Freedom Portal

Library => History & Civilization => Topic started by: Sue on January 07, 2009, 09:37:50 PM

Title: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 07, 2009, 09:37:50 PM

(http://www.racerealist.com/orion_2.gif) (http://www.racerealist.com/eckart_2.htm)

A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me

Deitrich Eckart
Translated by Dr. William Pierce


"Okay. So they are neither national nor international," I acknowledged. "What, then?"  

"In terms of our customary concepts," he shrugged, "it really can't be defined. It is a rank growth over the whole earth, sometimes advancing slowly, sometimes leaping ahead in great bounds. Everywhere it sucks voraciously at the lifeblood of the planet. What was in the beginning a swollen abundance will become in the end nothing but dried-up sap. Zionism is the visible, surface aspect. It is connected underground to the rest of the monstrous growth.

"And nowhere is there to be found a trace of opposition to this thing."  

"One might say," I laughed, "that the wolves have split themselves into two packs. It has been agreed that one of these shall abandon the land of the sheep in order to go live somewhere, quite among themselves, as pure vegetarians."

"There is one thing above all of which we must always keep in mind," he tendered, "one thing of which we must always remind ourselves: 'Great masters of the lie'! One need only forget Schopenhauer's words for an instant in order to begin slipping under the influence of their deceptions. To be sure, we also lie but, in the first place, not as a matter of habit and, in the second place, clumsily. Any really experienced judge of human nature is able to detect the lie of an Aryan, even a very shrewd one. Sherlock Holmes himself, however, would be at a loss when confronted with the Jewish cold-bloodedness in deception. A Jew is only embarrassed when he inadvertently blurts out the truth. If he should happen to deliberately tell the truth, it is always with a mental reservation, thus making a lie even of the truth."

"Indeed, Luther," I replied, "said to the Jews: 'You are not a German, but a deceiver, not a Frenchman, but a faker.' [31] His synonym for Jew was 'liar'!"

That's what everyone who knows them says of them." he rejoined, "from the Pharaohs up to Goethe and our time. It has been said in every dead and living language: in Greek, Latin, Persian, Turkish, English, French, or what have you. One would hope that these universal condemnations, throughout the whole world, would give our charmers and wizards at least a little to think about. God forbid! Not even Christ was able to reach them. He stood there among the cringing Jewish rabble, his eyes flashing, the very image of scorn, and his words fell among them like whiplashes:

       Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
       the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a
       lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it (John 8:44). But to our charmers
       and wizards that means no more than the unintelligible stammering of a child."

"They delude themselves by believing that to be only a stern but well-meaning lecture of the Lord to his beloved people of Israel," I underscored his irony.

"Christ," he continued with a raised voice, "was never other than perfectly straightforward and frank. God, not to feel the fact that there two fundamentally different worlds opposed one another! In Palestine after the Babylonian captivity there was a great lower stratum of non-Jews ruled over by Jewish moneylenders, powerful through their usury. One can read that in the book of Nehemiah. Sombart says that it leaves absolutely nothing to be desired in the way of clarity. [32]

The outstanding point is that the real population, composed of oppressed peasants, was of an entirely different race than the Hebrews. Gradually the Jews forced their religion on them. Christ himself growled about that: 'Woe onto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye encompass sea and land to make one proselyte...' (Matthew 23:15).To the Jews, Galilee was the land of the Gentiles, whose population 'sat in darkness,' as they impudently imagined (Matthew 4:15-16). They said: Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?' and 'Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet' (John 1:46; 7:52). The Hebrews were so firmly convinced of the non-Jewish ancestry of Christ that they counted him among the especially hated Samaritans (John 7:48). We live and learn! There are many more such examples."

One could hardly recommend a better policy than that which lets each man find salvation in his own fashion," I stressed. "The tacit assumption in that policy, though, is that each man's fashion should involve some sort of decent sentiment, some genuine belief, and not just a contemptible Phariseeism. This distinction should have been expressly emphasized long ago. It wasn't, and the religion of the moneychanger has received the benefit of this misguided tolerance. Christ was not so tolerant. With a whip he put a stop to the business of the children of the devil, even though he had said, 'Love your enemy'!"

"Yes," he replied, "but we must understand what Christ meant by 'enemy.' We can love an honorable and decent enemy, even a brutal one, who is frank and forthright in his enmity. And at the same time we can beware of him. But Christ never dreamed that we should love men whom no love whatever could dissuade from their implacable determination to poison us, body and soul. Indeed, he himself did not do that. On the contrary, he continued to strike with his whip as hard as he could. And the words that he flung with indignation into the faces of the rabble breathed of irreconcilability itself. To me, he acted very proudly in the founding of his religion: there was very little contradiction between his sermons and his deeds! Why, then, have the 'pious' never followed his example? They least of all. They mercilessly persecute even their decent adversaries -- as a matter of fact, only their decent adversaries. Their eyes remain closed to the most cunning bunch of swindlers in existence. The Bavarian People's Party, for instance, knows quite well that we are defending the Christian foundations of our nation without mental reservations. They also know, however, that we can make no common cause with them as long as they adhere to their present policies. And so they turned to the Jews, hoping to remain in power with their help. They surprised themselves. Dripping with friendliness at first, the Jews turned on them murderously when they had gotten the upper hand."

"That was inevitable," I agreed with him. "Fortunately, the Jews would not be able to provide us with that same sort of dreadful experience, for we do not betray and murder our own flesh and blood for the sales of profit. So far as we are concerned, the Bavarian People's party could even remain in office, provided they clean the manure out of they pigsty and perceive the correctness of our views. We are not willing to tear ourselves apart just for power. But we want Germanism, we want genuine Christianity, we want order and propriety, and we want these things so firmly established that our children and grandchildren can remain satisfied with them."

"They consider that impossible," he said, "and therefore they consider our program nothing but empty phrases, of no more sincerity than the empty phrases with which they consciously try to peddle themselves to the people. But our goals are not only possible, they are certain, even if we don't attain them tomorrow. But first a beginning must be made. So far, never and nowhere has there been a truly social state. Everywhere and always the upper crust has leaned much more strongly to the principle, 'what is yours, is mine,' than to, 'what is mine, is yours.' These wise ones have only themselves to blame for the fact the lower stratum, full of rage, now is committing the same error. The Jew is able to take advantage of both these groups. One of them provides for his affairs, the other carries them out. Therefore, we oppose them both. We will put an end to unfair privileges as well as to slavery."

"Decidedly," I replied. "Our front stands against both left and right. A strange situation; from two directions we must ward off attackers who also fight one another. The Reds scream at us as reactionaries, and to the reactionaries we are Bolsheviks. From both sides the Jew directs the attack on us. The lower stratum doesn't see him yet and, thus, hates us from sheer stupidity; the upper stratum sees him but thinks it can serve its own selfish purposes with him and thus, shoots us in the back more from unscrupulousness than stupidity. One really needs a good deal of faith under such circumstances in order to maintain one's courage."

"Which we have, God be thanked, in a hundred ways," he said, laughing, as he stretched himself. "No words were spoken more directly to our hearts than 'Be not afraid'! (Matthew 28:10) And that was supposed to have been said by a Jew? Those creatures of eternal fear? Crazy!"

"Every time new and promising opportunities for meddling have arisen," he brought out, "the Jew has been immediately involved. He has demonstrated an uncanny ability to sniff out like a bloodhound anything which was dangerous to him. Having found it, he uses all his cunning to get at it, to divert it, to change its nature, or, at least, to deflect its point from its goal. Schopenhauer called the Jew 'the dregs of mankind,' 'a beast,' 'the great master of the lie.' How does the Jew respond? He establishes a Schopenhauer Society. Likewise, the Kant Society in his work, in spite of the fact that -- or, rather, because -- Kant summarily declared the Jewish people to be a 'nation of swindlers.' [33] The same with the Goethe Society. 'We tolerate no Jews among us,' said Goethe. 'Their religion permits them to rob non-Jews,' he wrote. 'This crafty race has one great principle: as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained,' he continued. He categorically emphasized: 'I refrain from all cooperation with Jews and their accomplices. [34] All in vain; the Jewish Goethe Society is still there. It would be there even if he himself had expressly forbidden such knavery."

"With exactly the same right," I interjected, "the two of us could join a Talmud Society. What impudence that would require! Inconceivable."

"Not to the Jew," he replied. "To him impudence has no meaning. He is only able to think in terms of advantage or disadvantage, profit or loss. One must approach him with a different sort of measuring stick."

"Our charmers and wizards," I rejoined, "all fall for their trick. Goethe, Kant, Schopenhauer seem to be nothing but babblers to them."

"Bah, Goethe!" he interrupted contemptuously. "Not even the saintly Thomas Aquinas is able to reach these people. The great father of the Church has described in his writings our relationship with the Jews in terms of a voyage on a ship. The Jews, embarked on the same vessel with the Christians, play a characteristic role: while the Christians are occupied with sailing the ship, the Jews plunder the storeroom and bore holes in the hull. St. Thomas recommends that they should be relieved of their booty and chained to the rudder. What an atrocity! How un-Christian! Poor Jews! One can learn so much from them! At least, according to Drs. Heim and Schweyer. And so the world goes on, governed with the same wisdom as in the time of Joseph's Pharaoh."

"Namely, by statesmen," I completed, "who are so busy ruling that they completely fail to notice that not they but others actually rule; by men like Czar Nicholas, who indulged himself in the same self-deception and got a bullet in the head for it. As early as 1843 Disraeli gave us a hint of what we should expect there. 'The mysterious Russian diplomacy is organized by Jews,' he boasted. Also, 'the mighty revolution which is in the making in Germany is evolving entirely under the leadership of Jews.'" [35]

"Most of our revolutions," he said, "whether initially with desirable goals or not, have evolved under Jewish leadership. The revolutions of vulgar predisposition were, for the most part, the work of Jews; and those with loftier tendencies were soon subverted into a darker course by Jews. In the case of the struggling young Christianity, for example, the Jews, quick as a flash, began hanging onto its coattails. Consider Paul, properly called Schaul, who was a rabbinical student. That Schaul first chose the Roman-sounding name, Saulus, and then had himself renamed Paulus gives cause for thought. Still more, the fact that in the beginning he persecuted the fledgling Christian community with first-rate ferocity. I don't know: mass murderers who later become saints is that not too much of a marvel? Indeed, the Jew Weininger supposed that Christ had also originally been a criminal. [36] But, my God, a Jew could say that a hundred times, and it still need not be true on that account.

