenly given new cards authorising him to do the work of the police and to enter property without permission. His job was supposed to be just handing out tickets for illegal parking and so on. His boss would not discuss why these new cards were being issued, but a police officer friend explained all to him.

The officer said the government was preparing well ahead of time for a coming 'war', during which they were expecting mass protests and rioting in the streets. The police and the military were going to be so focussed on dealing with this that other uniformed professions, like traffic wardens, private security guards, CCTV operators and many others, were going to be brought forward to do the work normally done by the police.

Soon after the traffic warden approached me, the government announced that his profession was being re-designated 'civil enforcement officers', thus disconnecting them from their sole role of dealing with traffic. A few months later the government announced plans for a new group called 'accredited persons' - private security guards, CCTV operators and many others who would be given authority to do some of the work currently confined to the police.

The officer told the traffic warden about a 'war', and that is planned for sure at some point. But the excuse of the war could also have been a cover-story for those people who were needed to work on the preparations, but were not to know the real reason behind it. That real reason, as we can now see, could include economic rioting after the financial collapse that the Shadow People have long known was coming because they were going to cause it - although, I stress again, a war is also being engineered involving the 'West', China and Russia.

I have been stressing this point about the plan to stir up civil unrest and rioting whenever I can and now the insiders are beginning to put that thought into the public mind. 'There could be riots' is designed to communicate the theme subliminally of 'go out and riot'. It is the simple power of suggestion masquerading as 'concern'.

And who should do just that than Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Illuminati Trilateral Commission and one of the chief mentors and controllers of Barack Obama. I won't call him 'President' Obama any longer until he produces a birth certificate to prove he is eligible for the post. Brzezinski told MSNBC:

'... there's going to be growing conflict between the classes and if people are unemployed and really hurting, hell, there could be even riots!'

No, Mr. Brzezinski, you know there are going to be riots because the network you represent is going to do everything it can to make them happen. More and more we are seeing this theme appearing from representatives of the State. The U.S. Army War College has made the same warnings in a document called Known Unknowns: Unconventional 'Strategic Shocks' in Defense Strategy Development.

It said the military must be prepared for a 'violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States', in the light of 'unforeseen economic collapse'. Unforeseen?? You must be joking. The document talks of 'purposeful domestic resistance', 'pervasive public health emergencies' or 'loss of functioning political and legal order'. It goes on:

'Widespread civil violence ... would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security. An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home.

Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.'

As the traffic warden, now 'civil enforcement officer', found out, this is precisely what they are planning in the UK and the same will be the case in every country because they are all controlled by a world-wide web orchestrating a global agenda. The War College document said that the Department of Defense would be the 'enabling hub' for the 'continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance'.

Put that through the Orwellian Translation Unit and you get 'the military will control the country'. This has all been planned for a long, long time as I and others have been warning all these years, and the 'hostile groups' the document talks about will be anyone who is challenging the political/military dictatorship in any way, even verbally.

In the light of this, you won't be surprised to know that the US military is currently seeking to spend another $6 million on 'riot equipment'.

Dennis C. Blair, Obama's Director of National Intelligence and Trilateral Commission member, has also said that the economic crisis could create civil unrest in the United States and around the world. He said the crisis was 'regime-threatening' if it continued over one or two years and this manufactured crisis is designed to be much bigger and longer than that. In the simple language that he seems to find so hard to summon, Blair says that there is a greater chance of war during economic turmoil and there's no doubt they have just that planned in the wake of what is happening now.

Other establishment figures who have warned of unrest and rioting include the heads of the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund, both Illuminati organisations to their core, and anyone who heads them will be, by definition, gofers for the cabal.

In the UK, yet again confirming the validity of the traffic warden story, the head of the police branch dealing in public order has warned of a possible 'Summer of Rage' over rising unemployment and the economic crash. Superintendent David Hartshorn of London's Metropolitan Police said that 'known activists' were planning to exploit the situation to mount mass protests and he pointed to the G20 Summit in London in April as a likely target, along with banks.

The London Sunday Express has also reported that UK police and 'security' services are preparing to deal with rioting and 'the chilling prospect of soldiers being drafted on to the streets has not been discounted ...'

