Author Topic: Why War is Inevitable  (Read 546 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
Why War is Inevitable
« on: November 21, 2009, 09:11:07 AM »

Film: Fall Of The Republic ? The Presidency Of Barack H. Obama

Fall Of The Republic documents how an offshore corporate cartel is bankrupting the US economy by design. Leaders are now declaring that world government has arrived and that the dollar will be replaced by a new global currency.

John Kaminski ? via November 19, 2009

It always struck me as odd that just before all wars start, the people who have been asked to wage these wars say they don?t want to fight, and insist they want peace. And as a result, all the politicians say they?re for peace, and would never get us into war, especially one in which we had no obvious stake. Then the wars start.

Just before World War I, Woodrow Wilson was the peace candidate, but later lit the fuse that killed 25 million people. Franklin Roosevelt said he?d keep us out of war just before he was elected to a third term, and history has long ago revealed how he engineered Pearl Harbor to get us into WW II, which killed 57 million.

Just before World War I, the sentiment in America was decidedly pro-German, and more the half of all the immigrants coming to this developing land WERE German. Nobody wanted to get involved in a European war. But the media, owned by the same people who were making the weapons, convinced us, apparently, by suddenly and savagely telling hair-raising false stories about the Germans.

This is the great fact Americans continue to ignore. Instead of understanding that bankers create the wars, we prefer to believe the prejudicial hate speak that emanates from American media that our enemies are ?krauts,? ?gooks,? and ?ragheads,? without remembering, as the great suppressed writers have told us, that the folks who control the money also control everything else.

Slowly, we are learning that our real enemies are really the misanthropes making those statements, the bigwigs who control the flow of real wealth with imaginary rules that are nothing but blatant crime schemes. We are learning that these anti-human billionaires ? whose income is derived entirely from legalized crime ? are the true enemies of all civilized people.

And worse, we are learning that our leaders are owned by these people, these billionaires, who run the world anonymously from behind the scenes, and use puppets like Obama, Putin, Castro and Chavez to convince the gullible goyim that there are actually competing political philosophies in the world, when in fact there are not.

There are only apparent opponents, like Republicans and Democrats. Ultimately they work for the same owners.

This is something you did not learn in school, grotesquely infected as they are by Jewish influence.

The key to virtually all our present problems in societies throughout the world can be traced to this single paragraph, because it explains the scam that precious few people have realized is the root cause of every war in the last 200 years. It?s about the conditions that created World War I, and it reads like this:

?The European nations were already bankrupt, because they had maintained large standing armies for almost fifty years, a situation created by their own central banks, and therefore could not finance a war. A central bank always imposes a tremendous burden on the nation for ?rearmament? and ?defense?, in order to create inextinguishable debt, simultaneously creating a military dictatorship and enslaving the people to pay the ?interest? on the debt which the bankers have artificially created.?
? Eustace Mullins, Secrets of the Federal Reserve, 1951, p. 21

Please understand what Mullins is saying. It is the first step toward achieving an actual, stable, perpetual peace in the world.

The European nations were bankrupt BECAUSE they maintained large standing armies, which was mandated by the central banks as a condition for their graciously coordinating that nation?s finances. Of course, the basic premise was a scam, because it removed people?s power to coin their own money, and imprisoned it in the hands of a few bankers. A very few. The Rothschild family. And later to include a handful of now ?prestigious? Jewish names: Schiff, Warburg, Untermyer, Bronfman, etc.

The central banks, since the time of the American Revolution, were all coordinated by the Rothschilds, who captured England. The rest of the white nations of the world fell like so many dominos in the famous Communist theory.

The combination of money and media is irresistible. An entire history has been fabricated, and the majority of the world has believed it.

Sure, nations have always fought each other, and most of the time for the same reasons. But since then the Rothschilds, starting with the capture of the Bank of England in 1815 and accelerating with the worldwide Jewish revolution of 1848, have actually funded BOTH sides in every war ever since.