"As a Jew, Paul certainly knew that of all the peoples of the world the Jews, first and foremost, needed their souls saved. 'Go not ... to the Gentiles, ... But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,' demanded Christ (Matthew 10:5-6). Paul ignored it. He went to the Greeks and the Romans and brought them his 'Christianity.' A 'Christianity' with which the Roman Empire became unhinged. 'All men are equal! Brotherhood! Pacifism! No more privileges!' And the Jew triumphed."

"I always think," I spun the thread further, "of the admirable Herr Levine in the Berliner Lokalanzeiger. [37] He suddenly burst out one day, as if in rapture: only a Jew could have done that; could have, with Paul's impudence, put himself in the middle of the Capitol and there expounded a doctrine which must bring about the utter ruin of the Roman Empire! That's what the man said, word for word; I still remember it perfectly."

"It certainly hits the nail on the head," he rejoined. "It may be a long time yet before Christianity recovers from Paul. Oh, what gullible souls we are! A Jew murders hundreds of Christians; suddenly he notices that the rest only become even more zealous; the well-known light dawns on him; he pretends to be converted, throws himself into the great pose, and behold: even though he deviates in nearly all his doctrines from the other apostles, we listen devoutly to his sermons. The simple teachings of the Master, which the most childlike mind might comprehend, we must have 'explained' to us by a Hebrew."

"The Jew," I replied, "certainly must be tempted to say, 'Why are you so stupid that you let everyone make fools of you?' And there are many charmers and wizards who, on account of his extraordinary cunning, or 'spirituality' as they call it, look upon him with timid admiration."

"If it depended on mere possessions," he returned, "they would be justified. Someone named Goldstein once boasted that the Jews administer the spiritual property of the German people. [38] A pity that he didn't add how they administer it.

"Well, let us be thankful that there will always be men who, for example, will read Goethe through the eyes of Goethe and not through the slimy spectacles of Goldstein. They may not be professors, but perhaps vagabonds of a sort. A breed, anyway, which will not become extinct and through which the original Goethe will be safely preserved. The Jews can then quietly 'administer' the new Goethe. It will not be begrudged them." [39]

"Suppose, however," I interjected anxiously, "the 'vagabonds' also listen credulously to them and fall into the trap?"

"It lies in the nature of the 'vagabond,'" he laughed, "to have a heart so full that it matters not how his head happens to be persuaded; it will always be his heart that determines the outcome. They feel intuitively that which the clever, despite their understanding, are not able to see. And they preserve it. One may deceive their heads, but not even they have authority over their spirits."

"And, you see," he pounded on the table, "they alone are to be thanked that at least part of our Christian heritage, as well as our other cultural legacy, has survived administration by the Jews. Where are they? Where were they? Among high and low, among the kings and the soldiers, among the popes and the mendicant friars, among the learned and the illiterate, everywhere. But not among the nothing-but-rich; but not among the nothing-but-clever; but not among the greedy and the insatiable; but not among the Pöbelvolk. Here the Jew is at home. Whatever appears here in the way of spiritual possessions he matter-of-factly administers; it is his own. Just as everything was transformed into gold for King Midas, every deep and meaningful word is turned into filth at his touch. But for the others, for the..."

"Vagabonds of the spirit," I threw to him.

"Everything remains as of old," he nodded. "There have been popes of Jewish blood. [40] Also there has seldom or never been a shortage of other dignitaries of the same descent in the Church. Was that which they stood for Catholicism? No, it was Judaism. Let's take just one thing: the selling of indulgences. The very essence of the Jewish spirit. We are both Catholics, but dare we not say that? Are we really supposed to believe that there has never been anything in the Church with which one can find fault? Just because we are Catholics, we say it. That has nothing to do with Catholicism. We know that Catholicism would have remained intact even if half the hierarchy had consisted of Jews. A number of sincere men always held it high, though often only secretly, many times even against the pope. Sometimes there were many such men, sometimes few.

"The investigation of the Jew and his activities should have been the alpha and the omega of our historians. Instead, they investigate the bowel movements of the past.

"Karl the Great favored the Jews at every turn. It seems to me that his slaughter of the 4500 Saxons at Verden -- the best German blood -- and his Jewish advisers had something to do with one another.

"The notorious insanity of the Crusades bled the German people of six million men. Finally the Hohenstaufen, Frederick II, succeeded through mere negotiation, without striking a blow in securing the Holy Land for Christendom. What did the curia do? Full of hatred, they hurled the ban of excommunication on Frederick and refused to recognize his treaty with the sultan, thus neutralizing his great success. It seems that, to those pulling the strings, the incidental bloodletting was more important than the avowed objective of the Crusades.

"At last came the Children's Crusade. Tens of thousands of children sent against the victorious Turkish army, all to be destroyed. I can't believe that the idea for that absurdity originated in a non-Jewish mind. I am always reminded of the murder of the children of Bethlehem and the slaughter of the Egyptian firstborn. I would give anything for a photograph of the priest who preached that Crusade, and his flunkeys.

(http://www.racerealist.com/bruno.gif) (http://www.racerealist.com/julian_1.htm)  "Giordano Bruno called the Jews 'such a pestilential, leprous, and publicly dangerous race that they deserved to be rooted out and destroyed even before their birth.' [41] This genial philosopher was burned at the stake. For his heresy? Opponents of the Church were swarming in Italy during his time, yet he, the most impartial of them, was seized." [Image: Giordano Bruno (1550?-1600)]

"Well, how about now?" I interrupted him. "In Russia one Catholic priest after another is tortured to death by the Jewish beast; hundreds have already been liquidated; the Church is taking its last gasp; but Rome cannot bring herself to call the child by its real name. Many times she has made a small start in that direction -- but only to be immediately squelched. Catholicism wants to speak; Jewry paralyzes its tongue."

"Rome," he replied, "will pull herself together, but only if we pull ourselves together first. And one day it can be said that the Church is whole again."

"Since those who are responsible for the trouble will have been discovered!" I cried. "Since the disguised Hebrew, together with his cuckoo eggs, will have been thrown out of the Christian community! He has set not only the Egyptians but also the Christians against one another so that 'they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbor,' and he is still at this game. He works from the outside, carefully building his pitfalls and making his destructive influence felt in the press. But he also works from the inside, where he is even more dangerous, in the mask of the Christian minister. The Christian confessions swarm with Jewish and half-Jewish clergymen, the Protestant denominations even more so than the Catholic. They already feel so sure of victory in the Protestant churches that in Dresden a certain Pastor Wallfisch had the impudence to announce publicly: 'I am a Jew and will remain one; yes, now that I have learned the Christian beliefs I have become more than ever a true Israelite.' [42] And in Hamburg a preacher named Schwalb said: 'I consider myself a genuine Jew and have always considered myself thus'. [43] Where that sort of thing is possible, Christianity might as well let itself be buried.

"Luther's spirit seems to be completely played out among our Protestants. On the question of all questions, the Jewish question, they either hush him completely or try to tone him down. One of the most well meaning among their theologians, Professor Walther, calls Luther's attitude toward the Jews 'so offensive that it must arouse not only confused astonishment among Christians but also great indignation among Jews.' Those Christians with a confused astonishment wouldn't have found themselves in that state if they had not previously let themselves be confused by the Jews. And as for the great indignation of the Hebrews, we are not grieved a bit. Where, by the way, has that indignation been apparent? So far, Israel has been quiet as a mouse about it. They have always praised Luther greatly as the enemy of Rome. Heine began a ceremonious hymn of joy to the Reformer with the words, 'Luther, you dear man.'"

"He had good reason," he jeered. "All Jews have good reason to celebrate Luther and to ignore his anti-Semitism. Without intending to do so, he paved the way for them, and how! The more they extol his authority, the less the world notices his error. That he later cursed them as a pestilence is indeed bitter to them, but -- how many people are even aware of his condemnation of the Jews."

(http://www.racerealist.com/goldmann.gif)  "The Jew Goldmann," I put in, "stated their reason plainly enough. 'Luther has again brought the Old Testament to honor.'" [44] [Image: Nahum Goldmann (1894-1982)]

"Instead of to dishonor," was the reply. "His translation to the German language might have been of some use; as it is, it has grievously damaged the German power of discernment. Lord in heaven, what a halo now surrounds Satan's 'Bible'! Luther's poetry sparkles so that even the incest of Lot's daughters has been given a religious shimmer. Jehova's command to be fruitful and multiply had to be obeyed by these two pious maidens -- at any price!"

Schopenhauer expressed a similar opinion," I confirmed. "He said that if one wants to understand the Old Testament one must read it in the Greek version. There it has an entirely different tone, an entirely different color, with no presentiment of Christianity! Contrasted with the Greek, Luther's translation seems 'pious'; also 'often erroneous, indeed, sometimes intentionally, and delivered throughout in a churchly, edifying tone.' Luther has permitted himself changes 'which one could call forgeries' and so on." [45]

"Not Luther," he raised his finger. "The rabbis who helped him with the entire translation introduced changes and forgeries. Hebrew is a difficult language. Luther translated a certain word, for example, as 'racial kinsman.' But then the rabbi came in and said that the word means 'neighbor.' And so we have the translation: 'Love thy neighbor as thyself,' rather than, as it should be: 'Love thy racial kinsman as thyself.' A small piece of cunning, but -- it served its purpose of giving the Jews the aspect of real humanitarians."

