Author Topic: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?  (Read 6043 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gregor

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 745
  • Karma: +24/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2006, 06:03:41 AM »
For those who look for evidence of the RCC's infiltration, look no further than the Church's protection of it's molesters.  They's might as well be sending them to Tel Aviv to avoid extradition!  That same 'we don't answer to the herd animals' attitude originated from the Talmud, not the Bilbe.
To the web monitors:  You took an oath to the Constitution.  Why are you now subverting it?

Offline orraven

  • Private First Class
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #21 on: February 24, 2006, 08:21:33 AM »
To be fair the facts do not back up your opinion of the Catholic Church. The very same kinds of abuse have taken place in Jewish and Protestant denominations with little or no coverage from the Jew owned media. The state uses the "sex abuse scandal" as a lever to bankrupt the Catholic Church, its not rocket science. The problem is one concerning "homosexuality" so how would letting these perverts have the option to marry women solve the problem?

"All we want is to be left alone." President Jefferson Davis Confederate States of America

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2006, 09:44:59 PM »
Listen up MATRIX. Only one way to deal with this criticism...

6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million,6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million, 6 million!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now, dont ever speak of it again you anti-Semite. ;)

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2006, 10:02:34 PM »
Who's Been Changing The Inside of Roman Catholic Churches? And Why?

http://www.realnews247.com/altar_comparison_pictorial.htm

The Look of pre-1958 Roman Catholic churches
Here are two pictures of an altar in the sanctuary of a Roman Catholic Church as all Catholic churches appeared pre-1958. Catholic Churches looked exactly like this going back to the 1500s when Pope Pius V codified the Tridentine (traditional) Latin Mass, and essentially like this back to the time of the Apostles when Mass was said using the tomb of a Christian martyr as the altar. Notice that the Priest says Mass facing the crucifix and the tabernacle, where Catholics believe Christ is truly present in the Eucharist (Host), with his back to the people. Notice the steps where, after the prayers at the foot of the altar, the priest would ascend to the altar to offer Mass to God. (The picture at right was taken at Our Lady of Fatima Chapel in Richmond, Virginia.)



The Look Inside of Masonic Temples

Now look four pictures of "sanctuaries" in Masonic Lodges as they have been for centuries, and as they still are today in 2003. Notice the three chairs where men sit in the central place, as opposed to the central place of the Tabernacle in pre-1958 Catholic Churches. Notice the little table where the presiding officer faces the assembled people, as opposed to a tabernacle or crucifix. The two bottom pictures are from the Masonic Mountain View Lodge 194 in California.





The Look of post Vatican II, post 1969 (Novus Order) or New Order churches

Now look at pictures of Catholic Churches as they appear today in all parish churches under the control of a "Vatican II-New Church" bishop.

The picture on the left immediately below is a Catholic parish in transition from the "traditional Roman Catholic" look to the Masonic oriented look. Notice the Masonic-style table that has been inelegantly plopped in the middle of the sanctuary. This was the first step -- to just intrude the Masonic type table into the sanctuary. It would have been a little obvious and abrupt if, in 1969 when Paul VI ordered the "New Mass", the order would have been given to tear out all the traditional altars. So the first step of gradualism`”inserting the table in front of the altar`”was taken. (In many churches, the next step was this`¦)

The picture immediately below at the upper right position is from St. Hugo's Parish in Michigan. Both pictures on the right immediately below represent the final goal of the Vatican II "New Church". This type of deformation has taken place at all parish churches which have been subjected to demolition and remodeling since Vatican Council II. The picture at bottom right was taken at St. Jude's Parish in Radford, Virginia. This look is really the final goal of the "Vatican II" New Church; notice the strange and perhaps occult symbolism formed by the windows behind the table in the bottom right picture. Notice that the tabernacle is totally gone from the "sanctuaries" of both churches pictured on the right immediately below. Notice the two forms of the "presider's chair to the back left of the Novus Ordo, or New Church" tables, where a man sits in the place of prominence, instead of Christ in the tabernacle. Notice that the crucifix is gone in both New churches, and that at St. Jude's in Radford, Virginia, even any form of a cross is gone. Notice that it is evident in the St. Jude's picture that chairs with no kneelers have replaced the pews with kneelers found in pre-1958 Catholic Church's. Scroll back up and compare the "post-Vatican II" New Churches below, with the Masonic Lodges, and then with the pre-1958 Catholic Church look depicted in the pictures at the top of this page.




