Author Topic: Conn. Gov. Signs Bill Restricting Newtown Photos  (Read 1132 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rudi Jan

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • **
  • Posts: 15352
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • aka LoneWolf
    • View Profile
    • FauxWorld
Conn. Gov. Signs Bill Restricting Newtown Photos
« on: June 08, 2013, 12:41:42 PM »
Conn. Gov. Signs Bill Restricting Newtown Photos

By SUSAN HAIGH Associated Press
HARTFORD, Conn. June 5, 2013 (AP)
source: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/conn-lawmakers-compromise-newtown-privacy-bill-19328618#.UbORypz3OaR

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed legislation into law Wednesday that prevents the public release of crime scene photos and video evidence from the Connecticut school shootings that took the lives of 20 first graders and six school employees.

The new law, a result of efforts to balance private and public interests, creates an exemption to the state's Freedom of Information Act and applies to homicides in Connecticut.

The law prevents the release of photographs, film, video and other images depicting a homicide victim if those records "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of the victim or the victim's surviving family members."

Malloy signed the bill hours after the General Assembly approved the eleventh-hour compromise during the early morning hours of the final day of the state legislative session. Malloy said he believes "a parent of a deceased child should have the right to remember that child" as they wish and not because they were "caught up in some tragic and unbelievable circumstances."

The governor's office originally worked privately with legislative leaders and the state's top prosecutor to draft a bill that would address the concerns of families who lost relatives in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown. They considered various proposals, including legislation applying only to the Newtown victims and allowing their families to decide whether certain information should be released.

But in the end, the bill was tailored off an exemption in the federal Freedom of Information law.

During a somber early-morning Senate debate on the bill, as several family members of the victims looked on, Senate President Donald E. Williams Jr. said lawmakers were moved by the parents' concerns and tried to come up with a fair proposal.

"We have tried our best as Democrats and Republicans to work together to protect the interests of these families, these parents, these relatives sitting behind me, at the same time honoring our tradition as a free and open democracy," he said.

The new law creates a one-year moratorium on the release of certain portions of audiotape or other recordings in which the condition of a homicide victim is described. The exemption does not include 911 emergency call recordings, however.

Additionally, it creates a task force that would make recommendations on the balance between victim privacy under the FOI law and the public's right to know. The task force must submit its recommendations by Jan. 1.

Disputes over the release of materials could be resolved as similar disputes have been in the past, either in the state Freedom of Information Commission or the courts.

Colleen Murphy, the commission's executive director, said the standard of an "unwarranted" invasion of the personal privacy of the victim or victim's surviving family members has never been time-tested in Connecticut. She said the commission decisions on this issue will be a first.

The Senate approved the bill 33-2; the House by a vote of 130-2.

Rep. Stephen Dargan, D-West Haven, who voted against the measure, said he was concerned about the message it sent.

"Some people that thought they were impacted underneath the Second Amendment feel that they're impacted underneath the First Amendment because the government is covering up or not letting the public have the right to know," he said.

On Tuesday, family members of the Sandy Hook victims began a vigil at the state Capitol, waiting for legislative action.

Mark Barden, whose 7-year-old son Daniel was killed, told The Associated Press he knows of individuals and groups that want the photos. Given today's technology, he said, one photograph can be distributed worldwide and remain accessible forever.

"It's these strange individuals and fringe interest groups that have expressed a very real need for this information and they don't have any business having it," he said. "Nobody would benefit from it. On the contrary, it would do so much harm."

Members of the legislature's Black and Puerto Rican Caucus also voiced concerns about the original legislation preventing only the release of photos from the Newtown massacre. Legislators then broadened the bill to include other homicides.

The Connecticut Daily Newspaper Association had expressed concern about the possibility of limiting access to the documents.

"Any time the state is interested in opening up the Freedom of Information Act, we urge them to use extreme caution. Obviously, there's deference to the tragedy that happened at Sandy Hook," said Christopher VanDeHoef, the association's executive director. "But it's our concern that we're going to use that as sort of a sweeping change to FOI law that could be damaging to the openness of government down the road."

RW - What is it the public is always told about government intrusion? Oh yeah, if you have nothing to hide why worry. Well, does that not hold equally true for the government? Apparently not. It actually has the balls to hide what it does from the people to whom they owe their paychecks. Kinda like hiriing an acountant who then refuses to let you see you own books. Any talk about amendments is absolute nonsense. Constitutions apply to governments, NOT the people. Can we get that little factoid into peoples heads at the very least? And for the parents of the victims of Sandy Hook (assuming there ever were any) your child's rights (and yours) to privacy disappeared the moment you sent your kid to public school so quit your whining. If anything you should want the world to see what was done so your anger is supported. But instead you prefer to join the government in a massive cover up. But then, we still don't have proof your children died do we?

"...believes "a parent of a deceased child should have the right to remember that child" as they wish and not because they were "caught up in some tragic and unbelievable circumstances."

That term 'unbeleivable' pretty much states the case for why there is a need to know, even to know whether anything tragic transpired in the first place sine everything the government has given us is UNBELEIVABLE! Furthermore does such a statement mean parents of children who died in some tragic and unbelievable circumstance should be protected as they go into denial? And now, if someone does have a photo and twitters it - what then Connecticut? Gonna send out your state troopers across the world?
Suspend all belief. Get the facts ~ Rudi
No one rules if no one obeys ~ Lao Tzu

Offline FrankDialogue

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 5707
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
- Conn. Gov. Signs Bill Restricting Newtown Photos
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2013, 06:30:23 PM »
All the evidence is sealed...First, by court order, for 90 days after the event, and now, by fiat, permanently.

The story from day 1, as best can be told:

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=17051.0

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=17411.0