Author Topic: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?  (Read 1002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gregor

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 745
  • Karma: +24/-2
    • View Profile
Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« on: March 21, 2006, 09:59:29 AM »
Google:  "Political Officers".

Please.  Humor me.

I only thought communist countries, and Israel, used "zampolits". 

Now we do.  I guess when the 'wall' fell, it signaled that the west had been taken.

The same people who gave you Communism are going to give you...
 
Noahadism!
To the web monitors:  You took an oath to the Constitution.  Why are you now subverting it?

Offline Proemio

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2995
  • Karma: +28/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2006, 01:56:01 PM »
I only thought communist countries, and Israel, used "zampolits". 
True. So what's the question?
Last Sunday (on the Blitzer thing), Kissinger was asked the following question (paraphrased):
"Is it right for the United States of America to refuse to talk to Hamas?"
Answer:
"You can't expect Israel to talk to Hamas"  ......................................... " ".

Offline gregor

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 745
  • Karma: +24/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2006, 02:08:58 PM »
Quote
True. So what's the question?

Yeah.  LOL(sickly laugh)

A classic freudian slip by the K.  Or are they ALL gonna just start calling the US "Israel"?

'Member when we thought communism was no longer a threat?
To the web monitors:  You took an oath to the Constitution.  Why are you now subverting it?

Offline Proemio

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2995
  • Karma: +28/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2006, 03:15:38 PM »
'Member when we thought communism was no longer a threat?
That's OK. We were young - then.

'isms will be 'forever', or for as long as we let jews (re)define words.

Offline Effendi

  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1523
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2006, 03:36:43 PM »
as long as we let jews (re)define words.

Funny you should mention that...

I looked in old dictionaries and apparently the word "terrorism" really DID exist before it got hijacked in the last 30 years to become a "jewish" word..

There is a complete mindset that has been put in place by the powers that be to associate certain words with a certain feeling.

Have you ever heard of a Palestinian Soldier?......According to jewish mindset,  a Palestinian man who takes up arms in defense of his own is a "Gunman".

But an israeli man that defends his own is called a "Commando"

It's amazing how the press follow a narrow accepted definition set out by a select few!!

Scott!!
In this media blitz we call cyberspace, clever poseurs on all levels claim that it’s not Jews, it’s Zionists; it’s not Jews, it’s Neocons; it’s not Jews, it’s Communists; it’s not Jews, it’s the Illuminati. All these labels are synonyms for Judaism, which is not really a religion, but a crime scheme

Offline gregor

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 745
  • Karma: +24/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2006, 05:45:48 PM »
When one narrow-minded group is allowed to run the media, this is what happens.

It just means that "Never Again" is right around the corner.

Again.
To the web monitors:  You took an oath to the Constitution.  Why are you now subverting it?

Offline RACHEL1958

  • Shoved in a 55 Gallon drum and mailed to Lebanon
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2485
  • Karma: +31/-50
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2006, 05:48:05 PM »
Those who don't know history or soon doomed to repeat it!!!
Over the Rainbow !!!

Offline dominique

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 4107
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why do we have need of "Political Officers"?
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2006, 08:09:32 PM »
Last Sunday (on the Blitzer thing), Kissinger was asked the following question (paraphrased):
"Is it right for the United States of America to refuse to talk to Hamas?"
Answer:
"You can't expect Israel to talk to Hamas"  ......................................... " ".

OMG. I know this should not be shocking, but it's just so........blatant.
"Divert, distort, denigrate, disrupt or destroy any discussion of the corruption of American liberty by the organized lobby of a foreign power."  ~ WindRiverShoshoni