The Look of Anglican churches
Next look at two pictures of Anglican Churches, as they have been constituted for centuries since Thomas Cranmer helped wife-hopper and wife-murderer King Henry VIII replace the Roman Catholic Church with the Anglican Church in England. Catholics attending parish churches will be astounded to find that this is not a modern Catholic Church `”it looks exactly like one, replete with the burlap/cloth banners. This picture was taken at the Anglican Church in Lichfield, England. The picture to the left was taken at the Anglican Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Catholics will notice that this looks exactly like a New Mass, imposed on the parishes since 1969 by Paul VI, and maintained by John Paul II. Notice the golden cup in front of the Anglican minister`”the same "cup" is now found at all New Masses in the parishes`”the cup which has replaced the Chalice used during the traditional Latin Mass in all pre-1958 Catholic Churches.


The United Nations Meditation Room and Popes
(anti-Popes?) Paul VI and John Paul II at the UN


And finally, we come to the photos of the UN General Assembly Hall and the UN meditation room. On the left immediately below is the UN Meditation Room. Notice the similarity of the "barren" look and "sterile" feel between the UN Meditation Room, the masonic temples, the Anglican Churches and the Vatican II New "Catholic" Churches. According to the official United Nations website, the meditation room was "created by former Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld as 'a place where the doors may be open to the infinite lands of thought and prayer.'" One source has described it this as follows: "This room contains numerous freemasonic symbols and has an altar to the 'faceless god.'" (Revs. Francisco and Dominic Radecki, CMRI, What Has Happened to the Catholic Church?) Although in theory people of all faiths are welcome to us it, the stark, abstract chamber is tailor-made for occult/New Age groups, two of which enjoy the status of UN non-governmental organizations (NGOs): the Aquarian Age Community and the Lucis Trust (originally Lucifer Trust). These organizations hold their meetings in UN conference rooms and provide assistance, advice, and counseling to the U.N. officials and staff. The UN has also affiliated with other occultist-friendly activities and conducted its own, such as the Planetary Initiative, for which it named as director David Spangler, guru at Scotland's neo-pagan Findhorn Community. Spanger has been described by religious researcher J. Gordon Melton as the "primary architect/theoretician" of the New Age Movement and is particularly infamous for his contention that "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." And then there is the Earth Charter, which seeks to being about a new "global spirituality." (Among the Charter's supporters are the unrepentant Communist Mikhail Gorbachev and "liberation theology" propagandist Leonardo Boff.)



On the right is a picture from October 4, 1965, of Paul VI sitting beneath three UN officials just before he spoke at the UN assembly. (Later that day he would go to Yankee Stadium for an outdoor Mass before 80,000 people.) In that address he called the UN "the last, best hope of mankind," and, according to Catholic author Piers Compton, "propagated the social gospel so dear to the heart of revolutionaries, without a single reference to the religious doctrines that they [the revolutionaries] found so pernicious." (The Broken Cross) Paul VI also wore the breastplate of the Jewish High Priest Caiphas while visiting the UN. (Caiphas was the High Priest who condemned Christ to death 2000 years ago in the secret, illegal middle-of-the-night trial which took place right after Judas betrayed Christ with a kiss in the Garden of Gethesemane, and right before Caiphas ordered that Christ be taken to Pontius Pilate.) Once the photos of Paul VI wearing the breastplate of Caiphas circulated, Abbe de Nantes of France challenged Paul him about this, and the breastplate was never seen in public again. The late traditional Mexican priest, Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga, wrote that

Paul VI knows very well what this "Breastplate of Judgement,' the Ephod signifies; he knows its origins in the ritualistic dress of the Ancient Covenant [that is, the old testament]; he is not ignorant of the fact that Masons today use it as a distinctive mark of their high priest.
[/b]