"Yes, even Luther was taken in by the 'chosen people,'" I replied. "He looked upon the Old Testament as divine revelation. He approached the book with infatuation, convinced that it could contain nothing but sheer preciousness. Then he began wading into the vile thing. After a few steps he blinked his eyes, bewildered. He was stunned. That just couldn't be so! It must have some other meaning! And so, with perfectly honest intentions, he read between the lines what simply wasn't there. Everywhere he managed to see allusions to Christ, although nothing could be farther from the Jews' actual thoughts on the matter. Their Messiah is no 'lamb's tail,' Heine jeered at Christ, no scorner of earthly existence. [46] On the contrary, their Messiah is a brutal dog who will conquer the earth for his Jews; he is the 'prince of this world.' Page after page it says: 'Ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves,' or 'Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.' One of these is a statement of a 'divinely inspired' prophet, the other a 'deeply spiritual' psalm (Isaiah 61:6, Psalms 2:8).

"Credulously, Luther viewed everything in a rosy light. This became easier for him when, in the middle of the great morass, he came to passages like: 'Ye will have no permanent existence among the nations, and the soles of thy feet shall find no rest,' and 'Ye will be an abomination among all peoples.' Compassion seized him. "The Jews,' he thought to himself, 'have become untrue to their godly doctrine, but they will again find their way home to it.' It never occurred to him that these direly threatening sermons served only the purpose of holding the Jews to their course.

"On the other hand, many passages of apparently lofty stamp have quite a different purpose: namely, they serve as a protective cover. He later recognized this Jewish tactic, but only in the living Hebrews, not in their Bible. 'The Jews desire to make all their affairs ambiguous, so that nothing about them is really certain,' he said. If one belabors them for an especially low-minded passage, they can indignantly point at one which is dripping with loving kindness. Heine, for example, writes an utterly vulgar poem about Germany; five minutes later he is praising 'the dear homeland' to the skies. A matter of changing mood? Oh, dear God I suppose that we are to believe that an old street whore often finds herself in the mood to sing the 'Ave Maria,' or that a basically honest fellow is often in the mood to steal. What nonsense!"

(http://www.racerealist.com/spinoza.gif)  "No, you are right," he said. "The Jew often plays the role of a benefactor only in order to accomplish his destructive aims without notice. It's always been that way.

"This ambiguity," I completed, "one finds even in Spinoza. One can hardly imagine a bolder, more outspoken world view than his; but his ethics would horrify a pig. 'In all things seek that which is advantageous' is the quintessence of his moral philosophy -- the genuine Jewish viewpoint." [Image: Baruch Spinoza, the greatest Jewish philosopher (1632-1677)]

"It is the most terrible tragedy," he said sadly, "that Luther bears the responsibility for such a dire development -- the consequence of deeds committed in perfect innocence -- that today all civilization is in danger of running aground on it. The greatest German the unsuspecting cause of the German collapse; Luther, the mighty opponent of the Jews, the one who most disastrously paved the way for them -- incomprehensible, I tell you, incomprehensible. To happen too late by a paltry ten or twenty years! To first become awake to the Jews shortly before his death, when everything had already been determined! [47] Previously, body and soul for the traitors! Then the Hebrews had still been 'cousins and brothers of our Lord' to him, while we Christians were only 'brother-in-law and strangers.' Wringing his hands, he entreated the populace to associate with them in a 'decent and proper' manner. To him they were exalted above the Apostles! The late Erzberger couldn't have carried on more absurdly. [48]

"Only not for an instant as sincerely," I stopped him. "If Luther had been a contemporary of Erzberger, he wouldn't have had to find out about the purpose of the Jewish hush-money first, in order to see through Judaism. As early as his student days he would have promptly leaped with both feet into the battle against the devil's brood."

"My God," he immediately resumed, "one cannot blame him. A lot has happened in the last four hundred years. But there is one thing to remember: popular instinct was more alert then than nowadays. All along the line mistrust of the Jews was quite firm. Luther was a man of the people, the son of simple folk. His predilection of many years toward the Jews is a bit misleading; one must take into account a certain naivete, a lack of worldliness, the result of his stay in the cloister. The same rule seems to have applied here as elsewhere: too much studying ruined his vision. Nevertheless, Luther was a great man, a giant. With a shock which pierced the twilight he saw the Jews as we have only begun to see them today. But, unfortunately, too late, and even then not there, where he had done the most damage -- in Christianity. Oh, had he only seen them there; had he only seen them in his youth! Then he would not have attacked Catholicism, but, rather, the Jews behind it! Instead of a wholesale condemnation of the Church, he would have let his whole, passionate impetus fall on the true villains. Instead of glorifying the Old Testament, he would have branded it as the arsenal of the Antichrist. And the Jew -- the Jew would have stood there in his abominable nakedness, as an eternal warning. He would have been obliged to get out of the Church, out of society, out of the halls of the princes, out of the castles of the knights and the houses of the citizens. For Luther had the strength and the courage and the overpowering will. It would never have come to the splitting of the Church or to the war which, in accordance with the wishes of the Hebrews, spilled Aryan blood in torrents for thirty long years."

"'And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother and every one against his neighbor,'" he ground out. "What hatred, what demonic hatred! That's not human; what is it?"

"That, my friend," I joked, "is the 'geniality of the heart' of which the Jew, Fritz Kahn, has spoken, through which 'Israel has become the ethical mother of mankind.' These fellows are really quaint in their impudence. Kahn has called Moses 'an almost unique phenomenon in the history of civilized peoples: a national hero without weapons.' At the same time he reproves us with the remark that 'on stormy nights the distressed wail of widows may be heard around the bronze heroes of our market places,' that is, around the statues of Prince Eugene, Marshal Blucher and so on. I wonder what he thinks Moses used to massacre the Egyptian firstborn, if not weapons. Gumdrops, perhaps? Or were they smothered to death from sheer love? Apparently, we are to believe that the Pöbelvolk consisted entirely of baby sitters and wet nurses.

"Well, all these fellows operate the same way at least. They don't even bother to deny anything; instead they flatly maintain exactly the opposite."

"That tactic seems to work quite well with our men of learning,' he growled. "The Jews say whatever they please; it is all gospel to our scholars. They wouldn't think of trying to verify anything; the fact that it appears in print is enough for them. A certain Jewess called the Talmud 'a grandiose, monumental work of the spirit,' a 'heroic monument of ideas, to which the millennia have given the breath of their experience.' [49] Immediately upon encountering such a gem, the German professor whips out his notebook -- and the next day his students have devoured and digested the new tidbit. That's the way it goes in our gymnasia. They are all designed, so they say, to turn out nothing but geniuses; instead, one lackey after another is graduated."

"A few hours spent browsing in the Talmud," I proceeded, "is quite sufficient to remove any doubt about the Jews. It is understandable that they have only the most inordinate praise for the book. When they peep into it their own peculiar nature peers back out at them. And that, of course, is the greatest source of joy for them. Thus, in essence, every Jew is a Talmudist, even if he has never looked at the Talmud. It makes no difference when it was written; in fact, it needn't have been written at all. The first Jew comprised all its essential ingredients. The Jewish leaders fully understand that, but they only say it metaphorically. 'The Talmud is an unimpeachable authority,' trumpeted the rabbi Dr. Gronemann, before a Hanover tribunal in 1894. 'The legal doctrines of the Talmud have precedence,' a Professor Cohen imperiously told a criminal court in Marburg in 1888. And he added -- now pay attention to this! -- that it applied also to non-believing Jews who, however, were nonetheless still a part of the Jewish community, 'since they acknowledge the moral doctrines of the Talmud.' A masterpiece! From time to time the fellows blurt out a real secret in their babbling, but we just don't pay attention. 'Whatever it is in the Talmud we acknowledge to have absolute precedence over the whole law of Moses,' a group of so-called reformed Jews testified in Paris in 1860, with the concurrence of the Alliance Israelite. And a rabbi, Dr. Rahmer, has written in Pierer's Encyclopaedia that the Schul Aruch, a kind of Talmud for home use, has been 'taken on by the Israelitisch community as an authoritative guide for religious practice.' Taken on? Such a wag! Pretty soon I'll be 'taking on' the features of Dietrich Eckart."

"Lord," he said, "whoever doesn't become sickened and nauseated upon making a closer acquaintance with the Talmud can put himself on display in a circus side show."

"The local side show," I remarked, "has certain limits on the degree of abnormality it will exhibit. The young student from Tubingen who could gulp down half-a-dozen toads with gusto has been its greatest attraction till now. No one, though, has a stomach capable of digesting even this one passage from the Talmud: "Rabbi Johanan said the penis of Rabbi Ishmael was as large as a six-kab [50] wineskin; according to others, three kabs. The penis of Rabbi Papa was as large as one of the baskets of the inhabitants of Harpania.' [51] The high-minded competitive zeal of the three old rabbis could knock an unprepared person off his chair."

"One finds a whole series of such pleasantries in this magnificent example of a religious book," he said disgustedly. "The real clincher, however, is that non-Jewish girls 'who are less than three years and one day old' are considered 'suitable' for rabbis, since Moses had written: 'But all the women children that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves,' namely, for the rabbis.[52]

"The most abominable perversity and the most tedious syllable-thrashing in the same breath. What goes on within Jewish heads must really be frightful."

"They," I returned, "are of a contrary opinion on that. Otherwise their mirror image, the Talmud, wouldn't inform us that 'the Israelites are more pleasing before God than the angels,' [53] or that 'the world was created on behalf of the Israelites alone,' or that 'whoever slaps a Jew in the face has struck God himself,' or that 'the sun illuminates the earth and the rain makes it fertile only because Israelites live on it,' and more of the same sort of modesty."

"I really doubt that there is any sort of medical encyclopaedia which contains terms suitable for describing the Jewish megalomania," he said. "But what an incredible talent they have for disguising it!"

"Their book Sirach," I completed, "howls: 'Terrify all peoples; lift your hand up against strangers, that they may see your power. The fire of wrath must burn them. Crush the heads of the princes, who are our enemies!' (Sirach 36:2-12). And the Schulchan Aruch rages: 'Pour out, oh Lord, your fury over the goyim, who do not know you, and over the kingdoms which do not invoke your name. Pursue them in wrath and extinguish them beneath God's heaven!' (Schulchan Aruch, Orach Gaijim, 480). They make the same threat in both places, with the distinction that the Schulchan Aruch emphasizes that all must be exterminated who do not swear on Jehova."

