Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - grizzle

Pages: [1] 2 3
Conspiracy then and now. / "I Am Adam Lanza's Doctor (Psychiatrist)"
« on: December 29, 2012, 08:29:34 AM »

So, his psychiatrist (handler?) is married to a former Major General who initiated many "supersoldier"
programs , trying to make soldiers that would regrow limbs, could walk through walls
(no, not kidding), etc. In addition, this guy formed a company with infamous satanist and
pedophile Lt. Col. Michael Aquino, whose equally infamous essay, "Mind Wars", advocated
the use of mind control technology on the American public.

The World Below / Ignoble Fitness
« on: January 16, 2012, 06:55:13 AM »

"Aryanizers, in contrast, acknowledge above all the threat of ignoble fitness. The overwhelming majority of traits that improve survivability (including the very desire to survive without purpose) are morally negative. Nature favours the rapist over the non-rapist during war, the coward over the martyr during tyranny, the wealthseeker over the truthseeker during prosperity, and so on; in each case the former will be on average either more prolific or more materially secure than the latter. To use Savitri Devi’s comparison between the ultimate Gentile and Aryan avatars, Nature favours Genghis Khan (16,000,000+ genetic descendants alive today), not Hitler (0 genetic descendants). I would add that Nature favours also Genghis Khan’s sex slaves over Hitler."

Before you focus on Savitri Devi, etc., try to stay on point, please.
Wow, they hit a problem right on the head there. The sniveling coward, the thief, the crooked politician, whoever goes along to get along, fate will favor them over their opposites as to survival and procreation. It's easier to steal, to make others your slaves, than to create, to explore, to take chances. Those who sacrifice draw parasites.
I don't think that if we had a White nation that was secure, that procreation could be micromanaged to the greater good. It's too nonlinear in real life to make a policy. I think the best we can do is to avoid being ruled over by the jews, avoid race-mixing, and promote that the children be raised to be honest, basically to follow the Ten Commandments. I think the Christian religion, without the usual oppurtunists using it for political purposes, is pragmatic as a rule set for a civilization, it worked well enough for America, the United States.

Philosophy & Religion / I Am A Christian
« on: December 25, 2011, 01:06:21 PM »
After a lot of thinking and research on the subject, I finally came to the conclusion that the bad guys hate Christianity. It's not just that it's a tool that has outgrown it's usefulness. They've always hated it.
For what it's worth, I retract and apologize for all the times I have slandered Christianity.
I know and admit that what we have, the Bible, is sometimes inscrutable, probably incomplete, and altered for purposes of acquiring and maintaining power.
Nevertheless, the Christian faith has been the driving and unifying force behind Western civilization. It's rules are also pragmatic. I believe it is for people of European descent. And I believe that it is more than just pragmatic, I believe that it is true.


LW-please embed!

OMG! They're right!

Media Watch / Iron Sky
« on: November 02, 2010, 02:38:20 PM »
Unfortunately, of course, it's an anti-Nazi film, but nevertheless, some very cool imagery.

Interestingly enough, this film has it's basis in the research of an eastern european physicist who claims the Thule Society had advanced rocketry and other propulsion technology before 1930, and that the Nazis established a base on the moon in 1942.  Wiki says only that he has been accused of faking his photographic and video evidence.

Health & Healing / The Cure For All Drug Addictions - Highly illegal
« on: October 31, 2010, 08:16:28 AM »

Cures heroin, cocaine and alcohol addictions in one dose, but no one in the US can have it.

Sue's Place / And Don't Forget To Vote
« on: October 31, 2010, 06:28:30 AM »

Sue's Place / Things I Am Grateful For In My Life
« on: October 29, 2010, 03:22:44 PM »
Feel free to add yours, unless you wish to stick to depressing things exclusively.

(In no order except for my GF being 1st)  My GF, despite circumstances (practically raising three grandkids and running her business, etc) keeping us apart almost all of the time, I love her with all my heart and always will.
My family - despite some serious troubles in the past that we've caused each other, now we are truly a loving family. Thank goodness.
My mice, Veronica and Millicent, The little cheesers have the life of Riley, and they deserve it.
The children in my life, that come with visitors, they remind me why I fight for what's just. I want to see them continue to have a safe time and place in which to play, like I did.
My friends, though few, are highly valued (yes, this includes you, jb).
The animals at my Dad's house - a dachsund I call Snugelfritz, a rescued mutt, two rabbits, and two rescued cats ,and a Betta fish. Animals will never stab you in the back, unless they are brain-damaged or something.
My research into the manipulation of life and reality. What I was born to do.
I have more than what I need, and being a fan of the internet and movies, I have a nice laptop and a 26" flat panel TV. And a growing collection of videos and e-books.
i never have to go hungry, or without smokes, or the other necessities of life.
The people on this forum.

General / Fritz Springmeier Released From Prison
« on: October 28, 2010, 07:54:12 AM »

October 28, 2010

Henry Makow Ph.D.

I was elated to receive a letter today from my friend Fritz Springmeier informing me that he has been transferred to a halfway house in the Portland area.

He is there to find a job and accommodation after which he will be released on probation for five years. Under the terms of his probation he won't be able to do any political work but he hopes to be able to teach people to "make good decisions" in the hard times ahead.

He is able to work within a 100 mile radius of Portland. If you can help him find a job, or just want to wish him well, he can be reached at

Fritz was imprisoned in Feb. 2003 due to his research on the Illuminati and his work deprogramming victims of Illuminati mind control. His books "Bloodlines of the Illuminati" and "The Illuminati Formula Used to Create
an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave" helped thousands learn about Illuminati control.

"There is a wave of positive divine energy creating a positive momentum to my release and to overcoming the difficulties in my path," Fritz wrote. "I have a good case officer and a good probation officer, and this is a good halfway house."

Fritz is still confined to the establishment and can only leave on supervised job hunting expeditions.

He writes that many people opposed to the New World Order need to put their own lives in order. "Many are just news junkies," he writes.

He foresees bad times and wonders if we are prepared spiritually. For example, if we are hungry, will we steal?

Yay! Good for Fritz! Yes, news junkies indeed. - grizzle

Jewish Studies / Poll - Top Most Influential Men
« on: October 27, 2010, 06:42:41 PM »

1 Jon Stewart -

2 Bill Gates -

3 Mark Zuckerberg -

4 Steve Jobs -

5 Kanye West -

CNN was going on about this. The top four of course are jews. Then a negro. many of the remaining 49 are jews and other non-Whites, if not all of them. I am not familiar with many of the names. number 49 was a jew, Weissman. There was also that Branson character.
It's interesting, though, how  they picked a comedian to be #1. I suppose they were flush with the success of Al Franken. Could they be considering a comedian for president? Surreal, but then, what isn't? I hope cheap laughs somehow make an empty stomach feel better.
The four-jews-then-a-negro illustrates the pecking order, as does the absence of a White man in the top five.

For those that had any doubts that the Masons are a creepy Pagan cult:

note that Wallace-Murphy speaks blithely of the "Christian cult".

Beyond the Pale / Curious Film Anomaly Circa 1928 - Walkie Talkie?
« on: October 26, 2010, 09:45:53 AM »

No comment.

Preface: NOVA has a very good introductory video on the machanism called "The Ghost in Your Genes".

DNA has a core made of a biochemical called "histone". If the histone is "acetylated" at a certain point, a gene is turned on. If it is not acetylated, the gene is turned off. All genes are not turned on all the time. They must be turned on and off in a very specific order over time, especially in the time from foetus to adult, to produce normal,healthy human beings.
In order to produce heritable damage, it is not necessary to actually produce genetic damage. One can damage the process of acetylating histone in the proper order at the proper time, and it screws up development. Drugs, stress, diet, electromagnetic pollution and other factors all influence this process, and the effects can last over several generations, if not forever, they just don't know yet.
Those in power are intensely interested in this as a tool for social engineering, which is probably why there are so many endocrine disruptor chemicals in fopod container linings, baby bottles, etc. It is not only population control, but messing up endocrine development is probably largely responsible for the mental state of youth for generations now, the appearance of large number of homosexuals (due to endocrine disruptor pollution, they have found male bass that produce eggs), and lowered sperm counts and many varieties of systemic disease (note side effects warnings of birth control drugs, which are endocrine disruptors). - grizzle

Epigenetic Engineering
Michael Nield, 12th October 2010 ©


The effects of synthetic chemicals on fertility in animals has been extensively studied and the implications have been considered at political level for several decades. In the last five years, scientists have published studies showing that such chemicals can cause obesity. This article considers whether human exposure to these chemical endocrine disruptors has occurred purely by accident. By the 1940s, the scientists knew how to alter the expression of mammalian DNA in utero and in vivo using endocrine disruptors.