Riots in Greece

Mass protests around the world are no longer simply predictions because they are already happening and, with the global economy yet to collapse on anything like the scale it is intended to, we have seen nothing yet. Some 120,000 people demonstrated in Dublin over the handling of the economic crisis in Ireland, a million protestors have been on the streets in France, UK oil refinery and power station workers launched a series of strikes in protest at the use of foreign workers, and the riots across Greece late last year were partly economic in nature.

Albert Pike

I can encapsulate what is going on here with part of a letter alleged to have been sent in 1871 by Albert Pike, a Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America, to Giuseppe Mazzini, the Illuminati 'revolutionary' in Italy. In this letter, Pike is said to have detailed the background to three world wars the Illuminati was planning to bring about their global dictatorship. The first two happened as he predicted and this is what he said about the third:

'The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion ...

... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.'

Click here for more background ...

Many dismiss the letter as a myth, but in the context I am using it that doesn't matter. What it says is what is planned - an economic and social catastrophe in which the people turn on themselves in their engineered desperation and all morality is submerged in a mass battle for perceived survival.

The term 'nihilism', used in the Pike letter, has this dictionary definition:

* Rejection of all distinctions in moral or religious value and a willingness to repudiate all previous theories of morality or religious belief.

* The belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions is necessary for future improvement.

That pretty much sums it up, really, and this is why they want people to riot all over the world to destroy the existing order, which, yes, the Illuminati created, but they now seek to replace that with the next stage of their tyranny - total global control. This means that national governments and nation states must be destroyed to allow a world government to assume its dictatorship.

Look at that definition of 'nihilism' again in the light of this: 'The belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions is necessary for future improvement.'

'Rioter' and police dealing with the 'rioter' - all wearing the same police-issue boots.  Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.

Already waiting in the wings are the agent provocateurs and the useful idiots primed to start the riots and civil unrest that the idiots believe to be challenging the existing order. But the existing order was created by the same network of Illuminati families that are seeking to create the 'new order', the New World Order, which is planned to emerge from the turmoil and chaos they are now engineering.

To achieve this, as always, they need our cooperation and let no-one be in any doubt that those who choose to riot and loot in response to what is happening, and encourage others to riot and loot, are walking straight into the trap that has been laid for them. The government and military agent provocateurs will know that, the useful idiots will not, but it is time they did.

I have met few more concrete-minded or naive people than those that are termed the extreme end of the political 'Left'. They have been played like a violin for hundreds of years to change the world in the image of the Illuminati blueprint in violent revolutions to bring down the established order. Now they are being gathered again to complete the journey to global tyranny and provide the violence and chaos that is designed to open the way to a world government, world army, world central bank, world electronic currency and a microchipped population connected to the global positioning satellite system, or GPS, among many other technologies of surveillance and control.

The riots and looting they want to see, the chaos, will be met with the installation of a Police State with curfews, jail without trial, the military on the streets, and the activation of the concentration camps for 'dissidents' that we have long warned about. They are officially called 'military installations', run by FEMA, the deeply-sinister Federal Emergency Management Agency, and it is no coincidence, of course, that a bill numbered H.R. 645 is passing through Washington 'to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations'. No, concentration camps, and other countries will have them prepared also.

Look at what that War College document said: 'Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.' Might? It's a certainty because that's the plan and all the laws are in place to allow them to do it. They have been passed by governments around the world as 'anti-terror' legislation, but they use the terms 'terror' and 'terrorist' in such a non-specific way that all these laws can be applied to the entire population of the country that the 'laws' were supposed to protect according to their advocates.

It was all a gigantic con, as some of us tired of pointing out. It had nothing to do with terrorists who are alleged to plant bombs and so on. All these laws have been put into place with the specific goal of controlling the mass of the people through a Police State when they triggered an economic collapse, together with new wars.

Add to all this a stream of presidential executive orders signed by successive presidents without oversight by either the House of Representatives or the Senate. These are unconstitutional and make the president a virtual dictator. Click here to see the powers that the State can activate, thanks to these orders, when martial law is declared.