"And with such an abominable moral doctrine on his conscience," he began to boil, "that marvel of modern Jewry, Moses Mendelssohn, [54] had the impudence to assert that 'dominion over the earth belongs by right to Jewry.' Because of their religion! As a trained Talmudist he certainly knew his way around in the whole, vile thing -- those extracts we have just quoted are only a tiny fraction -- but he still ... oh, this lying, this utterly mendacious pack, the very essence of the lie!"

"All Berlin," I said, "buzzed with praise for the 'wise', for the 'noble' Moses. But Goethe wasn't deceived: 'Jewish trivia!' was his comment on the pious trickery. It struck no one as odd that the incomparable Moses philosophized himself in the twinkling of an eye from a simple, private tutor to the powerfully wealthy founder of the banking house of Mendelssohn, thus avoiding by a wide detour the eye of the needle. This benefactor of mankind slyly promoted the idea that the Jewish people constitute a religious community only. Today this still constitutes a favorite nostrum of the Jews. A certain Dr. Ruppin has revealed why. 'Special laws against the Jews,' he tells us as he chuckles and rubs his hands together, 'have always been directed against the religious aspects of Jewry, since this sphere of activity provided the only easily conceivable target for legislation. Anti-Semitism, has never really been inimicable to the Jewish religion, but has been indifferent to it.' [55] So! We now have an admission that their 'religion' serves a very useful diversionary purpose. Anyone, however, who has become acquainted with it has found out that what the Jews call their religion coincides exactly with their character."

"That's what they themselves say," he said. "They are incessantly boasting, too, that their religion is such a masterful creation that it stands alone in the world. Then bring the Talmud forward! It contains the Jewish religion in its purest form -- theology, dogmatics, morality, everything together in the same place. Why do they hold back the magnificent book so nervously, if indeed 'the millennia have given the breath of its existence' to it? As born benefactors of mankind they should have long since made it accessible to the general populace. Instead, it still hasn't been completely translated, even today. And who in the devil has read what there is of it? One would think they are afraid some medieval church is still waiting to burn it for heresy.

"Some religion! This wallowing in filth, this hate, this malice, this arrogance, this hypocrisy, this pettifogging, this incitement to deceit and murder -- is that a religion? Then there has never been anyone more religious than the devil himself. It is the Jewish essence, the Jewish character, period!"

"Luther," I interjected, "expressed his opinion of it plainly enough. He urges us to burn the synagogues and Jewish schools and to heap earth on the remains 'so that no man would ever again see one stone or cinder of them.' God would forgive us for what we formerly had tolerated through our ignorance -- 'I hadn't known it myself,' he wrote -- but now that we were aware of what went on, we dared not, at any price, protect these buildings 'wherein they slander, curse, spit on, and revile both Christ and us.' We could hardly speak more strongly ourselves. He also urged the destruction of their houses, for they carried on there the same way as in their schools. 'Some may feel,' he complained, 'that my judgment is too harsh. It is, if anything, too lenient, for I have seen their writings.' [56]

"Our school inspectors apparently haven't seen them, nor have our charmers or wizards."

"Burning their synagogues, I am afraid, would have been of little avail," he shrugged. "Even if there had never been a synagogue, a Jewish school, an Old Testament, or a Talmud, the Jewish spirit would still have been there and had its effect. It has always been there. Every Jew ever born has embodied it. And that is even more pronounced with the so-called enlightened Jews. Heine belonged, certainly, among the most enlightened, but he had just as much insane arrogance as the greasiest Galician kike. Moses Mendelssohn passed for a downright wonder of wisdom. Yet, lo and behold, he found it actually shocking that the Jews still didn't have the dominion over the earth which was due them!" [57]

(http://www.racerealist.com/dost.gif)  "From long years of experience," I brought out, "Dostoevski depicted the hair-raising conceit of the Russian Jew. [58] For a long time he lived with all kinds of convicts, including several Jews, sleeping on the same wooden bunks with them. Everyone treated these Jews in a friendly manner, he reported, not even taking offense at their raving-mad manner of praying. Probably their own religion had once been like that, thought the Russians to themselves, and they quietly let the Jews do as they pleased. But, on the other hand, the Jews haughtily rejected the Russians, didn't want to eat with them, and looked down on them. And where was this? In a Siberian prison! All over Russia Dostoevski found this antipathy and loathing of the Jews for the natives. Nowhere, however, did the Russian people resent their behavior, indulgently believing it to be a part of the Jewish religion." [Image: Feodor Dostoevski (1821-81)]

"Yes, indeed, and what a religion!" he said scornfully. "It is the character of a people which determines the nature of their religion, not the other way around."

"Dostoevski," I continued, "was compassion itself but, like Christ, he took exception to the Jews. With foreboding, he asked what would happen in Russia if ever the Jews should get the upper hand there. Would they even approximately give the natives the same rights they themselves enjoyed? Would they likewise allow them to pray in the manner they wished or would they not simply make slaves of them? Still worse, 'wouldn't they skin and fleece them?' Wouldn't they even exterminate them, as they had so often done with other peoples in their history?"

"Ah, could our workers but share his forebodings, particularly those who hope for salvation from the Soviets!" he cried. "Famine, mass graves, slavery, Jewish whips. Whoever goes on strike is hanged. 'Come hither, all ye who are weary and heavy laden.' How they whistle, the dogs! And how fine that sounds, in front of the curtain! Behind it, however, lurk the pampered 'Pöbelvolk' the Red Army, the dregs of non-Jewish humanity."

"The toll of Russians sacrificed since the beginning of Bolshevik domination is estimated by the authorities at about thirty million," I answered. "Those who weren't summarily executed fell to famine and disease. Were they all bourgeois? Only an imbecile could believe that. Who among us then has the most to suffer? The thousands who every day stand for long hours at their various occupations. Capitalists are hardly a majority among them. But that hasn't dawned on our workers. In their eagerness to be the masters, they let themselves be led about by the nose like children.

"Ebert [59] has thundered against capitalism his whole life. Now he is president. And? At every street corner banks sprout from the ground like mushrooms. That is certainly a fact. Everyone sees it. Anyone can reach out and touch it. But does that lead anyone to smell a rat? Not on your life!

"The first thing the Jew Eisner [60] did after the revolution was have the banks guarded by the army. Capitalists smuggled their enormous hordes of money out of the country for months, and he didn't raise a finger to stop them. He felt it was more important to travel to the Socialist Congress in Switzerland and there place the entire guilt for the world war on Germany. Do penance, he said, and the French will forgivingly clasp you to their hearts. Quite likely! Experience has gloriously confirmed it."

"The same Eisner," he nodded, "who, at the beginning of the war, sent a flood of telegrams to the other Social Democrat leaders, entreating them to remain true to the Kaiser. A disgraceful stab in the back must be avoided at all costs, said he. It went like that until the Treaty of Brest Litovsk. [61] Up till then all German Jews were inspired monarchists. But then came the about-face. The Moor had done his duty and crushed Czarist Russia; now for him to crush himself. The rest is silence. Visible to all eyes, the Jew also made his bid in Germany.

"Oh, workers! To let yourselves be thus deceived! Things are different than which innocents let themselves dream. The Communist Party in Germany still has fewer than a quarter of a million members; yet it owns over fifty newspapers. What that costs is simply incalculable. Millions. Who pays these enormous sums? We National Socialists have our hands full just keeping our one Beobachter [62] going. If we had an arrangement with the Jews, we would have a prodigious number of party newspapers in an instant. Are there comrades who doubt that? I'd like to meet one. And, look here, this is the incredible thing: they know that the Jews are secretly behind things, but they act as if it weren't so at all. Is that honest? Can that lead to a happy outcome? To rush to destruction unsuspectingly is one thing, but to do it knowingly and to single out one's grimmest enemy as an accomplice is another."

"I'd like to know," I remarked, "what the comrades would say if one proved to them in black and white that the Junkers or the big industrialists have had a secret moral philosophy of the most abominable sort since the time 'x'. Their rage would be unimaginable. 'Aha!' everyone would roar. 'With principles like that it is no wonder the devils torment us so! Imagine that! How can anyone be that mean and vile? The whole bunch of them should be exterminated!' They would carry on like that, as if possessed, and rightly so. But, on the other hand, when one shows them that the Jews have, in their official religious books, the most hair-raising statements about the plundering and murder of all Gentiles, it makes no difference at all to them. They either dispute it or, when that seems hopeless, say that most Jews haven't been that religious for a long time and don't concern themselves with that stuff anymore. It never occurs to them that the Jewish character is the source of their vile literature."

"But this," he said, "tops it all: all -- and I mean all -- social injustices of any significance in the world today can be traced back to the subterranean influence of the Jews. The workers seek, therefore, to eliminate with the help of the Jews those evils which none other than the Jews themselves have consciously and deliberately established. One can imagine what kind of help they will receive."

"Behold the modest Joseph!" I rejoined. "His influence on the Pharaoh caused the Egyptians dreadful distress, from which they later thought they would free themselves with the help of Moses. I must admit that the episode does not lack a certain grim humor."