Those unfamiliar with endocrine disruptors might first look at

Acknowledgements and sources: Many of the books cited are those recommended by Alan Watt of provided a useful article on stilbesterol (DES). Original hard copies of the books were obtained and quotes come directly from the editions cited in the endnotes. Scans of some of the pages have been uploaded below. Where an internet source was used, a link is provided.

Legal Notice

Nothing in this article is intended as harrassment or incitement to hatred or harrassment under the UK 2010 Equality Act ,which came in to force on 1st October 2010, or the UK 2008 Criminal Justice Act.

The following characteristics are now protected under UK law: age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

The purpose of this article is to suggest that certain factions within governments, corporations and charitable foundations have been implementing a population control agenda. Endocrine distruptors serve to decrease the birth rate by reducing fertility. They increase the death rate by causing morbid obesity - 'the metabolic syndrome'. The author offers no opinion on whether particular studies on animals are relevant to any legally protected human characteristic but considers the evidence as a whole for its implications on the general population with regard to declining fertility and increasing obesity.


1. Early twentieth century views on population control `“Reproduction and 'human engineering'
2. American charitable foundations funded gender equality
3. How many people have reduced fertility due to diethylstilbestrol?
4. A medical doctor's opinion
5. Increasing the death rate with obesogenic endocrine disruptors
6. Endocrine disruptors in pregnancy or early life can condition the expression of DNA -the science of epigenetics
7. Endocrine disruptors permanently alter the germ line of future generations through epigenetic inheritance
8. Use of these chemicals suggests design more than accident
9. Regulatory action `“ or lack of it
10. Simultaneous exposure to oestrogenic soy and obesogenic flavour enhancers
11. Corporations are aware of serious problems with processed foods but sell it anyway
1. Early twentieth century views on population control `“ reproduction and 'human engineering'

Dr Russell Blaylock is an expert on toxic food additives and has published several books on the subject. He recommends reading the following history of eugenic-oriented scientific research: The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of The New Biology by Lily E. Kay.[1]

Lily details the transformation of America's Davenport-style race eugenics into a corporate multi-displicinary scientific enterprise for the purpose of  'human engineering'. The end goal never changed for the private businessmen and technocrats who paid for and organized it. However, throughout the first half of the twentieth century, the aims were often obscured in the scientific complexities, both in the social sciences and physical sciences. After the Second World War, the stigma of the Nazi experiment required that henceforth, all the annual reports of the Rockefeller Foundation 'were sanitized of all rhetorical traces of eugenic goals' [p220]. The terms 'social control', 'human engineering', 'rationalization of human behaviour' had to be replaced with terms like 'understanding' and 'international cooperation'.

By the 1960s the movement's leading scientists felt able to reaffirm the original intent publicly. Caltech's Linus Pauling said in 1968 'There should be tattooed on the forehead of every young person a symbol showing possession of the sickle -cell gene or whatever other similar gene.... It is my opinion that legislation along this line, compulsory testing for defective gene before marriage, and some form of semi-public display of this possession, should be adopted.'[p276]

In 1963 there was a conference of two score distinguished scholars sponsored by the Ciba Foundation. Speculating on the role of molecular biology in shaping man's destiny, Joshua Lederberg stated, 'the ultimate application of molecular biology would be the direct control of nucleotide sequences in human chromosomes...'[p275]

From 1900, the end goal had always been expressed as 'improvement' or 'betterment' of the human race `“ positive eugenics. Robert Sinsheimer at Caltech prophesied in 1969 that 'The new eugenics would permit in principle the conversion of all the unfit to the highest genetic level'.[p276]

There were other eugenically minded scientists at Caltech in other disciplines whom the book doesn't cover, such as the nuclear physicist Harrison Brown. Brown worked on the Manhattan Project and authored The Challenge of Man's Future (1954). It was a detailed consideration of world population and natural resources and also had a few pages in favour of eugenics. It was very influential and has an endorsement from Einstein on the back cover.[2] Interestingly Brown was mentor to John P Holdren who is currently President Obama's 'Science Tsar'. Brown helped Bertrand Russell and Einstein set up the post-War Pugwash conferences from 1955, and John P Holdren became chairman of the International Pugwash Council.[3]

The Challenge of Man's Future was based on a book published two years earlier entitled The Next Million Years by Charles Galton Darwin of Cambridge University, England. Galton Darwin was the grandson of Charles Darwin, a senior nuclear physicst and President of The Eugenics Society 1953-59. In 1922 he was a visiting professor at Caltech.[4,5]

Darwin concluded that man should attempt to trump the laws of natural selection:

Attempts at improving the lot of mankind have all hitherto been directed towards improving his conditions, but not his nature, and as soon as the conditions lapse all is lost. The only hope is to use our knowledge of biology in such a way that all would not be lost with the lapse of the conditions. The principles of heredity offer an anchor which will permanently fix any gains that there may be in the quality of mankind.[p208]

On the other hand some scientists and philosophers, including Darwin, recognized the possibilities of eugenics for governmental purposes. Governmental eugenics was given detailed consideration in part three of Bertand Russell's book The Scientific Outlook (1931).[6] It was evidently the basis for Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, and according to the current Wikipedia entry, Russell considered suing Huxley for plagiarism.

Russell warned:

Manipulation and exploitation are the ruling passions of the typical scientific industrialist. The average man may not share this narrow concentration, but for that very reason he fails to acquire a hold on the sources of power, and leaves the practical government of the world to the fanatics of mechanism. The power of producing changes in the world which is possessed by the leaders of big business in the present age far exceeds the power ever possessed by individuals in the past.... Fortunately, the modern holders of power are not yet quite aware how much they could do if they chose, but when this knowledge dawns upon them a new era in human tyranny is to be expected.[p157]

Utilizing 'scientific technique in biology', only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks. In the main, food would be manufactured in 'vast chemical factories'. 'Men will acquire power to alter themselves, and will inevitably use this power. What they make of the species I do not venture to predict'.[pp167-169]

He outlines the 'scientific society' in part three. Education would be different for rulers and ruled:

 ...the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play.... Their diet will not be left to the caprices of their parents, but will be such as the best biochemists recommend.[pp251-252]

As for the governing class,

Eugenics, chemical and thermal treatment of the embryo, and diet in early years will be used with a view to the production of the highest possible ultimate ability.[p253]

The two classes would over time, become more distinct in character and heredity:

I think it may be assumed, however, that there would be a very strong tendency for the governing class to become hereditary, and that after a few generations not many children would be moved from either class into the other. This is especially likely to be the case if embryological methods of improving the breed are applied to the governing class, but not to the others. In this way the gulf between the two classes as regards native intelligence may become continually wider and wider. This will not lead to the abolition of the less intelligent class, since the rulers will not wish to undertake uninteresting manual work, or to be deprived of the opportunity for exercising benevolence and public spirit which they derive from the management of manual workers.[p258]

Russell said that, as with animals, only a small percentage males would be required for breeding. 5% of males and 25% of females would be selected to breed and the rest would be sterilized. Sexual activity amongst the sterile would still be generously permitted.[pp260-261]. However paternity goes out of the window completely:

Fathers would, of course, have nothing to do with their own children. There would be in general only one father to every five mothers, and it is quite likely that he would never have even seen the mothers of his children.[p263]

Unfortunately, he foresaw that a truly scientific society would necessarily become sadistic.

The advancement of knowledge will be held to justify much torture of individuals by surgeons, biochemists, and experimental psychologists. As time goes on the amount of added knowledge required to justify a given amount of pain will diminish, and the number of governors attracted to the kinds of research necessitating cruel experiments will increase. Just as the sun worship of the Aztecs demanded the painful death of thousands of human beings annually, so the new scientific religion will demand its holocausts of sacred victims....  Perhaps by means of injections and drugs and chemicals the population could be induced to bear whatever its scientific masters may decide to be for its good. New forms of drunkenness involving no subsequent headache may be discovered, and new forms of intoxication may be invented so delicious that for their sakes men are willing to pass their sober hours in misery.[pp267-268]

In The Impact of Science on Society (1952), Russell reiterated the possibility of governmental eugenics in a scientific society:

Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.[p66][7]

In same pages he said that the pacification of males would be required in a scientific dictatorship:

Sires will be chosen for various qualities, some for muscle, other for brains. All will have to be healthy, and unless they are to be the fathers of oligarchs they will have to be of a submissive and docile disposition.[p67]

Bertrand Russell was an eminent academic at Trinity College, Cambridge. The possibility of using synthetic chemicals to alter peoples' hormones and fertility was foreseen Charles Galton Darwin -also at Cambridge - in The Next Million Years:

Looking a little deeper there is the possibility of substantially altering the intellectual and moral natures of individuals by some sort of hormonal injections; already great effects have been produced on animals.[p76]

And again:

Why cannot man set up a community like an ants' nest? This would be the ideal of the anarchist, and hitherto it has held no promise at all of success, but with the help of recent and probable future biological discoveries, some sort of imitation by man of the ants' nest cannot be quite excluded from consideration. Thus the control of the numbers of the two sexes may become possible, and with the knowledge of the various sexual hormones it might also become possible to free the majority of mankind from the urgency of sexual impulse, so that they could live contented celibate lives, instead of the unsatisfied celibate lives that are the compulsory lot of such a large fraction of the present population of the world. If these discoveries should be made `“ and this is really by no means impossible `“ man would be able to carry out the sex revolution which is the typical characteristic of the insect civilizations.[p124]

And for a third time:

Another type of discovery may be connected with hormones, those internal secretions which so largely regulate the operations of the human body. The artificial use of hormones has already been shown to have profound effects on the behaviour of animals, and it seems quite possible that hormones, or perhaps drugs, might have similar effects on man. For example, there might be a drug, which, without other harmful effects, removed the urgency of sexual desire, and so reproduced in humanity the status of workers in a beehive.[p183]

2. American charitable foundations funded gender equality 

The large American tax exempt foundations have been proud promoters of gender equality. Female empowerment is often cited as a method for reducing birth rates, especially in third world countries. How did this quest for female empowerment manifest in early twentieth century American education? Georgetown University historian, Professor Carroll Quigley observed the following in his book Tragedy and Hope (1966)[8]:

Closely related to this confusion, or even reversal, of the social roles of the sexes was decreasing sexual differentiation in child-rearing practices. As recently as the 1920's girl babies were reared differently from boys. They were dressed differently, treated differently, permitted to do different things, and admonished about different dangers. By 1960, children, regardless of sex, were all being brought up the same. Indeed, with short cropped hair and play suits on both, it became impossible to be sure which was which. This led to a decrease in the personality differences of men and women, with males becoming more submissive and females more aggressive.

This tendency was accelerated by new techniques of education, especially in the first twelve years of life.... New methods, such as whole-word method of teaching reading or the  use of true-and-false or multiple-choice examinations, were also better adapted to female than to masculine talents. Less and less emphasis was placed on critical judgement, while more and more was placed on intuitive or subjective decisions. In this environment girls did better, and boys felt inferior or decided that school was a place for girls and not for boys. The growing aggressiveness of girls pushed these hesitant boys aside and intensified the problem. As consequences of this, boys had twice as many `non readers` as girls, several times as many stutterers, and many times as many "teen-age bedwetters.`[p1259].

Quigley does not identify the cause of this trend. However, the tax-exempt foundations must be considered one of the prime influences because they dominated the financing of American education in the early 20th Century. In 1954 the Congressional Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations (the 'Reece' committee) was set up to find out what the real goals of these foundations were. In 1982 the staff director of the committee, Norman Dodd, stated in an interview that America's large tax-exempt foundations were working together towards a common goal: The Carnegie Endowment, the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation, 'all working in harmony toward the control of education in the United States'.[9]

However the Reece committee was shut down and the Foundations continued their work. Lily Kay noted that in the early 1950s the Ford Foundation launched an enormous program in the behavioural sciences especially psychology, anthropology, and sociology. By 1957 it had granted nearly $24 million to such research, $13 million to the mental health program. [p274]

More evidence has come to light recently. Hollywood producer Aaron Russo was a former friend of one of the Rockellers. In an interview with Alex Jones shortly before he died, Russo said that Nick Rockefeller had bragged that the Rockefeller Foundation was behind the Women's Liberation movement. `We funded Women's lib'... We're the ones who got it all over the newspapers and television`.[10] He said that their goal was to get women into work to increase tax revenues and at the same time hand over their childrens' education to the schools which they controlled.

The websites of the Rockefeller, Ford, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations disclose the millions of dollars annually being used to promote gender equality all around the world. 

3. How many people have reduced fertility due to diethylstilbestrol exposure? 

In the American Journal of Public Health, Sarah Vogel provides some of the history of DES:

While in pursuit of a synthetic estrogen, Edward Charles Dodds, a British medical researcher at the University of London, identified the estrogenic properties of BPA in the mid-1930s. For the next several years, Dodds continued testing chemical compounds in search of what he later referred to as the "mother substance", a powerful estrogenic substance that he identified as diethylstilbestrol (DES).

DES was commercialized in the 1940s for the purported therapeutic treatment of numerous female "problems" related to menstruation, menopause, nausea during pregnancy, and for the prevention of miscarriages. Meat producers injected animals with the synthetic estrogen to increase meat production. For 30 years, DES was prescribed to millions of pregnant women and injected into millions of animals despite persistent concerns about its carcinogenicity. In 1971, the drug was finally banned for use in pregnant women after the first epidemiological studies reported rare vaginal cancers in young women exposed to DES while in their mothers' wombs. After considerable debate and controversy, the FDA finally banned all forms of DES use in meat production in 1979.[11]

Following the research by Dodds in London, DES was proposed as a prostate cancer drug in 1941 by Charles Huggins and Clarence Hodges at the University of Chicago.[12] This university was founded by J D Rockefeller in the 1890s.[13] In 1947 the FDA granted a licence to prescribe the drug to prevent miscarriage and other problems in pregnant women. The one of the first drug companies to obtain a licence was Squibb. According to Maurice Beale's Drug Story, this was one of several Rockefeller-controlled drug companies.[14] Gillam and Bernstein investigated the dubious process of FDA approval in their 1987 article Doing Harm: The DES Tragedy and Modern American Medicine:

In the United States a dozen drug companies banded together in 1941, mounted an unusual collaborative effort, overcame some medical dissent, and gained FDA approval for use of the drug in four specific conditions including those of menopause.

`¦...More tellingly, Karnaky had reported such transplacental DES effects on infants as discoloration of the breasts and genitals. In line with this last finding, an animal researcher had warned, in 1944 that sex hormones known (as DES was) to alter the in utero development of animal embryos probably did so in humans too [emphasis added]. Several experts, when contacted by the FDA, opposed any endorsement of prenatal DES on safety grounds. Thus, the FDA could easily have rejected these 1947 applications for a variety of reasons, including weak (almost non-existent) data, potential fetal and maternal risks, and expert doubts. Instead, the agency swept past all difficulties and quickly approved DES for use in habitual and threatened miscarriages, premature labor, and pregnancy problems complicated by diabetes... Curiously, the agency also advised the manufacturer of a non-prenatal DES preparation to delete a proposed literature statement warning against its use in pregnancy.[15]

The effects of DES on the sons and daughters of those millions of pregnant women prescribed DES has been considered recently. In 2005 the results of a five year study were published by Scott P. Kerlin, Ph.D of DES Sons International Network, Vancouver[16]. Infertility was one of a wide range of suspected reproductive side effects:

Nations of Origin

Approximately 85% of network members were born in the U.S., while 5% each indicated they were born in Canada, Europe (chiefly UK) or Australia.

     `¢ Core Health Concerns of DES Sons
Based on preliminary analysis of critical health issues reported by individual DES sons in the network, the three topics most frequently listed among the sample of 500 individuals with confirmed or suspected prenatal DES exposure are (a) gender identity concerns (at least 150 reports); (b) psychological/mental health issues, especially depression and anxiety disorders (at least 100 reports); and (c) hormonal/endocrine health issues (at least 75 reports) (see Appendix, Part II).

      `¢ Additional Reported Adverse Health Effects
Though identified less frequently in overall health reports provided by study participants, several participants listed histories of infertility, reproductive tract abnormalities (including reports of ambiguous or underdeveloped genitalia), epididymal cysts, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, gynecomastia, and erectile dysfunction. Statistics on the full extent of reporting of these concerns are still undergoing analysis. [emphasis added]

One of the most ubiquitous and controversial endocrine disruptors is bisphenol A. It is strongly suspected of impairing fertility especially in males. Although it was first discovered in 1891, it was suggested for use as a synthetic estrogen by Charles Dodds in 1936, the scientist that created DES. Dodds received a knighthood in 1954 and was made a Commander of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in 1958. He also received an honorary degree from the University of Chicago in 1959, the same year it awarded honary degrees to Sir Julian Huxley and Sir Charles Galton Darwin.[17]

[Dodds]own research covered many aspects of endocrinology. It was prolific and of  sustained high quality, perhaps the greatest achievement being the discovery and synthesis, in association with Wilfrid Lawson, of stilboestrol. - The Royal College of Physicians website[18]

4. A medical doctor's opinion 

In 1958 Dr R Swynburne Clymer discussed DES in book, Your Health and Sanity in the Age of Treason. See the article at Daniel Taylor's

The employment of stilbestrol by the laity with absolutely no knowledge of the dangerous agent they are employing, in conditioning chickens and meats, is mass medication without license, with a dangerous toxic drug that may have universal disastrous results on all who eat such adulterated foods. This is especially true as it concerns children, youths, young  women and men, resulting as it may, in their sterilization or cancer - something fervently hoped for by the enemies of mankind.