It?s the fastest way to make money, big money

Mullins? paragraph from Secrets of the Federal Reserve reveals that the very existence of a standing army guarantees that any nation will go bankrupt simply trying to maintain that army, and the only way that army will ever make a profit (and make that nation ?prosperous?) is to go to war and steal something big from somebody else (plus, get the benefits of their treasonous perfidy from the bankers who wanted them to go to war in the first place).

There we have a perfect picture of world history over the last 200 years. And we are still completely ensnared in the mindless madness we have come to know as ?the way the world works.?

The thing to realize is the world only works that way because shrewd and wealthy bankers have finetuned a system that guarantees the fantastic profits that come with war by pulling the wool over the minds of the sheeple, who simply can?t understand that they are slaves working for criminal genius masterminds who control virtually every aspect of everyone?s lives.

But from Eustace Mullins we now know that the maintenance of a standing army GUARANTEES war, because NOT to go to war means that nation will go bankrupt.

This formula would never work without the complicity of the media, and our educators. Fortunately for them (but not us), after more than a century of Jewish subversion of our educational and media systems, it should come as no surprise to anyone that they can make you believe anything they want you to believe. Just look at the history of the 20th century.

Whom have we been taught was the most heinous villain of the 20th century? And who is the only leader in world history who has gone after the Jews openly and by name? In this gap of thought lies your as-yet undiscovered political education.

As a friend tells it ?

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest.

Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, ?The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all? (p.267), and ?Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership? (p104-5).

Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain?s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

?He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ?where there is planing, there are shavings flying?.

He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church ? saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany?s position on the Continent. The return of Germany?s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..? (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, ?At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ?Battle over Britain? had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia? (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to ?the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.?

This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards.

Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

(end of citation)

Fortunately for us, Eustace Mullins was one of the few and possibly the greatest to ever escape this straitjacket, thanks to the initial guidance of the persecuted poetic genius Ezra Pound. If America is ever going to be anything like some of us had hoped it would be, this is the tangent of history that needs to be pursued and understood, instead of the constantly changing lies of never-truthful Jewish media.
« Last Edit: November 21, 2009, 09:12:58 AM by sushigirl »
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.

Offline Ajax

  • Lieutenant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1196
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2009, 09:53:09 AM »
Good combination sushigirl, the video and article identify the root cause of past and current conflicts.
Btw, that's the first I've read from Kaminski in a quite a while.
"There is no longer any room for hope"

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2009, 01:19:01 PM »
Good combination sushigirl, the video and article identify the root cause of past and current conflicts.
Btw, that's the first I've read from Kaminski in a quite a while.

That's what I thought too, thank you. In spite of rumors about Alex Jones, he covered everything that I have learned.

Same here Ajax, I have not read anything by Kaminski in a long time either, according to the posting date, he must still be active.  

12 Responses to ?Why War is Inevitable ? John Kaminski?

      Mike Benjamin said
      November 19, 2009 at 5:02 pm

      What proof is there that central banks require countries to maintain standing armies?
      Does Mullins footnote this claim?

      lulu said
      November 19, 2009 at 7:44 pm

      Neither Castro, Chavez nor Putin is a ?puppet?.

      Steve said
      November 19, 2009 at 8:26 pm

      I sometimes wonder how the US in 1917 could ally with the British (and French) over the Germans. The US was full of people of German and Irish descent. The British showed America their true colors when they executed the leaders of the Easter Uprising.

      It would have made more sense for the US to invade and liberate Ireland. They would have been welcomed as liberators by the Irish population. From Ireland they could have forced the British to terms. With the British Army off the continent the Germans could have finished off France.

      Oh, and recent evidence has exculpated the Germans over the sinking of the Lusitania.

      Vee said
      November 19, 2009 at 8:51 pm

      Very well stated. Carroll Quigley albiet worked for the bankers did a justice by writing his two
      books, Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo American Establishment. If you can find the original
      copies it proves Mullins theory to be correct.

      Andy said
      November 19, 2009 at 11:37 pm

      ?Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic
      agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest.?