"The truth," he said, "is, indeed, as you once wrote: one can only understand the Jew when one knows what his ultimate goal is. And that goal is, beyond world domination, the annihilation of the world. He must wear down all the rest of mankind, he persuades himself, in order to prepare a paradise on earth. He has made himself believe that only he is capable of this great task, and, considering his ideas of paradise, that is certainly so. But one sees, if only in the means which he employs, that he is secretly driven to something else. While he pretends to himself to be elevating mankind, he torments men to despair, to madness, to ruin. If a halt is not ordered, he will destroy all men. His nature compels him to that goal, even though he dimly realizes that he must thereby destroy himself. There is no other way for him; he must act thus. This realization of the unconditional dependence of his own existence upon that of his victims appears to me to be the main cause for his hatred. To be obliged to try and annihilate us with all his might, but at the same time to suspect that that must lead inevitably to his own ruin -- therein lies, if you will, the tragedy of Lucifer."
 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 07, 2009, 10:43:38 PM
I first read this about 18 months ago...In fact, I still have a printed copy somewhere in my files...Echart was supposedly Hitler's 'Occult initiator'...While I found it interesting, and in some ways insightful, I disagree with their conclusions...Hitler, and of course Eckart, were no friends of Jesus Christ...Although Hitler supposedly went to a Catholic school, although he was part-Jewish, he was no friend of the Church...He looked upon the Church as a political power that had to be dealt with in terms of power...The Nazis killed thousands of Catholic priests in Poland....But just as reading the Ariel Sharon interview gave insight into a certain mentality, so does this...Whatever agreement I may have with some of their dialogue, you must judge men by their fruits...What was the fruit of Hitler's work?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: dean_saor on January 08, 2009, 03:37:02 AM
Thanks for the flag, su. I've just skimmed through this - I'll have to come back to it to read it properly, maybe this evening. Don't know when I can comment (if I can comment): v. busy at the mo.  8)
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 08, 2009, 03:38:41 AM
Oh oh...

Quote
the well-known light dawns on him (Paul); he pretends to be converted ( ::) , throws himself into the great pose, and behold:) even though he deviates in nearly all his doctrines from the other apostles,

Such as?

The only unique about Paul was his statement that women should cover there head.  There was a chastity bit but I maybe confusing Paul with Peter.

Quote
we listen devoutly to his sermons. The simple teachings of the Master, which the most childlike mind might comprehend, we must have 'explained' to us by a Hebrew."

The definition of an Apostle.   Paul rehashed John, Luke, Matt, etc like a second generation Apostle should.

Of all the great crimes of Judah that the white nationalist take time to demonize a second generation scribbler like Paul makes me very suspicious.  Never a peep about about the post Jesus Pharisees Talmud scribblers.

White nats are 10-90s.  90 of what you want to hear, 10 percent on the Elders' message.


Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 08, 2009, 03:45:18 AM
Quote
The notorious insanity of the Crusades bled the German people of six million men.

What a magical Chosen number. You think after the 1 million dying in front of them the 5 million would go back to there farms and beer.  ::)

Imagine 6 million Us kids dead in Iraq....

These stories are Judahite fairy tales.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 08, 2009, 03:53:45 AM
The Nazis killed thousands of Catholic priests in Poland..

Thousands of priest in Poland?  There are barely thousands of priest in todays US population of 300 million.

Which regiment of the SS or Wehrmact exactly chased down 1000s of priests scattered about Poland? Was this unit made up of
the 150 000 Jews in Hitler's Army?

http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/150-000-jews-in-hitlers-army.html
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: jewbacca on January 08, 2009, 10:52:20 AM
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 08, 2009, 03:06:12 PM
Approximately 3000 Catholic priests and clerics were killed in either camps or by Werhmacht forces or Einzatzgruppen commandos...Are you defending Nazi actions, and for what reason?...You want regiment numbers and names?...OK, pay my airfare to Warsaw, and I can get you detailed information there; I will travel to Berlin at my own expense to get further info....Germany invaded Poland...Now you say there were 150000 Jews in the German army...Hitler, too was part Jewish...Then why then do you support a Jewish leader, Jewish regime and Jewish ideology?...Or did Hitler take a wrong turn somewhere?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: micah1199 on January 08, 2009, 03:18:17 PM
White Nationalists have the exact same belief system as talmudic jews and are just as suicidal and nasty.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 08, 2009, 04:22:48 PM
Approximately 3000 Catholic priests and clerics were killed in either camps or by Werhmacht forces or Einzatzgruppen commandos

Says you who were not there.

...Are you defending Nazi actions, and for what reason?...

I am defending brave courageous Christian people who fought the Bolsheviks and protected their mortal enemies the jews from you canard smears. Yes.

You want regiment numbers and names?...OK, pay my airfare to Warsaw, and I can get you detailed information there; I will travel to Berlin at my own expense to get further info
So you accuse people of murder without even knowing who you are accusing.  Got it.

....Germany invaded Poland...

Yes over 300,000 British expeditionary forces were on mainland Europe to destroy Germany.  Stalin reneged on his non-aggression pact with Hitler.  Poland stole German land with Versaille.  What would you have done when three giant ZOG USA UK and Russia are going attack you?


Now you say there were 150000 Jews in the German army...

I didn't say it.  The Germans had jews, blacks, asians in the military.

Hitler, too was part Jewish...Then why then do you support a Jewish leader, Jewish regime and Jewish ideology?...Or did Hitler take a wrong turn somewhere?

Do you have a copy of his bar mitzvah record? More rabbinic prattle.  It doesn't matter if Adolf was alien lizard hell dog, the Germans stood up to the Elders and gave them a run for their money for 6 years and saved European jewry.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 08, 2009, 08:32:32 PM

Frank, he may not have been a man of the church, but I doubt if Hitler ordered the killing of thousands of Catholic priests. Keep in mind, Germany's upper echelon was as 'infiltrated' as ours are here now in North America. 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 08, 2009, 08:34:46 PM
I now identify you as a bullshit artist....But a transparent one, because you try to provoke an argument over nonsense.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 08, 2009, 08:38:57 PM
Frank, he may not have been a man of the church, but I doubt if Hitler ordered the killing of thousands of Catholic priests. Keep in mind, Germany's upper echelon was as 'infiltrated' as ours are here now in North America.

My dear, you should know better...Where did I say 'Hitler ordered the killing of thousands of Catholic priests'...I said that an estimated 3000 Catholic priests & clerics died as a result of the German invasion of Poland.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 08, 2009, 08:59:39 PM
Thanks for the flag, su. I've just skimmed through this - I'll have to come back to it to read it properly, maybe this evening. Don't know when I can comment (if I can comment): v. busy at the mo.  8)

Take your time... I understand. ;>)

I have finally found the Rhodes - Millner ''Round Yable discussion from 1901'' (http://www.freedomportal.net/forum/index.php?topic=10946.msg91467#msg91467) again.
It's a very good read!
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 08, 2009, 09:06:56 PM
I saw the 6 Million too... lol. 'They' luv that numba.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 08, 2009, 09:09:44 PM
Thanks, saved!
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 08, 2009, 09:21:34 PM
My dear, you should know better...Where did I say 'Hitler ordered the killing of thousands of Catholic priests'...I said that an estimated 3000 Catholic priests & clerics died as a result of the German invasion of Poland.

Monument unveiled to Catholic priests killed in Nazi camps
http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Monument_unveiled_to_Catholic_pries_11042006.html

dpa German Press Agency
Published: Saturday November 4, 2006

Berlin- Catholic priests and monks, the bulk of them Polish, who were killed by the Nazis in a concentration camp near Berlin were commemorated Saturday with the unveiling of a stone sculpture in the presence of Cardinal Jozef Glemp of Poland. The sculpture is engraved with the names of 96 clergy who died at Sachsenhausen concentration camp on the north-west outskirts of Berlin.

Historians working for the Catholic archdiocese of Berlin have so far documented the names of 711 Catholic clergy from Poland, Germany and other European nations who were incarcerated in the camp, where inmates often died of starvation or disease or were executed.  

Hundreds were later transferred to Dachau concentration camp on the outskirts of Munich and other Nazi sites, where they died.

Unveiling the monument, in which a cross has been etched in the stone, Berlin's archbishop, Cardinal Georg Sterzinsky, said the German Catholic Church was grateful that there was now a memorial to this group of Nazi victims, more than 600 of whom were Poles.

One of the surviving inmates, Kazimierz Majdanski, now 90, later went on to become Catholic bishop of Szczecin-Kamien, the Berlin archdiocese said. Glemp, who holds the title of primate of Poland, represented the Polish Catholic Church at the ceremony.

Sterzinsky appealed for continued vigilance against right-wing extremism and racism.

The Nazis opened the Sachsenhausen detention camp in 1936. Thousands more died when the Nazis forced inmates to march away as defeat loomed, but the Red Army was able to liberate 3,000 prisoners at the camp on April 22, 1945.

© 2006 dpa German Press Agency

Don't forget: THE WINNERS WRITE THE HISTORY

Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 08, 2009, 09:59:21 PM
White Nationalists have the exact same belief system as talmudic jews and are just as suicidal and nasty.

Yes the mentality is very similiar, and both National Socialism & Zionism use 'sun/star symbols' as their logos.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Rudi Jan on January 08, 2009, 10:09:48 PM
Thousands more died when the Nazis forced inmates to march away as defeat loomed, but the Red Army was able to liberate 3,000 prisoners at the camp on April 22, 1945.

That line alone should make one suspicious of the verity of this article. Many who were in the concentration camps chose to retreat with the German Army rather than fall into the hands of the Red Army.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 08:28:51 AM
White Nationalists have the exact same belief system as talmudic jews and are just as suicidal and nasty.

I suggest that you read the Talmud in detail.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 09, 2009, 09:17:27 AM
Quote
711 Catholic clergy from Poland, Germany and other European nations who were incarcerated in the camp, where inmates often died of starvation or disease

Thanks for pwning BarneyFrankDialogue.

Often?

Translation: They died as a result of ZOG UK and ZOG USA aerial bombing.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 09:51:55 AM
That line alone should make one suspicious of the verity of this article. Many who were in the concentration camps chose to retreat with the German Army rather than fall into the hands of the Red Army.

All this will someday be veryfied when Germany introduces freedom of expression.

Yep, National Socialism was bad... it gave the boys of the Federal Reserve a severe case of the Hives. Surely, something had to be done about that - AND, it was.  8)
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 09:52:28 AM

Thousands more died when the Nazis forced inmates to march away as defeat loomed, but the Red Army was able to liberate 3,000 prisoners at the camp on April 22, 1945.

       That line alone should make one suspicious of the verity of this article. Many who were
       in the concentration camps chose to retreat with the German Army rather than fall into
       the hands of the Red Army.

Indeed.