This is why Obama's Zionist Svengali, the White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, is seeking to have gun ownership curtailed - to make the military takeover easier. Meantime, more people are seeking to be armed and requests for concealed weapon permits in Florida alone are up 42 per cent in 45 days with the consequences of the economic turmoil in mind.

The military on the streets of Iraq. How long before the same is seen on the streets of America and elsewhere?

The only way to stop all this is not to react as they want us to, with violence and hostility to both the State and each other. How many violent revolutions have led to just another tyranny, official or unofficial, to replace the one that fell? It has to be so because what is destroyed by violence will be replaced by the same energy. As I have said in my books, what you fight, you become.

John Lennon put it perfectly when he sang:

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it's evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don't you know that you can count me out ...

... You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait

Revolution (1968) ... click here to watch ...

Martin Luther King also put it brilliantly when he said of rioting:

'The limitation of riots, moral questions aside, is that they cannot win and their participants know it. Hence, rioting is not revolutionary but reactionary because it invites defeat. It involves an emotional catharsis, but it must be followed by a sense of futility.'

Those are the words of a revolutionary who succeeded through peaceful non-cooperation. Yes, they killed him, but what he created through non-violence and determination went forth to end segregation. Physical life does not matter when compared with what is right, for we are all eternal Conciousness having an illusory experience and the greatest illusion is death.

I would much rather die 'early' doing what I knew to be right than to eek out a few more illusory years as a slave to a tyranny.

But there is no need even for that to bring an end to this nonsense. There are billions of people being enslaved and a comparative handful doing the enslaving. Er, I think I see a way out of this.

We need to come together in mutual support, love, kindness and empathy. We need to put aside the manufactured fault-lines that divide us - religion, politics, race, culture and income bracket. That is not to say people have to reject their beliefs, just don't let them be weapons of division.

We are all in this together and we need to meet the challenge together, not steal from each other, loot or riot, or look the other way because something happening to someone else is 'not my problem'. They are not seeking to enslave Muslims, Jews, black people, or white middle class Americans and so on. They are seeking to do it to all of us and they are picking off different groups one by one, just like the Nazis did in Germany. Remember these famous words because they are so applicable now:

First they came for the Jews and I was not a Jew so I did nothing.
Then they came for the communists and I was not a communist so I did nothing.
Then they came for the trade unionists and I was not a trade unionist so I did nothing.
Then they came for me and there was no-one left to speak out for me.

Let us unite behind that which affects everyone - the loss of our most basic freedoms. And if this is being planned now, what kind of world are our children and grandchildren going to live in? Can you live with that thought while doing nothing or rioting as the authorities want? I can't.

We need to start getting organised in communities and groups to support each other and stop cooperating with the system - not to fight it. The system can only exist with our cooperation and acquiesce. We are holding it together. They have their men and women of violence, called the military and 'Swat' teams, to deal with violent resistance.

But their worst nightmare is our non-cooperation - the refusal to pay taxes; refusal to leave homes when banks foreclose on them; refusal to 'comply' with our own enslavement in any form. The system couldn't cope if this was done on a mass scale. And that's the point: to do this we need to do it en-masse and those not immediately affected need to support those who are.

Instead of compliance, we need the non-comply-dance of people who beat to a different drum and will not comply with what is unfair, unjust, or targets their freedom and the freedom of others. This approach does not refuse to comply in a spirit of hostility, rage or violence, but with love, joy and laughter - and an unbreakable determination not to cooperate with their own enslavement.

We need a mass refusal join the military, especially if they try to introduce the Draft; a refusal to do the compulsory 'community service' for young people that Obama's controllers want to introduce (as does the UK government); and a refusal to join, or accept the legitimacy of, Obama's planned civilian security force, which is nothing more than a scam to get the people to police the people on behalf of the Elite in the midst of the economic collapse and war.

We need to start getting together local currency schemes that can operate outside the system and, yes, people should also have mass protests if they choose, so long as they are peaceful. But they need to be part of the campaign of non-violent, non-cooperation, not the focus of it.

How many mass protests have there been over the years around the world and yet everything just goes on as before, be it war or globalisation. We need to stop posturing and then heading for the bar to feel good about ourselves and start doing what will actually make a difference.