The late writer William Strojie wondered whether Paul VI wore the breast plate of Caiphas because, just as Caiphas was condemning Christ to death and handing Him over to the worldly powers (Pontius Pilate, the Roman authority), Paul VI was attempting to condemn the Church (the Mystical Body of Christ) to death, and handing it over to the worldly powers (the United Nations). Concurrent with this was his greatly trumpeted handing over of the Papal tiara "for the poor" (November 14, 1964); likewise, he gave his pectoral cross and fisherman's ring to UN Secretary General U Thant, who, in turn, sold them to a Jewish businessman in the Midwest. (Rama Coomaraswamy, The Destruction of Christian Tradition. Compton notes that the the pair purchased for $64,000 and some of the gems from them were later seen adorning a Hollywood actress.)

Significantly, after his speech and before heading to Yankee Stadium, Paul VI went to the meditation room, but just what he did in there is disputed. Most commentators writing about this interlude report that he prayed (which is creepy enough in itself), but others maintain that something far darker occurred. Compton, who believes that Paul VI was a conscious enemy of the Catholic Church, was at that time happy with the success the conspiracy had had at the soon-to-be closing Vatican II`”the goal of subverting the Church was well in hand. The UN address can be see as Paul VI's veiled communication to his brother conspirators around the world that it was time to rejoice. With this in mind, Compton writes: "It now remained to round off a truly historic visit with an initiatory rite that would put the seal on this newly admitted realization." According to Compton, the purpose of the occult ritual that took place in the meditation room:

represented the early stage of a scheme, the fulfillment of which would be...the erection of the Temple of Understanding, on fifty acres of the Potomac in Washington, D.C....The underlying purpose of the Temple was plainly revealed by its...All-Seeing Eye...that represented six world faiths -- Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Confucianism, and Christianity...
[/b]



The Temple of Understanding calls itself a "spiritual United Nations," and is another group that has NGO status at the UN.  It was conceived in 1960, and besides Paul VI, other founders and supporters have included John XXIII (photo, below left), Mother Teresa, U Thant, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlat Nehru, Trappist monk Thomas Merton, the Dali Lama, former-First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, Dr. Albert Schweitzer, Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger, socialist Norman Thomas, seance-obsessed Episcopal Bishop James Pike, and billionaire John D. Rockefeller, who largely bankrolled the seed money for the organization. Just as the United Nations constitutes the precursor of a one world government, so. too, the syncretistic Temple of Understanding can be seen as the basis for a one world religion.

The photo below shows John Paul II addressing the UN General Assembly in 1995. He, too, is an ardent supporter of the United Nations, despite its abysmal record of propping up tyrannies (while allegedly championing freedom), trampling upon human rights (while claiming to uphold them), stirring up conflicts (while sending in its "peacekeepers") and the largest and being the world's most visible promoter of the New World Order. Former UN Under Secretary General Robert Muller, a member of the Novus Ordo church who promotes the late Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin's condemned evolutionary theology, is a favorite of John Paul II. Muller, who has been called the UN's "prophet of hope" wrote the "Framework for Planetary and Cosmic Consciousness" and is belongs to ex-Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev's Gorbachev Foundation. He blasphemously has referred to the United Nations as "the body of Christ." As a token of his esteem, John Paul II gave Muller a pectoral cross.



In fact, in the early 1990s he stated: "By the end of this decade we will live under the first one world government that has ever existed in the society of nations`¦a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable." (Cited, Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, emphasis added. Although John Paul II supposedly believes in free will, this quote is deterministic in tone, sounding eerily like the Communist Manifesto, where Marx and Engels`”who, by virtue of their materialism, were strict determinists`”declared that the eventual communism conquest of the world is inevitable.)

Such a statement is consistent with other statements coming out of Rome since Vatican II. John XIII's Pacem in Terris (1963), the call was made "Men's common interests make it imperative that at long last a world-wide community of nations be established." Two years later, Paul VI, during his United Nations speech, would echo this, saying that the UN "is the obligatory path for modern civilization and world peace."