Yes, and I am told that hundreds of thousands of German and allied prisoners - which in some case were delivered by the Western Allies - died on forced marches under the tutelage of the glorious Red Army, under specific orders of Comrade Stalin, into the vastness of the Soviet hinterland. Few did return.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 09, 2009, 10:31:07 AM
I would suggest all 'web historians' interested in WWII, as specifically concerning Poland, German & Russia visit Polish Forums http://www.polishforums.com (http://www.polishforums.com)

The main thread for these dicussion would be 'Polish Politics & History'...There are extensive discussions, usually very well informed, about what happened in Poland during WWII, as far as crimes of the Nazis and Communists...Poland got it from both sides, and also suffered internal subversion and betrayal by Jewish elements...There are also numerous historical documents and info online, but you will have to dig a bit, as Jewish 'historians' have monopolized much of the debate, and if you google the subject, the Jewish viewpoint will be the first items returned on your search...For those who for some insane reason glorify the Nazis, I would simply ask whether you would like to livw under such a tyrannical regime...Maybe you would enjoy it, and get work as a 'functionary'...Perhaps, for the time being, you could get a job with Homeland Security...As I have stated numerous times, you judge a man & his work by it's fruits...The fruits of National Socialism and the 'man of destiny' Adolph Hitler?...For Hitler, a bullet in the head from his own hand, and a cyanide pellet for his wife...For the German nation?...Destruction, partition and domination by the very same forces Hitler said he was fighting...Plus, an expansion of Communism into Central Europe that lasted almost 50 years...How many German dead?...10,000,000?...For what?...Hitler was simply a more extreme version of the puppet George Bush...So, use common sense and judge; you start a war, many people die, there is great destruction and misery...And remember, the elites and the rich are the only ones who profit from wars, and their profir is covered in the blood of ordinary people...So, while you sit behind your computer and keyboard and fantasize about the 'Glory of the Reich', please consider these truths.

(http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/52728451.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19390335F8FA9CA92A66164A8C76EFC8FE836CF19420219AD79)

Fruits of the 'Man of Destiny' 1945

(http://www.javno.com/slike/slike_3/r1/g2008/m04/y170306797117636.jpg)

'Man of Destiny' and his Wife
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 12:16:10 PM

For those who for some insane reason glorify the Nazis, I would simply ask whether you
would like to live under such a tyrannical regime...


Where do I glorify Hitler? ALL I have said was that the ''Victors write the HISTORY''.

I am far more alarmed and concerned about the coming of Brzezinski's protege`- the Gramsci
scholar - the next US President. Now that is insane!!!

Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 03:56:34 PM


Translation: They died as a result of ZOG UK and ZOG USA aerial bombing. ---  Correct

Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Jan Robertson on January 09, 2009, 05:10:35 PM
Quote
Nowhere, however, did the Russian people resent their behavior, indulgently believing it to be a part of the Jewish religion."

A lot like the USA ... until today now that the truth is beginning to emerge.

Ah yes! religious tolerance has a lot to answer for.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Jan Robertson on January 09, 2009, 05:21:43 PM
Thousands more died when the Nazis forced inmates to march away as defeat loomed, but the Red Army was able to liberate 3,000 prisoners at the camp on April 22, 1945.

That line alone should make one suspicious of the verity of this article. Many who were in the concentration camps chose to retreat with the German Army rather than fall into the hands of the Red Army.

Am I the only one reading this differently? "Thousands more died when the Nazis forced inmates to march" away as defeat loomed.

That doesn't read like the inmates CHOSE to retreat with the germans rather than fall into the hands of the Russians?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Jan Robertson on January 09, 2009, 05:29:48 PM
After reading through this thread I'm no longer surprised at the lack of comprehension of the written word ... God bless the bible! May the truth remain out of sight.

If this problem of understanding (comprehension) continues the way it does today then ....

THE JEWS WILL CONTINUE TO WRITE THE HISTORY
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 09, 2009, 05:50:33 PM
So sorry, Sushigirl...I meant to send my reply to the other idiot...But you should also know better than to make excuses for the Nazis...Their ideology/actions were anti-human.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: amonvanroark on January 09, 2009, 05:59:50 PM
Yes the mentality is very similiar, and both National Socialism & Zionism use 'sun/star symbols' as their logos.

And just how many other nations use stars and suns on their flags.

ALMOST ALL OF THEM.

Look and see.



Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: amonvanroark on January 09, 2009, 06:13:31 PM
So sorry, Sushigirl...I meant to send my reply to the other idiot...But you should also know better than to make excuses for the Nazis...Their ideology/actions were anti-human.

BULLSHIT!!

I knew people who had parents living at the time in question in Germany, and, one and all they stated how their lives improved after the National Socialists assumed power; the worker was respected, had regular paycheques, had holidays subsidised by the govt.; what Hitler did in Germany was something that the jew HAD to stop, lest it catch on elsewhere in the world.

Go back and watch your jew propaganda on History channel, CNN, or whatever. This seems, of late, the tack you have taken.

I thought better of you, and also thought that you were an intelligent person; one who does not follow the lies of the MSM.

MY BAD.

WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN!!!
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 09, 2009, 06:16:35 PM
Well, you are correct, but none quite as distinctive as these.

(http://www.klisia.net/blog/swastika.png)(http://www.floridaisrael.org/magen_david.gif)
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: amonvanroark on January 09, 2009, 06:22:17 PM
Well, you are correct, but none quite as distinctive as these.

(http://www.klisia.net/blog/swastika.png)(http://www.floridaisrael.org/magen_david.gif)

Your point being.....??
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 09, 2009, 06:33:06 PM
BULLSHIT!!

I knew people who had parents living at the time in question in Germany, and, one and all they stated how their lives improved after the National Socialists assumed power; the worker was respected, had regular paycheques, had holidays subsidised by the govt.; what Hitler did in Germany was something that the jew HAD to stop, lest it catch on elsewhere in the world.

Go back and watch your jew propaganda on History channel, CNN, or whatever. This seems, of late, the tack you have taken.

I thought better of you, and also thought that you were an intelligent person; one who does not follow the lies of the MSM.

MY BAD.

WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN!!!


Interesting...Sounds like the good old USA in the 50s & 60s...Maybe you could write an essay or article about these people you knew who had parents there...I would like to read it...If you are still in contact with these people, then perhaps interview/email/write them...It would make a good article...In fact, I will put it on my website if it is good and well-written...I don't say that the National Socialists had no good ideas, or that they may not have improved the lot of Germans for a period of time...The German people were in a very bad state after WWI, and the machinations of the bankers/merchants, many of whom were Jews, certainly made life miserable...I simply ask this: what was the final fate of Hitler's Reich?...Did Hitler's own mindset and mentality, along with the fanaticism of himself and his minions bring disaster to the German people?...What is the answer?...And by the way, this particular thread and the article it was based on by Eckart, I posted links to this on LibertForum over 18 months ago...You can access Aryan & racialist material like this here:

http://www.jrbooksonline.com (http://www.jrbooksonline.com)

I just ask people not to insult my intelligence...Use some judgement...Also, what is MSM?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 06:37:18 PM

Thanks to teevee, the public fool system

(http://www.nolajbs.net/mkportal/modules/gallery/album/t_a_8.jpg) -- blessed are the sheep, for they made it all possible... 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Jan Robertson on January 09, 2009, 06:51:16 PM
So sorry, Sushigirl...I meant to send my reply to the other idiot...But you should also know better than to make excuses for the Nazis...Their ideology/actions were anti-human.

And the American-Judaism ideology is humane?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 09, 2009, 07:08:04 PM
And the American-Judaism ideology is humane?

What is this ideology?...Please describe it...I am a Christian American and I don't subscribe to Judaism, nor know of any ideology of which you speak..Do you mean Zionism, gangster capitalism, 'neo-conism' or 'Hope for Changeism'?
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 09, 2009, 07:42:13 PM
     So sorry, Sushigirl...

     I meant to send my reply to the other idiot...But you should also know better than to make excuses
     for the Nazis...Their ideology/actions were anti-human.


No offense taken, Frank. Propaganda is just as alive today, as it has been in the past.

1926-1945. Germany had built up a major banking network around the world and of course did work with bankers in America, such as BBH, in the 1920`s as well as with bankers in just about every other country in the world. These relationships continued for many years after Hitler came into power. In 1926 Hitler was not even considered a threat so the claims that the normal business routine of the period was supporting him and his evil outlook on the world is just silly nonsense by those who don`t understand the business world.

Meanwhile banks provide credit to for importers and exporters so it is natural that commodities or other items would be financed. Most of these products are used for peaceful products but can also have military products.

1921-25 Hitler was hired by the government to spy on various splinter groups, including the German Worker's Party. He becomes a convinced anti-Semite, and joins the party, merging it with National Socialists.

1925-30. Although Hitler is an exceptional public speaker, the party gains few votes, until the great depression. Organization is strengthened.

1932. NSDAP party earns 33% of vote, a plurality. A dying Hindenburg asks Hitler to form a government.

1932-1936. Hitler's government impressively and comprehensively expands the economy, to an 11% growth  rate, best in the world, rearms secretly, occupies the Rhineland, builds Autobahns, wins 1936 election overwhelmingly - [No Diebolt machines.]  Hitler basks in glory at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin.

1938. Kristallnacht -- some claim it was a false flag. [Guess who may not have liked this success? Could they be same ones who are destroying our world now.][/b]

1940. Poland taken. Jews forcibly re-located in Ghettos. Disease is the grim reaper.

1941. Barbarossa, the drive against Russia to the east.

For most of this period trading with Germany and Hitler was done by just about every country in the world. Germany had a strong economy and as was pointed out, many in the world admired it.  

The US predictably entered the war and stopped all dealings with Germany and others under the 'Trading With the Enemy Act'. This was not selective but applied to hundreds of companies. This has been revised to say that those affected under this BHH act were `legally charged with dealing with the enemy,` which was not true.

By the way, both Harriman and Bush were true Americans and their business activities were similar to those of other nations that dealt with Germany and Hitler during this period.

(Read up on Bush, Degussi, Bush Machinations, etc.)

