Author Topic: * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique  (Read 1997 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
* Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« on: September 08, 2012, 12:55:17 PM »
A Critique





By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010 ~ source

AS WE EXPLORE a sampling of Hitler’s early views on the Jews, we shall discover striking parallels to conditions existing in our own day.

Jewish propagandists would have us believe that Hitler’s unfavorable attitude toward Jewry was based solely on a “racial” hostility between Aryans and the Jewish people.

But as we examine Hitler’s early views regarding the Jewish Question, we do not find a predominantly racial line of disputation, but rather, a social line of argumentation.

Although the future Führer did identify Jewry as having a “racial character” formed by centuries of Jewish insulation within their host nations, he did not ground his opposition on genetic predetermination. Thus, the accusation that Hitler was a “racist” is a Jewish lie.

Beginning with a letter written in 1919 in reply to an inquirer on the subject of Jewry’s influence in the Weimar Republic, Hitler stressed the need for a rational basis for anti-Semitism that would oppose the ethos and actions of Jewry:

  “Anti-Semitism as a political movement cannot be defined by emotional impulses but by recognition of the facts. The facts are these: First, Jewry is absolutely a race and not a religious association.

Jews never designate themselves as Jewish Germans, Jewish Poles, or Jewish Americans - but always as German, Polish, or American Jews.

Through thousands of years of the closest kind of inbreeding, Jews have maintained their peculiarities far more distinctly than many of the peoples among whom they have lived.

Thus there lives amongst us an alien race that neither wishes to neither sacrifice its racial character nor deny its feeling, thinking, and striving. Nevertheless, it possesses all the political rights we do.

If the ethos of the Jews is revealed in the purely material realm, it is even clearer in their thinking and striving. In their dance around the golden calf the value of the individual is no longer decided by his character but by the size of his fortune.

The loftiness of a nation is no longer to be measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual powers, but rather by the wealth of its material possessions.

This thinking and striving after money and power, and the feelings that go along with it, serve the purposes of the Jew who is unscrupulous in the choice of methods and pitiless in their employment.

His power is the power of money, which multiplies in his hands through interest, and which forces peoples under the most dangerous of yokes. Its golden glitter, so attractive in the beginning, conceals the ultimately tragic consequences.

Everything men strive after as a higher goal, be it religion, socialism, democracy, is to the Jew only means to an end, the way to satisfy his lust for gold and domination.

In his effects and consequences he is like a racial cancer of the nations.

Thus, an anti-Semitism based purely on emotional grounds will find its ultimate expression in the form of the pogrom.

But an anti-Semitism based on reason must lead to a systematic legal elimination of the privileges of the Jews. The ultimate objective of such legislation must, however, be the irrevocable removal of the Jews from civil and cultural influence.

To this end, the installation of nationally-minded leadership personalities with an inner sense of responsibility is necessary.” View Entire Story Here.

CLEARLY, HITLER OUTLINED a “social” problem posed by Jewry in its materialistic pursuits that acted as a “cancer” upon Germany. This could only be eliminated by denying the Jews civil and cultural influence through legal means.

As mentioned above, the relevance of Hitler’s early views on the Jews to today’s Jewish problem is to be considered.

The question must be asked: Is a legal denial of Jewry’s pernicious influence on society the means of ridding ourselves of the Jewish menace?

IS THIS A GERMAN?

WHEN DESCRIBING IN 1924 his early thoughts on Jewry, Hitler established in the opening chapters of Mein Kampf a formative model for his anti-Jewish polemic.

This model was set forth not in racial terms, but again, based on the activities pursued by Jewry, which Hitler viewed as destructive to the culture and destiny of Germany.

First, let us explore an “encounter” the future Führer experienced with a religious Jew while walking the streets of Vienna when still a young artist which acted as a catalyst for his ensuing opposition to Jewry:

“In the Jew I saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith.

Once, when passing through the inner city of Vienna, I suddenly encountered a phenomenon in a long caftan and wearing black side-locks.

My first thought was: ‘Is this a Jew? They certainly did not have this appearance in Linz.’

But the longer I gazed at the strange countenance and examined it feature by feature, the more the question shaped itself in my mind: ‘Is this a German?’” View Entire Story Here.

IT WAS AT THIS JUNCTURE that Hitler began to consider the role of the Jew in Germany’s cultural life: “As soon as I began to investigate the matter and observe the Jews, then Vienna appeared to me in a different light.