The influence of big money in medicine had encouraged most doctors to be less opinionated about anything which might upset the apple cart. In 1966, Carroll Quigley wrote:

Many of these eager workers headed for medicine, because to them medicine, despite the ten years of necessary preparation, meant up to $40,000 a year income by age fifty. As a consequence, the medical profession in the United States ceased, very largely, to be a profession of fatherly confessors and unprofessing humanitarians and became one of the largest groups of hard headed petty-bourgeois hustlers in the United States, and their professional association became the most ruthless materialistic lobbying association of any professional group.[p 1273]

5. Increasing the death rate with obesogenic endocrine disruptors 

Research published in the last five years suggests that endocrine disruptors may be increasing the death rate by causing morbid obesity. The epidemic of 'metabolic syndrome' or 'syndrome X'  has been making some interesting headlines in Britain lately.

Mayor calls Adsa shoppers 'mutants': A town mayor is under fire for labelling Asda shoppers 'mutants' in a video posted on YouTube

In July earlier this year, the mayor of Ellesmere Port in Cheshire caused outrage when he said he went to the supermarket in the evening `to avoid the mutants who go in during the day`. He offered a strange explanation and apology later, but many had suspected that he was really referring to fat people.[19]

'Fat, tattooed britons are not ship shape', reported The Daily Telegraph in September. British Ferry chief Pim de Lange, Stena Line's director for the North Sea, said that he had to recruit foreign workers because the `British are quite fat and covered in tattoos... not fit for the job...`[20]

Grun and Blumberg of the University of California, Irvine, coined the term 'obesogen' in the Journal of Endocrinology in 2006.[21] They have published several studies showing that plastic could be making us fat:

The modern world is plagued with expanding epidemics of diseases related to metabolic dysfunction. The factors that are driving obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and dyslipidemias (collectively termed metabolic syndrome) are usually ascribed to a mismatch between the body's homeostatic nutrient requirements and dietary excess, coupled with insufficient exercise. The environmental obesogen hypothesis proposes that exposure to a toxic chemical burden is superimposed on these conditions to initiate or exacerbate the development of obesity and its associated health consequences.Recent studies have proposed a first set of candidate obesogens (diethylstilbestrol, bisphenol A, phthalates and organotins among others) that target nuclear hormone receptor signaling pathways (sex steroid, RXR-PPARgamma and GR) with relevance to adipocyte biology and the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD). Perturbed nuclear receptor signaling can alter adipocyte proliferation, differentiation or modulate systemic homeostatic controls, leading to long-term consequences that may be magnified if disruption occurs during sensitive periods during fetal or early childhood development.[22]

The Breakspear Medical Group's newsletters reported the research at Harvard which suggested the impact of obesogens on babies:

In 2006, scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health reported that the prevalence of obesity ininfants under 6 months had risen 73% since 1980. Since the babies were given only formula or breast milk and did not get a lot of exercise, the explanation has to be related to a different factor in the environment. In general, the standard view is that the calories consumed have to equal the calories used. Therefore if more calories are consumed than are burned, weight is gained. However, exposure to environmental obesogens during  development and early life may be contributing to the obesity epidemic which is occurring now in babies. The various obesogens, which can cause a predisposition to obesity, are:
bisphenol A: a component in hard polycarbonate plastic, including that found in babies bottles       
tributyltin: a pesticide used as a biocide especially in marine anti-fouling paints
phthalates: chemicals that are present in some plastic food wraps, plastic bottles and vinyl plastics
perfluoroalkyl compounds: substances used in stain repellents and non-stick cooking surfaces [23]
6. Endocrine disruptors in pregnancy or early life can condition the expression of DNA -the science of epigenetics

Synthetic chemicals cause epigenetic changes in mammals. This means that although the underlying DNA sequence is not changed, the way the gene functions or expresses does change. These epigentic shifts are particularly significant if the chemical is introduced early in life. Scientists at Cambridge University's physiology department write:

In mammals, including man, epidemiological and experimental studies have shown that arange of environmental factors acting during critical periods of early development can alter adult phenotype. Hormones have an important role in these epigenetic modifications and can signal the type, severity and duration of the environmental cue to the developing feto- placental tissues. They act to alter gene expression, hence the protein abundance in a wide ange of different tissues, which has functional consequences for many physiological systems both before and after birth. By producing an epigenome specific to the prevailing  condition in utero, hormones act as epigenetic signals in developmental programming, withimportant implications for adult health and disease. `¦ Recent studies have also shown that inappropriate exposure to glucocorticoids during intrauterine development affects the ensuing adult phenotype and leads to abnormalities in a wide range of physiological systems much later in life.[24]

The science of epigentics was pioneered by Conrad Hal Waddington of Cambridge University from the 1930s onward. Later he became Director of The Institute of Genetics in Edinburgh. Waddington's early work on embryology and steroid 'inducing factors' was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. His book Organisers and Genes 1940 was published after he went to the United States to work on fruit flies at Caltech in 1939. In it he described how cells and tissues reacted to an inducing signal.[25]

His chemistry teacher at school, E J Holmyard, had introduced him to Arabic Alchemy and Alexandrian Gnosticism. In later life, he maintained that this interest in metaphysics had been seminal for his later scientific work. The source cited in the notes below provides a detailed biography.

7. Endocrine disruptors permanently alter the germ line of future generations through epigenetic inheritance

A landmark study published in Science in 2005 by Matthew Anway et al found that epigenetic changes induced by the fungicide vinclozolin, were heritable in mammals. This was confirmed by the authors in later studies.

Transgenerational effects of environmental toxins require either a chromosomal or epigenetic alteration in the germ line. Transient exposure of a gestating female rat during the period of gonadal sex determination to the endocrine disruptors vinclozolin (an antiandrogenic compound) or methoxychlor (an estrogenic compound) induced an adult phenotype in the F1 generation of decreased spermatogenic capacity (cell number and viability) and increased incidence of male infertility. These effects were transferred through the male germ line to nearly all males of all subsequent generations examined (that is, F1 to F4). The effects on reproduction correlate with altered DNA methylation patterns in the germ line. The ability of an environmental factor (for example, endocrine disruptor) to reprogram the germ line and to promote a transgenerational disease state has significant implications for evolutionary biology and disease etiology.[26]

The pesticide used in the experiment, vinclozolin, is a fungicide introduced in Germany in 1976 by BASF. It is used on vines, fruit, and vegetables worldwide. Other studies have confirmed its potential to affect fertility in animals:

Our morphological results indicated that vinclozolin has morphological effects similar to those of MPA, feminizing males (hypospadias) and masculinizing females (longer urethras).[27]

8. Use of these chemicals suggests design more than accident (more at source link)


Pathogenic Mycoplasma
- A Common Disease Agent Weaponised
© by Donald W. Scott, MA, MSc

There are 200 species of Mycoplasma. Most are innocuous and do no harm; only four or five are pathogenic. Mycoplasma fermentans (incognitus strain) probably comes from the nucleus of the Brucella bacterium. This disease agent is not a bacterium and not a virus; it is a mutated form of the Brucella bacterium, combined with a visna virus, from which the mycoplasma is extracted.

The pathogenic Mycoplasma used to be very innocuous, but biological warfare research conducted between 1942 and the present time has resulted in the creation of more deadly and infectious forms of Mycoplasma. Researchers extracted this mycoplasma from the Brucella bacterium and actually reduced the disease to a crystalline form. They "weaponised" it and tested it on an unsuspecting public in North America.

Dr Maurice Hilleman, chief virologist for the pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp & Dohme, stated that this disease agent is now carried by everybody in North America and possibly most people throughout the world.

Despite reporting flaws, there has clearly been an increased incidence of all the neuro/systemic degenerative diseases since World War II and especially since the 1970s with the arrival of previously unheard-of diseases like chronic fatigue syndrome and AIDS.

According to Dr Shyh-Ching Lo, senior researcher at The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and one of America's top mycoplasma researchers, this disease agent causes many illnesses including AIDS, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, Crohn's colitis, Type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Wegener's disease and collagen-vascular diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and Alzheimer's.

Dr Charles Engel, who is with the US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, stated the following at an NIH meeting on February 7, 2000: "I am now of the view that the probable cause of chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia is the mycoplasma..."