And the Iraqi War has given John Paul II's Vatican an occasion to once again promote the concept of world government:

Archbishop Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, said: "The crisis situation of the U.N., caused by the war in Iraq, does not contradict but reinforces the appeal in 'Pacem in Terris' for a world political authority." (U.N.'s role needed now more than ever, says Archbishop Martino," Zenit, 4/11/03)

He went on to say that the UN should be a "subsidiary world authority" to guarantee "a manner of world government that favors peace" and that "it is time to undertake a constitutional engineering of humanity so that the United Nations can carry out its irreplaceable role."

While world government is a concept embraced by John Paul II and the two Vatican II predecessors whose names he took, this no more resembles the traditional thinking of Popes concerning international relations than does the United Nations' meditation room resemble the interior of a Catholic Church. The notion of a singular global rule was addressed in 1920, by the reigning pontiff, Pope Benedict XV, (photo, right) who declared:

The coming of a world state is longed for, and confidently expected, by all the worst and most distorted elements. This state, based on the principles of absolute equality of men and a community of possessions, would banish all national loyalties. In it no acknowledgement would be made of the authority of a father over his children, or of God over human society. If these ideas are put into practice, there will inevitably follow a reign of unheard-of terror.


Offline rottenjohnh

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 743
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #24 on: February 25, 2006, 12:08:57 AM »
Quote
Who's Been Changing The Inside of Roman Catholic Churches? And Why?

Opus Dei and their cypto Jew founder Escriva.


Offline polperro

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2006, 03:44:09 PM »
"The problem is one concerning "homosexuality""

No it's not. The problem is pedophilia. The catholic church has been desperately trying to use the word "homosexuality" in place of the word "pedophilia" because they think it's less damning. The kids were under the legal age of consent, so the perps were pedophiles in my eyes.
And the stats show that 19% of victims were female, 22 percent of the victims were under 10 and 51 percent were 11 to 14 years old. http://www.americancatholic.org/News/ClergySexAbuse/

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #26 on: February 26, 2006, 12:02:14 AM »
Funny how Catholic Churches, freemasonic temples and most of the joosih/talmud/kabbahla signs and symbols all harken back to Egyption sun god worship. Anyone would think their was some kind of conspiracy to oust Christian traditions and laws and bring in an elitist, pyrimidal structure of worship of man as god. :-[

Offline Fenelon

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #27 on: February 26, 2006, 12:23:53 AM »
Quote
If Roman Catholicism was a project of Cabalist Jews for the purpose of subverting Christianity, it is conceivable that this Judaized Church has functioned for nearly two millennia as a covert branch of Judaism, whose handlers gradually and imperceptibly shifted Western Christendom to more advanced stages of apostasy than was possible during the vigilant period of the early Church when ecumenical councils convened to combat heresy, rather than to embrace it

I'm sorry, but that doesn't make any sense at all.  The media has targeted the Catholic Church with extreme prejudice in recent years, because it is a continuation of the attacks that Jews have been making on Catholicism and Christianity for 2000 years.  The Church has been targeted by Revolutionary movements since the Enlightenment.  Going back to Cromwell and the wars against the Habsburg Dynasty, often referred to as the "Religious Wars," there has been constant strife between Catholics and Jews, with the Jews nearly always supporting the Protestants and seeking to destroy the Catholic monarchies.  In Spain, the convert from Judaism, Paul of Burgos, spoke of the plans of the Jews to rule Spain.  Even the Visigoths in Spain contended with the Jews for the same reason, that the Jews sought to rule.  It is widely believed that Jews helped the Arabs quickly take Spain.  As for the current abuse scandal, it is terrible.  But you should consider two things: first, the Church hierarchy has been infiltrated by Jews and Freemasons.  Secondly, the media literally waged a hate campaign that would have caused mobs and riots in the old days, before people were zoned out on TV.  As for the beginnings of the Church, there is no way to settle that controversy, so I won't even broach the subject.  Jews and Catholics have been hostile all the way back to the beginning.  The same can't be said for all Protestants, can it?

The Jews have achieved their power because of Anglo-Protestants who have been totally out of touch with reality, willing to go to war with "Catholic Spain" over the Maine, for example.  Check out the Skunk's site, he reveals the Jewish campaign to get TR on the McKinley ticket.

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #28 on: February 26, 2006, 12:33:58 AM »
I agree with you FENELON.