      Oh yeah??? So his invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland were not intended as conquests.
      Right. Try another line of bull***t.

      b bond said
      November 20, 2009 at 3:17 am

      carroll quigley as in bill rockefeller clintons mentor

      Bill said
      November 20, 2009 at 3:23 am

      For Mike Benjamin above,

      The Rothschilds who captured control of the Bank of England in the early 1800?s tried desperately for decades to do the same in the United States. As a larger power with a much greater industrial base and population, the USA was a much sweeter package. But a Central Bank is unconstitutional in the United States. Only the Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof. This is in the Constitution.

      On a few occasions the Central Bank idea was created in the United States only to quickly be struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The reason is that banks would manipulate the value of currencies in their favor to the detriment of the public for which the currency was to be used for exchange. And it would give the bankers unlimited power. An example is the statement made by J.P. Morgan at the beginning of the 20th Century. ?Give me control over a country?s money supply and I care not who makes the laws.?

      In 1860 Abraham Lincoln needed money to fight the Civil War. Back in those days, the government only made money by taxing ?income?, trade commodities and luxury items. These taxes paid for roads, railroads, bridges, public works, schools and so on. Wars were expensive because they were expenses ?above and beyond? what the country had income for. Which is why there were things like War Bonds. The public understood wars were not free and so did the politicians. So Abraham Lincoln, estimating the war would be extremely expensive, figured he needed about $100 million dollars to fight the war. But he didn?t have it. He went to the banks and asked for loans, and these banks, most of them Jewish, said sure?At 36% interest! Lincoln said he would not see his country economically ruined and perpetually indebted to the banks, so he did what the government has always had the power to do? He created his own currency for use to pay debts. With no interest attached. This was called the Green Back because it was the first currency with printing on the reverse side that happened to be in green ink. The new money worked. The war was being paid for without interest. And then Lincoln was assassinated, the money ?mysteriously? taken out of circulation immediately after his death.

      In 1901, William McKinley tried to do the same thing. Create a national currency with no interest attached to it. He was then assassinated.

      Then in 1912, the big banking families of Europe and the United States met in semi-secret to discuss how they could gain control over the US money supply. These were the Jewish bankers, most of whom were not even Americans. Warburgs, Rothchilds, Morgans, etc as listed above in teh article. They needed some way to change the Constitution, make it ?legal? for them to control the money. And they found a way. Woodrow Wilson. A presidential candidate who did not have enough finances to win the election. They told him, in exchange for hefty donations and enough media help to get him elected, he would back the Federal Reserve Act and the Internal Revenue Service Act, and then get the United States involved in the War in Europe they were about to start. Woodrow Wilson got elected, and in the dead of night in December of 1913, when most of Congress and the State Legislatures that have to vote on any changes to the Constitution were gone for the Christmas season, the Federal Reserve Act was passed, handing the power to regulate the value of money over to the private banks who make up the Federal Reserve. Most people do not realize that the Federal Reserve is not Federal. It is not a government agency. It just sounds like one. It is a group of private banks, many foreign owned, that regulate the money supply and value of American currency, and set the interest rates.

      The Federal Reserve Act basically made this happen: From 1780 to 1913, the US Government paid all its bills by collecting taxes. What came in, is what they had to work with. No interest was involved. The definition of ?income? only related to businesses. A company can make an income, but an individual cannot. The reason is that your labor is exchanged by you like barter. You agree on what it is worth and exchange for that value. There is no profit, thus there is no income. Once you understand this concept, you understand why there was no income tax as you know it today, before 1913. So what happened with the creation of the Federal Reserve was that whereas before, the government took in taxes and paid the bills with it, now the government handed that over to the banks. And the banks then LOANED that money back at interest. So imagine you get your paycheck from your job. You go to the bank and deposit it. You pull out $100 and go buy your groceries. No big deal. But now, imagine you deposit that same check and then want the $100 for groceries and the bank says sure, at %10 interest. Not the same is it? That?s what the Federal Reserve Act did. But like you, in order to pay off that interest, you?d have to get a second job or something, find some other source of money. Our government only has its taxes and tariffs to work with. So the Internal Revenue Service Act came along with the Federal Reserve Act and suddenly, for the first time, Americans had to pay an income tax. Not to pay for schools and roads with, but to pay back the interest on the loans the government now owed to the banks. The Federal Reserve Banks. Yes, the Treasure Department prints the money itself, and is part of the Federal Government. But they hand that printed money to the Federal Reserve Banks which are all privately owned.