Mass protests can ease frustration - steam whistles as I call them - but what good do most of them do? Mass non-cooperation with the system is far more effective.

The protests need to be targeted at non-cooperation, refusing to accept laws that ban assembly by massive numbers turning up; surrounding the homes of neighbours when the bank bailiffs come to put them on the street; and so filling the locations of government and finance with masses of people that the system cannot function. Workers who provide essential services to government, police and financial institutions etc., can refuse to do so until Orwellian laws and financial injustice are removed. In this way the perpetrators are affected, not the mass of the people, as with all-out strikes.

And all of this needs to be good humoured and strictly peaceful.

I would say this also to those in uniform. You may think you have power, but you are just pawns in the game like anyone else. You don't have the power, your uniform does, because that is an extension of the State. Those inside are just there to animate the uniform and do the bidding of those it represents. When you are useful to the cabal they'll praise you and when you are surplus to their requirements as part of the bigger agenda they'll show you the door.

You have children and grandchildren, too, who will have to live in the world you are policing into existence by 'following orders' and believing the manipulative nonsense fed to you by governments and cabal 'training' fronts like the UK-based Common Purpose. Wake up from the trance and stop building a Police State for your own children and grandchildren - and everyone else. Think about the consequences for those you love of what you are doing - and stop doing it.

More than anything, we all need to free our minds and become conscious. From that, everything else will come, including the intuition, inspiration and knowing that will guide us on how most effectively to deal with what we face.

If there are many things you would like to do in a room, but the room is dark and you can't see, what is the fundamental first step to anything else happening? You have to turn on the light and then all the rest becomes possible. Without that you are thrashing around in the dark and falling over the furniture.

That is what 'humans' are doing today and have been for so long. They have been manipulated to believe they are their bodies and their names when those are just the experiences of who they truly are - eternal Consciousness. As the great American comedian, Bill Hicks, said:

'... all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There's no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.'

The divisions between us are illusory to allow a certain kind of experience, but these illusions have been exploited mercilessly to divide and rule us.


When we awaken to the truth of who we are the world looks very different and so do the challenges that are put before us - or we put before ourselves. Move your point of observation and everything changes. Try it. Try ceasing to identify who you are with your body, your name and the reflection in the mirror. Try seeing those things as experiences and not who you are. Try observing your life and the world from the perception of the real you - eternal Conciousness, All That Is, Has Been and Ever Can Be in our illusion called 'time'.

Eternal Conscious in awareness of itself doesn't riot; it is not violent and it doesn't loot. But nor does it ever do, or accept for itself and others, what is not fair, just, loving and kind. Crucially, Consciousness is without fear. When we operate on that level then we can truly claim to be Conscious and not trapped in the illusion called Mind. As Albert Einstein said: 'You cannot solve problems with the same level of consciousness that created them.'

John Lennon also made this key point in Revolution about what needs to happen to really make a difference. We need to free our minds and become Conscious:

You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow

We are now fast heading for the eye of the storm that has been planned for so long to enslave the global population in a centralised tyranny. But we don't have to accept it or acquiesce to it, meekly looking on as the walls of control close in by the day.

But that is what is happening and it has to stop. For everyone's sake, it has to stop.

We can come together, we MUST come together, putting aside the fault-lines of race, religion, culture and income bracket. These are just illusory labels through which we are divided and therefore ruled. Believe in them if you wish, and enjoy them if they make you happy, but don't let them divide us any longer.

We need to come together in mutual support at this time as those with sick minds and closed hearts are poised to throw everything at us to complete their agenda for total control. Whether their insanity prevails is not in their hands, but in ours. It is we who have the power if only we would choose to use it.

We are One Consciousness deluded into thinking we are 'little me'. When we realise that we are all One - and act upon that with courage, love, kindness, peace and empathy for all who need support - the walls of oppression must fall.

But sitting on your arse hoping it will all go away is no longer an option.

It never was.

General / Cute pictures of nature-DCS eaters not allowed
« on: March 07, 2009, 10:46:32 AM »

Pages: [1] 2 3 4