There's still the Russian, Serb and Greek Orthadox Church if you're lonely. They STILL hold on BITTERLY and with a firm hand to their tradition and faith.

Catholics have allowed this to happen. They could kick up a stink but few do. So...it dies and people move on. What can I say. As long as homosexuals are drawn to the Church due to it's insitance of celebacy we will see men move easily from man love to boy love. The Catholic Church has had scandal after scandal...what are we to do? Shrug our shoulders?




Offline Fenelon

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #29 on: February 26, 2006, 12:38:58 AM »
The Pope has been a head of state for hundreds of years.  I'm surprised at you taking sides with the lawyers who would try to confiscate the Sistine Chapel if they could get away with it.  The Catholic Church has serious problems, but the "abuse" crisis is part of an ongoing propaganda war on Catholics.

Offline rottenjohnh

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 743
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #30 on: February 26, 2006, 12:45:05 AM »
Anyone would think their was some kind of conspiracy to oust Christian traditions and laws and bring in an elitist, pyrimidal structure of worship of man as god. :-[

I'm definetely of that opinion and though I'm not religious I support their right to exist and am fully against the modern day Bolsheviks who are striving to achieve their agenda. They've been attacking Christianity for years and are now going at, with the same gusto Islam.

Offline Fenelon

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #31 on: February 26, 2006, 12:47:08 AM »
Don't think other orthodox branches haven't been infiltrated too.  BTW, I really appreciate those pictures you put up about the "Masonic" altar and the bizarre and sacrilegious Church architecture that has become the norm.  Essentially, Catholics must accept that their leadership has been compromized, and recognize that Church doctrine through the ages is still there to guide them.  There are holy priests faithful to those doctrines, and they must be sought out by Catholics.  It is sad, but perhaps to be expected given the anti-Catholics who permeate the Catholic Church, that the anti-Catholic bigotry which would tar all priests has become extremely widespread and virulent

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #32 on: February 26, 2006, 12:52:56 AM »
Again, what am I to do? I CANNOT go to a place where time and time again criminal activity has been covered up. What am I to do? This has not happened once, nor twice, nor thrice but THOUSANDS of times over the last 1000 years with the Vatican doing...nothing. We have Popes who spend more time hunting than they do showing compassion. We have vast buildings filled with treasures while humans starve and the status quo maintained.

Instead of the Pope suck holing to filth ridden Talmudic Rabbi's he could make himself up a nice cord and in his spare time whip the child molesters from Gods temple. It will be time well used. The people would return and some dignity returned to Peters rock.

To watch a Pope GROVEL to those scum Rabbi's on that fateful day was the end for me.

I kiss my icons and I like it.

Peace. Sincerely.

I note you posted just as I finished typing above.

Don't think other orthodox branches haven't been infiltrated too.  BTW, I really appreciate those pictures you put up about the "Masonic" altar and the bizarre and sacrilegious Church architecture that has become the norm.  Essentially, Catholics must accept that their leadership has been compromized, and recognize that Church doctrine through the ages is still there to guide them.  There are holy priests faithful to those doctrines, and they must be sought out by Catholics.  It is sad, but perhaps to be expected given the anti-Catholics who permeate the Catholic Church, that the anti-Catholic bigotry which would tar all priests has become extremely widespread and virulent

I agree. If i sound harsh it's because I'm so dissapointed. Will keep your words in mind.

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #33 on: February 26, 2006, 01:04:55 AM »
I'm definetely of that opinion and though I'm not religious I support their right to exist and am fully against the modern day Bolsheviks who are striving to achieve their agenda. They've been attacking Christianity for years and are now going at, with the same gusto Islam.

Yeh, BOLSHEVISM is the key or maybe we should call it what it is...SATANISM. A shame these words have become some sort of caricature for whacky conspiricy theory with jack boot polishing overtones.

Though i have serious reservations with Islam I believe the Quaran is largely rightous though not my cup of tea. I would have no problem having a Muslim for my neighbour (minus the Lebbo Sydney amphetamine dealers). I just wish they'd stop smirking under their breathe when they see the birthrate drop off for Western women and they calmly utter amongst themselves that they will takeover simply via demographic invasion. Hardly sporting and a little underhanded. If it speaks the truth it does'nt need a covert takeover.