I have all the official documents to prove that mycoplasma is the disease agent in chronic fatigue syndrome/fibromyalgia as well as in AIDS, multiple sclerosis and many other illnesses. Of these, 80% are US or Canadian official government documents, and 20% are articles from peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of the American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine and the Canadian Medical Association Journal. The journal articles and government documents complement each other.
How the Mycoplasma Works

The mycoplasma acts by entering into the individual cells of the body, depending upon your genetic predisposition.

You may develop neurological diseases if the pathogen destroys certain cells in your brain, or you may develop Crohn's colitis if the pathogen invades and destroys cells in the lower bowel.

Once the mycoplasma gets into the cell, it can lie there doing nothing sometimes for 10, 20 or 30 years, but if a trauma occurs like an accident or a vaccination that doesn't take, the mycoplasma can become triggered.

Because it is only the DNA particle of the bacterium, it doesn't have any organelles to process its own nutrients, so it grows by uptaking pre-formed sterols from its host cell and it literally kills the cell; the cell ruptures and what is left gets dumped into the bloodstream.
Creation of the Mycoplasma

A Laboratory-Made Disease Agent

Many doctors don't know about this mycoplasma disease agent because it was developed by the US military in biological warfare experimentation and it was not made public. This pathogen was patented by the United States military and Dr Shyh-Ching Lo. I have a copy of the documented patent from the US Patent Office.1

All the countries at war were experimenting with biological weapons. In 1942, the governments of the United States, Canada and Britain entered into a secret agreement to create two types of biological weapons (one that would kill, and one that was disabling) for use in the war against Germany and Japan, who were also developing biological weapons. While they researched a number of disease pathogens, they primarily focused on the Brucella bacterium and began to weaponise it.

From its inception, the biowarfare program was characterised by continuing in-depth review and participation by the most eminent scientists, medical consultants, industrial experts and government officials, and it was classified Top Secret.

The US Public Health Service also closely followed the progress of biological warfare research and development from the very start of the program, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States were working with the military in weaponising these diseases. These are diseases that have existed for thousands of years, but they have been weaponised--which means they've been made more contagious and more effective. And they are spreading.

The Special Virus Cancer Program, created by the CIA and NIH to develop a deadly pathogen for which humanity had no natural immunity (AIDS), was disguised as a war on cancer but was actually part of MKNAOMI.2 Many members of the Senate and House of Representatives do not know what has been going on. For example, the US Senate Committee on Government Reform had searched the archives in Washington and other places for the document titled "The Special Virus Cancer Program: Progress Report No. 8", and couldn't find it. Somehow they heard I had it, called me and asked me to mail it to them. Imagine: a retired schoolteacher being called by the United States Senate and asked for one of their secret documents! The US Senate, through the Government Reform Committee, is trying to stop this type of government research.

Crystalline Brucella

The title page of a genuine US Senate Study, declassified on February 24, 1977, shows that George Merck, of the pharmaceutical company, Merck Sharp & Dohme (which now makes cures for diseases that at one time it created), reported in 1946 to the US Secretary of War that his researchers had managed "for the first time" to "isolate the disease agent in crystalline form".3

They had produced a crystalline bacterial toxin extracted from the Brucella bacterium. The bacterial toxin could be removed in crystalline form and stored, transported and deployed without deteriorating. It could be delivered by other vectors such as insects, aerosol or the food chain (in nature it is delivered within the bacterium). But the factor that is working in the Brucella is the mycoplasma.

Brucella is a disease agent that doesn't kill people; it disables them. But, according to Dr Donald MacArthur of the Pentagon, appearing before a congressional committee in 1969,4 researchers found that if they had mycoplasma at a certain strength--actually, 10 to the 10th power (1010)--it would develop into AIDS, and the person would die from it within a reasonable period of time because it could bypass the natural human defences. If the strength was 108, the person would manifest with chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia. If it was 107, they would present as wasting; they wouldn't die and they wouldn't be disabled, but they would not be very interested in life; they would waste away.

Most of us have never heard of the disease brucellosis because it largely disappeared when they began pasteurising milk, which was the carrier. One salt shaker of the pure disease agent in a crystalline form could sicken the entire population of Canada. It is absolutely deadly, not so much in terms of killing the body but disabling it.

Because the crystalline disease agent goes into solution in the blood, ordinary blood and tissue tests will not reveal its presence. The mycoplasma will only crystallise at 8.1 pH, and the blood has a pH of 7.4 pH. So the doctor thinks your complaint is "all in your head".

Crystalline Brucella and Multiple Sclerosis

In 1998 in Rochester, New York, I met a former military man, PFC Donald Bentley, who gave me a document and told me: "I was in the US Army, and I was trained in bacteriological warfare. We were handling a bomb filled with brucellosis, only it wasn't brucellosis; it was a Brucella toxin in crystalline form. We were spraying it on the Chinese and North Koreans."

He showed me his certificate listing his training in chemical, biological and radiological warfare. Then he showed me 16 pages of documents given to him by the US military when he was discharged from the service. They linked brucellosis with multiple sclerosis, and stated in one section: "Veterans with multiple sclerosis, a kind of creeping paralysis developing to a degree of 10% or more disability within two years after separation from active service, may be presumed to be service-connected for disability compensation. Compensation is payable to eligible veterans whose disabilities are due to service." In other words: "If you become ill with multiple sclerosis, it is because you were handling this Brucella, and we will give you a pension. Don't go raising any fuss about it." In these documents, the government of the United States revealed evidence of the cause of multiple sclerosis, but they didn't make it known to the public--or to your doctor.

In a 1949 report, Drs Kyger and Haden suggested "the possibility that multiple sclerosis might be a central nervous system manifestation of chronic brucellosis". Testing approximately 113 MS patients, they found that almost 95% also tested positive for Brucella.5 We have a document from a medical journal, which concludes that one out of 500 people who had brucellosis would develop what they call neurobrucellosis; in other words, brucellosis in the brain, where the Brucella settles in the lateral ventricles--where the disease multiple sclerosis is basically located.6

Contamination of Camp Detrick Lab Workers

A 1948 New England Journal of Medicine report titled "Acute Brucellosis Among Laboratory Workers" shows us how actively dangerous this agent is.7 The laboratory workers were from Camp Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, where they were developing biological weapons. Even though these workers had been vaccinated, wore rubberised suits and masks and worked through holes in the compartment, many of them came down with this awful disease because it is so absolutely and terrifyingly infectious.

The article was written by Lt Calderone Howell, Marine Corps, Captain Edward Miller, Marine Corps, Lt Emily Kelly, United States Naval Reserve, and Captain Henry Bookman. They were all military personnel engaged in making the disease agent Brucella into a more effective biological weapon.
Covert Testing of Mycoplasma

Testing the Dispersal Methods

Documented evidence proves that the biological weapons they were developing were tested on the public in various communities without their knowledge or consent.

The government knew that crystalline Brucella would cause disease in humans. Now they needed to determine how it would spread and the best way to disperse it. They tested dispersal methods for Brucella suis and Brucella melitensis at Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, in June and September 1952. Probably, 100% of us now are infected with Brucella suis and Brucella melitensis.8

Another government document recommended the genesis of open-air vulnerability tests and covert research and development programs to be conducted by the Army and supported by the Central Intelligence Agency.

At that time, the Government of Canada was asked by the US Government to cooperate in testing weaponised Brucella, and Canada cooperated fully with the United States. The US Government wanted to determine whether mosquitoes would carry the disease and also if the air would carry it. A government report stated that "open-air testing of infectious biological agents is considered essential to an ultimate understanding of biological warfare potentialities because of the many unknown factors affecting the degradation of micro-organisms in the atmosphere".9

Testing via Mosquito Vector in Punta Gorda, Florida

A report from The New England Journal of Medicine reveals that one of the first outbreaks of chronic fatigue syndrome was in Punta Gorda, Florida, back in 1957.10 It was a strange coincidence that a week before these people came down with chronic fatigue syndrome, there was a huge influx of mosquitoes.

The National Institutes of Health claimed that the mosquitoes came from a forest fire 30 miles away. The truth is that those mosquitoes were infected in Canada by Dr Guilford B. Reed at Queen's University. They were bred in Belleville, Ontario, and taken down to Punta Gorda and released there.

Within a week, the first five cases ever of chronic fatigue syndrome were reported to the local clinic in Punta Gorda. The cases kept coming until finally 450 people were ill with the disease.

Testing via Mosquito Vector in Ontario

The Government of Canada had established the Dominion Parasite Laboratory in Belleville, Ontario, where it raised 100 million mosquitoes a month. These were shipped to Queen's University and certain other facilities to be infected with this crystalline disease agent. The mosquitoes were then let loose in certain communities in the middle of the night, so that the researchers could determine how many people would become ill with chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia, which was the first disease to show.