      So every year since 1913, we have had to borrow more and more money to pay off more and more interest. World War I was expensive. To fight it, we had to borrow money. To pay it back, we either have to raise Income Taxes to 100%, or borrow more money, which has to be paid back at interest. But it wasn?t enough for the bankers. After World War I, nobody wanted to fight anymore. It was ?The War to End all Wars.? As World War II came along, the US had something like 12 tanks. We had 6 aircraft carriers. 9 battleships. The British Prime Minister Nevile Chamberlain didn?t want to go to war with Germany over little third world countries like Czechoslovakia and Poland. But Winston Churchill sure did. And Churchill was a banker. He had total backing by bankers for a big war. And here?s an interesting fact? Germany had been decimated by the Versailles Treaty. Their money was worthless. Citizens were going to the store with barrels of cash to buy a loaf a bread, literally. Hitler created an alternative currency. One with no interest on it. A government currency. You work for an hour, you get an hours worth of labor currency to ?exchange? for products. Suddenly bankers made no money. No interest. Hitler had to go. And then Chamberlain was out, and Winston Churchill was in and the war was on. But not in the United States, which nobody wanted any part of. Except the bankers, and Roosevelt. Many conspiracy theories believe, as this article points out, that everyone knew about Pearl Harbor.

      We had broken the Japanese Codes, countries like Norway and even China as well as Great Britain told us the Japanese were going to attack, and where. But there would be no war unless the Japanese did attack. They did, and suddenly we were spending billions upon billions to fight a war that was essentially over. Russia had won. Germany could not defeat Russia once it was clear Moscow was not going to fall or Saint Petersburg. Britain won the Battle of Britain. Britain defeated Germany in North Africa. The war was over. Or would be eventually. But now America was in the game. 12 tanks became 100,000 tanks. A few hundred fighters and almost no bombers became tens of thousands. A few carriers became a hundred. And who was financing it all? The bankers. They financed Hitler too. Look up George Bush?s grandfather Prescott Bush. His bank was financing Hitler. So was Standard Oil owned by the Rockefellers. The bankers finance all sides. A few hundred million deaths mean nothing unless you can make a few hundred thousand per death. Look up some statistics like how many bullets on average are fired to kill a single person on the battlefield. Hundreds of thousands.

      And when the war was over, Britain, Germany, Japan, the United States were all heavily in debt. And yet we didn?t dismantle the huge army. No. Now for the Cold War. The endless period of huge standing armies, for what? Was Russia really ever going to come over here and start something? No. Did they ever really intend to invade Europe? No. Russia has never invaded Europe. Just as today, Iran is the new villain, Iran has not attacked another country in centuries. Yet they are supposed to be a huge threat? Iran has more people than Iraq and Afghanistan combined. If it has taken several trillion dollars to occupy those countries these past years, how much more do the same in Iran? Why does the United States maintain military bases all over the planet in more than 100 countries? Who exactly is threatening us? I thought we were the most loved country in the world (Before Bush came along)?

      There?s no money to be made with peace.

      By the way, another president back in the 60?s tried to create a US Currency backed by silver and with no interest. His name was John F. Kennedy. Shortly after he was shot dead. The silver money he created? Gone. All those silver certificates we used to have before 1964? Gone. Kennedy dies in 1963, a year later the silver-backed money is ended.

      Richard Nixon? He took us off the Bretton Woods Agreement whereby our currency was backed by gold and had a fixed value. Since then US currency has only the value the banks decide it does. You can no longer trade it in for silver or gold.