Still, funny how Thomas Barnett in the "Pentagons New Map" points out that the "Gap" which must be Westernized just happens to be 95% Muslim. When it was pointed out he said with a straight face it was a mere concidence.

Secular, Luciferian State worshippers do not like competition. Especially from some sort of supernatural God who cant be floated on Wall Street at a good profit.

Now, wheres my cord again...

Offline rottenjohnh

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 743
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #34 on: February 26, 2006, 01:15:39 AM »
Quote
Though i have serious reservations with Islam I believe the Quaran is largely rightous though not my cup of tea.

That's basically how I see all religions other than those who follow the Talmud.

Quote
Still, funny how Thomas Barnett in the "Pentagons New Map" points out that the "Gap" which must be Westernized just happens to be 95% Muslim. When it was pointed out he said with a straight face it was a mere concidence.

He has ice running through his veins that pr*ck. Further proof though of the agenda these bastards are working towards.

Quote
Secular, Luciferian State worshippers do not like competition. Especially from some sort of supernatural God who cant be floated on Wall Street at a good profit.

The worship of Mammon and those who control it is the goal.

Offline Fenelon

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2006, 01:25:44 AM »
I know a few Muslims, and they seem for the most part like decent people.  However, they have no right to settle in our lands.  My mother grew up in a small town that was practically 100% German Catholic.  There was one Muslim boy at her school whose father was some sort of sales rep.  Anyway, that's how many Muslims we should have in the West.  A few to be curiosities.  Not ten per cent of the population.  The Muslim influx is part of the Jew's divide and conquer strategy, part of their Talmudic dialectic.  What can be more absurd, than to invent this legend of "Al Qaeda" while refusing to give an inch on Islamic immigration.  THEY are responsible, not only for the Muslim influx, but also for racial suicide resulting from feminism.  The goal must be to have the dwindling number of whites become crossed with the Jews, until Jews or people with a Jewish grandparent represent the majority of whites.  All other peoples will be mixed race or asian or black.  The alpha, beta, delta, and gamma classes that Huxley came up with.

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2006, 02:34:59 AM »
Yes, worship of Mammon and the mortgage is indeed the goal.

I guess i'm a bit of a seperatist, though i think good foreign restaurant owners should have special access to the country. No Tom Yum soup? Bahhhhhh.

When my sister stayed in Malaysia for a year she learnt the language and follwed the customs including head dress though it was not required. To think of her DEMANDING the Malays take time to get to know HER customs is quite ridiculous but that is EXACTLY what the average whitey is supposed to do. I quite frankly do not have the time to learn 647 different ethnic customs nor quite frankly do I want to. When in Rome...simple really, but to say it will often invite glaring glances in good lefty company. Especially at the Farhenheit 9-11 preview when the cheese and champers is passed round. I only just got out alive.

Yes indeed...Huxley was correct. The hard part to get accross to the average pleb is believing that a certain people including the joooze but not limited to them...can foster a multigenerational conspiracy to take over the planet and make slaves of men. I guess thats the point of the New Testament and the book of Revalation...it's their if you want to look.


Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #37 on: March 02, 2006, 01:44:42 AM »
Ted Pikes "Why The Mid East Bleeds" available in part here.

http://www.solargeneral.com/video/whymideastbleeds.wmv

Offline rottenjohnh

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 743
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #38 on: March 02, 2006, 02:23:56 AM »
Cheers.

You've probably seen the site before but someone put it up here a few days ago. Been downloading stuff off it today.

http://www.technoslavery.com/documentary/

There's a short litle video made by Richard Krege put up on Australian Free Press today worth looking at as well.

http://www.australiafreepress.org/articles/tobeniran.htm

Offline DonnieDarko

  • ! Account Frozen !
  • Group Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1400
  • Karma: +14/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Jewish Child Molesters and No Media Coverage - Why?
« Reply #39 on: March 02, 2006, 04:18:07 AM »
TA.

I'm pissed off. You've got me addicted to these stupid forums again!

All good stuff by the way.