What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life. Was there any undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate?

I discovered the Jewish activities in the press, in art, in literature and the theatre. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and study the names of the authors in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions.

Here was a pestilence with which the public was being infected. I began to carefully investigate the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude to which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews.

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation - that fact could not be gainsaid.”

NO HINT of racial profiling here, dear readers. And as the saying goes, “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.”

For although Hitler did try to change the cultural degradation perpetrated by German Jewry - the moral depravity remains the same throughout the Western world.

Perhaps another “führer” who understands “legalities” will arise and apply some Old Deutsch Cleanser once again…



Read also: THE DEMISE OF CHRISTIAN EUROPE BY JUDEO MASONRY

THANKS TO JUDEO MASONRY and its promulgation of Anti-Christian humanism, the demise of Christian Europe is now almost complete.

In his 1885 Immortale Dei on the Christian Constitution of States, Pope Leo XIII issued this warning:

— “Christianity had subdued the barbarous nations of Europe: the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Celts, Franks, and Teutons, changing them from a savage to a civilized condition.

Christian Europe victoriously rolled back the tide of Mohammedan conquest, standing forth as the teacher of all in every branch of national culture and bestowed on the world the gift of true liberty.

There was once a time when States were governed by the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Then it was that the power of Christian wisdom had diffused itself throughout the institutions, laws, and morals of the people.

But the authority of God is now passed over in silence as if He cared nothing for human society; or as if men, whether in their individual capacity or bound together in social relations, owed nothing to God; or as if there could be a government of which the whole origin and power and authority did not reside in God Himself.” — Here
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.

Offline wag

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 10423
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
- * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2012, 05:29:00 PM »
Hitler says everything a real German leader wants to say but holds inside.
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.

Offline laconas

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 13653
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
- * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2012, 07:47:14 PM »
The narrow historical perspective is troubling. To focus on Germany, who was was the key player, is narrow, and an even more narrow focus is the man Hitler. The reality is more that throughout Europe nations and movements were revolting against being squeezed by the jew bankers.

A few examples: Metaxas in Greece was killed off before the war started, and Spain's Franco was compromised by having to fight paid mercs not too much different than what's going on in Syria at this time. Italy who was ahead of even Germany in nationlist political leaning couldn't be compromised internally and had to fight a hot war while internal jew control of France couldn't be maintained.

At some point we have to break through viewing WWII as Hitler and the Nazis, and the Jews and the Holocaust cause the revolt in Europe was a lot more widespread. When we start talking about WWII beyond the two Jewish bookends Jews will really start to worry.

Most of the people in Europe during the 20's and 30's were being squeezed and they talked about it and organized, but that part of history has been re-written.
Nobody censors what they agree with

Offline EyeBelieve

  • General of the Army
  • *****
  • Posts: 8632
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
- * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2012, 10:26:51 PM »
A few examples: Metaxas in Greece was killed off before the war started, and Spain's Franco was compromised by having to fight paid mercs not too much different than what's going on in Syria at this time. Italy who was ahead of even Germany in nationlist political leaning couldn't be compromised internally and had to fight a hot war while internal jew control of France couldn't be maintained.

In Romania Ceaușescu was executed on 25 DEC 89 (Western Christmas Day).  Ceaușescu was probably a jew but OTOH very weird that he was killed one month after announcing IMF/World Bank debts had been paid off & no further loans to be taken.  Jew MSM had paved the way with numerous tv/print stories about Romanian "repression" just as they sandbagged Shah of Iran.

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
- * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2012, 04:25:09 PM »
A few examples: Metaxas in Greece was killed off before the war started, and Spain's Franco was compromised by having to fight paid mercs not too much different than what's going on in Syria at this time. Italy who was ahead of even Germany in nationlist political leaning couldn't be compromised internally and had to fight a hot war while internal jew control of France couldn't be maintained.

Most of the people in Europe during the 20's and 30's were being squeezed and they talked about it and organized, but that part of history has been re-written.

Of course there was no shortage of Genocides before WWII.





"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.

Offline laconas

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 13653
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Nobody censors what they agree with

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
- * Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2013, 07:25:32 PM »
Deanna Spingola & Gerhard Strauch 
Parasitical Bankers Targeted Germany



"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.