Edited to add: The family was the smallest unit of the nation. The mother was revered, the children were well looked after. People were finally recovering after horrific WWI losses, the future for most looked bright.

Same here, until America's Reichstag Fire - 9/11 - we all had a reasonable existence. Look at us now!

 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Jan Robertson on January 10, 2009, 12:10:46 AM
What is this ideology?...Please describe it...

The ideology of operating as a superior super power, one that figured American politics could take-over every industry, own all fuel supplies, rule over energy production under the direction of jews. The ideology that let the jews dictate policy, the ideology that is now in the grip of the jews just as Germany found itself in preceding WW2. andIdeology that led to the invading of Iraq and tore it asunder on the request of Israel, the one that supplies Israel with the ammunition and the technology used today to murder innocent children. Yeah sure! America's ideology is squeaky clean. Ideology is the domain of the leaders then TAUGHT to the people and just who was it that was most vociferous in supporting the jews? Maybe the farcical jewdao christians?


Quote
I am a Christian American and I don't subscribe to Judaism, nor know of any ideology of which you speak

Sure you do, you follow religious dogma christian, jew, or muslim they all start with the Abrahamic bloodline, and the christian bible old or new are based on the Torah. Moses was a jew,as were all the other 'characters' that led into the New testament. There is no way out of that one because the books of the old teatament are undeniably 'direct copies' of the 5 books of the Torah.

Quote
..Do you mean Zionism, gangster capitalism, 'neo-conism' or 'Hope for Changeism'?

Yeah that exactly what I mean, you subscribe to those things (albeit in all ignorance) because you subscribe to the ruse they use to subvert the American citizens, as does the rest of christians world wide. I believe the American heart of the people are against the ideology, but religion keeps it firmly in place because they are afraid to deny the g-d of the bible.

I have been defying the jewish g-d for many years now (as You have probably noticed) and my life and relationships have gotten better, not worse ... there is no deity raining hell and brimstone down on me ... but I can expect that in the near future in the form of American made weapons and missiles, (or something even more insidious), since the devout are literally praying for it to happen and the judaic g-d is sure to oblige.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 10, 2009, 11:20:22 AM
You make a few points, but your perspective is skewed and YOU need to educate yourself...Now, what is the saying :'Nature abhors a vacuum'...The United States was dominated for many years by the WASP establishment, with the Jews playing roles behind the scenes in terms of finance & intrigue...With the disintegration of the WASP ruling class, the Jews were positioned to step in, more openly, and they did...Now, who permitted that?...The average person has little control over these elite games...But you would have thought that certain American corporate interests would have had some loyalty to the country that made them rich, and realized we were being 'overtaken' by a force not loyal to our country, except for making money from it's people.
Now this 'Moses was a Jew'...Where does it say 'Moses was a Jew' in the Bible?...Please show me...Where does it say Abraham, Issac or Jacob were 'Jews'?...Please show me...Abraham was an Iraqi, in present day terms/identification...The Jews cling to this untruth because theirs is a racial/tribal religion, and they falsely think they have a physical lineage to these Patriarchs...Could these men be described as Hebrews...This is debatable, and probably no definite conclusions can be drawn...If 'Hebrew' is derived from the Biblical person, Eber, maybe...But Hebrew, likewise Israelite, is not the same as Jew...Today's 'Jews' never sopke Hebrew...Their ancestors never lived in Palestine...They spoke Yiddish as their 'Jewish' tongue...Hebrew was made the official language of Israel for political reasons, because the use of Yiddish by the Jews who settled in Palestine would have made them seem even more alien to the Arabs already there, and because the Jews wanted 'to get back to their roots'...Perhaps they should have gone to Babylon instead...I won't even discuss Christ with you because you reject Him for no reason...As for your personal spiritual journey, I wish you luck...But do not smear another person's faith unless you have some real understanding of it...Peace to you.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: jola on January 11, 2009, 03:32:08 AM
Quote
Approximately 3000 Catholic priests and clerics were killed in either camps or by Werhmacht forces or Einzatzgruppen commandos

Says you who were not there.


Quote from: FrankDialogue on January 08, 2009, 06:06:12 PM
...Are you defending Nazi actions, and for what reason?...


I am defending brave courageous Christian people who fought the Bolsheviks and protected their mortal enemies the jews from you canard smears. Yes.

I know you won't believe Poles telling you differnent, so I'll quote a Wehrmacht soldier for you.  Clergy, as well as other community leaders were targeted by Germans and their friends and allies, the Soviets.  I'd be happy to explain to you if you like.  Anyway, back to the brave, courageous, German Christians fighting bolshevism.



Quote
Mathias Schenk, an 18-year old Belgian served as Sturmpionier (assault engineer) in Wehrmacht during the suppression of the Warsaw Uprising in 1944. Members of his unit were assigned to various SS-Sturmbrigade Dirlewanger platoons as demolition engineers.

Quote
`My second penitentiary watch was for a priest. We blew up the back door to a monastery `“ very heavy, they lead to a cellar. The monastery, a huge building near the Old Town, was already very damaged by bombs and grenades. Two of us jumped inside. There was a priest standing in front of us. He held a wafer and a chalice in his hands. Maybe this was an impulse, I don't know. We genuflected and took the communion. Then a third from our group ran in and did the same. SS-men stormed in and the usual shots, screams, and groans could be heard. The nuns were in habits. A few hours later I saw that priest in Dirlewangerers' hands. They drank wine from the chalice, the wafers were scattered and broken. They were pissing on a cross that was leaning against the wall. They were torturing the priest: he had a bloody face, torn cassock. We took that priest from them, it was an impulse. They were surprised, but so drunk, that they didn't know what was happening. The next day they also didn't remember what happened. We passed the priest to our battalion. I didn't hear about him anymore. But on the road we meet Fels. For the priest I got a solitary guard duty on a bridge.

Quote
`I was setting explosives under big doors, somewhere in Old Town. From inside we heard Nicht schießen! Nicht schießen! (don't shoot). The doors opened and a nurse appeared with a tiny white flag. We went inside with fixed bayonets. A huge hall with beds and mattresses on the floor. Wounded were everywhere. Besides Poles there were also wounded Germans. They begged the SS-men not to kill the Poles. A Polish officer, a doctor and 15 Polish Red Cross nurses surrendered the military hospital to us. The Dirlewangerers were following us. I hid one of the nurses behind the doors and managed to lock them. I heard after the war that she has survived. The SS-men killed all the wounded. They were breaking their heads with rifle butts. The wounded Germans were screaming and crying in despair. After that, the Dirlewangerers ran after the nurses; they were ripping clothes off them. We were driven out for guard duty. We heard women screaming. In the evening, on Adolph Hitler's Square [now Piłsudzki Square] there was a roar as loud as during boxing fights. So I and my friend climbed the wall to see what was happening there. Soldiers of all units: Wehrmacht, SS, Kaminski's Cossacks [ RONA ], boys from Hitlerjugend; whistles, exhortations. Dirlewanger stood with his men and laughed. The nurses from the hospital were rushed through the square, naked with hands on their heads. Blood ran down their legs. The doctor was dragged behind them with a noose on his neck. He wore a rag, red maybe from blood and a thorn crown on top of the head. All were lead to the gallows where a few bodies were hanging already. When they were hanging one of the nurses, Dirlewanger kicked the bricks she was standing on. I couldn't watch that anymore. We ran to our quarters, but before we reached them we saw Kaminski`s Cossacks rushing with civilians. We called those 'Cossacks Hiwis' `“ from Hilfswillige (volunteers, willing to help). Next to them a Polish pregnant woman fell down. One of the Hiwis turned back and whipped her, she tried to escape on knees, but they killed her running over her with horses.`
http://www.warsawuprising.com/witness/schenk.htm (http://www.warsawuprising.com/witness/schenk.htm)

If Hitler were serious about fighting bolshevism, he shouldn't have attacked the only country which had some experience in actual fighting bolshevism.  In 1920, Poland stopped the bolshevik hord from running over Europe.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on January 11, 2009, 07:32:54 AM
I know you won't believe Poles telling you differnent,

You have nailed it my friend.  It is a belief.  This story is a story.  It hits the neurons in the brain to trigger emotions not logcial thought.

Fact:  Bolsheviks used pictures of Germans they slaughtered as evidence that Germans slaughtered Jews.

Logic Robot: Bolsheviks used stories like these that they actually committed as evidence that Germans killed whoever priests, Poles, etc.

Look at this thread.

3000 priests killed by nazis

700 priests killed by nazis

one priest tortured by a drunk war crazed psychos

a doctor and 15 Polish - 16 people tortured and killed by drunk war crazed psychos

If these are true war atrocities by individual Germans against Poles they are unforgiveable.  But I doubt the Zionist German gov't will ever give an apology to Poland. Better for them to keep the hate up.

By the way, why did Poles not return the land that was stolen from Germany with WWI and Versaille?

Hitler

Quote
Danzig was to return to the Reich. An exterritorial road was to be built to East Prussia—at our expense of course. In return Poland was to receive the most extensive Free Port rights, and similar exterritorial access. I, on the other hand, on top of that, was prepared to guarantee the existing frontiers, hardly bearable as they were, and finally to let Poland participate in guaranteeing the safety of Slovakia. I cannot imagine what a state of mind the Polish Government was in when it rejected these proposals. I do know, however, that untold millions of Germans gave a sigh of relief because they were of the opinion that in making those proposals I had gone too far.

Poland's reply was to order the first mobilization, immediately followed by ferocious terrorism. My request to the then Polish Foreign Minister to visit me in Berlin in order to discuss this question with me once more was rejected. Instead of coming to Berlin, he went to London!

Quote
I succeeded in coming to an agreement with the late Marshall Pilsudski, which was intended to pave the way towards a peaceful understanding between the two nations, an agreement which, from the outset, did not sanction anything that was created by the Treaty of Versailles, but which endeavored to lay at least the foundations for a reasonable and tolerable side-by-side existence by completely ignoring that treaty.