One of the communities they tested it on was the St Lawrence Seaway valley, all the way from Kingston to Cornwall, in 1984. They let out hundreds of millions of infected mosquitoes. Over 700 people in the next four or five weeks developed myalgic encephalomyelitis, or chronic fatigue syndrome.
Covert Testing of Other Disease Agents........

Philosophy & Religion / Why Jefferson Read the Quran
« on: October 21, 2010, 08:16:06 PM »
This is what the enlighhtened WRS believes in with all his heart.  The Muslim religion is more like judaism than any other I have happened across. Mutilate and kill children in the furtherance of making sex slaves out of them. Could have come right out of the Talmud. This forum has a quote from Jefferson on it's home page. Perhaps the owner and moderators should read up more on Jefferson before fawning over a devotee of this barbaric, primitive, evil "religion" which would make Molech blush, with it's atrocities. I, for one, have always realized that there is no working with any non-Whites in the fight against the jew. They have nothing to offer in the fight, and they hate Whites every bit as much as the jew does, whatever the shade of their skin.
The arabs in this country, the US, are much like the jew. They acquired their convenience stores and motels and other businesses because race-traitors and jews in the government gave them a seven year interest-free loan with a seven year tax abatement with which to do it. The popular image of them sleeping on the floor and working 24/7 to build up a business is pure nonsense, it exists only in Hollywood and on television, not in reality. They built their fortunes because White workers and taxpayers footed the bill. Could I have got one of these sweetheart deals? Why, no, I couldn't. I'm White. Another way the jew had of promoting their number one commandment - the melting pot for everyone else, and racial purity for them, if one can use the word "pure" in any context with regard to jews without gagging and laughing at the same time. - Grizzle

What Thomas Jefferson learned
from the Muslim book of jihad...
Know Your Enemy

By Ted Sampley
U.S. Veteran Dispatch
January 2007

Democrat Keith Ellison is now officially the first Muslim United States congressman. True to his pledge, he placed his hand on the Qur'an, the Muslim book of jihad (Qur'an) and pledged his allegiance to the United States during his ceremonial swearing-in.

Capitol Hill staff said Ellison's swearing-in photo opportunity drew more media than they had ever seen in the history of the U.S. House. Ellison represents the 5th Congressional District of Minnesota.

The Qur'an Ellison used was no ordinary book. It once belonged to Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and one of America's founding fathers. Ellison borrowed it from the Rare Book Section of the Library of Congress. It was one of the 6,500 Jefferson books archived in the library.

Ellison, who was born in Detroit and converted to Islam while in college, said he chose to use Jefferson's Qur'an because it showed that "a visionary like Jefferson" believed that wisdom could be gleaned from many sources.

There is no doubt Ellison was right about Jefferson believing wisdom could be "gleaned" from the Muslim Qur'an. At the time Jefferson owned the book, he needed to know everything possible about Muslims because he was about to advocate war against the Islamic "Barbary" states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Tripoli.

Ellison's use of Jefferson's Qur'an as a prop illuminates a subject once well-known in the history of the United States, but, which today, is mostly forgotten - the Muslim pirate slavers who over many centuries enslaved millions of Africans and tens of thousands of Christian Europeans and Americans in the Islamic "Barbary" states.

Over the course of 10 centuries, Muslim pirates cruised the African and Mediterranean coastline, pillaging villages and seizing slaves.

The taking of slaves in pre-dawn raids on unsuspecting coastal villages had a high casualty rate. It was typical of Muslim raiders to kill off as many of the "non-Muslim" older men and women as possible so the preferred "booty" of only young women and children could be collected.

Young non-Muslim women were targeted because of their value as concubines in Islamic markets. Islamic law provides for the sexual interests of Muslim men by allowing them to take as many as four wives at one time and to have as many concubines as their fortunes allow.

Boys, as young as 9 or 10 years old, were often mutilated to create eunuchs who would bring higher prices in the slave markets of the Middle East. Muslim slave traders created "eunuch stations" along major African slave routes so the necessary surgery could be performed. It was estimated that only a small number of the boys subjected to the mutilation survived after the surgery.

When American colonists rebelled against British rule in 1776, American merchant ships lost Royal Navy protection. With no American Navy for protection, American ships were attacked and their Christian crews enslaved by Muslim pirates operating under the control of the "Dey of Algiers"--an Islamist warlord ruling Algeria.

Because American commerce in the Mediterranean was being destroyed by the pirates, the Continental Congress agreed in 1784 to negotiate treaties with the four Barbary States. Congress appointed a special commission consisting of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, to oversee the negotiations.

Lacking the ability to protect its merchant ships in the Mediterranean, the new America government tried to appease the Muslim slavers by agreeing to pay tribute and ransoms in order to retrieve seized American ships and buy the freedom of enslaved sailors.

Adams argued in favor of paying tribute as the cheapest way to get American commerce in the Mediterranean moving again. Jefferson was opposed. He believed there would be no end to the demands for tribute and wanted matters settled "through the medium of war." He proposed a league of trading nations to force an end to Muslim piracy.

In 1786, Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and Adams, then the American ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the "Dey of Algiers" ambassador to Britain.

The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress' vote to appease.

During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey's ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

In a later meeting with the American Congress, the two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur'an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."

For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Not long after Jefferson's inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.

Declaring that America was going to spend "millions for defense but not one cent for tribute," Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America's best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast.

The USS Constitution, USS Constellation, USS Philadelphia, USS Chesapeake, USS Argus, USS Syren and USS Intrepid all saw action.

In 1805, American Marines marched across the dessert from Egypt into Tripolitania, forcing the surrender of Tripoli and the freeing of all American slaves.

During the Jefferson administration, the Muslim Barbary States, crumbling as a result of intense American naval bombardment and on shore raids by Marines, finally officially agreed to abandon slavery and piracy.

Jefferson's victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine Hymn, with the line, "From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, we will fight our country's battles on the land as on the sea."

It wasn't until 1815 that the problem was fully settled by the total defeat of all the Muslim slave trading pirates.

Jefferson had been right. The "medium of war" was the only way to put and end to the Muslim problem.
Mr. Ellison was right about Jefferson. He was a "visionary" wise enough to read and learn about the enemy from their own Muslim book of jihad.


Heaven Above / How To Make A Nuclear Reactor
« on: October 18, 2010, 07:50:49 PM »
This is hours of fun for the curious, intelligent and somewhat twisted teenage science hobbyist. This is no s**t, you really can do this, and raise the neighborhood background radiation to several thousand times normal. Have fun, kids! (note: the preceeding paragraph is completely facetious. I advise all who read this to never do anything like this, no matter what) THIS MATERIAL IS PRESENTED SOLELY FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

The guy in the video handles this stuff with an incredible lack of caution. The dumbass.  It would not surprise me at all to find out he contracted cancer after doing this. NEVER handle radium, thorium or other radioactive substances in fluid solution, or as smoke, without being schooled in handling technique first, and abide by it as if your life depends on it, because it does.Always wear heavy rubber gloves, and limit your exposure time. Probably best never to make radioactive smoke at all. One atom inhaled is all it takes, or if you get it on your fingers and eat or smoke afterwards....

Of course, there are easier ways to get Thorium. Thorianite, the ore of thorium, is easy and inexpensive to get on the internet, and may contain 75% or more ThO2.
Or you can do this (see video below). Thoriated tungsten TIG welding rod is not too expensive and available at your local welding supply house, much more cheaply on the internet.
Radium watch hands, the availability comes and goes on ebay. Sometimes it seems like people are obsessed with radium watches the way some are with antique baseball cards or stamps and coins.?

I find it amazing that no one has ever made a silent dirty bomb by this method (that we know of). (note: They no longer use thorium in gas lantern mantles } I have absolutely NO interest in doing so, by the way. That, like using guns or conventional bombs, would only play into the hands of our enemies, and would immediately lead to a brutal military dictatorship in whatever country this hypothetical person is in, so I strongly suggest that nobody do any of these things I just mentioned. As I will not.

I do have some such materials, but they are handled very respectfully and safely, and they never come into such an arrangement. I also don't have nearly enough of these materials to do this, nor do I wish to have these quantities.

Some of my inventions use Thorium oxide or radium paint, but only very small amounts, and used in a way that mainstream physicists would characterize as a slightly radioactive paperweight. But what do they know.
 (I have one smoke detector, some thoriated Tungsten welding rod, and one radium-painted watch, all safe and legal to own)

 I have achieved an electromechanical interface with the vital force, the ether, whatever you may call it. This allows me to influence specific living organisms at great distances without the expenditure of electromagnetic energy or chemicals. Several volunteer test subjects have reported robust effects, despite their not being enthusiasts for alternative science or anything outside of what science says it knows. Several have asked me to turn the machine off after a time, including a learned friend who has extensive training in mental disciplines. These effects have been broadcast to people tens, hundreds or a thousand miles away from the machine.