      The Federal Reserve Banks now control everything related to money and its value. They can create bubbles at will. The stock market bubble in 1929 that caused the crash of ?29. Our current bubbles that hurt us today, such as the housing bubble, the mortgage bubble, the derivitives bubble? All created by the banks. And they are all, by the way, Jewish. Conspiracy? Anti-semite? I don?t care. What I care about is what it is doing to our freedom, or lives, or economic survival. I don?t care who is causing it. I just want it stopped. But unless people know what?s going on and what has gone on since the Civil War and even before, it isn?t going to stop.  

      spartacus said
      November 20, 2009 at 8:54 am

      Interesting, indeed.

      Here?s what I wonder, when one makes a point out of these bankers being Jewish: Would it be
      any better if they were Catholic? Or Lutheran?

      If these gents are duplicitous psychopathic parasites, let?s judge them by their dark deeds.
      It doesn?t matter one little bit to me what religion they happen to claim membership in.

      If they are condemned by the facts, it seems like an unnecessary ad hominem attack to lean on
      their being Jewish, and for me, detracts from the credibility of the rest of your argument.

      On think I know about poker is that when you know have a winning hand, you don?t have to cheat.

      Gerry said
      November 20, 2009 at 8:54 am

      To Steve: The British could ally with the americans, because the jewish lobby there promoted
      it! They have been promised their own jewish state by Lord Balfour in the UK !! Google it under
      ?Balfour declaration?.
      Lord Rothschild was the recipient of the promise, as he controlled England at that time

      spartacus said
      November 20, 2009 at 8:56 am

      That?s ?one thing? I know about poker is that when you know you have a winning hand, you
      don?t have to cheat.?

      I beg your pardon for the typos.

      I should never type before I have my coffee.

      David said
      November 20, 2009 at 1:42 pm

      2% of Americans are Jewish
      yet they control all the levers of power in America
      they control the media,Hollywood,govt,banks etc?
      you have to ask yourself is this normal
      they will tell you it?s because they are smarter
      what they are really telling you is you are the under class and they are the elites.
      What they will never tell you is that it is the banks that they control that enables them to
      control USA while the American people walk around like zombies in An Eddie Bernays haze .

      stupid Bill said
      November 20, 2009 at 2:21 pm

      yeah 3rd world countries like Czechoslovakia?.

      well..we were on 6th place GNP in the entire world.
      but we were small..,thats true..

      Switzerland is a 3rd world country ,?agricultural..
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.

Offline wag

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 10423
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2009, 04:44:02 PM »
Btw, that's the first I've read from Kaminski in a quite a while.

I hope he's back.  I enjoyed getting his emails when he was doing that.
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.

Offline wag

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 10423
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2009, 04:46:33 PM »
but ?where there is planing, there are shavings flying?.

Never heard that, but it sounds like a German folk saying.
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.

Offline Rudi Jan

  • Administrator
  • Veteran
  • **
  • Posts: 15352
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • aka LoneWolf
    • View Profile
    • FauxWorld
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2009, 07:53:58 PM »

I used to get Kaminsky's e-mails as well. Exchanged a few as well. Read this from him a few days ago. Good article and supports my prediction that war will be their 'solution'... like 9/11 preempted an investigation into the missing 2.3 trillion a war will be cover for looting and profit making on a scale that will make the previous wars look like a walk in the park. This has to be stopped. Nothing is inevitable in the way Alex Jones and Alan Watts seem to intimidate.
Suspend all belief. Get the facts ~ Rudi
No one rules if no one obeys ~ Lao Tzu

Offline Sue

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 19731
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Thumbs Up
    • View Profile
Re: Why War is Inevitable
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2009, 09:45:53 PM »
Btw, that's the first I've read from Kaminski in a quite a while.

I hope he's back.  I enjoyed getting his emails when he was doing that.

I wondered if he was ill, I like his articles. I recently added Mike James
to my list.
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done".
...Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with.