As long as the Marshall was alive it seemed as if this attempt might indeed lead to an improvement of the tense situation. Immediately after his death, however, an intensified anti-German campaign began. This campaign, which took numerous and varied forms, embittered and complicated the relations between the two nations in an increasing degree. In the long run it was extremely difficult to look on patiently while in a neighboring country, whose very existence had caused grievous harm to Germany, the German minorities were being persecuted in the most barbarous way. The world, ready to shed tears whenever a Polish Jew who immigrated into Germany only a comparatively short time ago is turned out—this same world remained absolutely deaf to the sufferings of those who, in compliance with the Treaty of Versailles, were forced to leave their native land not by the thousand, but by the million. The world was deaf for the simple reason that they were Germans.

Quote
I am thinking of the thousands of slaughtered Germans, of the bestially butchered women, girls and children, of the countless German soldiers and officers who, when wounded, fell into the hands of the enemy. They were massacred, their eyes were torn out, they were brutally mutilated. And worst of all: the Polish Governor openly admitted by its own broadcasts that airmen who parachuted to the ground were murdered. There were really moments when the question arose whether under these circumstances it was possible to refrain from taking retaliatory action. I have not learnt that a single democratic statesman went to the trouble of protesting against this barbarity. I gave orders to the German air force to wage this war humanely, that is to say, to attack only fighting troops. The Polish Government and supreme command ordered their civilian population to carry on this war as snipers firing from hiding-places. It was very hard not to lose one's self-control. But I should like to emphasize here: Let no one in the democratic States imagine that this state of affairs must needs continue forever. If they want a change of methods they can have it. Here, too, my patience may come to an end.

http://judicial-inc.biz/Br.oomberg_supplement_hitler%20speech.htm

(http://judicial-inc.biz/versaille-1.jpg)

skunk

Quote
WW 2 was started over the Danzig corridor which was part of Germany until the Versailles treaty gave it to Poland. The Versailles Treaty gave away the areas in yellow.

Quote
The 1939 Danzig Massacres

The Polish Bolsheviks kill 58,000 German Nationals in the Danzig corridor In the months leading up to the German invasion the Polish Army and independent Bolshevik units had been slaughtering German nationals in the Danzig corridor. Mass killings of thousands of civilian ethnic Germans (Volksdeutsche) by both civilian and Russian NDVK Jews, who were confident that Poland would quickly defeat Germany. Many apparently expected to take possession of German farms and businesses. An estimated 58,000 German civilians lost their lives in the massacres carried out prior to the 1939 invasion.

Poles had been merrily slaughtering anything or anybody German since at least as early as April 1939, with smaller incidents stretching back to the close of WW I -- you haven't been told that by the Mass Media, or the fact that these atrocities were one of the main causes for the German invasion of Poland.

Germany had  protesting in writing to the League of Nations literally dozens of times with no results.

http://judicial-inc.biz/Broomberg.htm

Only one group of "people" can cause madness like this.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: FrankDialogue on January 12, 2009, 08:30:27 AM
Heads & tails of the same coin...Also, be intelligent and don't take everything you read on Judicial Inc as absolute truth, as it contains mis-accuracies...Whoever publishes the site seems to consider Poles to be Jews, which shows ignorance...Hitler was also ignorant in this way, as he considered Slavs 'incapable of governing themselves'...Not a friend of the Polish people...If you want to beleive in the betrayal of the great German people, and in the nonsense that they were all noble warriors fighting to crush the Bolshevist devil, OK...Hitler, as I said, was a puppet, although he did have some good ideas...He was a fanatic, and fanatics lose their reasoning abilility...You should consider some of the words of his generals, as much as was recorded...He brought the German nation to destruction...This was a great man?...The Geman ideology was built on a false racialism, and based in occult, Jewish 'spirituality'.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: jola on January 12, 2009, 11:01:07 PM
You are quoting Hitler and the Skunk.  What next, you're going to reference The Onion?  I know Hitler's speech from Gdansk well, and it is similar to Bush's speeches about invading Iraq.  Poland stole no land from Germany; Germany lost a war, and consequenty lost some terrain.  Hitler kept ranting and spitting about expansion to the east for years.  Dust off your copy of Mein Kampf and you will see what he had in mind in 1924.  No one had to push him toward a new war, he planed it, armed for it, and we know the rest of the story.  What was his reason for annexing Austria and Czechoslovakia? It would have been called an invasion had they fought.

Skunk loses credibility by spreading stories as such.  He has plenty of other bullshit stories as well.

Coming back to the clergy, I can hardly find a Polish church that had no victims listed during the war.  The 3000 figure is very close to the actual, and many more were imprisoned and tortured. 
In pre-war Germany, there were 24,000 priests.  Guess how many joined the Nazi party?  Less than one percent.  Now, what kind of a priest joines a party that considers its neighbors sub-human?  The Germans had to revise their clasification of who is an Aryan a few times to fit in beautiful specimens as these:
(http://www.2neatmagazines.com/covers/1941cover/1941-Feb-03.jpg)

 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: amonvanroark on January 13, 2009, 01:59:46 PM
Quote
Maybe you could write an essay or article about these people you knew who had parents there...I would like to read it...If you are still in contact with these people, then perhaps interview/email/write them...It would make a good article...

This is impossible, as the parents of the people I heard this from are likely no longer alive, and over the years I have lost touch with all concerned. The information simply came up in conversation with a few co-workers, over twenty five years ago.
I never stuck with the job, moved, and lost all contact. I doubt that the company even exists any longer, as the Internet has made it redundant. I have found some other such testimonials on the web, and bookmarked them in the past, but all my bookmarks were lost when my last computer got fried.

Quote
I don't say that the National Socialists had no good ideas, or that they may not have improved the lot of Germans for a period of time...The German people were in a very bad state after WWI, and the machinations of the bankers/merchants, many of whom were Jews, certainly made life miserable...I simply ask this: what was the final fate of Hitler's Reich?...Did Hitler's own mindset and mentality, along with the fanaticism of himself and his minions bring disaster to the German people?

Hitler initially did a great many good things for the German people, however he did get involved in what can be regarded as a three front war, which would have still been winnable, had he taken decisive action at the beginning. The intervention of America in the war sealed Germany's fate.

Quote
Eckart, I posted links to this on LibertForum over 18 months ago...You can access Aryan & racialist material like this here:

I care little to nothing about either Aryan or racialist material. I have lived long enough and seen enough to not immerse myself in that dead end. To be honest, in real life, I do not get on well with Germans at all. Most that I have met are not as intelligent as they purport themselves to be, and always seem to be individuals that wish to be in control. This does not work out well, as if I am, personally, not in control of any undertaking I assume, I soon lose interest in it, or, sometimes, insure the failure of the undertaking. They wish to control and lead, but I am a very poor follower.

Quote
Also, what is MSM?

MSM = MainStream Media

=============================================================

Quote
Also, be intelligent and don't take everything you read on Judicial Inc as absolute truth, as it contains mis-accuracies...Whoever publishes the site seems to consider Poles to be Jews, which shows ignorance

You are operating under a mis-apprehension. I doubt that I have read more than two or three articles at Judicial. While some may like the format there, I would rather have a lot more detail on any given subject than it offers. The pictures, and one liners may be enough to get some people thinking, but I prefer to have more in depth information. I have arrived at my conclusions on my own, and before I even had happened upon internet forums.

Quote
The Geman ideology was built on a false racialism, and based in occult, Jewish 'spirituality'.

The jew has been, for centuries, regarding himself as being racially superior to all others, and it has not worked out so badly, in reality, for him. What the jew has, that other lack, is cohesion. The problem with the muzzies, the whites, in America, and abroad, and many other racial units is they lack a sense of purpose, and moreover, the cohesion to accomplish whatever goals they wish. A jew is a jew is a jew. This is the foremost of their thinking. In most cases, everything hinges on, and reflects the truth that a jew is a jew, and a jew must do what is best for all jews. This seldom varies, and if it does, there is likely an ulterior motive.


Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: John_de_Nugent on January 14, 2009, 10:59:47 AM
Hitler was most definitely not part-Jewish; that is one of many, often contradictory defamations, flung at him by the Khazar lie machine.

No Jews whatsoever were permitted to live in the part of Austria where his grandmother supposedly worked for a Rothschild or Frankenberger (the bogus story varies).

"Mugwort" on Liberty Forum had a good thread on this, which I am trying to locate.

The arrogant Jew psychiatrist Walter Langer actually said that since most Austrian peasants were stupid, therefore Hitler had to have Jewish blood!!!
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: John_de_Nugent on January 14, 2009, 11:03:53 AM
Interesting quote from Eckart:
Quote
"....we must understand what Christ meant by 'enemy.' We can love an honorable and decent enemy, even a brutal one, who is frank and forthright in his enmity. And at the same time we can beware of him. But Christ never dreamed that we should love men whom no love whatever could dissuade from their implacable determination to poison us, body and soul. Indeed, he himself did not do that. On the contrary, he continued to strike with his whip as hard as he could. And the words that he flung with indignation into the faces of the rabble breathed of irreconcilability itself. To me, he acted very proudly in the founding of his religion: there was very little contradiction between his sermons and his deeds! Why, then, have the 'pious' never followed his example? They least of all."

Why not?

Cowardice. and irresponsibility, which Adolf in his Second Book (1927) called the "hallmarks of our age."

An age where Khazars constantly promote selfish individualism.
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: Sue on January 15, 2009, 05:46:50 AM
Interesting quote from Eckart:
Why not?

Cowardice. and irresponsibility, which Adolf in his Second Book (1927) called the "hallmarks of our age."

An age where Khazars constantly promote selfish individualism.

It took the holyco$t of their lesser brethren to finally place themselves 'under world protection' - like rare animals - while laughing all the way to the bank. What chutzpa! 
Title: Re: Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin:
Post by: bpocatch on February 01, 2009, 09:30:34 AM
lol BarneyFrank is very emotional.

Pray for him.  It drives them crazy.

Someday the anti-German bigots will see feel hear reason:

Quote
The statement about the "six million Jews", allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.

http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/TheTalmudicVengeance.htm