 I believe such technology will change human life as we know it, very much for the better if the right people use it rightly, very much for the worse if it goes unused or misused. It can have effects on a person such as making them immune to disease (this should not be taken as medical advice) or immune to adverse conditions such as cold. It can double or triple endurance, more.

And the mental fireworks which people seek out through mental disciplines, hallucinogens, etc., well, you get that too, more than you want, in the form of extremely vivid dreams. Some people don't think they can get too much of this type of fun. Believe me, you can. In the next month or so, my tech is going to make several quantum leaps.


All rights expressly reserved under relevant sections of the Unified Commercial Code.

Survival & Firearms / Powder-Actuated Nail Guns
« on: October 17, 2010, 12:40:26 AM »
Good weapons for up to a certain range? Your thoughts? note: They are not firerarms by law, neither are the blanks firearm ammo by law.,26637,27022,27143&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=powder+actuated+nail+gun&cp=9&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1024&bih=605

Health & Healing / Onions & Health
« on: October 16, 2010, 02:35:47 PM »
Onion Lore (from Keelynet)

A friend of mine told me a story about when he was a kid he was in the hospital & nearly dying. His Italian grandmother came to the hospital & told a family member to go buy her a large onion & a new pair of white cotton socks. She sliced the onion open then put a slice on the bottom of each of his feet & put the white cotton socks on him. In the morning when he awoke they removed the socks. The slices of onion were black & his fever was gone. The following story that someone sent to me might have some truth in it & we are going to try it this winter.

In 1919 when the flu killed 40 million people there was this Doctor that visited the many farmers to see if he could help them combat the flu.. Many of the farmers and their family had contracted it and many died.

The doctor came upon this one farmer and to his surprise, everyone was very healthy. When the doctor asked what the farmer was doing that was different the wife replied that she had placed an unpeeled onion in a dish in the rooms of the home, (probably only two rooms back then). The doctor couldn't believe it and asked if he could have one of the onions and place it under the microscope. She gave him one and when he did this, he did find the flu virus in the onion. It obviously absorbed the bacteria, therefore, keeping the family healthy.

Now, I heard this story from my hairdresser in AZ. She said that several years ago many of her employees were coming down with the flu and so were many of her customers. The next year she placed several bowls with onions around in her shop. To her surprise, none of her staff got sick. It must work.. (And no, she is not in the onion business.)

The moral of the story is, buy some onions and place them in bowls around your home. If you work at a desk, place one or two in your office or under your desk or even on top somewhere. Try it and see what happens. We did it last year and we never got the flu.

I contracted pneumonia and needless to say I was very ill...I came across an article that said to cut both ends off an onion put one end on a fork and then place the forked end into an empty jar...placing the jar next to the sick patient at night. It said the onion would be black in the morning from the germs...sure enough it happened just like that...the onion was a mess and I began to feel better.

Another thing I read in the article was that onions and garlic placed around the room saved many from the black plague years ago. They have powerful antibacterial, antiseptic properties.

This is the other note.


I have used an onion which has been left in the fridge, and sometimes I don't use a whole one at one time, so save the other half for later. Now with this info, I have changed my mind....will buy smaller onions in the future.

I had the wonderful privilege of touring Mullins Food Products, Makers of mayonnaise. Mullins is huge, and is owned by 11 brothers and sisters in the Mullins family. My friend, Jeanne, is the CEO.

Questions about food poisoning came up, and I wanted to share what I learned from a chemist.

The guy who gave us our tour is named Ed. He's one of the brothers Ed is a chemistry expert and is involved in developing most of the sauce formula. He's even developed sauce formula for McDonald's.

Keep in mind that Ed is a food chemistry whiz. During the tour, someone asked if we really needed to worry about mayonnaise. People are always worried that mayonnaise will spoil. Ed's answer will surprise you. Ed said that all commercially- made Mayo is completely safe.

"It doesn't even have to be refrigerated. No harm in refrigerating it, but it's not really necessary." He explained that the pH in mayonnaise is set at a point that bacteria could not survive in that environment. He then talked about the quaint essential picnic, with the bowl of potato salad sitting on the table and how everyone blames the mayonnaise when someone gets sick.

Ed says that when food poisoning is reported, the first thing the officials look for is when the 'victim' last ate ONIONS and where those onions came from (in the potato salad?). Ed says it's not the mayonnaise (as long as it's not homemade Mayo) that spoils in the outdoors. It's probably the onions, and if not the onions, it's the POTATOES.

He explained, onions are a huge magnet for bacteria, especially uncooked onions. You should never plan to keep a portion of a sliced onion.. He says it's not even safe if you put it in a zip-lock bag and put it in your refrigerator.

It's already contaminated enough just by being cut open and out for a bit, that it can be a danger to you (and doubly watch out for those onions you put in your hotdogs at the baseball park!)

Ed says if you take the leftover onion and cook it like crazy you'll probably be okay, but if you slice that leftover onion and put on your sandwich, you're asking for trouble. Both the onions and the moist potato in a potato salad, will attract and grow bacteria faster than any commercial mayonnaise will even begin to break down.

So, how's that for news? Take it for what you will. I (the author) am going to be very careful about my onions from now on. For some reason, I see a lot of credibility coming from a chemist and a company that produces millions of pounds of mayonnaise every year.'

Also, dogs should never eat onions. Their stomachs cannot metabolize onions. Please remember it is dangerous to cut onions and try to use it to cook the next day, it becomes highly poisonous for even a single night and creates Toxic bacteria which may cause Adverse Stomach infections because of excess Bile secretions and even Food poisoning.

Onions have always disagreed with my stomach, I always take them off of food that has them on it.  - grizzle

Money & Markets / Trading Prisoners Like Cattle
« on: October 14, 2010, 03:48:26 PM »
Wal-Mart, Nestle, etc. carried insurance policies on employees, unbeknownst to them, called colloquially "Dead Peasant Insurance". Nyuk. - grizzle

All crimes are commercial and have a commercial value to them. It makes you look at improvements to the freeways, cities and towns in a different light `¦ especially when those improvements are funded by `˜municipal bonds.` You`ll also understand why there`s no hurry to end the war in Iraq.

All criminal prosecution is for the purpose for raising revenue for the United States. Now you`ll have a better understanding of why people are in jail, why they are in prison, why they are on probation and why they are charged with everything from jaywalking on up through murder one.

An American soldier who dies in Afghanistan and Iraq probably carries a $10 million life insurance
on him carried by the government. After all, every soldier, marine, or air force person is an asset to the United States. They have a huge investment in that particular soldier and his activity and it can explain why it is that the US is not so anxious to withdraw its troops from that area. It`s a money making activity and they don`t want to talk about the fact that they are making money on death and that they are making money from the incarceration and imprisonment of many otherwise good hearted people who have not necessarily committed otherwise serious crimes.

They have a rule called the 144 holder. The rule is that they can`t sell private investment securities that are not registered. The rule prohibits them from selling the prison bonds. They have to wait 6 months before they can sell a certain quantity of private securities without being registered, selling them as private securities.

Basically there are 8 people on the board of directors of CCA (Corrections Corporation of America) The top holders are Joseph E. Russell and John M. Ferguson. Russell owns 64,000 shares of CCA stock, which is worth about $70 million. Ferguson owns 34,000 shares valued at about $37 million.

Fidelity Management and Research is the top stock holder, the top investment firm that is selling the bonds as investment securities. They pool them and sell them as mortgage backed securities. Also when they pool them, they sell them as mutual funds on the stock market. By `pooling` we mean the securities on the inmates.

What they are doing is they are actually taking the mortgage backed securities, which are really bid bonds, performance bonds and payment bonds. They pool these bonds and when they pool them together they call them mortgage backed securities. They take these to TBA which is the Bond Market Association. It`s an actual market for bonds. Anytime a bond is issued there has to be an underwriter. The bonds have to be underwritten. Bonds that are issued have to be indemnified so there has to be surety to indemnify the bonds. The brokerage houses and the insurance companies indemnify the bonds. They`re called surety companies.

After the surety companies indemnify the bonds, which is underwriting them, they do this through an investment banker or the banks themselves do this. They job it out to them. They buy up all these shares and turn around and sell them as investment securities. The shares represent the stock which represent the account of CCA. All of this has been funneled through CCA, the Corrections Corporation of America.

What they are doing is selling stock in the prison system by selling the prisoners` accounts as securities through the securities exchange. They are making huge amounts of money off it. They privatize the prisoners` accounts and bring all these investors in and what they are doing is underwriting all these prisoner`s accounts (bonds). This is after the surety company guarantees the bonds. Then they are underwritten through an investment bank or banker. Then they are put out on the market and resold to the public.


    Enter any prisoner`s case number within the specified entry boxes, located at Fidelity Investments` online Securities look up index query, locate that prisoner`s bonds and find out where they are being traded.

(Here at source link are pics of damning documents)

In other words the banks are buying up all the shares and then they resell them as investment securities to the public. The public then buys them as mutual funds or they can buy them as debt instruments, equity instruments.

What they are really doing is they are buying up debt instruments. They are using the fiscal accounting cycle of accrual and they sell the prisoner`s `˜capital and interest` as it is called in accrual accounting. They resell these to the public because the prisoner did not do full settlement and closure on the account.

They sell the prisoner accounts as a commercial dishonor and sell it to the public as a commercial dishonor.

When you go in the courts they always say they are operating under a statute jurisdiction. The Black`s Law Dictionary 4th edition says a statute is a bond or obligation of record. That`s what all the criminal statutes are: bonds or obligation of record. Go in and read the definition of a recognizance bond and you find that it is a bond or obligation of record. They are selling bonds. They are charging prisoners under a bond; the prisoner signs the bond and the bond becomes the agreement for the payback. This is done when the prisoner signs the final court papers at a sentencing hearing.

Just how many of us remember when our government attempted to finance from the private sector during the Second World War? Weren`t they selling war bonds? They were soaking up the people`s equity in terms of buying bonds, transferring your funds to the government. The government by purchasing those bonds, was promising to pay you back your investment at sometime in the future with interest. At that time what they were collecting from the people was their so-called cash equity. People have gotten too poor, too stingy, too smart to buy bonds to finance the government.

How long has it been since you heard the Post Office or anyone trying to get you down to buy US savings bonds? So what they are doing now instead of getting us to voluntarily give our cash equity to the government for a promise to be paid back in the future, they are securing from us some violation of a statute by which the law ascribes from us a penalty; i.e., the payment of a sum of money due.

Instead of collecting the cash from us, they put us through a criminal procedure where we dishonor the system and what is happening is they are selling our capital and our interest. In other words, they are selling the liability you had in whatever charge was brought against your strawman.

They are taking that capital and interest that you should pay and are grabbing that from us and selling it on the open market to bankers and investors to transfer their funds to government which is covered by the bond of the violation of your strawman of that statute.

In order to secure the bond the living soul is placed in prison as the surety to back the bond which is financed on the investment of the public market place in terms of the sales of stocks and bonds.

The public doesn`t directly bid on my (the prisoner`s) debt. Your debt is assumed by the bankers. The bankers issue secondary paper that allows me to invest in what they are holding as the holder in due course of the claim against your strawman. The reason they are doing this is because you dishonored the post settlement procedures for settlement and closure of the account.

The prisoner should have come in and accepted and used his exemption. Since the prisoner dishonored the post settlement proceedings, then the prisoner is in dishonor and the issuance of the bonds by the financing system was done in order to pass the punishment on to him because of his inability to fulfill his post settlement objectives.

If you get into dishonor by nonacceptance, what they are trying to do is get an acceptor which is the same thing as a banker. They need someone to pay off the obligation and if you get into dishonor, they sell your dishonor and put you into prison as the collateral and they sell the bond.

The bond is issued and they get a surety to underwrite the bid bond with a performance bond and then they get an underwriter to underwrite the performance and payment bonds.

What the performance bond does is it guarantees the bid contract, or the bid bond. What the bid bond does is guarantee the payment of the performance bond. This is done through a surety company. Then they get an underwriter or an investment banker to underwrite it. After it`s underwritten, they sell it to the public as investment securities, debt instruments, or mutual backed securities.

It`s all done through bonds `¦ bonding. That`s what all these municipal bonds are. What they doing is following everything through the prison system. The prison system is being privatized. Through privatization, private enterprise can fund the prison system cheaper than the government can. They are subsidizing everything through privatization.

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), promotes privatization through foundations like the Reason Foundation owned by David Knott. They get the foundations to promote this and get investors to come in.

Cornell was merged with Trinity Venture Company which is an investment company. What they did was change their name to Reid Trinity Venture and then merged with SB Warburg. (Warburg was out of Germany and partnered with Rothschild.) SB Warburg is in Chicago, Illinois, and they merged with BIF in Switzerland, which is a settlement and closure bank, and the biggest bank in the world for settlements. They are connected to Cornell Company which is owned by David Cornell.

Everyone is tied in. Paine Webber Group in the United States and all the big international corporations are the stockholders and own all the stock in CCA. Everyone is using our exemptions on the private side. They filed a 1096 tax return and show it as a prepaid account, as prepaid interest and they returned it back to the prisoner. They took the prisoners deduction for the exemption and they deduct the tax and the IRS bills the prisoner for the tax. So the corporations are stealing your exemption which is your intellectual property.

What`s wrong with this? They are not telling us what they are doing. It`s all commercial. When you go into the court room everything is commercial.

What really matters here is honor and dishonor. The courts have to dishonor the potential prisoner or get that `˜person` to argue or get that person`s attorney to argue. Just like Martha Stewart. Argue and you`re in dishonor and you`ll end up in jail.

The attorneys are actors to make us think the whole process is a factual issue. They get us into the guilty/not guilty mode and they get into all the cloak and dagger or what evidence to present. It`s a dog and pony show to cover up that they are after the debt money.

All corporations work on a fiscal accounting year which means that they spend debt. They can`t get rid of the debt and balance the books unless they run it through our accounts on the private side.

We the people run on a calender year and the corporations run on the fiscal year. The only way that they can balance their books is to run it through our accounts using our exemptions. Then they can do their reverse bookkeeping entry and go to post settlement and closure. They can`t do that until the prisoners do the acceptance (if they do it).

That what they are looking for in the court room under UCC 3-410 is the acceptor. That means we are assuming the liability for the debt as the principal. A lot of times with debt the principal is always the primary libelant in the commercial setting. He has to assume the liability and then you get your remedy. Otherwise you don`t get a remedy.

What they do is they sell the notes just as they do when you go into prison. They endorse the note and they no longer the holder of the note. The mortgage company
wasn`t involved in this process `¦ the attorneys are doing all this. What they are doing is coming to the private side to get the debt without any permission from the mortgage company. In this case they quoted from the UCC, and it`s from Lex Mercatoria, the Law of the Merchant.

Admiralty is all debt and it`s all civil; it becomes criminal when the prisoner gets a contempt charge when he refuses to pay. They can keep you in jail until you pay the debt. The initial get out of jail bond releases you until you`ve successfully paid the debt. Warden comes from admiralty-warden of the sea. The warden is the warehouse man who is warehousing all the goods; he`s the bailee. The commitment order is your bailment, your contract for the commitment of the goods. Then they put the goods in a warehouse and store them there. (Prisoners stored in prisons, just like the people stored in the pods in the movie, The Matrix.)

This fiction (corporation) took you (John Henry Doe), the flesh and blood creation of God, out of the picture and substituted in your place something called the `strawman` (JOHN HENRY DOE).

Whenever you get a summons to appear in court, your name is printed in all capital letters `JOHN HENRY DOE` because that is how the `straw man` is distinguished from the flesh and blood `John Henry Doe`, God-created man.

Since you show up and answer to your all-capital name (JOHN HENRY DOE) on the docket, the court accepts you (John Henry Doe) as the `˜representative` of the straw man (JOHN HENRY DOE) and proceeds to play the game with you. If you don`t show up, they will still arrest you for failure to appear, because the state has already recognized you as the representative of the straw man - unless you learn how to break that connection (called a `˜nexus`) and take back your straw man from state `˜ownership`.

It sounds complicated and you weren`t told a thing about it in school (public school), but we did tell you it was a `deception`, remember?

If you don`t realize that you are `˜owned` by the state, then consider this: whenever you go to a car dealer and buy a new car, the `deed` (from the manufacturer) of that car is sent by the car dealer to the Secretary of State of the state in which you live. It`s recorded and then destroyed. You, in turn, are given a `title of certificate` by your state which says that you have a legal right to possess and use this car which is now `owned by the state` who received its deed. `Your` ownership of the car is an `illusion,` the reality is that the state owns the car.

Same for a marriage licence. You are asking the state to give you permission to become man and wife. By seeking out said marriage licence, you are affirming to the state that your are slaves of the state (`chattel`) and you recognize that the `˜massah` has authority over you for such things, otherwise you wouldn`t be asking for its `˜permission` in the first place.

Pages: [1] 2 3